Dual-Gain Mode of Head-Gaze Interaction Improves the Efficiency of Object Positioning in a 3D Virtual Environment

References

• Barteit, S., Lanfermann, L., Bärnighausen, T., Neuhann, F., & Beiersmann, C. (2021). Augmented, mixed, and virtual reality-based head-mounted devices for medical education: Systematic review. JMIR Serious Games, 9(3), e29080. https://doi.org/10.2196/29080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, R., & Istance, H. O. (2003). Why are eye mice unpopular? A detailed comparison of head and eye controlled assistive technology pointing devices. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2(3), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0053-y
   Google Scholar
• Blattgerste, J., Renner, P., & Pfeiffer, T. (2018). Advantages of eye-gaze over head-gaze-based selection in virtual and augmented reality under varying field of views. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Communication by Gaze Interaction (Article 1, pp. 1–9). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206343.3206349
   Google Scholar
• Casallas, J. S., Oliver, J. H., Kelly, J. W., Merienne, F., & Garbaya, S. (2014). Using relative head and hand-target features to predict intention in 3D moving-target selection. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) (pp. 51–56). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2014.6802050
   Google Scholar
• Casiez, G., Vogel, D., Balakrishnan, R., & Cockburn, A. (2008). The impact of control-display gain on user performance in pointing tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 23(3), 215–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020802278163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E., Kim, H. T., & Yoo, B. (2020). Virtual reality sickness: A review of causes and measurements. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(17), 1658–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Hoffmann, E. R., & Goonetilleke, R. S. (2015). Structure of hand/mouse movements. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(6), 790–798. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2015.2430872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-J., Lin, C. J., & Lin, P.-H. (2019). Effects of control-display gain and postural control method on distal pointing performance. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 72, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. D., Bhagat, A. B., & Riggs, S. L. (2020). Extending Fitts’ law in three-dimensional virtual environments with current low-cost virtual reality technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 139, 102413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, C. L., Geng, P., Hu, Y. F., & Kuai, S. G. (2019). Beyond Fitts’s law: A three-phase model predicts movement time to position an object in an immersive 3D virtual environment. Human Factors, 61(6), 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819831517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, C. L., Tian, C. Y., & Kuai, S. G. (2022). A combination of eye-gaze and head-gaze interactions improves efficiency and user experience in an object positioning task in virtual environments. Applied Ergonomics, 103, 103785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, T., & Fleury, C. (2009). An asymmetric 2D pointer/3D ray for 3D interaction within collaborative virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 14th international Conference on 3D Web Technology (pp. 33–41). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1559764.1559769
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. G., Drew, R., & Blenkhorn, P. (2000). Controlling mouse pointer position using an infrared head-operated joystick. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering : A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 8(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/86.830955
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freedman, E. G. (2008). Coordination of the eyes and head during visual orienting. Experimental Brain Research, 190(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1504-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frees, S., & Kessler, G. D. (2005). Precise and rapid interaction through scaled manipulation in immersive virtual environments. In IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005 (pp. 99–106). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2005.1492759
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Gonzalez, V. A., & Yiu, T. W. (2019). The effectiveness of traditional tools and computer-aided technologies for health and safety training in the construction sector: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 138, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, C. (1962). Controller design: Interactions of controlling limbs, time-lags and gains in positional and velocity systems. Ergonomics, 5(2), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140136208930602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52(C), 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
   Google Scholar
• Hock, P., Benedikter, S., Gugenheimer, J., & Rukzio, E. (2017). Carvr: Enabling in-car virtual reality entertainment. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4034–4044). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025665
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., & Roscoe, R. D. (2021). Head-mounted display-based virtual reality systems in engineering education: A review of recent research. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(5), 1420–1435. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, S., Hamilton, M., Warren, R., Faucett, D., Tian, W., Wang, Y., & Ma, J. (2021). Implementing Virtual Reality technology for safety training in the precast/prestressed concrete industry. Applied Ergonomics, 90, 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Oh, S., Han, S. H., & Chung, M. K. (2019). Motion–display gain: A new control–display mapping reflecting natural human pointing gesture to enhance interaction with large displays at a distance. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(2), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1447422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama, R., Koge, M., Taguchi, S., & Kajimoto, H. (2017). COMS-VR: Mobile virtual reality entertainment system using electric car and head-mounted display. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE symposium on 3D user interfaces (3DUI) (pp. 130–133). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2017.7893329
   Google Scholar
• Kota, S., & Young, J. G. (2019). Effects of control-display mapping and spatially dependent gain on supported free-hand gesture pointing performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631518
   Google Scholar
• Krichenbauer, M., Yamamoto, G., Taketom, T., Sandor, C., & Kato, H. (2018). Augmented reality versus virtual reality for 3d object manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(2), 1038–1048. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2658570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S., Choi, E., & Chung, M. K. (2011). Effect of control-to-display gain and movement direction of information spaces on the usability of navigation on small touch-screen interfaces using tap-n-drag. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(3), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kytö, M., Ens, B., Piumsomboon, T., Lee, G. A., & Billinghurst, M. (2018). Pinpointing: Precise head-and eye-based target selection for augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 81, pp. 1–14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173655
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Nancel, M., Kim, S., & Oulasvirta, A. (2020). AutoGain: Gain function adaptation with submovement efficiency optimization. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376244
   Google Scholar
• Lemasters, L., & Flach, J. (2015). Multi-gain control: Balancing demands for speed and precision. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 771–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591239
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Cho, I., & Wartell, Z. (2015). Evaluation of 3D virtual cursor offset techniques for navigation tasks in a multi-display virtual environment. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI) (pp. 59–66). https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2015.7131727
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. J., Chen, H. J., & Choi, J. H. (2016). The postural and control-display gain effects of distal pointing on upper extremity fatigue. Ergonomics, 59(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1055824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. J., Ho, S. H., & Chen, Y. J. (2015). An investigation of pointing postures in a 3D stereoscopic environment. Applied Ergonomics, 48, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M. L., Radwin, R. G., & Vanderheiden, G. C. (1992). Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device. Ergonomics, 35(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., van Liere, R., Nieuwenhuizen, C., & Martens, J.-B. (2009). Comparing aimed movements in the real world and in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (pp. 219–222). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2009.4811026
   Google Scholar
• LoPresti, E., Brienza, D. M., Angelo, J., Gilbertson, L., & Sakai, J. (2000). Neck range of motion and use of computer head controls. In Proceedings of the fourth international ACM conference on Assistive technologies (pp. 121–128). https://doi.org/10.1145/354324.354352
   Google Scholar
• Maas, M. J., & Hughes, J. M. (2020). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2020). NASA TLX task load index. NASA. https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/tlx/
   Google Scholar
• Pang, Y. H., Hoffmann, E. R., & Goonetilleke, R. S. (2019). Effects of gain and index of difficulty on mouse movement time and Fitts’ law. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 49(6), 684–691. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2019.2931743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastel, R. (2008). The difficulty of centering circular discs. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52(19), 1312–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120805201902
   Google Scholar
• Pastel, R. (2009). Investigating the difficulty of one degree of freedom positioning: Associating movement phases with regions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 53(15), 965–969. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120905301506
   Google Scholar
• Pathmanathan, N., Becher, M., Rodrigues, N., Reina, G., Ertl, T., Weiskopf, D., & Sedlmair, M. (2020). Eye vs. head: Comparing gaze methods for interaction in augmented reality. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (Article 50, pp. 1–5). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379156.3391829
   Google Scholar
• Petford, J., Nacenta, M. A., & Gutwin, C. (2018). Pointing all around you: Selection performance of mouse and ray-cast pointing in full-coverage displays. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 533, pp. 1–14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174107
   Google Scholar
• Poupyrev, I., Billinghurst, M., Weghorst, S., & Ichikawa, T. (1996). The go-go interaction technique: Non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR. In Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 79–80). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/237091.237102
   Google Scholar
• Poupyrev, I., Weghorst, S., Billinghurst, M., & Ichikawa, T. (1997). A framework and testbed for studying manipulation techniques for immersive VR. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp. 21–28). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/261135.261141
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Y. Y., & Teather, R. J. (2017). The eyes don’t have it: An empirical comparison of head-based and eye-based selection in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (pp. 91–98). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131277.3132182
   Google Scholar
• Rey-Becerra, E., Barrero, L. H., Ellegast, R., & Kluge, A. (2021). The effectiveness of virtual safety training in work at heights: A literature review. Applied Ergonomics, 94, 103419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaab, J. A., Radwin, R. G., Vanderheiden, G. C., & Hansen, P. K. (1996). A comparison of two control-display gain measures for head-controlled computer input devices. Human Factors, 38(3), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872096778702042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutter, C., Müsseler, J., & Bardos, L. (2011). Effects of sensorimotor transformations with graphical input devices. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(3), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449291003660349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, D., Zeng, J., Liu, K., & Qu, X. (2021). Effects of control-to-display gain and operation precision requirement on touchscreen operations in vibration environments. Applied Ergonomics, 91, 103293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teather, R. J., & Stuerzlinger, W. (2007). Guidelines for 3D positioning techniques [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328214
   Google Scholar
• Triantafyllidis, E., & Li, Z. (2021). The challenges in modeling human performance in 3d space with Fitts’ law. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 56, pp. 1–9). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3443442
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, R. R. A., & Unema, P. (2005). Effects of adaptation to altered display gain on the control of single aimed movements. Motor Control, 9(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.9.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn, R. R. A., Unema, P. J. A., & Hendriks, E. J. (2005). The locus of adaptation to altered gain in aimed movements. Human Movement Science, 24(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. R., & Kirsch, R. F. (2016). Case study: Head orientation and neck electromyography for cursor control in persons with high cervical tetraplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 53(4), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S. (1899). Accuracy of voluntary movement. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements, 3(3), i–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092992
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., Mizobuchi, S., Zhou, W., Khan, T. A., Li, W., & Lank, E. (2021). Leveraging CD gain for precise barehand video timeline browsing on smart displays. In C. Ardito, R. Lanzilotti, A. Malizia, H. Petrie, A. Piccinno, G. Desolda, & K. Inkpen (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021 (pp. 72–91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85610-6_5
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., Han, M., Liang, Q., Hu, Y. F., & Kuai, S. G. (2019). A social interaction field model accurately identifies static and dynamic social groupings. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(8), 847–855. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0618-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., Miao, M.-C., Chen, X.-R., Hu, Y.-F., Chang, Q., Yan, M.-Y., & Kuai, S.-G. (2022). Human-behaviour-based social locomotion model improves the humanization of social robots. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(11), 1040–1052. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00542-z
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Fitzmaurice, G., & Anderson, F. (2022). In-depth mouse: Integrating desktop mouse into virtual reality. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 354, pp. 1–17). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501884
   Google Scholar