FlyBrate: Evaluating Vibrotactile Cues for Simulated Flight

References

• Anagnostopoulos, V., Havlena, M., Kiefer, P., Giannopoulos, I., Schindler, K., & Raubal, M. (2017). Gaze-informed location-based services. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31(9), 1770–1797. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2017.1334896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basil, M. D. (2012). Multiple resource theory. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 2384–2385). Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Billinghurst, M., & Weghorst, S. (1995, March). The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments. In Proceedings Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium ’95 (pp. 40–47). https://doi.org/10.1109/VRAIS.1995.512478
   Google Scholar
• Biondi, F., Leo, M., Gastaldi, M., Rossi, R., & Mulatti, C. (2017). How to drive drivers nuts: effect of auditory, vibrotactile, and multimodal warnings on perceived urgency, annoyance, and acceptability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2663(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.3141/2663-05
   Google Scholar
• Blades, M. (1990). The reliability of data collected from sketch maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80032-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, M. L., & Bass, E. J. (2009). Comparing perceptual judgment and subjective measures of spatial awareness. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS – A quick and dirty usability scale (P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, I. L. McClelland, & B. Weerdmeester, Eds.). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, J. L., Prewett, M. S., Gray, A. A., Yang, L., Stilson, F. R. B., & Coovert, M. D. (2006). Comparing the effects of visual-auditory and visual-tactile feedback on user performance: A metaanalysis [Paper presentation]. In The 8th International Conference, ICMI ’06: Proceedings of on Multimodal Interfaces, Banff, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180995.1181017
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, S. C., van Erp, J. B. F., & Kiefer, R. J. (2009). Direction coding using a tactile chair. Applied Ergonomics, 40(3), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehais, F., Causse, M., Vachon, F., Régis, N., Menant, E., & Tremblay, S. (2014). Failure to detect critical auditory alerts in the cockpit: Evidence for inattentional deafness. Human Factors, 56(4), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813510735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stasi, L. L., & Diaz-Piedra, C. (2019). Eye movements research in aviation: Past, present, and future. In Improving aviation performance through applying engineering psychology, advances in aviation psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 143–162). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. (2017). Eye tracking methodology – Theory and practice (3rd ed., Vol. 328). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57883-5
   Google Scholar
• Durá-Gil, J. V., Bazuelo-Ruiz, B., Moro-Pérez, D., & Mollà-Domenech, F. (2017). Analysis of different vibration patterns to guide blind people. PeerJ, 5, e3082. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M. J. (1997). Query processing in spatial-query-by-sketch. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 8(4), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvlc.1997.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. R., van Erp, J., Redden, E. S., & Duistermaat, M. (2010). Field-based validation of a tactile navigation device. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 3(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2010.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R., Farley, T. C., Jones, W. M., Midkiff, A. H., Hansman, R. J. (1998). Situation awareness information requirements for commercial airline pilots (Tech. Rep.). Massachusetts Institute of Technology: International Center for Air Transportation. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20020030334
   Google Scholar
• Eurocontrol. (2009). European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation, guidance notes for pilots - 1. Rules for VFR Flight. http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/716.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Forbus, K. D., Usher, J. M., Lovett, A. M., Lockwood, K., & Wetzel, J. (2008). Cogsketch: Open-domain sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education. In Eurographics workshop on sketch-based interfaces and modeling (pp. 159–166). The Eurographics Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/SBM/SBM08/159-166
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A., & Kohler, B. (2003). Bidimensional regression: Assessing the configural similarity and accuracy of cognitive maps and other two-dimensional data sets. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 468–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallace, A., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2006). The failure to detect tactile change: A tactile analogue of visual change blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 300–303. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardony, A. L., Taylor, H. A., & Brunyé, T. T. (2016). Gardony map drawing analyzer: Software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0556-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkonos, C., Giannopoulos, I., & Raubal, M. (2017). Maps, vibration or gaze? Comparison of novel navigation assistance in indoor and outdoor environments. Journal of Location Based Services, 11(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489725.2017.1323125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G. (2006). Nasa-task load index (nasa-tlx); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
   Google Scholar
• Helmreich, R. L., & Foushee, H. C. (2010). Why CRM? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training. In Crew resource management (pp. 3–59). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heuten, W., Henze, N., Boll, S., & Pielot, M. (2008). Tactile wayfinder: A non-visual support system for wayfinding [Paper presentation]. The 5th Nordic Conference, Proceedings of on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges (pp. 172–181).
   Google Scholar
• Hogema, J. H., De Vries, S. C., Van Erp, J. B., & Kiefer, R. J. (2009). A tactile seat for direction coding in car driving: Field evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2(4), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2009.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & de Weijer, J. V. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2005). Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(6), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, C.-Y., Nikolic, M. I., & Sarter, N. B. (2001). Multimodal information presentation in support of timesharing and effective interruption management [Paper presentation]. 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Daytona Beach, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, C., van Erp, J., van Veen, H.-J., Vos, W., Groen, E., & Duistermaat, M. (2008). Supporting skill acquisition using vibrotactile feedback. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.389.8371&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. A., & Sarter, N. B. (2008). Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. Human Factors, 50(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008x250638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, L. T., & Bryant, K. J. (1977). Sense of direction, spatial orientation, and cognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(4), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2018). Item benchmarks for the system usability scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 13(3), 158–167. https://uxpajournal.org/item-benchmarks-system-usability-scale-sus/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liggett, K. (2009). Controls, displays, and crew station design. In Handbook of aviation human factors (pp. 15-1–15-36). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuirl, J. M., & Sarter, N. B. (2001). Presenting in-flight icing information: A comparison of visual and tactile cues [Paper presentation]. 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Daytona Beach, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R., & Raubal, M. (2013). Functions and applications of spatial cognition. In D. Waller & Nadel L. (Eds.), Handbook of spatial cognition (pp. 249–264). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13936-014
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S., & Dalton, P. (2016). Out of touch? Visual load induces inattentional numbness. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 42(6), 761–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parush, A., Ahuvia, S., & Erev, I. (2007). Degradation in spatial knowledge acquisition when using automatic navigation systems [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (pp. 238–254).
   Google Scholar
• Peißl, S., Wickens, C. D., & Baruah, R. (2018). Eye-tracking measures in aviation: A selective literature review. The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 28(3–4), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/24721840.2018.1514978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielot, M., Boll, S. (2010). Tactile wayfinder: Comparison of tactile waypoint navigation with commercial pedestrian navigation systems [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Pervasive Computing (pp. 76–93).
   Google Scholar
• Portugali, J. (1996). The construction of cognitive maps (Vol. 32). Springer Science & Business Media. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-0-585-33485-1
   Google Scholar
• Prinet, J. C., Wan, Y., & Sarter, N. (2016). Tactile spatial guidance for collision avoidance in nextgen flight operations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601069
   Google Scholar
• Rantala, J., Majaranta, P., Kangas, J., Isokoski, P., Akkil, D., Špakov, O., & Raisamo, R. (2020). Gaze interaction with vibrotactile feedback: Review and design guidelines. Human–Computer Interaction, 35(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1306444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, E., Marsja, E., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2020). Exploring residual capacity: The effectiveness of a vibrotactile warning during increasing levels of mental workload in simulated flight tasks. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 10(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000180
   Google Scholar
• Rudi, D., Kiefer, P., & Raubal, M. (2020). The instructor assistant system (iASSYST) – utilizing eye tracking for commercial aviation training purposes. Ergonomics, 63(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1685132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudi, D. (2019). Enhancing spatial awareness of pilots in commercial aviation [Doctoral dissertation]. ETH Zurich, Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2014). Applying the user experience questionnaire (UEQ) in different evaluation scenarios. In A. Marcus (Eds.), Design, user experience, and usability. theories, methods, and tools for designing the user experience. DUXU 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 8517). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schwering, A., Wang, J., Chipofya, M., Jan, S., Li, R., & Broelemann, K. (2014). Sketchmapia: Qualitative representations for the alignment of sketch and metric maps. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 14(3), 220–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2014.917378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stähli, L., Rudi, D., & Raubal, M. (2018). Turbulence ahead – A 3D web-based aviation weather visualizer. In Proceedings of the 31st annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 299–311). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242624
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, W. (1995). The glass cockpit [flight deck automation]. IEEE Spectrum, 32(9), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/6.406460
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, R. S., Nelson, W. T., Bolia, R. S., Warm, J. S., & Dember, W. N. (2004). Evaluating adaptive multisensory displays for target localization in a flight task. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap1403_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Kuang, D. (2002). Quick and easy implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for controlling the false positive rate in multiple comparisons. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986027001077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55(4), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trant, J. P. Jr, (1955). Preliminary investigation of a stick shaker as a lift-margin indicator (Tech. Rep.). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42801880.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tsukada, K., & Yasumura, M. (2004). Activebelt: Belt-type wearable tactile display for directional navigation. In UbiComp 2004: Ubiquitous computing (pp. 384–399). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Van Baelen, D., Paassen, M. v., Ellerbroek, J., Abbink, D. A., & Mulder, M. (2021). Flying by feeling: Communicating flight envelope protection through haptic feedback. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(7), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1890489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Erp, J. B. F., van, Kroon, L. C. M., Mioch, T., & Paul, K. I. (2017). Obstacle detection display for visually impaired: Coding of direction, distance, and height on a vibrotactile waist band. Frontiers in ICT, 4(23), 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00023
   Google Scholar
• Van Erp, J. B., & Van Veen, H. A. (2004). Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(4–5), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Erp, J. B., Self, B. (2008). Tactile displays for orientation, navigation and communication in air, sea and land environments (Tech. Rep.). https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a492500.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Veen, H. A., Van Erp, J. B. (2000). Tactile information presentation in the cockpit [Paper presentation]. International Workshop on Haptic Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 174–181).
   Google Scholar
• Velázquez, R. (2010). Wearable assistive devices for the blind. In Wearable and autonomous biomedical devices and systems for smart environment (pp. 331–349). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vidulich, M. A., & Tsang, P. S. (2012). Mental workload and situation awareness (4th ed., pp. 243–273). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118131350.ch8
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (1995). Designing for situation awareness and trust in automation. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 28(23), 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)46646-8
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2002). Situation awareness and workload in aviation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2008a). Aviation. In Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 361–389). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713181.ch14
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. (2008b). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50(3), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziat, M., Wagner, S., & Frissen, I. (2016). Haptic feedback to compensate for the absence of horizon cues during landing. In Haptics: Perception, devices, control, and applications (pp. 47–54). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ziv, G. (2016). Gaze behavior and visual attention: A review of eye tracking studies in aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 26(3–4), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2017.1313096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar