Team at Your Service: Investigating Functional Specificity for Trust Calibration in Automated Driving with Conversational Agents

References

• Antrobus, V., Large, D. R., & Burnett, G. E. (2018). ‘Trust me – I’m autocab’: Using natural language interfaces to improve the trust and acceptance of level 4/5 autonomous vehicles. In 6th Humanist Conference. https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1218942
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. In G. Johannsen & J. Rijnsdorp (Eds.), Analysis, design and evaluation of man–machine systems (pp. 129–135). Pergamon. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080293486500269
   Google Scholar
• Biondi, F., Alvarez, I., & Jeong, K.-A. (2019). Human–vehicle cooperation in automated driving: A multidisciplinary review and appraisal. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(11), 932–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blömacher, K., Nöcker, G., & Huff, M. (2018). The role of system description for conditionally automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54(APR), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, S.-Y., Lewis, M., Hergeth, S., Semnani-Azad, Z., & Sycara, K. (2015). Cross-country validation of a cultural scale in measuring trust in automation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 59, pp. 686–690). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591149
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, M., Bräuner, C., Lanzer, M., Walch, M., Baumann, M., & Rukzio, E. (2020). Effect of visualization of pedestrian intention recognition on trust and cognitive load. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 181–191). https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410648
   Google Scholar
• Derakhshan, S., Nezami, F. N., Wächter, M. A., Czeszumski, A., Keshava, A., Lukanov, H., De Palol, M. V., Pipa, G., & König, P. (2022). Talking cars, doubtful users—A population study in virtual reality. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Detjen, H., Faltaous, S., Pfleging, B., Geisler, S., & Schneegass, S. (2021). How to increase automated vehicles’ acceptance through in-vehicle interaction design: A review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(4), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1860517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detjen, H., Pfleging, B., & Schneegass, S. (2020). A wizard of oz field study to understand non-driving-related activities, trust, and acceptance of automated vehicles. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 19–29). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410662
   Google Scholar
• Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017, November 13–15). CARLA: An open urban driving simulator. In S. Levine, V. Vanhoucke, & K. Goldberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning (Vol. 78, pp. 1–16). PMLR. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v78/dosovitskiy17a.html
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, F., Johansson, M., & Sochor, J. (2018). Creating appropriate trust in automated vehicle systems: A framework for HMI design. IEEE Transactions on Human–Machine Systems, 48(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2776209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (2017). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. In Situational awareness (pp. 9–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feldhütter, A., Gold, C., Hüger, A., & Bengler, K. (2016). Trust in automation as a matter of media influence and experience of automated vehicles. Human Factors, 60(1), 2024–2028. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601460
   Google Scholar
• Frison, A.-K., Wintersberger, P., Riener, A., Schartmüller, C., Boyle, L. N., Miller, E., & Weigl, K. (2019). In ux we trust: Investigation of aesthetics and usability of driver-vehicle interfaces and their impact on the perception of automated driving. In Proceedings of the 2019 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300374
   Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K. (2015). Trust in automation–before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(2015), 3025–3032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.847
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Monk, A. (2010). The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human–Computer Interaction, 25(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2010.500139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegner, S. M., Beldad, A. D., & Brunswick, G. J. (2019). In automatic we trust: Investigating the impact of trust, control, personality characteristics, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(19), 1769–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1572353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Krems, J. F., Toenert, L. (2015). Effects of take-over requests and cultural background on automation trust in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (Vol. 2015, pp. 330–336). University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., & Krems, J. F. (2016). Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human Factors, 58(3), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815625744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holländer, K., Wintersberger, P., & Butz, A. (2019). Overtrust in external cues of automated vehicles: An experimental investigation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 211–221). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344528
   Google Scholar
• Holthausen, B. E., Wintersberger, P., Walker, B. N., & Riener, A. (2020). Situational trust scale for automated driving (STS-AD): Development and initial validation. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 40–47). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410637
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-Y., & Bashir, M. (2017). Personal influences on dynamic trust formation in human-agent interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction (pp. 233–243). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125749
   Google Scholar
• Jessup, S. A., Schneider, T. R., Alarcon, G. M., Ryan, T. J., & Capiola, A. (2019). The measurement of the propensity to trust automation. In J. Y. Chen & G. Fragomeni (Eds.), Virtual, augmented and mixed reality. applications and case studies (pp. 476–489). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
   Google Scholar
• Krefting, I., Trende, A., Unni, A., Rieger, J., Luedtke, A., & Fränzle, M. (2021). Evaluation of graphical human–machine interfaces for turning manoeuvres in automated vehicles. In 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 77–80). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3473682.3480268
   Google Scholar
• Kunze, A., Summerskill, S. J., Marshall, R., & Filtness, A. J. (2018). Augmented reality displays for communicating uncertainty information in automated driving. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 164–175). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239074
   Google Scholar
• Lanzer, M., Babel, F., Yan, F., Zhang, B., You, F., Wang, J., & Baumann, M. (2020). Designing communication strategies of autonomous vehicles with pedestrians: An intercultural study. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 122–131). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410653
   Google Scholar
• Large, D. R., & Burnett, G. E. (2013). Drivers’ preferences and emotional responses to satellite navigation voices. International Journal of Vehicle Noise and Vibration, 9(1/2), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVNV.2013.053815
   Google Scholar
• Large, D. R., Burnett, G., & Clark, L. (2019). Lessons from oz: Design guidelines for automotive conversational user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (pp. 335–340). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351314
   Google Scholar
• Large, D. R., Clark, L., Burnett, G., Harrington, K., Luton, J., Thomas, P., & Bennett, P. (2019). “It’s small talk, Jim, but not as we know it.”: Engendering trust through human-agent conversation in an autonomous, self-driving car. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342789
   Google Scholar
• Large, D. R., Harrington, K., Burnett, G., Luton, J., Thomas, P., & Bennett, P. (2019). To please in a pod: Employing an anthropomorphic agent-interlocutor to enhance trust and user experience in an autonomous, self-driving vehicle. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 49–59). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344545
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. C., Jeong, S., Wang, M., Hock, P., Baumann, M., & Jeon, M. (2021). “To go or not to go? that is the question”: When in-vehicle agents argue with each other. In 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 223–224). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3473682.3481876
   Google Scholar
• Lin, R., Ma, L., & Zhang, W. (2018). An interview study exploring tesla drivers’ behavioural adaptation. Applied Ergonomics, 72(OCT), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G., Dudek, C., Sen, D., Sumegi, L., & Noonan, P. (2011). An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1959022.1959023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2020). Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. M., & Ilgen, D. R. (2008). Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 50(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morando, A., Gershon, P., Mehler, B., & Reimer, B. (2021a). A model for naturalistic glance behavior around tesla autopilot disengagements. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 161(OCT), 106348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morando, A., Gershon, P., Mehler, B., & Reimer, B. (2021b). Visual attention and steering wheel control: From engagement to disengagement of tesla autopilot. Human Factors, 65(1), 1390–1394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651118
   Google Scholar
• Nees, M. A. (2016). Acceptance of self-driving cars: An examination of idealized versus realistic portrayals with a self-driving car acceptance scale. Human Factors, 60(1), 1449–1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601332
   Google Scholar
• O’Kane, S. (2020, February 25). Tesla autopilot, distracted driving to blame in deadly 2018 crash. The Verge. Retrieved March 11, 2020, from https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/25/21153320/tesla-autopilot-walter-huang-death-ntsb-probable-cause
   Google Scholar
• Oord, A., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016). Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499.
   Google Scholar
• Reig, S., Norman, S., Morales, C. G., Das, S., Steinfeld, A., & Forlizzi, J. (2018). A field study of pedestrians and autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 198–209). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239064
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghian, S., Wintersberger, P., Laschke, M., & Hassenzahl, M. (2022). Designing sustainable mobility: Understanding users’ behavior. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 34–44). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546833
   Google Scholar
• SAE (2018). SAE j3016 taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE International.
   Google Scholar
• Schartmüller, C. (2021). Towards a mobile office: User interfaces for safety and productivity in conditionally automated vehicles/submitted by dipl.-ing.clemens schartmüller.
   Google Scholar
• Schwieren, J. (2020). Conversing with automated cars: Exploring voice assistants for trustful user interactions with fully automated vehicles [B.S. thesis]. University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Spain, R. D., Bustamante, E. A., & Bliss, J. P. (2008). Towards an empirically developed scale for system trust: Take two. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52(19), 1335–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120805201907
   Google Scholar
• Tolmeijer, S., Zierau, N., Janson, A., Wahdatehagh, J. S., Leimeister, J. M. M., & Bernstein, A. (2021). Female by default? – Exploring the effect of voice assistant gender and pitch on trait and trust attribution. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451623
   Google Scholar
• Torggler, A., Edwards, J., & Wintersberger, P. (2022). Beyond the halo: Investigation of trust and functional specificity in automated driving with conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 195–203). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546834
   Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Walle, S., & Six, F. (2014). Trust and distrust as distinct concepts: Why studying distrust in institutions is important. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schaik, P., Hassenzahl, M., & Ling, J. (2012). User-experience from an inference perspective. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 19(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2240156.2240159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, P., Cornelis, C., De Cock, M., & Pinheiro da Silva, P. (2009). Gradual trust and distrust in recommender systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(10), 1367–1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, T. W., Tivesten, E., Gustavsson, P., Johansson, J., Sangberg, F., & Ljung Aust, M. (2018). Automation expectation mismatch: Incorrect prediction despite eyes on threat and hands on wheel. Human Factors, 60(8), 1095–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818788164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, F., Wang, J., Martens, M., & Verwey, W. (2019). Gaze behaviour and electrodermal activity: Objective measures of drivers’ trust in automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64(JUL), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintersberger, P. (2020). Automated driving: Towards trustworthy and safe human-machine cooperation/submitted by dipl.-ing. philipp wintersberger (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universität Linz.
   Google Scholar
• Wintersberger, P., Dmitrenko, D., Schartmüller, C., Frison, A.-K., Maggioni, E., Obrist, M., Riener, A. (2019). S(c)entinel: Monitoring automated vehicles with olfactory reliability displays. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 538–546).
   Google Scholar
• Wintersberger, P., Frison, A.-K., Riener, A., & Sawitzky, T. v (2018). Fostering user acceptance and trust in fully automated vehicles: Evaluating the potential of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 27(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintersberger, P., Nicklas, H., Martlbauer, T., Hammer, S., & Riener, A. (2020). Explainable automation: Personalized and adaptive UIS to foster trust and understanding of driving automation systems. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 252–261). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410659
   Google Scholar
• Wintersberger, P., Schartmüller, C., Sadeghian, S., Frison, A.-K., & Riener, A. (2021). Evaluation of imminent take-over requests with real automation on a test track. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211051435
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P. N. Y., Brumby, D. P., Babu, H. V. R., & Kobayashi, K. (2019). Voices in self-driving cars should be assertive to more quickly grab a distracted driver’s attention. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 165–176). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344535
   Google Scholar