402
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Extending the UTAUT Model of Tencent Meeting for Online Courses by Including Community of Inquiry and Collaborative Learning Constructs

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 24 Feb 2023, Accepted 30 Jun 2023, Published online: 11 Jul 2023

References

  • Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
  • Akyol, Z., Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). The impact of course duration on the development of a community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820902809147
  • Alghazi, S. S., Kamsin, A., Almaiah, M. A., Wong, S. Y., & Shuib, L. (2021). For sustainable application of mobile learning: An extended UTAUT model to examine the effect of technical factors on the usage of mobile devices as a learning tool. Sustainability, 13(4), 1856. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041856
  • Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. (2019). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of mobile learning system in higher education. IEEE Access. 7, 174673–174686. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957206
  • Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers & Education, 121, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010
  • Alshaher, A. (2021). IT capabilities as a fundamental of electronic government system success in developing countries from users perspectives. Transforming Government, 15(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-05-2020-0080
  • Al-Shami, S. A., Aldahmani, S., Kamalrudin, M., Al-Kumaim, N. H., Al Mamun, A., Al-Shami, M., & Jaber, M. M. (2022). A model of motivational and technological factors influencing massive open online courses’ continuous intention to use. Sustainability, 14(15), 9279. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159279
  • Altalhi, M. (2021). Toward a model for acceptance of MOOCs in higher education: The modified UTAUT model for Saudi Arabia. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1589–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10317-x
  • Apoki, U. C., Hussein, A. M. A., Al-Chalabi, H. K. M., Badica, C., & Mocanu, M. L. (2022). The role of pedagogical agents in personalised adaptive learning: A review. Sustainability, 14(11), 6442. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116442
  • Aretio, L. G. (2022). Radio, television, audio and video in education. Functions and possibilities, enhanced by COVID-19. Revista Iberoamericana De Educacion a Distancia, 25(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.1.31468
  • Aristovnik, A., Kerzic, D., Ravselj, D., Tomazevic, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
  • Bamoallem, B., & Altarteer, S. (2022). Remote emergency learning during COVID-19 and its impact on university students perception of blended learning in KSA. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10660-7
  • Bazelais, P., Binner, G., & Doleck, T. (2022). Examining the key drivers of student acceptance of online labs. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2121729
  • Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: Implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9066-6
  • Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: A literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184
  • Chang, J. H., Chiu, P. S., & Lai, C. F. (2023). Implementation and evaluation of cloud-based e-learning in agricultural course. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1815217
  • Chen, J. L., & Bogachenko, T. (2022). Online community building in distance education: The case of social presence in the blackboard discussion board versus multimodal VoiceThread interaction. Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202204_25(2).0005
  • Chen, P. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2019). An empirical examination of the effect of self-regulation and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) factors on the online learning behavioural intention of college students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1575184
  • Chen, S., Shen, W. B., & Tan, X. Y. (2023). Entrepreneurial education model based on interactive technology and cognitive psychology. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2189816
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Decman, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 49(C), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.022
  • Deng, Q. (2022). A research on online education behavior and strategy in university. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 767925. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.767925
  • Dewey, J. (1942). Inquiry and indeterminateness of situations. The Journal of Philosophy, 39(11), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/2018037
  • Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
  • Dindar, M., Suorsa, A., Hermes, J., Karppinen, P., & Naykki, P. (2021). Comparing technology acceptance of K-12 teachers with and without prior experience of learning management systems: A Covid-19 pandemic study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1553–1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12552
  • Dost, S., Hossain, A., Shehab, M., Abdelwahed, A., & Al-Nusair, L. (2020). Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open, 10(11), e042378. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378
  • Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
  • El-Sayad, G., Saad, N. H. M., & Thurasamy, R. (2021). How higher education students in Egypt perceived online learning engagement and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(4), 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00191-y
  • Fatani, T. H. (2020). Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 396. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02310-2
  • Feng, X. Y., Xie, J. J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Using the community of inquiry framework to scaffold online tutoring. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2362
  • Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
  • Fianu, E., Blewett, C., & Ampong, G. O. (2020). Toward the development of a model of student usage of MOOCs. Education and Training, 62(5), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2019-0262
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  • Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 17(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.005
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
  • Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
  • Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. Mis Quarterly, 35(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044042
  • Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172650
  • Gikandi, J. W. (2021). Enhancing E-learning through integration of online formative assessment and teaching presence. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 11(2), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2021040104
  • Guo, C., Shea, P., & Chen, X. D. (2022). Investigation on graduate students’ social presence and social knowledge construction in two online discussion settings. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2751–2769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10716-8
  • Haghighi, H., Jafarigohar, M., Khoshsima, H., & Vahdany, F. (2019). Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners’ appropriate use of refusal: Achievement, participation, perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1504083
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23033534 https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
  • Huang, P., & Lucas, H. C. (2021). Early exploration of MOOCs in the U.S. higher education: An absorptive capacity perspective. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 12(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3456295
  • Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernandez-Garcia, A., Chaparro-Pelaez, J., & Prieto, J. L. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119(3), 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713
  • Jain, V., & Jain, P. (2022). From Industry 4.0 to Education 4.0: Acceptance and use of videoconferencing applications in higher education of Oman. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(3), 1079–1098. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-10-2020-0378
  • Jan, S. K., & Vlachopoulos, P. (2019). Social network analysis: A framework for identifying communities in higher education online learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(4), 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9375-y
  • Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.005
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580
  • Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
  • Kusal, S., Patil, S., Kotecha, K., Aluvalu, R., & Varadarajan, V. (2021). AI based emotion detection for textual big data: Techniques and contribution. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5030043
  • Lee, J., Soleimani, F., Irish, I., Hosmer, J., Soylu, M. Y., Finkelberg, R., & Chatterjee, S. (2022). Predicting cognitive presence in at-scale online learning: MOOC and for-credit online course environments. Online Learning, 26(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.3060
  • Li, B., Sun, J. M., & Oubibi, M. (2022). The acceptance behavior of blended learning in secondary vocational school students: Based on the modified UTAUT model. Sustainability, 14(23), 15897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315897
  • Lin, X., Wu, R. Z., Lim, Y. T., Han, J. P., & Chen, S. C. (2019). Understanding the sustainable usage intention of mobile payment technology in Korea: Cross-countries comparison of Chinese and Korean users. Sustainability, 11(19), 5532. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195532
  • Lipman, M., Sharp, A., & Oscanyan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the classroom (2nd ed.). Temple University Press.
  • Lu, H. P., & Dzikria, I. (2023). The role of intellectual capital and social capital on the intention to use MOOC. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1796543
  • McDonald, A., McGowan, H., Dollinger, M., Naylor, R., & Khosravi, H. (2021). Repositioning students as co-creators of curriculum for online learning resources. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6735
  • Momani, A. M. (2020). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A new approach in technology acceptance. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 12(3), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.2020070105
  • Mujalli, A., Khan, T., & Almgrashi, A. (2022). University accounting students and faculty members using the blackboard platform during COVID-19: Proposed modification of the UTAUT model and an empirical study. Sustainability, 14(4), 2360. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042360
  • Munir, F., Anwar, A., & Kee, D. M. H. (2021). Online learning and students’ fear of COVID-19: Study in Malaysia and Pakistan. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i4.5637
  • Nacheva, R., & Jansone, A. (2021). Multi-layered higher education E-learning framework. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 9(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2021.9.3.08
  • Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ acceptance and readiness for E-learning in Northeastern Thailand. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0034-x
  • Ononiwu, C. (2021). Role of online discussion forums in enhancing users’ cognitive skills. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 9(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2103307O
  • Park, C., & Kim, D. G. (2020). Perception of instructor presence and its effects on learning experience in online classes. Journal of Information Technology Education, 19, 475–488. https://doi.org/10.28945/4611
  • Parkes, R. S. V., & Barrs, V. R. D. (2021). Interaction identified as both a challenge and a benefit in a rapid switch to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 48(6), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2020-0063
  • Patrascoiu, L. A., Folostina, R., Patzelt, D., Blaj, M. P., & Poptean, B. (2022). E-tools for personalizing learning during the pandemic: Case study of an innovative solution for remote teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 751316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.751316
  • Persada, S. F., Miraja, B. A., & Nadlifatin, R. (2019). Understanding the generation Z behavior on D-learning: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(05), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.9993
  • Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421
  • Rehn, N., Maor, D., & McConney, A. (2018). The specific skills required of teachers who deliver K-12 distance education courses by synchronous videoconference: Implications for training and professional development. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 27(4), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1483265
  • Roig-Vila, R., Urrea-Solano, M., & Merma-Molina, G. (2020). Communication at university classrooms in the context of COVID-19 by means of videoconferencing with Google Meet. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27510
  • Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Lins, R. D., & GǎSević, D. (2019). A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.05.001
  • Sarfraz, M., Khawaja, K. F., & Ivascu, L. (2022). Factors affecting business school students’ performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A moderated and mediated model. International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100630
  • Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
  • Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
  • Shea, P., Hayes, S., Smith, S. U., Vickers, J., Bidjerano, T., Pickett, A., Gozza-Cohen, M., Wilde, J., & Jian, S. B. (2012). Learning presence: Additional research on a new conceptual element within the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.002
  • So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
  • Sobaih, A. E., Hasanein, A. M., & Abu Elnasr, A. E. (2020). Responses to COVID-19 in higher education: Social media usage for sustaining formal academic communication in developing countries. Sustainability, 12(16), 6520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166520
  • Sumak, B., & Sorgo, A. (2016). The acceptance and use of interactive whiteboards among teachers: Differences in UTAUT determinants between pre- and post-adopters. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(2), 602–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037
  • Tao, Y. H., Cheng, C. J., & Sun, S. Y. (2009). What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience. Computers & Education, 53(3), 929–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.009
  • Teo, T., Huang, F., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2018). Explicating the influences that explain intention to use technology among English teachers in China. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1341940
  • Thongsri, N., Shen, L., & Bao, Y. (2019). Investigating factors affecting learner’s perception toward online learning: Evidence from ClassStart application in Thailand. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(12), 1243–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1581259
  • Tlili, A., Zhang, J., Papamitsiou, Z., Manske, S., Huang, R., Hoppe, H. U., Kinshuk, (2021). Towards utilising emerging technologies to address the challenges of using open educational resources: A vision of the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09993-4
  • Tseng, T. H., Lin, S. J., Wang, Y. S., & Liu, H. X. (2022). Investigating teachers’ adoption of MOOCs: The perspective of UTAUT2. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674888
  • Turk, M., Heddy, B. C., & Danielson, R. W. (2022). Teaching and social presences supporting basic needs satisfaction in online learning environments: How can presences and basic needs happily meet online? Computers & Education, 180(3–4), 104432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104432
  • vanOostveen, R., Desjardins, F., & Bullock, S. (2019). Professional development learning environments (PDLEs) embedded in a collaborative online learning environment (COLE): Moving towards a new conception of online professional learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1863–1900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9686-6
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Wan, L. Y., Xie, S. M., & Shu, A. (2020). Toward an understanding of university students’ continued intention to use MOOCs: When UTAUT model meets TTF model. SAGE Open, 10(3), 215824402094185. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941858
  • Wijaya, T. T., Cao, Y. M., Bernard, M., Rahmadi, I. F., Lavicza, Z., & Surjono, H. D. (2022). Factors influencing microgame adoption among secondary school mathematics teachers supported by structural equation modelling-based research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 952549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952549
  • Wu, W. C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL Learners’ oral proficiency. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142–157. http://www.jstor.org/stable/90002170
  • Yang, H. H., Feng, L., & MacLeod, J. (2019). Understanding college students’ acceptance of cloud classrooms in flipped instruction: Integrating UTAUT and connected classroom climate. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), 1258–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746084
  • Yang, C., Guo, R., & Cui, Y. (2023). What affects vocational teachers’ acceptance and use of ICT in Teaching? A large-scale survey of higher vocational college teachers in China. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010077
  • Yu, Z. G. (2020). Extending the learning technology acceptance model of WeChat by adding new psychological constructs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6), 1121–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120923772
  • Yu, Z. G., & Li, M. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of Community of Inquiry in online learning contexts over twenty-five years. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11669–11688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11081-w
  • Yunus, M. M., Ang, W. S., & Hashim, H. (2021). Factors affecting teaching English as a second language (TESL) postgraduate students’ behavioural intention for online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(6), 3524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063524
  • Yu, Z. G., Xu, W., & Sukjairungwattana, P. (2022). A meta-analysis of eight factors influencing MOOC-based learning outcomes across the world. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2096641
  • Yu, Z. G., Xu, W., & Yu, L. H. (2022). Constructing an online sustainable educational model in COVID-19 pandemic environments. Sustainability, 14(6), 3598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063598
  • Yu, Z. G., Yu, L. H., Xu, Q. Y., Xu, W., & Wu, P. (2022). Effects of mobile learning technologies and social media tools on student engagement and learning outcomes of English learning. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 31(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2045215
  • Zhan, Z. H., He, G. Q., Li, T. T., He, L. Y., & Xiang, S. Y. (2022). Effect of groups size on students’ learning achievement, motivation, cognitive load, collaborative problem-solving quality, and in-class interaction in an introductory AI course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1807–1818. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12722
  • Zhang, K. X., & Yu, Z. (2022). Extending the UTAUT model of gamified English vocabulary applications by adding new personality constructs. Sustainability, 14(10), 6259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106259
  • Zhang, R. N., Bi, N. C., & Mercado, T. (2023). Do zoom meetings really help? A comparative analysis of synchronous and asynchronous online learning during Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(1), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12740
  • Zheng, L. Q., Zhong, L., Niu, J. Y., Long, M. L., & Zhao, J. Y. (2021). Effects of personalized intervention on collaborative knowledge building, group performance, socially shared metacognitive regulation, and cognitive load in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 174–193. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032864
  • Zhou, T., Lu, Y. B., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.013
  • Zhu, Y., Zhang, J. H., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2020). University students’ online learning attitudes and continuous intention to undertake online courses: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1485–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09753-w

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.