Perception of Society’s Trust in Care Robots by Public Opinion Leaders

References

• Andtfolk, M., Nyholm, L., Eide, H., & Fagerström, L. (2021). Humanoid robots in the care of older persons – a scoping review. Assistive Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1880493
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, M. M., & Barnard, A. (2018). Futurism in nursing: Technology, robotics and the fundamentals of care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(11–12), 2473–2480. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. (2008). The effect of presence on human-robot interaction [Paper presentation]. In RO-MAN 2008-The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 701-706). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Reichenbach, J., Breemen, V. A. (2004). In your face, robot! The influence of a character’s embodiment on how users perceive its emotional expressions. Proceedings of the Design and Emotion. Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Botsman, R. (2017). Who can you trust?: How technology brought us together–and why it could drive us apart. Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Brell, T., Biermann, H., Philipsen, R., & Ziefle, M. (2019). Trust in autonomous technologies. In A. Moallem (Ed.), HCI for cybersecurity, privacy and trust. HCII 2019. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 11594. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown Cooper, S. (2015). Opinion leaders’ perspective of the benefits and barriers in telemedicine: A grounded theory study of telehealth in the Midwest. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(1), 25.
   Google Scholar
• Compagna, D., & Kohlbacher, F. (2015). The limits of participatory technology development: The case of service robots in care facilities for older people. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, K., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Sheikh, A. (2018). Health care robotics: Qualitative exploration of key challenges and future directions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(7), e10410. https://doi.org/10.2196/10410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdys, J., & Halicka, K. (2018). Sustainable adaptation of new technology - the case of humanoids used for the care of older adults. Sustainability, 10(10), 3770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdys, J. (2018). Trust in technology in case of humanoids used for the care for the senior persons. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering, 1(1), 875–881. https://doi.org/10.2478/mape-2018-0110.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). The 2012 ageing report: Economic and budgetary projections for the EU27 Member States (2010–2060). https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2012/2012-ageing-report_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2020). Population on 1st January by age, sex and type of projection, PROJ_19NP. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/proj_19np/default/table?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Fischinger, D., Einramhof, P., Papoutsakis, K., Wohlkinger, W., Mayer, P., Panek, P., Hofmann, S., Koertner, T., Weiss, A., Argyros, A., & Vincze, M. (2016). Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: First prototype and lessons learned. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frennert, S. (2021). Hitting a moving target: digital transformation and welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1642393.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frennert, S., Aminoff, H., & Östlund, B. (2021). Technological frames and care robots in eldercare. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00641-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Soler, Á., Facal, D., Díaz-Orueta, U., Pigini, L., Blasi, L., & Qiu, R. (2018). Inclusion of service robots in the daily lives of frail older users: A step-by-step definition procedure on users' requirements. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 74, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto, S. G. (1996). To trust or not to trust: Situational and dispositional determinants. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 24(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1996.24.2.119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, P. P., Hansen, J., & De Jong, J. D. (2019). Trust in times of health reform. Health Policy, 123(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halicka, K., & Surel, D. (2021). Gerontechnology—new opportunities in the service of older adults. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(3), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0025
   Google Scholar
• Halicka, K., & Surel, D. (2020). Evaluation and Selection of Technologies Improving the Quality of Life of Older People. European Research Studies Journal, XXIII(Issue 2), 592–611. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1611
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, E., Selander, G., & Rosenqvist, U. (2003). Can we bridge the gap between goals and practice through a common vision? A study of politicians and managers’ understanding of the provisions of elderly care services. Health Policy, 65(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00212-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, W., Mohammed, S., Moreno, J. C., & Amirat, Y. (2016). Lower limb wearable robots for assistance and rehabilitation: A state of the art. IEEE Systems Journal, 10(3), 1068–1081. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2014.2351491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson-Pajala, R. M., & Gustafsson, C. (2022). Significant challenges when introducing care robots in Swedish elder care. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 17(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1773549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson-Pajala, R. M., Thommes, K., Hoppe, J. A., Tuisku, O., Hennala, L., Pekkarinen, S. (2019). Improved knowledge changes the mindset: Older adults’ perceptions of care robots. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 212–227). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson-Pajala, R.-M., Thommes, K., Hoppe, J. A., Tuisku, O., Hennala, L., Pekkarinen, S., Melkas, H., & Gustafsson, C. (2020). Care robot orientation: What, who and how? Potential users’ perceptions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(5), 1103–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00619-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachouie, R., Sedighadeli, S., Khosla, R., & Chu, M. T. (2014). Socially assistive robots in elderly care: A mixed-method systematic literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(5), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2013.873278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koay, K. L., Syrdal, D. S., Walters, M. L., & Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Living with robots: Investigating the habituation effect in participants' preferences during a longitudinal human-robot interaction study [Paper presentation]. RO-MAN 2007-The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 564–569).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Lee, H. J., Chang, W. H., Choi, B. O., Lee, J., Kim, J., Ryu, G. H., & Kim, Y. H. (2017). Gait performance and foot pressure distribution during wearable robot-assisted gait in elderly adults. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0333-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loomis, J. L. (1959). Communication, the development of trust and cooperative behavior. Human Relations, 12(4), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675901200402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeil, M., Koch, M., Kuspinar, A., Juzwishin, D., Lehoux, P., & Stolee, P. (2019). Enabling health technology innovation in Canada: Barriers and facilitators in policy and regulatory processes. Health Policy, 123(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.09.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkas, H. (2003). Network collaboration within safety telephone services for ageing people in Finland. Gerontechnology, 2(4), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2003.02.04.003.00
   Google Scholar
• Melkas, H., Hennala, L., Pekkarinen, S., & Kyrki, V. (2020). Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 134, 104041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, B. M. (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27(5–6), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(87)80013-5.
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, P. (2010). Enabling consumer-driven service innovation in health care: The role of online Health Information Technologies (HIT). Information Technology and Product Development (pp. 159–177). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, J. (2016). Iterative categorization (IC): A systematic technique for analyzing qualitative data. Addiction, 111(6), 1096–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, K. E. (2013). Understanding the construct of human trust in domestic service robots [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 39(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen, S., Hennala, L., Tuisku, O., Gustafsson, C., Johansson-Pajala, R. M., Thommes, K., Hoppe, J. A., & Melkas, H. (2020). Embedding care robots into society and practice: Socio-technical considerations. Futures, 122, 102593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. Tampa. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Cartano, D. G. (1962). Methods of measuring opinion leadership. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1086/267118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale, P., Franceschini, M., Waldner, A., & Hesse, S. (2012). Use of the robot assisted gait therapy in rehabilitation of patients with stroke and spinal cord injury. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(1), 111–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzmann-Erikson, M., & Eriksson, H. (2018). A descriptive statistical analysis of volume, visibility and attitudes regarding nursing and care robots in social media. Contemporary Nurse, 54(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2017.1388183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. J. (2017). Technology adoption, acceptance, satisfaction and benefit: Integrating various assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, 12(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1253939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozawa, K., Naya, F., Yamato, J., & Kogure, K. (2005). Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuck, R. E., & Rogers, W. A. (2018). Older adults’ perceptions of supporting factors of trust in a robot care provider. Journal of Robotics, 2018, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6519713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studley, M., & Winfield, A. (2020). ELSA in industrial robotics. Current Robotics Reports, 1(4), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6519713.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M., Charles, D., Patel, V., & Searcy, T. (2015). Health information exchange among US non-federal acute care hospitals: 2008–2014. ONC Data Brief, 24, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tapus, A., Maja, M., & Scassellatti, B. (2007). The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 14(1), 35–42. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00770113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J. B., McKnight, D. H., Baker, E. W., Arsal, R. E., & Roberts, N. H. (2011). The role of trust in postadoption IT exploration: An empirical examination of knowledge management systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2028320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aerschot, L., & Parviainen, J. (2020). Robots responding to care needs? A multitasking care robot pursued for 25 years, available products offer simple entertainment and instrumental assistance. Ethics and Information Technology, 22(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09536-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, S., Gu, Z., & Ni, Q. (2020). Cognitive computing and wireless communications on the edge for healthcare service robots. Computer Communications, 149, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, C., Frisina, L., & Rothgang, H. (2009). Healthcare system types: a conceptual framework for comparison. Social Policy & Administration, 43(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00647.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichert, R., & Eberhardt, B. (2012). Ambient assisted living. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Winfield, A. F., & Jirotka, M. (2018). Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180085. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar