Why Do I Share? Participants’ Personality Traits and Online Participation

References

• Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf, A. R., Thongpapanl Tek, N., Anwar, A., Lapa, L., & Venkatesh, V. (2021). Perceived values and motivations influencing m-commerce use: A nine-country comparative study. International Journal of Information Management, 59(3), 102318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102318
   Google Scholar
• Audet, É. C., Levine, S. L., Metin, E., Koestner, S., & Barcan, S. (2021). Zooming their way through university: Which Big 5 traits facilitated students’ adjustment to online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 180(1), 110969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110969
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunker, C. J., Saysavanh, S. E., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2021). Are gender differences in the Big Five the same on social media as offline? Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3(4), 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100085
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., Yang, Y., & Shi, W. (2022). A predictive model of the knowledge-sharing intentions of social Q&A community members: A regression tree approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1938393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavusoglu, H., Li, Z., & Kim, S. H. (2021). How do virtual badges incentivize voluntary contributions to online communities? Information & Management, 58(5), 103483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, B. P., Duberstein, P. R., Sörensen, S., & Lyness, J. M. (2007). Gender differences in five factor model personality traits in an elderly cohort: Extension of robust and surprising findings to an older generation. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1594–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Baird, A., & Straub, D. (2019). Why do participants continue to contribute? Evaluation of usefulness voting and commenting motivational affordances within an online knowledge community. Decision Support Systems, 118(C), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Baird, A., & Straub, D. (2022). The impact of hierarchical privilege levels and non-hierarchical incentives on continued contribution in online Q&A communities: A motivational model of gamification goals. Decision Support Systems, 153, 113667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, J., Borghans, L., & Diris, R. (2021). Personality traits, preferences and educational choices: A focus on STEM. Journal of Economic Psychology, 84(1–2), 102361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102361
   Google Scholar
• Cross, T. L., Cross, J. R., Mammadov, S., Ward, T. J., Neumeister, K. S., & Andersen, L. (2018). Psychological heterogeneity among honors college students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(3), 242–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218781754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, L., Huang, L., Hou, J., & Liu, Y. (2020). Continuous content contribution in virtual community: The role of status-standing on motivational mechanisms. Decision Support Systems, 132, 113283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, L., Zhang, J., Huang, L., & Liu, Y. (2021). Social influence on endorsement in social Q&A community: Moderating effects of temporal and spatial factors. International Journal of Information Management, 61(2), 102396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102396
   Google Scholar
• Fleischhauer, M., Enge, S., Brocke, B., Ullrich, J., Strobel, A., & Strobel, A. (2010). Same or different? clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, T., Wang, L., Jin, J., & Song, X. (2018). Knowledge contribution behavior in online Q&A communities: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, M. J., Staff, R. T., Bunting, B. P., Deary, I. J., & Whalley, L. J. (2012). Openness to experience and activity engagement facilitate the maintenance of verbal ability in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C. J. (2007). Moderation and mediation in structural equation modeling: Applications for early intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention, 29(3), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510702900305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irfan, M., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Relating consumers’ information and willingness to buy electric vehicles: Does personality matter? Transportation Research Part D, 100, 103049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics (pp. 227–260). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Lin, Z., & Nie, J. (2022). How personality and social capital affect knowledge sharing intention in online health support groups?: A person-situation perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(10), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1976508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, J., Dong, X., & Guo, Y. (2020). Examining knowledge contribution in firm- versus consumer-hosted virtual brand community. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 41, 100963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, K. O., & Fleeson, W. (2012). What is extraversion for? integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1498–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612444904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., Fleckenstein, J., Retelsdorf, J., & Köller, O. (2019). The relationship of personality traits and different measures of domain-specific achievement in upper secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S., Qiao, Y., Yan, X., Anwar, A., Tengyue, H., & Rana, S. (2022). Digital students’ satisfaction with and intention to use online teaching modes, role of big five personality traits. [Original Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 956281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mustafa, S., Sohail, M. T., Alroobaea, R., Rubaiee, S., Anas, A., Othman, A. M., & Nawaz, M. (2022). Éclaircissement to understand consumers’ decision-making psyche and gender effects, a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S., Tengyue, H., Jamil, K., Qiao, Y., & Nawaz, M. (2022). Role of eco-friendly products in the revival of developing countries’ economies & achieving a sustainable green economy. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 955245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S., Tengyue, H., Qiao, Y., Sha, S. K., & Sun, R. (2022). How a successful implementation and sustainable growth of e-commerce can be achieved in developing countries; a pathway towards green economy. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.940659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S., & Zhang, W. (2022b). Predicting users knowledge contribution behaviour in technical vs non-technical online Q&A communities: Sem-neural network approach. Behaviour & Information Technology, 17, 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2133633
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S., & Zhang, W. (2022a). How to achieve maximum participation of users in technical versus nontechnical online Q&A communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 26(4), 441–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2022.2123645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S., Zhang, W., Anwar, S., Jamil, K., & Rana, S. (2022). An integrated model of UTAUT2 to understand consumers’ 5G technology acceptance using SEM-ANN approach. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 20056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-24532-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S., Zhang, W., & Naveed, M. M. (2022). What motivates online community contributors to contribute consistently? A case study on Stackoverflow netizens. Current Psychology, 41(07), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03307-4
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S., Zhang, W., Shehzad, M. U., Anwar, A., & Rubakula, G. (2022). Does health consciousness matter to adopt new technology? An integrated model of UTAUT2 with SEM-fsQCA approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 836194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.836194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, S., Zhang, W., Sohail, M. T., Rana, S., & Long, Y. (2023). A moderated mediation model to predict the adoption intention of renewable wind energy in developing countries. PLOS One, 18(3), e0281963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuberg, L. G. (2003). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference, by Judea Pearl, Cambridge University Press, 2000. Econometric Theory, 19(04), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466603004109
   Google Scholar
• Olson, B. D., & Evans, D. L. (1999). The role of the Big Five personality dimensions in the direction and affective consequences of everyday social comparisons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(12), 1498–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992510006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, R. A., & Pluess, M. (2015). Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on common genetic variants. Translational Psychiatry, 5(7), e604-e604. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.96
   Google Scholar
• Rahmani, S., & Lavasani, M. G. (2012). Gender differences in Five factor model of personality and sensation seeking. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2906–2911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.587
   Google Scholar
• Ranga, I., Singh, R., & Ranga, B. (2022). Which user-generated content is considered useful by tourists? An investigation into the role of information types shared in online discourse in online travel communities. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2093447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safadi, H., Johnson, S. L., & Samer, F. (2021). Who contributes knowledge? Core-periphery tension in online innovation communities. Organization Science, 32(3), 752–775. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekaran, U. (2019). Sampling research methods for business: A skill building approach. (8 ed., pp. 432). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, C., Hu, P., Fan, W., & Qiu, L. (2021). How learning effects influence knowledge contribution in online Q&A community? A social cognitive perspective. Decision Support Systems, 149(3), 113610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113610
   Google Scholar
• Smidt, W., Kammermeyer, G., & Roux, S. (2015). Relations between the Big Five personality traits of prospective early childhood pedagogues and their beliefs about the education of preschool children: Evidence from a German study. Learning and Individual Differences, 37(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutin, A. R., Evans, M. K., & Zonderman, A. B. (2013). Personality traits and illicit substances: The moderating role of poverty. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 131(3), 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.10.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwar, S., Srivastava, S., Sakashita, M., Islam, N., & Dhir, A. (2022). Personality and travel intentions during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: An artificial neural network (ANN) approach. Journal of Business Research, 142(5), 400–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, N., Liu, Y., & Xiao, S. (2022). Which feedback matters? The role of expressions and valence in continuous high-quality knowledge contribution in the online Q&A community. Decision Support Systems, 156(3), 113750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113750
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Lu, J., Ow, T. T., Feng, Y., & Liu, L. (2021). Understanding the emotional and informational influence on customer knowledge contribution through quantitative content analysis. Information & Management, 58(2), 103426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Paulo Esperança, J., & Wu, Q. (2022). Effects of live streaming proneness, engagement and intelligent recommendation on users’ purchase intention in short video community: Take TikTok (DouYin) online courses as an example. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2091653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, Y., DeYoung, C., & Hirsh, J. (2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(178), 178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., & Oltmanns, J. R. (2017). Neuroticism is a fundamental domain of personality with enormous public health implications. World Psychiatry, 16(2), 144–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, B., Li, D., & Shao, B. (2012). Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: A study of citizenship behavior and its social-relational antecedents. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(5), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.590121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J., Leidner, D. E., Benbya, H., & Zou, W. (2019). Social capital and knowledge contribution in online user communities: One-way or two-way relationship? Decision Support Systems, 127, 113131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Han, Y., Zhou, J.-L., Liu, Y.-S., & Wu, Y. (2021). Influence of intrinsic motivations on the continuity of scientific knowledge contribution to online knowledge-sharing platforms. Public Understanding of Science, 30(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520970782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhihu. (2022). Annual financial report. Z Inc. http://www.cninfo.com.cn/new/disclosure/detail?orgId=9900055191&announcementId=1214472626&announcementTime=2022-08-30%2019:06
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, T. (2020). Understanding users’ participation in online health communities: A social capital perspective. Information Development, 36(3), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919864620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar