E-Learning Engagement and Effectiveness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Interaction Model

References

• Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1665–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, R., Roberts, H., Crombie, N., & Dixon, K. (2021). Determinants of accounting students’ undergraduate learning satisfaction. Accounting & Finance, 61(4), 5231–5254. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ansi, A. M., Garad, A., & Al-Ansi, A. (2021). ICT-based learning during Covid-19 outbreak: Advantages, opportunities and challenges. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.30870/gpi.v2i1.10176
   Google Scholar
• Al-Ansi, A. M., Suprayogo, I., & Abidin, M. (2019). Impact of information and communication technology (ICT) on different settings of learning process in developing countries. Science and Technology, 9(2), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.scit.20190902.01
   Google Scholar
• Aldholay, A. H., Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., & Ramayah, T. (2018). The role of transformational leadership as a mediating variable in DeLone and McLean information system success model: The context of online learning usage in Yemen. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1421–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, S., & Golja, T. (2007). Using students’ experiences to derive quality in an e-Learning system: An institution’s perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 17–33.https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.2.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir, L. R., Tanti, I., Maharani, D. A., Wimardhani, Y. S., Julia, V., Sulijaya, B., & Puspitawati, R. (2020). Student perspective of classroom and distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic in the undergraduate dental study program Universitas Indonesia. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2007.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Annansingh, F., & Bright, A. (2010). Exploring barriers to effective e-learning: Case study of DNPA. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 7(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/17415651011031653
   Google Scholar
• Baber, H. (2021). Social interaction and effectiveness of the online learning – A moderating role of maintaining social distance during the pandemic COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-09-2020-0209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baporikar, N. (2020). Finer student engagement via quality and lifelong learning for sustainable education. International Journal of Political Activism and Engagement, 7(4), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPAE.2020100104
   Google Scholar
• Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2018). Instructor and student perceptions of online student engagement strategies. Distance Education, 39(4), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhs, E., Ladd, G., & Herald, S. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimisation: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417693487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, I.-S. (2017). Computer self-efficacy, learning performance, and the mediating role of learning engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 72(7), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.059
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Gao, Q. (2022). Effects of social media self-efficacy on informational use, loneliness, and self-esteem of older adults. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2062855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. T., Liou, S., & Chen, L. F. (2019). The relationships among gender, cognitive styles, learning strategies, and learning performance in the flipped classroom. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, T., & Scriven, R. (2016). Communities of inquiry in curriculum approach to online learning: Strengths and limitations in context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht, M. (2005). Adapting to changing expectations: Postgraduate students’ experience of an e-learning tax program. Computers & Education, 45(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
   Google Scholar
• Favale, T., Soro, F., Trevisan, M., Drago, I., & Mellia, M. (2020). Campus traffic and e-learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Computer Networks, 176(5), 107290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107290
   Google Scholar
• Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, C. L., & Balakrishnan, V. (2018). Mobile technology in the classroom: What drives student-lecturer interactions? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(7), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1380970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garad, A., Al-Ansi, A. M., & Qamari, I N. (2021). The role of e-learning infrastructure and cognitive competence in distance learning effectiveness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33474
   Google Scholar
• Gares, S. L., Kariuki, J. K., & Rempel, B. P. (2020). Community matters: Student–instructor relationships foster student motivation and engagement in an emergency remote teaching environment. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3332–3335. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 884–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, L. M. A., Zamudio, K. R., Drake, A. G., & Smith, M. K. (2021). Implementing team-based learning in the life sciences: A case study in an online introductory level evolution and biodiversity course. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3527–3536. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg, J. G., & Lye, J. N. (2005). Inferences for the extremum of quadratic regression models [Tech. Rep. 906]. Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the‐difference‐between‐emergency‐remote‐teaching‐and‐online‐learning#fn8
   Google Scholar
• Hu, P. J.-H., & Hui, W. (2012). Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 782–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., Mick, D. G., & Bearden, W. O. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, N. (2020). The shift towards digital literacy in Australian University libraries: Developing a digital literacy framework. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 69(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2020.1712638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122(7), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
   Google Scholar
• Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 61(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23.https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428478
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386–434). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., Liu, S., & Bonk, C. J. (2005). Online MBA students’ perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Koay, K. Y., Ong, D. L. T., Khoo, K. L., & Yeoh, H. J. (2020). Perceived social media marketing activities and consumer-based brand equity: Testing a moderated mediation model. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-07-2019-0453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koay, K. Y., & Poon, W. C. (2022a). Students’ cyberslacking behaviour in e-learning environments: The role of the Big Five personality traits and situational factors. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2021-0437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koay, K. Y., & Poon, W. C. (2022b). Understanding students’ cyberslacking behaviour in e-learning environments: Is student engagement the key? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2080154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35(4), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. H., Hew, J. J., Leong, L. Y., Tan, G. W. H., & Ooi, K. B. (2022). The dark side of compulsory e-education: Are students really happy and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(12), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1987681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepe, J. J., Alexeeva, A., Breuer, J. A., & Greenberg, M. L. (2021). Transforming University of California, IRVINE medical physiology instruction into the pandemic era. FASEB BioAdvances, 3(3), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2020-00082
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, Y., & Lerner, R. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., & Churchill, D. (2014). The effect of social interaction on learning engagement in a social networking environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(4), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.680966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2014). Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 39(10), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.024
   Google Scholar
• Martens, R., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). New learning design in distance education: The impact on student perception and motivation. Distance Education, 28(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701305327
   Google Scholar
• Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in Alexander learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Survey of Student Engagement. (2003). Converting data into action: Expanding the boundaries of institutional improvement – 2003 Annual report. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/23485.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25(4), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Orlov, G., McKee, D., Berry, J., Boyle, A., DiCiccio, T., Ransom, T., Rees-Jones, A., & Stoye, J. (2021). Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: It is not who you teach, but how you teach. Economics Letters, 202(5), 109812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109812
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, H.-H., & Ho, T.-T.-H. (2020). Toward a ‘new normal’ with e-learning in Vietnamese higher education during the post COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1327–1331. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1823945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skill training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organisational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, W. C., & Koo, A. C. (2010). Mobile learning: The economics perspective. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 7(4), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2010.032931
   Google Scholar
• Poon, W. C., & Lee, C. K. C. (2012). Undergraduates’ perception on causes, coping and outcomes of academic stress: Its foresight implications to university administration. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation, 8(4), 379–403. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2490271
   Google Scholar
• Poon, W. C., Low, K. L. T., & Yong, D. G. F. (2004). A study of the web-based learning (WBL) environment in Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(6), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410554031
   Google Scholar
• Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Noortgate, W. V. D., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers & Education, 143(1), 103682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, A., Eseryel, U. Y., Lehrer, C., & Reinhard Jung, R. (2021). Why users comply with wearables: The role of contextual self-efficacy in behavioral change. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1819669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
   Google Scholar
• Salam, M., Iskandar, D. N. A., Ibrahim, D. H. A., & Farooq, M. S. (2019). Technology integration in service-learning pedagogy: A holistic framework. Telematics and Informatics, 38(5), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar, H., Akhtar, H., Naeem, M. M., Khan, J. A., Waraich, K., Shabbir, S., Hasan, A., & Khurshid, Z. (2020). Self-reported effectiveness of e-Learning classes during COVID-19 Pandemic: A nation-wide survey of Pakistani undergraduate dentistry students. European Journal of Dentistry, 14(S01), S34–S43. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1717000
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLS predict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, Q., Tu, Q., & Wang, K. (2011). The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer-related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(10), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, D. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Engagement with mathematics courseware in traditional and online remedial learning environments: Relationship to self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(3), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.37.3.c
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1979). Individuals and groups in social psychology. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, H., Kuo, Y. C., & Walsh, E. J. (2020). Exploring first-time online undergraduate and graduate students’ growth mindsets and flexible thinking and their relations to online learning engagement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2285–2303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09774-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venn, E., Park, J., Andersen, L. P., & Hejmadi, M. (2020). How do learning technologies impact on undergraduates’ emotional and cognitive engagement with their learning? Teaching in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K. A., & Koralesky, K. E. (2021). Student and instructor perceptions of engagement after the rapid online transition of teaching due to COVID‐19. Natural Sciences Education, 50(1), e20038. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20038
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00028-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The Math and Science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43(6), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, F., Khan, N. A., & Hussain, S. (2020). The COVID 19 pandemic and digital higher education: Exploring the impact of proactive personality on social capital through internet self-efficacy and online interaction quality. Children and Youth Services Review, 119(12), 105694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105694
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., Zhang, J. H., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2020). University students’ online learning attitudes and continuous intention to undertake online courses: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1485–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09753-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar