RoamFab: A Design Tool for Reconfiguring Parameterized Mechanisms to 3D Models With Structural Optimization

References

• Alvarez, C., K. L., Lagos, C. R. F., & Aizpun, M. (2016). Investigating the influence of infill percentage on the mechanical properties of fused deposition modelled ABS parts. Ingeniería e Investigación, 36(3), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v36n3.56610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andheum. (2022, January). Human UI. https://www.food4rhino.com/en/app/human-ui
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International. (2015). ASTM D638-14, standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Bächer, M., Bickel, B., James, D. L., & Pfister, H. (2012). Fabricating articulated characters from skinned meshes. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 31(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, A., Quek, F., Woodward, R., Okundaye, O., & Kim, J. (2020). “anyone can print”: Supporting collaborations with 3d printing services to empower broader participation in personal fabrication. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (pp. 1–13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420068
   Google Scholar
• Budynas, R. G., & Nisbett, J. K. (2011). Shigley’s mechanical engineering design (Vol. 9). McGraw-Hill New York.
   Google Scholar
• Calì, J., Calian, D. A., Amati, C., Kleinberger, R., Steed, A., Kautz, J., & Weyrich, T. (2012). 3d-printing of non-assembly, articulated models. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 31(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2366145.2366149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D., Levin, D. I., Sueda, S., & Matusik, W. (2015). Data-driven finite elements for geometry and material design. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 34(4), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Kim, J., Mankoff, J., Grossman, T., Coros, S., & Hudson, S. E. (2016). Reprise: A design tool for specifying, generating, and customizing 3d printable adaptations on everyday objects. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 29–39). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Cura, U. (2022, January). Ultimaker cura. https://ultimaker.com/software/ultimaker-cura
   Google Scholar
• Es-Said, O., Foyos, J., Noorani, R., Mendelson, M., Marloth, R., & Pregger, B. (2000). Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 15(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426910008912976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, A., Kim, J., Chen, X., Yeh, T., Hudson, S. E., Mankoff, J., & Bigham, J. P. (2017). Facade: Auto-generating tactile interfaces to appliances. In Proceedings of the 2017 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5826–5838). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• He, L., Peng, H., Lin, M., Konjeti, R., Guimbretière, F., & Froehlich, J. E. (2019). Ondulé: Designing and controlling 3d printable springs. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Acm Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 739–750). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, K., Bickel, B., & Alexa, M. (2013). Orthogonal slicing for additive manufacturing. Computers & Graphics, 37(6), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2013.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.-J., Chan, S.-Y., Lin, W.-C., & Chuang, S.-Y. (2016). Making and animating transformable 3d models. Computers & Graphics, 54, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2015.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, N., Alcock, C., & Chilana, P. K. (2016). Understanding newcomers to 3d printing: Motivations, workflows, and barriers of casual makers. In Proceedings of the 2016 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 384–396). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Ion, A., Wall, L., Kovacs, R., & Baudisch, P. (2017). Digital mechanical metamaterials. In Proceedings of the 2017 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 977–988).
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., Zakaria, H., Chong, Y., Saad, M., & Basaruddin, K. (2018). Effect of infill on tensile and flexural strength of 3D printed PLA parts. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 429, p. 012101). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/429/1/012101
   Google Scholar
• Koo, B., Li, W., Yao, J., Agrawala, M., & Mitra, N. J. (2014). Creating works-like prototypes of mechanical objects. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 33(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661229.2661289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama, Y., Sueda, S., Steinhardt, E., Igarashi, T., Shamir, A., & Matusik, W. (2015). Autoconnect: computational design of 3D-printable connectors. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 34(6), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledo, D., Houben, S., Vermeulen, J., Marquardt, N., Oehlberg, L., & Greenberg, S. (2018). Evaluation strategies for HCI toolkit research. In Proceedings of the 2018 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–17). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Cui, M., Kim, J., & Chen, X. (2020). Romeo: A design tool for embedding transformable parts in 3d models to robotically augment default functionalities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Acm Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 897–911). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Kim, J., & Chen, X. (2019). Robiot: A design tool for actuating everyday objects with automatically generated 3d printable mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Acm Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 673–685). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347894
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Gaynor, A. T., Chen, S., Kang, Z., Suresh, K., Takezawa, A., Li, L., Kato, J., Tang, J., Wang, C. C. L., Cheng, L., Liang, X., & To, A. C. (2018). Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 57(6), 2457–2483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1994-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L., Sharf, A., Zhao, H., Wei, Y., Fan, Q., Chen, X., Savoye, Y., Tu, C., Cohen-Or, D., & Chen, B. (2014). Build-to-last: Strength to weight 3d printed objects. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 33(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601097.2601168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeel, R. (2010). Rhinoceros 3D, version 7.0. Robert McNeel & Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Megaro, V., Thomaszewski, B., Nitti, M., Hilliges, O., Gross, M., & Coros, S. (2015). Interactive design of 3D-printable robotic creatures. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 34(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megaro, V., Zehnder, J., Bächer, M., Coros, S., Gross, M. H., & Thomaszewski, B. (2017). A computational design tool for compliant mechanisms. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36(4), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noma, Y., Narumi, K., Okuya, F., & Kawahara, Y. (2020). Pop-up print: Rapidly 3d printing mechanically reversible objects in the folded state. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Acm Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 58–70). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, J. (2022, January). 3d printing infill: The basics - simply explained. https://all3dp.com/2/infill-3d-printing-what-it-means-and-how-to-use-it/
   Google Scholar
• Pinterest. (2022, January). An Image Sharing and Social Media Service. https://www.pinterest.com/
   Google Scholar
• Prusaprinters. (2022, January). Community Site for 3D Printer Users. https://www.prusaprinters.org/prints
   Google Scholar
• PrusaSlicer. (2022, January). Infill types and their properties. https://help.prusa3d.com/
   Google Scholar
• Ramakers, R., Anderson, F., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2016). Retrofab: A design tool for retrofitting physical interfaces using actuators, sensors and 3D printing. In Proceedings of the 2016 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 409–419). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Rhinoceros. (2022, January). Rhinoceros grasshopper. https://www.rhino3d.com/6/new/grasshopper/
   Google Scholar
• Roumen, T. J., Müller, W., & Baudisch, P. (2018). Grafter: Remixing 3d-printed machines. In Proceedings of the 2018 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Stava, O., Vanek, J., Benes, B., Carr, N., & Měch, R. (2012). Stress relief: Improving structural strength of 3D printable objects. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 31(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Li, J., Luo, D., Liu, H., Yao, L., Tao, Y., & Wang, G. (2021). Shrincage: 4D printing accessories that self-adapt. In Proceedings of the 2021 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445220
   Google Scholar
• Thingiverse. (2022, January). Digital Designs for Physical Objects. https://www.thingiverse.com/
   Google Scholar
• Umetani, N., & Schmidt, R. M. (2013). Cross-sectional structural analysis for 3d printing optimization. In Siggraph Asia Technical Briefs (pp. 5–1). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2542355.2542361
   Google Scholar
• Ureta, F. G., Tymms, C., & Zorin, D. (2016). Interactive modeling of mechanical objects. Computer Graphics Forum, 35(5), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Xu, W., Yang, Y., Guo, X., & Zhou, K. (2015). Agile structural analysis for fabrication-aware shape editing. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 35, 163–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Barbič, J. (2015). Interactive material design using model reduction. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 34(2), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C., Crane, K., & Coros, S. (2017). Computational design of telescoping structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., Zheng, C., & Coros, S. (2018). Computational design of transformables. Computer Graphics Forum, 37(8), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., Auzinger, T., & Bickel, B. (2021). Computational design of planar multistable compliant structures. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 40(5), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., Auzinger, T., Ceylan, D., Li, W., & Bickel, B. (2017). Functionality-aware retargeting of mechanisms to 3D shapes. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 36(4), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Le, X., Wu, Z., Whiting, E., & Wang, C. C. (2016). Data-driven bending elasticity design by shell thickness. Computer Graphics Forum, 35(5), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Kalogerakis, E., Wang, R., & Grosse, I. R. (2016). Direct shape optimization for strengthening 3D printable objects. Computer Graphics Forum, 35(7), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar