Influences of Different Traffic Information on Driver Behaviors While Interacting with Oncoming Traffic in Level 2 Automated Driving

References

• Abe, T., Nonomura, T., Komada, Y., Asaoka, S., Sasai, T., Ueno, A., & Inoue, Y. (2011). Detecting deteriorated vigilance using percentage of eyelid closure time during behavioral maintenance of wakefulness tests. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 82(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlstrom, C., Kircher, K., & Kircher, A. (2009). Considerations when calculating percent road centre from eye movement data in driver distraction monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment and Design. (pp. 132–139). Iowa City, United States. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1313
   Google Scholar
• Akash, K., Jain, N., & Misu, T. (2020). Toward adaptive trust calibration for level 2 driving automation. In: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 538–547). New York, United States: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418885
   Google Scholar
• Beller, J., Heesen, M., & Vollrath, M. (2013). Improving the driver-automation interaction: An approach using automation uncertainty. Human Factors, 55(6), 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813482327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boos, A., Feldhutter, A., Schwiebacher, J., & Bengler, K. (2020). Mode errors and intentional violations in visual monitoring of level 2 driving automation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. New York, United States: IEEE. (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294690
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., & Olson, J. R. (1988). Mental models in human-computer interaction: Research issues about what the user of software knows. In: Handbook of human-computer interaction. (pp. 45–65). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Durso, F. T., & Gronlund, S. D. (1999). Situation awareness. In: Handbook of applied cognition. (pp. 283–314). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, T., Zhou, W., & Bengler, K. (2022). How to keep drivers attentive during level 2 automation? Development and evaluation of an HMI concept using affective elements and message framing. Safety, 8(3), 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety8030047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helland, A., Jenssen, G. D., Lervåg, L.-E., Westin, A. A., Moen, T., Sakshaug, K., Lydersen, S., Mørland, J., & Slørdal, L. (2013). Comparison of driving simulator performance with real driving after alcohol intake: A randomised, single blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 53(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helldin, T., Falkman, G., Riveiro, M., & Davidsson, S. (2013). Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 210–217). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516554
   Google Scholar
• Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (2004). Guidelines for in-vehicle display systems – version 3.0. (pp. 1–15). Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jenness, J. W., Lerner, N. D., Mazor, S. D., Osberg, J. S., & Tefft, B. C. (2008). Use of advanced in-vehicle technology by younger and older early adopters. Selected results from five technology surveys. Washington, DC, United States: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, P., Bergasa, L. M., Nuevo, J., Hernandez, N., & Daza, I. G. (2012). Gaze fixation system for the evaluation of driver distractions induced by IVIS. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(3), 1167–1178. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2012.2187517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle, M. W., Yang, S. Y., Trey, R., Jonny, K., & Michael, G. (2020). Driver trust & mode confusion in an on-road study of level-2 automated vehicle technology. Safety Science. 130, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria, S. (2009). Factors correlated with traffic accidents as a basis for evaluating advanced driver assistance systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 41(5), 1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinik, A., Bishop, R., Fitchett, V., Morgan, J. F., Trimble, T. E., & Blanco, M. (2014). Human factors evaluation of level 2 and level 3 automated driving concepts of operation. Washington, DC, United States: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Mehlenbacher, B., Wogalter, M. S., & Laughery, K. R. (2002). On the reading of product owner’s manuals: Perceptions and product complexity. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. 46(6), 730–734. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120204600610
   Google Scholar
• Miyajima, C. (2015). Analyzing driver gaze behavior and consistency of decision making during automated driving. In: Proceeding of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (pp. 1293–1298). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, A. S., Reagan, I. J., & Cicchino, J. B. (2021). Addressing driver disengagement and proper system use: Human factors recommendations for level 2 driving automation design. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 15(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343420983126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Police Agency. (2017). The occurrence situation of traffic accident in 2017. (accessed October 2021). https://www.npa.go.jp/toukei/koutuu48/toukei.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Nissan Motor. (2021). Cautions regarding the Pro-PILOT system. https://www.nissan.co.jp/OPTIONALPARTS/NAVIOM/SERENA_SPECIAL/PG/guid-58a7bebf-95c9-4a3e-9d71-b1b4380b35e4.html
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, F. N., Merenda, C., Greatbatch, R., Tanous, K., Suga, C., Akash, K., Misu, T., & Gabbard, J. (2021). The effect of augmented reality cues on glance behavior and driver-initiated takeover on SAE level 2 automated-driving. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 65(1), 1342–1346. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• On-Road Automated Driving committee. (2016). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Pennsylvania, United States: SAE Inter-National.
   Google Scholar
• Pettitt, M. A., Burnett, G. E., & Bayer, S. (2006). Assessment of the occlusion technique as a means for evaluating the distraction potential of driver support systems. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 153(4), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-its:20060027
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, M., Rittger, L., Kienast, H., & Neukum, A. (2018). HMI for left turn assist (LTA). SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars – Electronic and Electrical Systems, 11(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.4271/07-11-01-0002
   Google Scholar
• Seppelt, B. D., & Lee, J. D. (2007). Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 65(3), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, S., & Neyens, D. M. (2014). Assessing drivers’ performance when automated driver support systems fail with different levels of automation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 2068–2072. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581435
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A., Young, M., & McCaulder, B. (1997). Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science. 27(2–3), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00054-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K., Lee, J., & Kanbe, A. (2020). HMI design when using level 2 automated driving function – effects of system status presentation considering the risk of malfunction on driver behavior. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 32(3), 520–529. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2020.p0520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimble, T. E., Bishop, R., Morgan, J. F., & Blanco, M. (2014). Human factors evaluation of level 2 and level 3 automated driving concepts: Past research, state of automation technology, and emerging system concepts. Report No. DOT HS 812 043. Washington, DC, United States: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Verberne, F. M. F., Ham, J., & Midden, C. J. H. (2012). Trust in smart systems: Sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars. Human Factors, 54(5), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812443825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, T. W. (2005). Keeping eye and mind on the road. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology. Uppsala Sweden: Uppsala University. pp. 1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Victor, T. W., Harbluk, J. L., & Engström, J. A. (2005). Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Inoue, K., Kitazaki, S., Nakano, K. (2021). Influences on drivers’ understandings of systems by presenting image recognition results. In: 32nd IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium. (pp. 19–24). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Obana, T., Wang, Z., Kaizuka, T., Sugimachi, T., Sakurai, T., Maki, T., & Nakano, K. (2021). Evaluations of different human machine interfaces for presenting right-turn timing at intersections. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 19(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-020-00223-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Zheng, R. C., Shimono, K., Kaizuka, T., & Nakano, K. (2017). Evaluation of the effects of in-vehicle traffic lights on driving performances for unsignalised intersections. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 11(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2016.0084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Zheng, R. C., Yin, Y., Yamabe, S., & Nakano, K. (2016). Analysis of influence on driver behaviour while using in-vehicle traffic lights with application of head-up display. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 10(5), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2015.0179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., Wilson, K. M., Roady, T., Kuo, J., & Lenné, M. G. (2022). Evaluating driver features for cognitive distraction detection and validation in manual and level 2 automated driving. Human Factors, 64(4), 746–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820964149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Kamijo, K., Itoh, M., & Kitazaki, S. (2021). Effects of explanation-based knowledge regarding system functions and driver’s roles on driver takeover during conditionally automated driving: A test track study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 77(2021), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar