Telepresence Robots for People with Special Needs: A Systematic Review

References

• Abibullaev, B., Zollanvari, A., Saduanov, B., & Alizadeh, T. (2019). Design and optimization of a bci-driven telepresence robot through programming by demonstration. IEEE Access, 7, 111625–111636. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahsan, U., Fuzail, M., Raza, Q., & Muhammad, A. (2012). Development of a virtual test bed for a robotic dead man’s switch in high speed driving. In 2012 15th International Multitopic Conference (INMIC) (pp. 97–104). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ahumada-Newhart, V., & Olson, J. S. (2019). Going to school on a robot: Robot and user interface design features that matter. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 26(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, P., Pluim, J. P., Viergever, M. A., & Ramsey, N. F. (2013). Navigation of a telepresence robot via covert visuospatial attention and real-time fMRI. Brain Topography, 26(1), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0252-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araujo, J. M., Zhang, G., Hansen, J. P. P., & Puthusserypady, S. (2020). Exploring eye-gaze wheelchair control. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 1–8). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Beam. (2020). suitabletech.com/
   Google Scholar
• Beraldo, G., Antonello, M., Cimolato, A., Menegatti, E., & Tonin, L. (2018). Brain-computer interface meets ros: A robotic approach to mentally drive telepresence robots. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bi, L., Fan, X.-A., & Liu, Y. (2013). EEG-based brain controlled mobile robots: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Human-machine Systems, 43(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2012.2219046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canese, K., & Weis, S. (2013). PubMed: The bibliographic database. The NCBI Hand Book 2(2),1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK153385/
   Google Scholar
• Carrascosa, C., Klügl, F., Ricci, A., & Boissier, O. (2015). From physical to virtual: Widening the perspective on multi-agent environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9068, 133–146. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23850-0_9
   Google Scholar
• Carreto, C., Gêgo, D., & Figueiredo, L. (2018). An eye-gaze tracking system for teleoperation of a mobile robot. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 3(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.20897/jisem.201816
   Google Scholar
• Chang, E. (2019). Experiments and probabilities in telepresence robots. In R. L. Garner (Ed.), Exploring digital technologies for art-based special education: models and methods for the inclusive K-12 classroom (pp. 1–12). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W.-L., Chen, S.-C., Chen, Y.-L., Chen, S.-H., Hsieh, J.-C., Lai, J.-S., & Kuo, T.-S. (2005). The m3s-based electric wheelchair for the people with disabilities in Taiwan. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(24), 1471–1477. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500264725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotet, E., Martínez, D., Moreno, J., Tresanchez, M., & Palacín, J. (2016). Assistant personal robot (APR): Conception and application of a tele-operated assisted living robot. Sensors, 16(5), 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgun, A., Florencio, D. A., & Christensen, H. I. (2013). Autonomous person following for telepresence robots. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 4335–4342). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, M., Tsui, K. M., Yanco, H. A., & Uhlik, C. (2011). Essential features of telepresence robots. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA) (pp. 15–20). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Double. (2020). Retrieved August 17, 2020, from www.doublerobotics.com/
   Google Scholar
• Eid, M. A., Giakoumidis, N., & El-Saddik, A. (2016). A novel eye-gaze-controlled wheelchair system for navigating unknown environments: Case study with a person with als. IEEE Access, 4, 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2520093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escolano, C., Antelis, J. M., & Minguez, J. (2011). A telepresence mobile robot controlled with a noninvasive brain–computer interface. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 42(3), 793–804. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2011.2177968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escolano, C., Murguialday, A. R., Matuz, T., Birbaumer, N., & Minguez, J. (2010). A telepresence robotic system operated with a p300-based brain-computer interface: Initial tests with als patients. In 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology (pp. 4476–4480). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fels, D. I., & Weiss, P. L. T. (2001). Video-mediated communication in the classroom to support sick children: A case study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28(5), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00020-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferland, F., & Michaud, F. (2016). Selective attention by perceptual filtering in a robot control architecture. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 8(4), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2016.2604375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson, M., & Van Denend, T. (2003). Experiencing the loss of mobility: Perspectives of older adults with ms. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(20), 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280310001596180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, N., & Cabral, A. (2018). Using a telepresence robot to improve self-efficacy of people with developmental disabilities. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 489–491). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, V., Prasad, G., Coyle, D., Behera, L., & McGinnity, T. M. (2014). EEG-based mobile robot control through an adaptive brain–robot interface. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(9), 1278–1285. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2014.2313317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. P., Alapetite, A., Thomsen, M., Wang, Z., Minakata, K., & Zhang, G. (2018). Head and gaze control of a telepresence robot with an HMD. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 1–3). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, V. L., Cavender, A., & Trewin, S. (2015). Writing about accessibility. Interactions, 22(6), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/2828432
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of nasatlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hasdai, A., Jessel, A. S., & Weiss, P. L. (1998). Use of a computer simulator for training children with disabilities in the operation of a powered wheelchair. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(3), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.52.3.215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey, C. L. (2012). ACM digital library. The Charleston Advisor, 13(4), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.13.4.34
   Google Scholar
• Heshmat, Y., Jones, B., Xiong, X., Neustaedter, C., Tang, A., Riecke, B. E., & Yang, L. (2018). Geocaching with a beam: Shared outdoor activities through a telepresence robot with 360 degree viewing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 359). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, B. J., Bekgaard, P., MacKenzie, S., Hansen, J. P. P., & Puthusserypady, S. (2020). Gimis: Gaze input with motor imagery selection. In ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 1–10). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, R. J. (1990). What you look at is what you get: Eye movement-based interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 11–18). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jadhav, D., Shah, P., & Shah, H. (2018). A study to design vi classrooms using virtual reality aided telepresence. In 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 319–321). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Jerald, J. (2015). The VR book: Human-centered design for virtual reality. Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Kishore, S., González-Franco, M., Hintemüller, C., Kapeller, C., Guger, C., Slater, M., & Blom, K. J. (2014). Comparison of ssvep bci and eye tracking for controlling a humanoid robot in a social environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 23(3), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, B., Hanson, V. L., Rogers, Y., Piper, A. M., Waycott, J., Davies, N., Ambe, A. H., Brewer, R. N., Chattopadhyay, D., Dee, M., Frohlich, D., GutierrezLopez, M., Jelen, B., Lazar, A., Nielek, R., Pena, B. B., Roper, A., Schlager, M., Schulte, B., & Yuan, I. Y. (2021). The harm in conflating aging with accessibility. Communications of the ACM, 64(7), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3431280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koceski, S., & Koceska, N. (2016). Evaluation of an assistive telepresence robot for elderly healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(5), 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-016-0481-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosugi, A., Kobayashi, M., & Fukuda, K. (2016). Hands-free collaboration using telepresence robots for all ages. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Com p anion (pp. 313–316). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., & Loutfi, A. (2013). A review of mobile robotic telepresence,” Advances in. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2013, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/902316
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., & Takayama, L. (2011). Now, i have a body: Uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 33–42). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Leeb, R., Perdikis, S., Tonin, L., Biasiucci, A., Tavella, M., Creatura, M., Molina, A., Al-Khodairy, A., Carlson, T., & dR Millán, J. (2013). Transferring brain–computer interfaces beyond the laboratory: Successful application control for motor-disabled users. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 59(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2013.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb, R., Tonin, L., Rohm, M., Desideri, L., Carlson, T., & D. R. Millán, J. (2015). Towards Independence: A BCI telepresence robot for people with severe motor disabilities. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(6), 969–982. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2419736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, K., McDonnell, E., Jain, D., Lu Wang, L., Froehlich, J. E., & Findlater, L. (2021). What do we mean by “accessibility research”? A literature survey of accessibility papers in chi and assets from 1994 to 2019. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–18). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1980). Telepresence. Omni, 2(9), 44–52. https://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Telepresence.html
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, G. C. (1987). Robotic telepresence. In Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Moyle, W., Arnautovska, U., Ownsworth, T., & Jones, C. (2017). Potential of telepresence robots to enhance social connectedness in older adults with dementia: An integrative review of feasibility. International Psychogeriatrics, 29(12), 1951–1964. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle, W., Jones, C., Cooke, M., O’Dwyer, S., Sung, B., & Drummond, S. (2013). Social robots helping people with dementia: Assessing efficacy of social robots in the nursing home environment. In 2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI) (pp. 608–613). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Moyle, W., Jones, C., Cooke, M., O’Dwyer, S., Sung, B., & Drummond, S. (2014). Connecting the person with dementia and family: A feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC Geriatrics, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newhart, V. A. (2014). Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom. In CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 951–956). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Newhart, V. A., & Olson, J. S. (2017). My student is a robot: How schools manage telepresence experiences for students. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 342–347). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Newhart, V. A., Warschauer, M., & Sender, L. (2016). Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: An exploratory case study. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 23(4), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v23i04/9-25
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M. K., Primatesta, S., Giuliano, L., Lupetti, M. L., Russo, L. O., Farulla, G. A., Indaco, M., Rosa, S., Germak, C., & Bona, B. (2015). A cloud robotics system for telepresence enabling mobility impaired people to enjoy the whole museum experience. In 2015 10th International Conference on Design & Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era (DTIS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Niemelä, M., van Aerschot, L., Tammela, A., & Aaltonen, I. (2017). A telepresence robot in residential care: Family increasingly present, personnel worried about privacy. In International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 85–94). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ondas, S., Juhar, J., Pleva, M., Cizmar, A., & Holcer, R. (2013). Service robot scorpio with robust speech interface. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 10(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.5772/54934
   Google Scholar
• Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Habib, L., & Carlson, T. (2018). Human-robot cooperation through brain-computer interaction and emulated haptic supports. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) (pp. 1973–1978). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Padbot. (2020). Retrieved August 17, 2020, from www.padbot.com/
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2008). Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2(2), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534308X284417
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. H., & Howard, A. M. (2012). Real world haptic exploration for telepresence of the visually impaired. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 65–72). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. H., & Howard, A. M. (2013). Real-time haptic rendering and haptic telepresence robotic system for the visually impaired. In 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC) (pp. 229–234). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. H., & Howard, A. M. (2014). Robotics-based telepresence using multi-modal interaction for individuals with visual impairments. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 28(12), 1514–1532. https://doi.org/10.1002/acs.2495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. H., Ryu, E.-S., & Howard, A. M. (2015). Telerobotic haptic exploration in art galleries and museums for individuals with visual impairments. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 8(3), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2015.2460253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, L., Diez, E., Usamentiaga, R., & García, D. F. (2019). Industrial robot control and operator training using virtual reality interfaces. Computers in Industry, 109, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrushin, A., Barresi, G., & Mattos, L. S. (2018). Gaze-controlled laser pointer platform for people with severe motor impairments: Preliminary test in telepresence. In 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 1813–1816). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Petrushin, A., Tessadori, J., Barresi, G., & Mattos, L. S. (2018). Effect of a click-like feedback on motor imagery in eeg-bci and eye-tracking hybrid control for telepresence. In 2018 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) (pp. 628–633). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, I., Takayama, L., & Mutlu, B. (2013). The influence of height in robot-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 1–8). IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeswaran, P., & Orsborn, A. L. (2021). Neural interface translates thoughts into type. Nature, 600(7890), 618. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00776-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riek, L. D. (2017). Healthcare robotics. Communications of the ACM, 60(11), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/3127874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, D., Magasi, S., Novak, C., & Harniss, M. (2016). Conducting accessible research: Including people with disabilities in public health, epidemiological, and outcomes studies. American Journal of Public Health, 106(12), 2137–2144. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabet, M., Orand, M., & McDonald, D. W. (2021). Designing telepresence drones to support synchronous, mid-air remote collaboration: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–17). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sankhe, P., Kuriakose, S., & Lahiri, U. (2013). A step towards a robotic system with smartphone working as its brain: An assistive technology. In 2013 International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Embedded Systems (CARE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Schwind, V., Knierim, P., Haas, N., & Henze, N. (2019). Using presence questionnaires in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Shishehgar, M., Kerr, D., & Blake, J. (2018). A systematic review of research into how robotic technology can help older people. Smart Health, 7, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smhl.2018.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. C., LoPresti, E. F., & Cooper, R. A. (2008). How many people would benefit from a smart wheelchair? The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.01.0015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, N., Kay, J. C., & Craven, G. (2017). Mobile robotic telepresence solutions for the education of hospitalized children. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 14(Fall), 1–14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5653953/
   Google Scholar
• Stawicki, P., Gembler, F., & Volosyak, I. (2016). Driving a semiautonomous mobile robotic car controlled by an ssvep-based bci. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2016, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4909685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, A., Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A., & Goodrich, M. (2006). Common metrics for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 33–40). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Stephanidis, C., & Savidis, A. (2001). Universal Access in the Information Society: Methods, Tools, and Interaction Technologies. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s102090100008
   Google Scholar
• Stuck, R. E., Hartley, J. Q., Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., & Rogers, W. A. (March 2017). Understanding attitudes of adults aging with mobility impairments toward telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (New York, NY, USA) (pp. 293–294). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayama, L., Marder-Eppstein, E., Harris, H., & Beer, J. M. (2011). Assisted driving of a mobile remote presence system: System design and controlled user evaluation. In Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, K., Nakanishi, H., & Ishiguro, H. (2014). Comparing video, avatar, and robot mediated communication: Pros and cons of embodiment. In International conference on collaboration technologies (pp. 96–110). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, F., Takahashi, T., Matsuzoe, S., Tazawa, N., & Morita, M. (2014). Telepresence robot helps children in communicating with teachers who speak a different language. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 399–406). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, M., Carriere, J., & Torabi, A. (2020). Robotics, smart wearable technologies, and autonomous intelligent systems for healthcare during the covid-19 pandemic: An analysis of the state of the art and future vision. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2(7), 2000071. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202000071
   Google Scholar
• Tonin, L., Carlson, T., Leeb, R., & Millán, J. D. R. (2011). Brain-controlled telepresence robot by motor-disabled people. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology S o c iet (pp. 4227–4230). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tonin, L., Leeb, R., Tavella, M., Perdikis, S., & D. R. Millán, J. (2010). The role of shared-control in bci-based telepresence. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 1462–1466). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, K. M., Dalphond, J. M., Brooks, D. J., Medvedev, M. S., McCann, E., Allspaw, J., Kontak, D., & Yanco, H. A. (2015). Accessible human-robot interaction for telepresence robots: A case study. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 6(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2015-0001
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, K. M., Flynn, K., McHugh, A., Yanco, H. A., & Kontak, D. (2013). Designing speech-based interfaces for telepresence robots for people with disabilities. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, K. M., McCann, E., McHugh, A., Medvedev, M., Yanco, H. A., Kontak, D., & Drury, J. L. (2014). Towards designing telepresence robot navigation for people with disabilities. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 7(3), 307–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJICC-10-2013-0044
   Google Scholar
• Tsun, M. T. K., Theng, L. B., Jo, H. S., & Lau, S. L. (2015). A robotic telepresence system for full-time monitoring of children with cognitive disabilities. In Proceedings of the international Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology (pp. 1–4). START Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Turk, M. (2014). Multimodal interaction: A review. Pattern Recognition Letters, 36(1), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2013.07.003
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF and WHO. (2015). Assistive technology for children with disabilities: Creating opportunities for education, inclusion and participation: A discussion paper. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Vasic, M., & Billard, A. (2013). Safety issues in human-robot interactions. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 197–204). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Voznenko, T. I., Chepin, E. V., & Urvanov, G. A. (2018). The control system based on extended bci for a robotic wheelchair. Procedia Computer Science, 123, 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.079
   Google Scholar
• Watson, G. S., Papelis, Y. E., & Hicks, K. C. (2016). Simulation-based environment for the eye-tracking control of tele-operated mobile robots. In Proceedings of the Modeling and Simulation of Complexity in Intelligent, Adaptive and Autonomous Systems 2016 (MSCI- AAS 2016) and Space Simulation for Planetary Space Exploration (SPACE 2016) (pp. 1–7). Society for Computer Simulation.
   Google Scholar
• Wieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N., & Rolland, C. (2006). Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: A proposal and a discussion. Requirements Engineering, 11(1), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-005-0021-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde, M. (2016). IEEE xplore digital library. The Charleston Advisor, 17(4), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.17.4.24
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. R. (2008). The declaration of Helsinki and public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(8), 650–652. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.050955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1994). Measuring immersion in virtual environments. tech. rep., ARI Technical Report 1014. US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO. 1–325. https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Thomas, R. C., Drobina, E. C., Mitzner, T. L., & Beer, J. M. (2017). Telepresence heuristic evaluation for adults aging with mobility impairment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 61 16–20). SAGE Publications Sage CA.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi, J., Parone, C., Di, D. F., Beomonte, P. Z., & Felzani, G. (2015). Measuring benefits of telepresence robot for individuals with motor impairments. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 217, 703–709. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-566-1-703
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang, L., Neustaedter, C., & Schiphorst, T. (2017). Communicating through a telepresence robot: A study of long distance relationships. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3027–3033). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., & Hansen, J. P. (2019). Accessible control of telepresence robots based on eye tracking. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Appli c ations (pp. 1–3). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., & Hansen, J. P. (2020). People with motor disabilities using gaze to control telerobots. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–9). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Hansen, J. P., & Minakata, K. (2019). Hand and gaze-control of telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 1–8). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Hansen, J. P., Minakata, K., Alapetite, A., & Wang, Z. (2019). Eye-gaze-controlled telepresence robots for people with motor disabilities. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 574–575). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Minakata, K., & Hansen, J. P. (2019). Enabling real-time measurement of situation awareness in robot teleoperation with a head-mounted display. In Nordic Human Factors Society Conference (pp. 169–171). NES.
   Google Scholar