iSTART: Adaptive Comprehension Strategy Training and Stealth Literacy Assessment

References

• Afflerbach, P., Hurt, M., & Cho, B. Y. (2020). Reading comprehension strategy instruction. In D. L. Dinsmore, L. K. Fryer, & M. M. Parkinson (Eds.), Handbook of strategies and strategic processing (pp.98–118). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). You are your words: Modeling students’ vocabulary knowledge with natural language processing. In O. C. Santos, J. G. Boticario, C. Romero, M. Pechenizkiy, A. Merceron, P. Mitros, J. M. Luna, C. Mihaescu, P. Moreno, A. Hershkovitz, S. Ventura, & M. Desmarais (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2015) (pp.258–265). International Educational Data Mining Society.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Are you reading my mind? Modeling students' reading comprehension skills with Natural Language Processing techniques. In J. Baron, G. Lynch, N. Maziarz, P. Blikstein, A. Merceron, & G. Siemens (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (LAK'15) (pp. 246–254). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• American College Testing. (2006). ACT high school profile report: The graduating class of 2006. https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/Natl-Scores-2006-National2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arner, T., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2021). iSTART StairStepper—Using comprehension strategy training to game the test. Computers, 10(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10040048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J. D., Cook, A. L., & Baldi, S. (2006). The literacy of America’s college students. American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, C., Yang, J., & Tang, Y. (2022). Embedding self-explanation prompts to support learning via instructional video. Instructional Science, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09587-4
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Rowe, M., Ozura, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 65–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowyer-Crane, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2005). Assessing children's inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(Pt 2), 189–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X010002014
   Google Scholar
• Butterfuss, R., Orcutt, E., Fang, Y., Kendeou, P., & McNamara, D. S. (2021, April 22–25). You pick’em: Selecting main ideas versus deleting details [Conference presentation]. American Educational Research Association (AERA) 2021 Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5/6), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Elbro, C. (2003). The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2013). STEM attrition: College students' paths into and out of STEM fields. Statistical analysis report [NCES 2014-001]. National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coté, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S., Kyle, K., Davenport, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Automatic assessment of constructed response data in a chemistry tutor. International Educational Data Mining Society.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986). Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2021). Predicting reading skills via stealth assessment using educational games. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. Spotlight on Statistics. https://stats.bls.gov/spotlight/2017/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future/pdf/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 356–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulikers, J. T. M., Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2008). The effect of practice experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, A. F., Schneider, V. I., & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (2012). Empirically valid principles of training. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, (Eds.), Training cognition: Optimizing efficiency, durability, and generalizability (pp. 13–39). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Motivation and performance in a game-based intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). The motivation and mastery cycle framework: Predicting long-term benefits of educational games. In Y. Baek (Ed.), Game-based learning: Theory, strategies and performance outcomes (pp. 97–122). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. T., Dempsey, K. B., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Game-based practice in a reading strategy tutoring system: Showdown in iSTART-ME. In H. Reinders (Ed.), Computer games (pp. 115–138). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. T., Snow, E. L., Varner (Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Game performance as a measure of comprehension and skill transfer. In C. Boonthum-Denecke & G. M. Youngblood (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Flordia Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference (pp. 497–502). The AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. T., Varner, L. K., Denecke, C. B., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). The impact of individual differences on learning with an educational game and a traditional ITS. International Journal of Learning Technology, 8(4), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2013.059129
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. T., Boonthum, C., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Natural language processing and game-based practice in iSTART. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(2), 189–208.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, G. T., Boonthum, C., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). The efficacy of iSTART extended practice: Low ability students catch up. In J. Kay & V. Aleven (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 349–351). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jacovina, M. E., Jackson, G. T., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Timing game-based practice in a reading comprehension strategy tutor. In A. Micarelli, J. Stamper, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2016) (pp. 80–89). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. T., & Casidy, R. (2018). Authentic assessment in business education: Its effects on student satisfaction and promoting behavior. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1165659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. M., Guerrero, T. A., Tighe, E. L., McNamara, D. S. (2017, June). iSTART-ALL: Confronting adult low literacy with intelligent tutoring for reading comprehension [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 125–136). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. E., & Soto, C. M. (2016). Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 13–29). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. M., Ozogul, G., & Reisslein, M. (2015). Supporting multimedia learning with visual signalling and animated pedagogical agent: Moderating effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. M., McCarthy, K. S., Kopp, K., Perret, C. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Adaptive reading and writing instruction in iSTART and W-Pal. In Z. Markov & V. Rus (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society International Conference (FLAIRS) (pp. 561–566). AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kastberg, D., Chan, J. Y., & Murray, G. (2016). Performance of US 15-year-old students in science, reading, and mathematics literacy in an international context: First look at PISA 2015 [NCES 2017-048]. National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P. (2015). A general inference skill. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 160–181). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1456–1470. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (1989). Gates–MacGinitie reading tests. Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. The American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., Allen, L. K., Hinze, S. R. (2020). Predicting reading comprehension from constructed responses: Explanatory retrievals as stealth assessment [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 197–202). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., Watanabe, M., & McNamara, D. S. (2020). The design implementation framework: Guiding principles for the redesign of a reading comprehension intelligent tutoring system. In M. Schmidt, A. Tawfik, Y. Earnshaw, & I. Jahnke (Eds.), Learner and User Experience Research: An introduction for the Field of Learning Design & Technology. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/ux/9_the_design_impleme
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., Watanabe, M., Dai, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2020). Personalized learning in iSTART: Past modifications and future design. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1716201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2009). The importance of teaching reading strategies. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 35(2), 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2017). Self-explanation and reading strategy training (SERT) improves low-knowledge students’ science course performance. Discourse Processes, 54(7), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1101328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Healy, A. F. (1995). A procedural explanation of the generation effect: The use of an operand retrieval strategy for multiplication and addition problems. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2004). Suppressing irrelevant information: Knowledge activation or inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Jacovina, M. E., Snow, E. L., & Allen, L. K. (2015). From generating in the lab to tutoring systems in classrooms. The American Journal of Psychology, 128(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T., Rowe, M., Boonthum, C., & Levinstein, I. B. (2007). iSTART: A web-based tutor that teaches self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. In D. S. McNamara (ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 397–420). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., O'Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students' reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.2190/1RU5-HDTJ-A5C8-JVWE
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers' prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 229–257.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., & Louwerse, M. M. (2012). Sources of text difficulty: Across genres and grades. In J. P. Sabatini, E. Albro, & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how we assess reading ability (pp. 89–116). R&L Education.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., Likens, A. D., Kopp, K. J., Watanabe, M., Perret, C. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). The “LO”-down on grit: Non-cognitive trait assessments fail to predict learning gains in iSTART and W-Pal [Paper presentation]. Companion Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK’18), Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, R. R., & Nering, M. L. (1999). Computerized adaptive testing: Overview and introduction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466219922031310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb00842.x
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2019). Reading comprehension and reading comprehension difficulties. In D. Kilpatrick, R. Joshi, & R. Wagner (Eds.), Reading development and difficulties (pp. 83–115). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Perret, C. A., Johnson, A. M., McCarthy, K. S., Guerrero, T. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). StairStepper: An adaptive remedial iSTART module. In B. Boulay, R. Baker & E. Andre (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED)., (pp. 557–560). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, M., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Inhibition needs no negativity: Negativity links in the construction-integration model. In V. Sloutsky, B. Love, & K. McRae (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1777–1782). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rupley, W. H., Blair, T. R., & Nichols, W. D. (2009). Effective reading instruction for struggling readers: The role of direct/explicit teaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(2–3), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802683523
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2020). Stealth assessment of creativity in a physics video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., & Ventura, M. (2013). Measuring and supporting learning in games: Stealth assessment. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., & Kim, Y. J. (2013). Assessment and learning of qualitative physics in Newton's playground. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(6), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.832970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Wang, L., Greiff, S., Zhao, W., & Moore, G. (2016). Measuring problem solving skills via stealth assessment in an engaging video game. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCarthy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Bucklein, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student attraction, Persistence and retention in STEM programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n1p46
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Education.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, E. L., Jackson, G. T., Varner, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2013a). Investigating the effects of off-task personalization on system performance and attitudes within a game-based environment. In S. K. D'Mello, R. A. Calvo, & A. Olney (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 272–275). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, E. L., Jackson, G. T., Varner, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2013b). The impact of system interactions on motivation and performance. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII) (pp. 103–107). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, E. L., Jacovina, M. E., Allen, L. K., Dai, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Entropy: A stealth assessment of agency in learning environments. In J. Stamper, Z. Pardos, M. Mavrikis, & B. M. McLaren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 241–244). International Educational Data Mining Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R. (2020). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2132–2148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, E. A., Park, S., & Vaughn, S. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grades 3 through 12: 1978–2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517749940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. Y., Lin, H. S., & Liu, S. C. (2020). The effect of pedagogical GAME model on students' PISA scientific competencies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek, P., Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanLehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 227–265.
   Google Scholar
• Ventura, M., & Shute, V. (2013). The validity of a game-based assessment of persistence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2568–2572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Embse, N., Jester, D., Roy, D., & Post, J. (2018). Test anxiety effects, predictors, and correlates: A 30-year meta-analytic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 483–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., Li, W., Mayer, R. E., & Liu, H. (2018). Animated pedagogical agents as aids in multimedia learning: Effects on eye-fixations during learning and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents' text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467–502. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2304_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, Y., Larson, R. C. (2015). Stem crisis or stem surplus? yes and yes: Monthly labor review. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved February 9, 2022, from https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm
   Google Scholar