It’s Not My Fault, But I’m to Blame: The Effect of a Home Robot’s Attribution and Approach Movement on Trust and Emotion of Users

Reference

• Adams, R. B., Jr., Ambady, N., Macrae, C. N., & Kleck, R. E. (2006). Emotional expressions forecast approach-avoidance behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babel, F., Kraus, J., Miller, L., Kraus, M., Wagner, N., Minker, W., & Baumann, M. (2021). Small talk with a robot? The impact of dialog content, talk initiative, and gaze behavior of a social robot on trust, acceptance, and proximity. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(6), 1485–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00730-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, A. L., Phillips, E. K., Ullman, D., & Keebler, J. R. (2018). Toward an understanding of trust repair in human-robot interaction: Current research and future directions. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 8(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3181671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossuyt, E., Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2014). On angry approach and fearful avoidance: The goal-dependent nature of emotional approach and avoidance tendencies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brave, S., & Nass, C. (2007). Emotion in human-computer interaction. In A. Sears & J. A. Jacko (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (pp. 251–271). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781410615862
   Google Scholar
• Breazeal, C. (2004). Social interactions in HRI: The robot view. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 34(2), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2004.826268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J., Begum, M., Yanco, H. A. (2016). Analysis of reactions towards failures and recovery strategies for autonomous robots. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 487–492). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745162
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J. (2017). A human-centric approach to autonomous robot failures [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Massachusetts Lowell.
   Google Scholar
• Camara, F., & Fox, C. (2021). Space invaders: Pedestrian proxemic utility functions and trust zones for autonomous vehicle interactions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(8), 1929–1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00717-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S., Mattila, A. S., & Bolton, L. E. (2021). To Err Is Human (-oid): How do consumers react to robot service failure and recovery? Journal of Service Research, 24(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520978798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E., & Saxberg, B. (2018). Engineering motivation using the belief-expectancy-control framework. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 2(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.2.1.004
   Google Scholar
• Das, D., Banerjee, S., & Chernova, S. (2021). Explainable AI for robot failures: Generating explanations that improve user assistance in fault recovery. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 351–360). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444657
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, M. M., & Malle, B. F. (2017). How people explain action (and autonomous intelligent systems should too). In 2017 AAAI Fall Symposium Series. AAAI.
   Google Scholar
• De Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., & Parasuraman, R. (2016). Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 22(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deligianis, C., Stanton, C. J., McGarty, C., & Stevens, C. J. (2017). The impact of intergroup bias on trust and approach behaviour towards a humanoid robot. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 6(3), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.6.3.Deligianis
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. T., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2011). Trust recovery following voluntary or forced financial compensations in the trust game: The role of trait forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being (pp.247–266). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T., Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., & Cooper, C. D. (2011). Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esterwood, C., & Robert, L. P. (2022). A literature review of trust repair in HRI. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 1641–1646). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ro-man53752.2022.9900667
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In P. Ekman, T. Dalgleish, & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Embgen, S., Luber, M., Becker-Asano, C., Ragni, M., Evers, V., Arras, K. O. (2012). Robot-specific social cues in emotional body language. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 1019–1025). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343883
   Google Scholar
• Flook, R., Shrinah, A., Wijnen, L., Eder, K., Melhuish, C., & Lemaignan, S. (2019). On the impact of different types of errors on trust in human-robot interaction: Are laboratory-based HRI experiments trustworthy? Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 20(3), 455–486. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.18067.flo
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkes, V. S. (1988). Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1086/209135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, T., Bailey, R., Zinser, O., & Williams, D. E. (1994). Casual attribution and affective response as mediated by task performance and self-acceptance. Psychological Reports, 75(3 Pt 2), 1555–1562. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.75.3f.1555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groom, V., Chen, J., Johnson, T., Kara, A., & Nass, C. (2010). Critic, compatriot, or chump?: Responses to robot blame attribution. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 211–217). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2010.5453192
   Google Scholar
• Gunawan, T. S., Yaldi, I. R. H., Kartiwi, M., Ismail, N., Za’bah, N. F., Mansor, H., & Nordin, A. N. (2017). Prototype design of smart home system using internet of things. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 7(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v7.i1.pp107-115
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (1966). The hidden dimension. Dooubleday Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y., De Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011). A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors, 53(5), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811417254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel, F., Muhl, C., Wrede, B., Hielscher-Fastabend, M., & Sagerer, G. (2009). Understanding social robots. In 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (pp. 169–174). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The naive analysis of action. In F. Heider (Eds.), The psychology of interpersonal relations (pp. 79–124). John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-004
   Google Scholar
• Honig, S., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2018). Understanding and resolving failures in human-robot interaction: Literature review and model development. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horstmann, A. C., & Krämer, N. C. (2022). The fundamental attribution error in human-robot interaction: An experimental investigation on attributing responsibility to a social robot for its pre-programmed behavior. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(5), 1137–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00856-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1987). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyanathaya, K. P., Akila, D., & Rajesh, P. (2019). Advances in natural language processing–a survey of current research trends, development tools and industry applications. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(5C), 199–202.
   Google Scholar
• Khavas, Z. R., Ahmadzadeh, S. R., & Robinette, P. (2020). Modeling trust in human-robot interaction: A survey. In A. R. Wagner, D. Feil-Seifer, K. S. Haring, S. Rossi, T. Williams, H. He, & S. S. Ge (Eds.), International conference on social robotics (pp. 529–541). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, C., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and System (pp. 3230–3235). Edmonton. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2008.4651113
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T., & Song, H. (2021). How should intelligent agents apologize to restore trust? Interaction effects between anthropomorphism and apology attribution on trust repair. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Mutlu, B. (2014). How social distance shapes human–robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(12), 783–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2009). Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A guide to producing research that matters. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koay, K. L., Syrdal, D. S., Ashgari-Oskoei, M., Walters, M. L., & Dautenhahn, K. (2014). Social roles and baseline proxemic preferences for a domestic service robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(4), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0232-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, T., de Leeuw, J., & Long, J. H. (2021). How movements of a non-humanoid robot affect emotional perceptions and trust. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(8), 1967–1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00711-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Kiesler, S., Eorlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., & Rybski, P. (2010). Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic service. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 203–210). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2010.5453195
   Google Scholar
• Lei, X., & Rau, P. P. (2021). Should I blame the human or the robot? Attribution within a human-robot group. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(2), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00645-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, X., & Huh, Y. E. (2020). Who gets the blame for service failures? Attribution of responsibility toward robot versus human service providers and service firms. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Liu, Q., Xu, W., Liu, Z., Zhou, Z., & Chen, J. (2019). Deep learning-based human motion prediction considering context awareness for human-robot collaboration in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 83, 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.080
   Google Scholar
• Lussier, B., Chatila, R., Ingrand, M., Killijian, O., & Powell, D. (2004). On fault tolerance and roburstness in autonomous systems. In 3rd IARP-IEEE/RAS-EURON Joint Workshop on Technical Challenges for Dependable Robots in Human Environments (pp. 351–358).
   Google Scholar
• Maroto-Gómez, M., Alonso-Martín, F., Malfaz, M., Castro-González, Á., Castillo, J. C., & Salichs, M. Á. (2023). A systematic literature review of decision-making and control systems for autonomous and social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-00977-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matore, E. M., & Khairani, A. Z. (2020). The pattern of skewness and kurtosis using mean score and logit in measuring adversity quotient (AQ) for normality testing. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 13(1), 688–702.
   Google Scholar
• Matsui, T., & Koike, A. (2021). Who is to blame? The appearance of virtual agents and the attribution of perceived responsibility. Sensors, 21(8), 2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl, D., & Nejat, G. (2014). Recognizing emotional body language displayed by a human-like social robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0226-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Smith, A. K. (2006). Chapter 10 customer emotions in service failure and recovery encounters. In W. J. Zerbe, N. M. Ashkanasy, & C. E. J. Härtel (Eds.), Individual and organizational perspectives on emotion management and display (research on emotion in organizations) (Vol. 2, pp. 237–268). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1746-9791(06)02010-4
   Google Scholar
• Mead, R., & Mataric, M. (2016). Robot have need too: How and why people adapt their proxemic behavior to improve robot social signal understanding. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 5(2), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.5.2.Mead
   Google Scholar
• Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirnig, N., Stollnberger, G., Miksch, M., Stadler, S., Giuliani, M., & Tscheligi, M. (2017). To err is robot: How humans assess and act toward an erroneous social robot. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 4, 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00021
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Y. (2003). Don’t blame the computer: When self-disclosure moderates the self-serving bias. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1–2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP13-1&2_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshayedi, A. J., Roy, A. S., Kolahdooz, A., & Shuxin, Y. (2022). Deep learning application pros and cons over algorithm. EAI Endorsed Transactions on AI and Robotics, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4108/10.4108/airo.v1i.19
   Google Scholar
• Moshayedi, A. J., Li, J., Sina, N., Chen, X., Liao, L., Gheisari, M., & Xie, X. (2022). Simulation and validation of optimized PID controller in AGV (automated guided vehicles) model using PSO and BAS algorithms. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 7799654. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7799654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, B. M., & Moray, N. (1996). Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics, 39(3), 429–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139608964474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na, G. H., Kim, H. J., & Kang, H. M. (2021). A Study of User Experience Based on Feedback Positioning of Home Robots and Approach-Avoidance Behaviors: Focused on the Context of Tasks. Journal of Digital Convergence, 19(8), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2021.19.8.225
   Google Scholar
• Ososky, S., Schuster, D., Phillips, E., & Jentsch, F. G. (2013). Building appropriate trust in human-robot teams. In 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Series. AAAI.
   Google Scholar
• Pavone, G., Meyer-Waarden, L., & Munzel, A. (2023). Rage against the machine: experimental insights into customers’ negative emotional responses, attributions of responsibility, and coping strategies in artificial intelligence–based service failures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 58(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221134492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portugal, D., Alvito, P., Christodoulou, E., Samaras, G., & Dias, J. (2019). A study on the deployment of a service robot in an elderly care center. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(2), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0492-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinette, P., Howard, A. M., & Wagner, A. R. (2015). Timing is key for robot trust repair. In A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, & M. Ammi (Eds.), Social robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 9388). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_57
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, A., Holthaus, P., Perugia, G., Moros, S., & Scheunemann, M. (2021). Trust, acceptance and social cues in human–robot interaction (SCRITA). International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(8), 1833–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00844-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saerbeck, M., & Bartneck, C. (2010). Perception of affect elicited by robot motion. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 53–60). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2010.5453269
   Google Scholar
• Saunderson, S., & Nejat, G. (2019). How robots influence humans: A survey of nonverbal communication in social human–robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(4), 575–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00523-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., Hershey, J. C., & Bradlow, E. T. (2006). Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock-Homburg, R. (2022). Survey of emotions in human–robot interactions: Perspectives from robotic psychology on 20 years of research. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(2), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00778-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohkorb Sebo, S., Traeger, M., Jung, M., & Scassellati, B. (2018). The ripple effects of vulnerability: The effects of a robot’s vulnerable behavior on trust in human-robot teams. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 178–186). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171275
   Google Scholar
• Tiberio, L., Cesta, A., & Olivetti Belardinelli, M. (2013). Psychophysiological methods to evaluate user’s response in human robot interaction: A review and feasibility study. Robotics, 2(2), 92–121. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics2020092
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, E. C. (2018). The contributions of attribution theories to trust research. In R. H. Searle, A.-M. I. Nienaber, & S. B. Sitkin (Eds.), The Routledge companion to trust (pp. 245–266). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, E. C., & Mayer, R. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.35713291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, E. C., Nelson, C. A., & Langlinais, L. A. (2021). A cognitive process model of trust repair. International Journal of Conflict Management, 32(2), 340–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-03-2020-0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Hoorn, D. P., Neerincx, A., & de Graaf, M. M. (2021). “I think you are doing a bad job!” The effect of blame attribution by a robot in human-robot collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 140–148). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444681
   Google Scholar
• van Maris, A., Sutherland, A., Mazel, A., Dogramadzi, S., Zook, N., Studley, M., Winfield, A., & Caleb-Solly, P. (2020). The impact of affective verbal expressions in social robots. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 508–510). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378358
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1986). Attribution, emotion, and action. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 281–312). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1980). A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.2.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Howard, A. (2022). Evaluating the impact of emotional apology on human-robot trust. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 1655–1661). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900518
   Google Scholar
• You, S., Nie, J., Suh, K., & Sundar, S. S. (2011). When the robot criticizes you… Self-serving bias in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 295–296). https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957778
   Google Scholar
• Zachiotis, G. A., Andrikopoulos, G., Gornez, R., Nakamura, K., & Nikolakopoulos, G. (2018, December). A survey on the application trends of home service robotics. In 2018 IEEE international conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 1999–2006. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2018.8665127
   Google Scholar
• Zafari, S., & Koeszegi, S. T. (2021). Attitudes toward attributed agency: Role of perceived control. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(8), 2071–2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00672-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Lee, S. K., Kim, W., & Hahn, S. (2023). “Sorry, it was my fault”: Repairing trust in human-robot interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 175, 103031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar