Chatbot’s Complementary Motivation Support in Developing Study Plan of E-Learning English Lecture

References

• Abbasi, S., & Kazi, H. (2014). Measuring effectiveness of learning chatbot systems on student’s learning outcome and memory retention. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 3(7), 57–260. https://doi.org/10.15590/ajase/2014/v3i7/53576
   Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2012). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. In The next generation of distance education (pp. 49–69). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Adesope, O. O., & Nesbit, J. C. (2012). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1974). Effects of information on interpersonal attraction: Similarity versus affective value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barta, S., Flavian, C., & Gurrea, R. (2021). Managing consumer experience and online flow: Differences in handheld devices vs PCs. Technology in Society, 64, 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2005). Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(2), 95–115.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self‐determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237x(200011)84:6<740::aid-sce4>3.0.co;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M. (2004). Academic motivation in self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal orientations, and attributional beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.6.287-298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, C. G., Rill, R., Ha, S., Chiang, M., Smith, R., & Ju, W. (2015). Individualization for education at scale: MIIC design and preliminary evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2014.2370635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. L. (2003). Teaching style vs. learning style. Myths and Realities, 26(1).
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14(3), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597143008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. C., Liang, C., Yan, C. F., & Tseng, J. S. (2013). The impact of college students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on continuance intention to use English mobile learning systems. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0011-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. M. (2014). Roles of interactivity and usage experience in e-learning acceptance: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 10(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-05-2013-0015
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). The effect size. In Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (pp. 77–83). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Toward an organismic integration theory. In Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (pp. 113–148). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., Danielsen, A. G., & Samdal, O. (2012). A path analysis of basic need support, self-efficacy, achievement goals, life satisfaction and academic achievement level among secondary school students. Educational Psychology, 32(3), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2012.657159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
   Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649309526830
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnewuch, U., Meng, Y., & Maedche, A. (2020). The effect of perceived similarity in dominance on customer self-disclosure to chatbots in conversational commerce. In Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2020). Presented at the the 28th European Conference on Information Systems, Marrakech, Morocco.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, R. D. (2011). Differences in motivational orientation in foreign language learning context: Findings from Filipino foreign language learners. The Assessment Handbook, 4(2), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2746285
   Google Scholar
• Guay, F., Boggiano, A. K., & Vallerand, R. J. (2001). Autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and perceived competence: Conceptual and empirical linkages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(6), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201276001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnell, K. E., Crocker, P. R., Mack, D. E., Wilson, P. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2014). Goal contents, motivation, psychological need satisfaction, well-being and physical activity: A test of self-determination theory over 6 months. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1997). Learning styles and training and development in work settings: Lessons from educational research. Educational Psychology, 17(1–2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170114
   Google Scholar
• Holotescu, C. (2016). MOOCBuddy: A chatbot for personalized learning with MOOCs. In RoCHI (pp. 91–94). Matrix Rom.
   Google Scholar
• Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insko, C. A., Thompson, V. D., Stroebe, W., Shaud, J. A., Pinner, G., & Layton, B. D. (1973). Implied evaluation and the similarity-attraction effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karumbaiah, S., Lizarralde, R., Allessio, D., Woolf, B., Arroyo, I., & Wixon, N. (2017, Jun 25–28). Addressing student behavior and affect with empathy and growth mindset. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Wuhan, China.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Park, S.-W., Cozart, J., & Lee, H. (2015). From motivation to engagement: The role of effort regulation of virtual high school students in mathematics courses. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 261–272. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.4.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Lee, J., & Gweon, G. (2019, May). Comparing data from chatbot and web surveys: Effects of platform and conversational style on survey response quality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12). ACM SIGCHI. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300316
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Wei, Q. (2011). The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment. Computers & Education, 56(2), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (revised and updated). Cambridge Adult Education.
   Google Scholar
• Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, A. C., & Smith, W. L. (2000). Ten facts of life for distance learning courses. TechTrends, 44(1), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02818203
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, D. (2018, November 7). Online education ascends. Inside Higher Ed, 7. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/11/07/new-data-online-enrollments-grow-and-share-overall-enrollment
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. G., & Lee, K. M. (2022). Polite speech strategies and their impact on drivers’ trust in autonomous vehicles. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. G., Lee, J., & Lee, D. (2021). Cheerful encouragement or careful listening: The dynamics of robot etiquette at children’s different developmental stages. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Why presence occurs: Evolutionary psychology, media equation, and presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(4), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1162/1054746041944830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Jin, S. A., & Yan, C. (2006). Can robots manifest personality?: An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human–robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 754–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Mao, J. (2015). Hedonic or utilitarian? Exploring the impact of communication style alignment on user’s perception of virtual health advisory services. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C., Palvia, P., & Lin, H. N. (2006). The roles of habit and web site quality in e-commerce. International Journal of Information Management, 26(6), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., & Jayothisa, C. (2013). The effects of peer-like and expert-like pedagogical agents on learners’ agent perceptions, task-related attitudes, and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 275–286. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.4.275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, X. J., Cheah, J. H., Ng, S. I., Basha, N. K., & Liu, Y. (2021). Are men from Mars, women from Venus? Examining gender differences towards continuous use intention of branded apps. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. H., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, B. (2017). The roles of learning strategies and motivation in online language learning: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & Education, 113, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, S. (2020, May 26). Remember the MOOCs? After near-death, they’re booming. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/26/technology/moocs-online-learning.html
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. L. (2021). The effect of pedagogical agent persona on performance, self-efficacy, and attitudes in adult learners in an online environment [Doctoral dissertation]. Western Kentucky University.
   Google Scholar
• Meyvis, T., & Van Osselaer, S. M. (2018). Increasing the power of your study by increasing the effect size. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1157–1173. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (2001). Learning styles: The multimedia of the mind. Research Report. ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(1), 64–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512452989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nass, C., & Lee, K. M. (2000, April). Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? An experimental test of similarity-attraction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 329–336). ACM SIGCHI. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332452
   Google Scholar
• Nass, C., Jonsson, I.-M., Harris, H., Reaves, B., Endo, J., Brave, S., & Takayama, L. (2005, April). Improving automotive safety by pairing driver emotion and car voice emotion. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1973–1976). ACM SIGCHI. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057070
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
   Google Scholar
• Noels, K. A., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1999). Perceptions of teachers’ communicative style and students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self‐determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noels, K., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. (2001). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations of French Canadian learners of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogan, A., Finkelstein, S., Mayfield, E., D’Adamo, C., Matsuda, N., Cassell, J. (2012, May). “Oh dear stacy!” Social interaction, elaboration, and learning with teachable agents. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 39–48). ACM SIGCHI. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207684
   Google Scholar
• Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2020). Python-Bot: A chatbot for teaching python programming. Engineering Letters, 29(1), 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsini, C., Evans, P., & Jerez, O. (2015). How to encourage intrinsic motivation in the clinical teaching environment?: A systematic review from the self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 12, 8. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakes, G. C., & Dunn, K. E. (2010). The impact of online graduate students’ motivation and self-regulation on academic procrastination. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (1999). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding socio-cultural influences on student motivation. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (pp. 31–60). IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruijten, P. A. M. (2021). The similarity-attraction paradigm in persuasive technology: Effects of system and user personality on evaluations and persuasiveness of an interactive system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(8), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1723701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children’s perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarrazin, P. G., Tessier, D. P., Pelletier, L. G., Trouilloud, D. O., & Chanal, J. P. (2006). The effects of teachers’ expectations about students’ motivation on teachers’ autonomy‐supportive and controlling behaviors. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2006.9671799
   Google Scholar
• Savenye, W. C. (2005). Improving online courses: What is interaction and why use it? Distance Learning, 2(6), 22.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600.https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Shroff, R. H., Vogel, D. R., Coombes, J., & Lee, F. (2007). Student e-learning intrinsic motivation: A qualitative analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01912
   Google Scholar
• Shumanov, M., & Johnson, L. (2021). Making conversations with chatbots more personalized. Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 106627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, C., & Du, Y. (2004). Effects of learning styles and class participation on students’ enjoyment level in distributed learning environments. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 45(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/40323899
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Connell, J. P., Eccles, J. S., & Wellborn, J. G. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(2–3), i+iii+v–vi+1–231. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger. Computers & Education, 151, 103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, D., Oh, E. Y., Rice, M. (2017, July). Interacting with a conversational agent system for educational purposes in online courses. In 2017 10th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI) (pp. 78–82). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2017.8005002
   Google Scholar
• Stitt-Gohdes, W. L. (2003). Student teachers and their students: Do their instructional and learning preferences match? Business Education Forum, 57(4), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Cano, E., Mengual-Andrés, S., & López-Meneses, E. (2021). Chatbot to improve learning punctuation in Spanish and to enhance open and flexible learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00269-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F. (2008). Motivation and English achievement: An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of a new measure for Chinese students of English learning. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 633–646.
   Google Scholar
• Wanna, W. O., & de Jesus Simôes, M. D. F. (2021). Impact of learning styles on higher distance learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 21(1), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v21i1.4047
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, P. M., Rogers, W. T., Rodgers, W. M., & Wild, T. C. (2006). The psychological need satisfaction in exercise scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 28(3), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.28.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting (AOM). AOM.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, R., Hobert, S., Salovaara, A., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2020, April). Sara, the lecturer: Improving learning in online education with a scaffolding-based conversational agent. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14). ACM SIGCHI. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376781
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Powering e-learning in the new millennium: An overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers, 5(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022609809036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. (2011). Learning styles and teaching styles in college English teaching. International Education Studies, 4(1), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n1p73
   Google Scholar
• Zirkin, B. G., & Sumler, D. E. (1995). Interactive or non-interactive? That is the question!!!. Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., Porac, J., Lathin, D., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically-motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(3), 443–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar