Influence of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Attributes on Consumers’ Attitude and Intention of Using Wearable Technology

References

• Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand and equity. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adapa, A., Nah, F. F. H., Hall, R. H., Siau, K., & Smith, S. N. (2018). Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(5), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1357902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ameen, N., Hosany, S., & Tarhini, A. (2021). Consumer interaction with cutting-edge technologies: Implications for future research. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Bakhshian, S., & Lee, Y. A. (2021). Social acceptability and product attributes of smart apparel: their effects on consumers’ attitude and use intention. The Journal of the Textile Institute, 1–10. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2021.1898138
   Google Scholar
• Bakhshian, S., & Lee, Y. A. (2018). Holistic integration of product attributes with consumer behavioural aspects for the use of wearable technology. International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, 16. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/itaa_proceedings/2018/presentations/16/
   Google Scholar
• Brucks, M., Zeithaml, V. A., & Naylor, G. (2000). Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300283005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, J. M. (2010). Consumers’ acceptance of smart clothing-A comparison between perceived group and non-perceived group. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 34(6), 969–981. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2010.34.6.969
   Google Scholar
• Chae, M., & Schofield-Tomschin, S. (2010). Investigation of design characteristics and regulatory requirements for snowboarding helmets. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 3(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2010.493530
   Google Scholar
• Chao, P., Wührer, G., & Werani, T. (2005). Celebrity and foreign brand name as moderators of country-of-origin effects. International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2005.11072913
   Google Scholar
• Chattaraman, V., & Rudd, N. A. (2006). Preferences for aesthetic attributes in clothing as a function of body image, body cathexis and body size. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0602400104
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2003). A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e‐commerce: A preliminary investigation. Psychology and Marketing, 20(4), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah, S. H. W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clermont, C. A., Duffett-Leger, L., Hettinga, B. A., & Ferber, R. (2020). Runners’ perspectives on ‘smart’ wearable technology and its use for preventing injury. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1597575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conn, S. (2021, January 12). Gartner forecasts global spending on wearable devices to total $81.5 Billion in 2021. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2021-01-11-gartner-forecasts-global-spending-on-wearable-devices-to-total-81-5-billion-in-2021
   Google Scholar
• Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2006). Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Information & Management, 43(8), 950–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damhorst, M. L. (1990). In search of a common thread: Classification of information communicated through dress. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9000800201
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawar, N., & Parker, P. (1994). Marketing universals: Consumers’ use of brand name, price, physical appearance, and retailer reputation as signals of product quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M. (2018). Exploring the motivational factors on continuous usage intention of smartwatches among actual users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1424246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhebar, A. (1996). Speeding high-tech producer, meet the balking consumer. Sloan Management Review, 37(2), 37.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, L. E., Ashdown, S. P., & Smyth, B. (2005). Expanding garment functionality through embedded electronic technology. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 4(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Eike, R. J., & Bakhshian, S. (2018). Review of fashion, technology, and health: Future directions of the apparel industry. Trends in Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology, 4(3), 504–507. https://doi.org/10.31031/TTEFT.2018.04.000588
   Google Scholar
• Fetscherin, M., & Toncar, M. (2010). The effects of the country of brand and the country of manufacturing of automobiles: An experimental study of consumers’ brand personality perceptions. International Marketing Review, 27(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331021037494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., Rammal, H. G., & Veiga, P. M. (2021). Wearable technology and consumer interaction: A systematic review and research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, H., & Gleeson, K. (2004). Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.40
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Li, H., & Luo, Y. (2015). An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(9), 1704–1723. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J., & Marmorstein, H. (1994). The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1086/209388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, V. A., Kerner, C., & Quennerstedt, M. (2019). Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies; surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance. Sport, Education and Society, 24(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1375907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R. L. (1976). The structure of perceived risk: Some further progress. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4(4), 694–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729830
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, K. L. (2013). Android smartphone adoption and intention to pay for mobile internet: Perspectives from software, hardware, design, and value. Library Hi Tech, 31(2), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, S. Y., Ku, C. Y., & Chang, C. M. (2003). Critical factors of WAP services adoption: an empirical study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00008-5
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C., Chung, T. L., & Sanders, E. A. (2016). Attitudes and purchase intentions for smart clothing: Examining U.S. consumers’ functional, expressive, and aesthetic needs for solar-powered clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 34(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X16646447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., & Shin, D. H. (2015). An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Research, 25(4), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, S. H. (2017). Consumer differences in the United States and India on wearable trackers. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 46(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, S. H., & Fallon, K. (2018). Explorations of wearable technology for tracking self and others. Fashion and Textiles, 5(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0123-z
   Google Scholar
• Koo, H. S., & Fallon, K. (2017). Preferences in tracking dimensions for wearable technology. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 29(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-03-2016-0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, J. M., & Kallal, M. J. (1992). A conceptual framework for apparel design. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9201000207
   Google Scholar
• Lau, G. T., & Lee, S. H. (1999). Consumers’ trust in a brand and the link to brand loyalty. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 4(4), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009886520142
   Google Scholar
• Lazaroiu, G., (2012). Communication functions of smart clothing. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 4(1), 162–167.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. E. (2016). Female bike riders’ clothing needs with the incorporation of wearable technology: Design and evaluation of wearers’ perception of smart clothing within the cradle-to-cradle design framework. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 16089. https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-5718
   Google Scholar
• Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, N., & Lee, Y. A. (2020). Health monitoring smart clothing: Understanding its acceptance among older adults. International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.11788
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The effect of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioural intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200204
   Google Scholar
• Muller, C., & de Klerk, N. (2020). Influence of design aesthetics and brand name on generation Y students’ intention to use wearable activity-tracking devices. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 12(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.34111/ijebeg.202012202
   Google Scholar
• Nanda, P., Bos, J., Kramer, K. L., Hay, C., & Ignacz, J. (2008). Effect of smartphone aesthetic design on users’ emotional reaction: An empirical study. The TQM Journal, 20(4), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730810881339
   Google Scholar
• Perry, A. (2016). Consumers’ acceptance of smart virtual closets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., & Fors, V. (2017). Self-tracking and mobile media: New digital materialities. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917695578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.075690
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salahuddin, M., & Romeo, L. (2020). Wearable technology: Are product developers meeting consumer’s needs? International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1723713
   Google Scholar
• Shanley, L. A., Slaten, B. L., & Shanley, P. S. (1993). Military protective clothing: Implications for clothing and textiles curriculum and research. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11(3), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9301100308
   Google Scholar
• Shehzad, U., Ahmad, S., Iqbal, K., Nawaz, M., & Usman, S. (2014). Influence of brand name on consumer choice & decision. Journal of Business and Management, 16(6), 72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. H. (2009). An empirical investigation of a modified technology acceptance model of IPTV. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290701814232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson, A., & Schmitt, B. H. (1997). Marketing aesthetics: The strategic management of brands, identity, and image. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Sontag, M. S. (1985). Comfort dimensions of actual and ideal insulative clothing for older women. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 4(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X8500400102
   Google Scholar
• Statista (2018). Household income distribution in the United States in 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distribution-of-household-income-in-the-us/
   Google Scholar
• Suh, M., Carroll, K. E., & Cassill, N. L. (2010). Critical review on smart clothing product development. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 6(4), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80005-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technopedia: Cutting-Edge Technology. (2019, February 25). Technopedia. Retrieved October 10, 2021. https://www.techopedia.com/definition/26589/cutting-edge-technology
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrick, D. L., & Bond, L. (2011). Reducing sensitive survey response bias in research on adolescents: A comparison of web-based and paper-and-pencil administration. American Journal of Health Promotion: AJHP, 25(5), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.080611-ARB-90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar