References
- Abrahams, L., Hartsuiker, R., De Fruyt, F., & Bajo, M. (2019). Structural alignment and its prosocial effects in first and second languages. Acta Psychologica, 199, 102906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102906
- Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
- Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001
- Balcetis, E., & Dale, R. (2005). An exploration of social modulation of syntactic priming. Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the cognitive science society.
- Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
- Bell, L., Gustafson, J., & Heldner, M. (2003, September 12). Prosodic adaptation in human–computer interaction. Proceedings of the international congress of phonetic sciences.
- Bergmann, K., Branigan, H. P., & Kopp, S. (2015). Exploring the alignment space – Lexical and gestural alignment with real and virtual humans. Frontiers in ICT, 2, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2015.00007
- Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordiantion in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5
- Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & McLean, J. F. (2010). Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(9), 2355–2368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.012
- Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., McLean, J. F., & Brown, A. (2011). The role of beliefs in lexical alignment: Evidence from dialogs with humans and computers. Cognition, 121(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.011
- Brennan, S. E. (1991). Conversation with and through computers. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158952
- Brennan, S. E. (1996, October 2–3). Lexical entrainment in spontaneous dialog. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spoken Dialog (pp. 41–44). Philadelphia, PA: Acoustical Society of Japan. https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~nenkova/Courses/cis700-2/brennan96lexical.pdf
- Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 22(6), 1482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482
- Castro-González, Á., Admoni, H., & Scassellati, B. (2016). Effects of form and motion on judgments of social robots׳ animacy, likability, trustworthiness and unpleasantness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 90, 27–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.02.004
- Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893
- Chartrand, T. L., & Van Baaren, R. (2009). Human mimicry (Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00405-X
- Chaves, A. P., & Gerosa, M. A. (2020). How should my chatbot interact? A survey on social characteristics in human–chatbot interaction design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(8), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438
- Chun, E., Barrow, J., & Kaan, E. (2016). Native English speakers’ structural alignment mediated by foreign-accented speech. Linguistics Vanguard, 2(s1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0027
- Chun, E., & Kaan, E. (2020). The effects of speaker accent on syntactic priming in second-language speakers. Second Language Research, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320926563
- Clark, H. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. Advances in Psychology, 9, 287–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60059-5
- Coupland, & Nikolas. (1984). Accommodation at work: Some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1984(46), 49–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.46.49
- Cowan, B. R., Branigan, H. P., Obregón, M., Bugis, E., & Beale, R. (2015). Voice anthropomorphism, interlocutor modelling and alignment effects on syntactic choices in human−computer dialogue. International Journal of Human - Computer Studies, 83(C), 27–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.008
- Demberg, V., Winterboer, A., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A strategy for information presentation in spoken dialog systems. Computational Linguistics, 37(3), 489–539. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00064
- Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior. A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283–308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283
- Erdle, S., Sansom, M., Cole, M. R., & Heapy, N. (1992). Sex differences in personality correlates of helping behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(8), 931–936. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90010-M
- Ferreira, V. S., Kleinman, D., Kraljic, T., & Siu, Y. (2012). Do priming effects in dialogue reflect partner- or task-based expectations? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(2), 309–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0191-9
- Fraser, N. M., & Gilbert, G. N. (1991). Simulating speech systems. Computer Speech & Language, 5(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2308(91)90019-M
- Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., & Dumais, S. T. (1987). The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM, 30(11), 964–971. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/32206.32212
- Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27(2), 181–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90018-7
- Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001
- Gong, L. (2008). How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1494–1509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.007
- Guéguen, N. (2009). Mimicry and seduction: An evaluation in a courtship context. Social Influence, 4(4), 249–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802628173
- Henríquez, A. T., Rabagliati, H., & Branigan, H. (2019). Lexical entrainment reflects a stable individual trait: Implications for individual differences in language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(6), 1091–1105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000774
- Hone, K. S., & Graham, R. (2000). Towards a tool for the Subjective Assessment of Speech System Interfaces (SASSI). Natural Language Engineering, 6(3–4), 287–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324900002497
- Hopkins, Z. L., & Branigan, H. P. (2020). Children show selectively increased language imitation after experiencing ostracism. Developmental Psychology, 56(5), 897–911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000915
- Hwang, H., & Chun, E. (2018). Influence of social perception and social monitoring on structural priming. Cognitive Science, 42 Suppl 1(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12604
- Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926625
- Jungers, M. K., & Hupp, J. M. (2009). Speech priming: Evidence for rate persistence in unscripted speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802602241
- Koulouri, T., Lauria, S., & Macredie, R. D. (2014). Do (and Say) as i say: Linguistic adaptation in human–computer dialogs. Human–Computer Interaction, 31(1), 59–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2014.934180
- Kulms, P., & Kopp, S. (2019). More human-likeness, more trust? The effect of anthropomorphism on self-reported and behavioral trust in continued and interdependent human-agent cooperation. Proceedings of mensch und computer 2019.
- Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.14481
- Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The Chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(3), 145–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025389814290
- Lambert, A., Norouzi, N., Bruder, G., & Welch, G. (2020). A systematic review of ten years of research on human interaction with social robots. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(19), 1804–1817. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801172
- Lelonkiewicz, J. R. (2017). The cognitive mechanisms and social consequences of imitation [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Edinburgh.
- Lev-Ari, S. (2016). Selective grammatical convergence: learning from desirable speakers. Discourse Processes, 53(8), 657–674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1094716
- Linnemann, G., & Jucks, R. (2016). As in the question, so in the answer? Language style of human and machine speakers affects interlocutors convergence on wordings. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(6), 686–697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15625444
- Linnemann, G., & Jucks, R. (2018). ‘Can I trust the spoken dialogue SYSTEM because it uses the same words as i do?’—Influence of lexically aligned spoken dialogue systems on trustworthiness and user satisfaction. Interacting with Computers, 30(3), 173–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwy005
- Maddux, W. W., Mullen, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 461–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.003
- Mõttus, R., Realo, A., Allik, J., Deary, I. J., Esko, T., & Metspalu, A. (2012). Personality traits and eating habits in a large sample of estonians. Health Psychology, 31(6), 806–814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027041
- Müller, B., Maaskant, A., Baaren, R., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Prosocial consequences of imitation. Psychological Reports, 110(3), 891–898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/07.09.21.PR0.110.3.891-898
- Namy, L., Nygaard, L., & Sauerteig, D. (2002). Gender differences in vocal accommodation: the role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4), 422–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237958
- Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
- Pearson, J., Hu, J., Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Nass, C. (2006). Adaptive language behavior in HCI: How expectations and beliefs about a system affect users’ word choice. Sigchi Conference on human factors in computing systems.
- Pickard, M. D., Burgoon, J. K., & Derrick, D. C. (2014). Toward an objective linguistic-based measure of perceived embodied conversational agent power and likeability. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 30(6), 495–516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.888504
- Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychology Bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
- Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Science, 27(2), 169–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000056
- Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2006). Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language & Computation, 4(2), 203–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-006-9004-0
- Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2005). Online consumer trust and live help interfaces: The Effects of text-to-speech voice and three-dimensional avatars. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 19(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1901_6
- R Development Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Revelle, W. (2020). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University. https://personality-project.org/r/psych/
- Roche, J. M., Dale, R., & Caucci, G. M. (2012). Doubling up on double meanings: Pragmatic alignment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.509929
- Schoot, L., Heyselaar, E., Hagoort, P., & Segaert, K. (2016). Does syntactic alignment effectively influence how speakers are perceived by their conversation partner? Plos One, 11(4), e0153521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153521
- Van Baaren, R., Holland, R., Steenaert, B., & Knippenberg, A. (2003). Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(4), 393–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00014-3
- Weatherholtz, K., Campbell-Kibler, K., & Jaeger, T. F. (2014). Socially-mediated syntactic alignment. Language Variation and Change, 26(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394514000155
- Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1977). The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 250–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00523.x
- Wolters, M., Georgila, K., Moore, J. D., & MacPherson, S. E. (2009). Being old doesn’t mean acting old: How older users interact with spoken dialog systems. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 2(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1525840.1525842
- Zhang, J., & Curley, S. P. (2018). Exploring explanation effects on consumers’ trust in online recommender agents. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(5), 421–432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1357904