Analysis of User Experience of Hand Gestures for Interaction with Wearable Devices

References

• Ahn, S., Lee, J., Park, K., & Lee, G. (2018). Evaluation of edge-based interaction on a square smartwatch. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 109(C), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Baharum, M. A. A., Rashid, Z. Z., Husin, Z., & Abu, Z. (2011). An evaluation of Universiti Teknologi Mara branch campuses websites towards acceptance among staff [Paper presentation]. 2011 IEEE Conference on Open Systems. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Blascheck, T., Besancon, L., Bezerianos, A., Lee, B., & Isenberg, P. (2019). Glanceable visualization: Studies of data comparison performance on smartwatches. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1), 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasko, G., & Feiner, S. (2004). An interaction system for watch computers using tactile guidance and bidirectional segmented strokes [Paper presentation]. Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K. Y., Patel, S. N., Keller, S. (2016). Finexus: Tracking precise motions of multiple fingertips using magnetic sensing. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1504–1514), San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., Yang, P., Cao, S., Zhang, M., & Li, P. (2018). WritePad: Consecutive number writing on your hand with smart acoustic sensing. IEEE Access, 6, 77240–77249. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2880980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, J., Dey, A., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2018). A qualitative study of smartwatch usage and its usability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28(4), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte, T., Massollar, J., Mendes, E., & Travassos, G. H. (2007). Usability evaluation based on web design perspectives [Paper presentation]. First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counterpoint. (2021). TWS drives 2020 wearables growth; smartwatches to add momentum from 2021. https://www.counterpointresearch.com/zh-hans/tws-drives-2020-wearables-growth-smartwatches-add-momentum-2021/.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Oreiro, I., López, G., Quesada, L., Guerrero, L. A. (2019). Standardized questionnaires for user experience evaluation: A systematic literature review [Paper presentation]. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings. MDPI.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, L., & Wei, W. (2019). An empirical study on user experience evaluation and identification of critical UX issues. Sustainability, 11(8), 2432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., Rammal, H. G., & Veiga, P. M. (2021). Wearable technology and consumer interaction: A systematic review and research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 118(3), 106710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106710
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraune, M. R., Khalaf, A. S., Zemedie, M., Pianpak, P., NaminiMianji, Z., Alharthi, S. A., Dolgov, I., Hamilton, B., Tran, S., & Toups, Z. O. (2021). Developing future wearable interfaces for human-drone teams through a virtual drone search game. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 147, 102573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, M., Sahami, A., Henze, N., & Schmidt, A. (2014). Using a touch-sensitive wristband for text entry on smartwatches. CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. P., Biermann, F., Madsen, J. A., Jonassen, M., Lund, H., Agustin, J. S., & Sztuk, S. (2015). A gaze interactive textual smartwatch interface [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of The 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 839–847). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., & Hudson, S. E. (2009). Abracadabra: Wireless, high-precision, and unpowered finger input for very small mobile devices. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Victoria, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., Tan, D., & Morris, D. (2010). Skinput: Appropriating the body as an input surface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2001). The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1304_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2018). The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In Funology 2 (pp. 301–313). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung Wahrgenommener Hedonischer und Pragmatischer Qualität. In Mensch & computer 2003 (pp. 187–196). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2008). On the track of user experience. https://www.uid.com/en/publications/attrakdiff.
   Google Scholar
• Hee, O. C. (2014). Validity and reliability of the customer-oriented behaviour scale in the health tourism hospitals in Malaysia. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3), 771–775. https://doi.org/10.1017/bec.2016.9
   Google Scholar
• Hinderks, A., Schrepp, M., Mayo, F. J. D., Escalona, M. J., & Thomaschewski, J. (2019). Developing a UX KPI based on the user experience questionnaire. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 65(July), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2019.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J., Heo, S., Isokoski, P., & Lee, G. (2016). Comparison of three QWERTY keyboards for a smartwatch. Interacting with Computers, 28(6), 811–825. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, D. Y., Chan, L., Yang, S., Wang, F., Liang, R. H., Yang, D. N., Hung, Y. P., & Chen, B. Y. (2016). DigitSpace: Designing thumb-to-fingers touch interfaces for one-handed and eyes-free interactions. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1526–1537), San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• IDC. (2020). Shipments of wearable devices leap to 125 million units, up 35.1% in the third quarter, according to IDC. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp? containerId=prUS47067820.
   Google Scholar
• Isleifsdottir, J.,& Larusdottir, M. (2008). Measuring the user experience of a task oriented software. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Meaningful Measures: Valid Useful User Experience Measurement (pp. 97–101), Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241-210: 2019. (2019). Ergonomics of human system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
   Google Scholar
• Jung, E. H., & Kang, H. (2022). Self-determination in wearable fitness technology: The moderating effect of age. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(15), 1399–1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2002048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, J. J. (2007). Evaluating experience-focused HCI [Paper presentation]. CHI'07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1661–1664), San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Khalaf, A. S., Alharthi, S. A., Alshehri, A., Dolgov, I., & Toups, Z. (2020a). A comparative study of hand-gesture recognition devices for games [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd International Conference, HCII 2020, Part II 22 (pp. 57–76). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Khalaf, A. S., Alharthi, S. A., Hamilton, B., Dolgov, I., Tran, S., & Toups, Z. (2020b). A framework of input devices to support designing composite wearable computers [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd International Conference, HCII 2020, Part II 22, (pp. 401–427). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., He, J., Lyons, K., & Starner, T. (2007). The gesture watch: A wireless contact-free gesture based wrist interfac [Paper presentation]. 11th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 15–22). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Lee, S., & Han, J. (2018). StretchArms: Promoting stretching exercise with a smartwatch. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(3), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1342408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo, Y., Shizuki, B., & Tanaka, J. (2016). B2B-Swipe: Swipe gesture for rectangular smartwatches from a bezel to a bezel. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3852–3856), San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. C., Li, B., & Starner, T. (2011). AirTouch: Synchronizing in-air hand gesture and on-body tactile feedback to augment mobile gesture interaction [Paper presentation]. 15th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 3–10). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, K. Y., Chien, C. F., & Kerh, R. (2016). UNISON framework of data-driven innovation for extracting user experience of product design of wearable devices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99(15), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.023
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Han, M. (2022). Determining the key factors of wearable devices consumers’ adoption behavior based on an MADM model for product improvement. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6), 4036–4051. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2960499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAD Gaze. (2020). MAD Gaze Watch –world’s first bone conduction gesture controlled smartwatch. https://www.madgaze.com/watch/.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, D., Brown, B., Lampinen, A., McGregor, M., Hoggan, E., & Pizza, S. (2017). Situating wearables: Smartwatch use in context. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3582–3594), San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Minge, M., & Thüring, M. (2018). Hedonic and pragmatic halo effects at early stages of user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 109(3), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Motti, V. G. (2020). Wearable Interaction (pp. 81–107). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Motti, V. G., & Caine, K. (2014). Human factors considerations in the design of wearable devices. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 1820–1824. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581381
   Google Scholar
• Munteanu, C., Irani, P., Oviatt, S., Aylett, M., Penn, G., Pan, S., & Nakadai, K. (2016). Designing speech and multimodal interactions for mobile, wearable, and pervasive applications [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3612–3619), San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical Diagnosis of Mental Disorders (pp.97–146). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, I., & Lee, D. (2014). Interaction on the edge: Offset sensing for small devices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 169–178), Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ogbanufe, O., & Gerhart, N. (2020). The mediating influence of smartwatch identity on deep use and innovative individual performance. Information Systems Journal, 30(6), 977–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbanufe, O., & Gerhart, N. (2022). Exploring smart wearables through the lens of reactance theory: Linking values, social influence, and status quo. Computers in Human Behavior, 127(2), 107044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107044
   Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta, A., & Abowd, G. D. (2016). User interface design in the 21st century. Computer Magazine. 49(7), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2016.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E. (2020). User acceptance of smart wearable devices: An expectation-confirmation model approach. Telematics and Informatics, 47, 101318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K., Jeong, M., & Kim, K. (2020). Usability evaluation of menu interfaces for smartwatches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1425644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrault, S. T., Lecolinet, E., Eagan, J., & Guiard, Y. (2013). Watchit: Simple gestures and eyes-free interaction for wristwatches and bracelets. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1451–1460), Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Pizza, S., Brown, B., McMillan, D., & Lampinen, A. (2016). Smartwatch in vivo. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5456–5469), San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosales, A., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Comunello, F., Mulargia, S., & Ferran-Ferrer, N. (2017). Older people and smartwatches, initial experiences. El Profesional de la Información, 26(3), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.may.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrepp, M., & Thomaschewski, J. (2019). Design and validation of a framework for the creation of user experience questionnaires. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 5(7), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2019.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., & Minocha, S. (2005). User interface design and evaluation. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A. (2002). Assessing the reliability of heuristic evaluation for Web site attractiveness and usability [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1838–1847). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Thimbleby, H. (2001). Permissive user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2000.0442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeeren, A. P., Law, E. L. C., Roto, V., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J., & Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. (2010). User experience evaluation methods: Current state and development needs. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (pp. 521–530). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Hsu, Y. (2020). The relationship of symmetry, complexity, and shape in mobile interface aesthetics, from an emotional perspective—A case study of the smartwatch. Symmetry, 12(9), 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091403
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S., & Parasuraman, R. (2015). Engineering psychology and human performance. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L. H., Wu, L. C., & Chang, S. C. (2016). Exploring consumers’ intention to accept smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(C), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Yi, X., Yu, C., Shi, W., & Shi, Y. (2017). Is it too small? Investigating the performances and preferences of users when typing on tiny QWERTY keyboards. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 106, 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., Laput, G., & Harrison, C. (2016). Skintrack: Using the body as an electrical waveguide for continuous finger tracking on the skin. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1491–1503), San Jose, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, P., Yu, S., Wang, Y., Zhong, R. Y., & Xu, X. (2017). User-experience based product development for mass personalization: A case study. Procedia CIRP, 63, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.122
   Google Scholar