Design and Implementation Requirements for Increased Acceptance of Occupational Exoskeletons in an Industrial Context: A Qualitative Study

References

• Baltrusch, S. J., Houdijk, H., van Dieën, J. H., & Kruif, J. T. C. M. d (2021). Passive trunk exoskeleton acceptability and effects on self-efficacy in employees with low-back pain: A mixed method approach. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 31(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09891-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltrusch, S. J., Houdijk, H., van Dieën, J. H., van Bennekom, C. A. M., & de Kruif, A. J. T. C. M. (2020). Perspectives of end users on the potential use of trunk exoskeletons for people with low-back pain: A focus group study. Human Factors, 62(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819885788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bär, M., Steinhilber, B., Rieger, M. A., & Luger, T. (2021). The influence of using exoskeletons during occupational tasks on acute physical stress and strain compared to no exoskeleton – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Applied Ergonomics, 94(C), 103385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103385
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, J. S., Monfared, S., Stefanidis, D., Nussbaum, M. A., & Yu, D. (2020). Supporting surgical teams: identifying needs and barriers for exoskeleton implementation in the operating room. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 62(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819879271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, B., & Knight, H. (2020). The robot makers. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 9(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bock, S., Ghillebert, J., Govaerts, R., Tassignon, B., Rodriguez-Guerrero, C., Crea, S., Veneman, J., Geeroms, J., Meeusen, R., & De Pauw, K. (2022). Benchmarking occupational exoskeletons: An evidence mapping systematic review. Applied Ergonomics, 98(3), 103582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Kok, J., Vroonhof, P., Snijders, J., Roullis, G., Clarke, M., Peereboom, K., Dorst, P. V., & Isusi, I. (2019). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Prevalence, costs and demographics in the EU. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
   Google Scholar
• Elprama, S. A., Vanderborght, B., & Jacobs, A. (2022). An industrial exoskeleton user acceptance framework based on a literature review of empirical studies. Applied Ergonomics, 100(1), 103615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103615
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elprama, S. A., Vannieuwenhuyze, J. T. A., De Bock, S., Vanderborght, B., De Pauw, K., Meeusen, R., & Jacobs, A. (2020). Social processes: What determines industrial workers’ intention to use exoskeletons? Human Factors, 62(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819889534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, G., Gaspar, J., Fujão, C., & Nunes, I. L. (2020). Piloting the use of an upper limb passive exoskeleton in automotive industry: Assessing user acceptance and intention of use. Advances in human factors and systems interaction (pp. 342–349). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51369-6_46
   Google Scholar
• Gilotta, S., Spada, S., Ghibaudo, L., Isoardi, M., & Mosso, C. O. (2019). Acceptability Beyond Usability: A Manufacturing Case Study. In Y. Bagnara, S and Tartaglia, R and Albolino, S and Alexander, and T. Fujita (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Congress of The International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Vol Vii: Ergonomics in Design, Design for All, Activity Theories for Work Analysis and Design, Affective Design (Vol. 824, pp. 922–934). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_95
   Google Scholar
• Govaerts, R., Tassignon, B., Ghillebert, J., Serrien, B., De Bock, S., Ampe, T., El Makrini, I., Vanderborght, B., Meeusen, R., & De Pauw, K. (2021). Prevalence and incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in secondary industries of 21st century Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22(1), 751. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04615-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groos, S., Fuchs, M., & Kluth, K. (2020). Determination of the Subjective Strain Experiences During Assembly Activities Using the Exoskeleton Chairless Chair. In J. Chen (Ed.), Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems (pp. 72–82). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Halim, I., Saptari, A., Abdullah, Z., Perumal, P. A., Abidin, M. Z. Z., Muhammad, M. N., & Abdullah, S. (2022). Critical Factors Influencing User Experience on Passive Exoskeleton Application: A Review. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 14(4), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2022.14.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel, R., & Keil, M. (2019). Subjective Evaluation of a Passive Industrial Exoskeleton for Lower-back Support: A Field Study in the Automotive Sector. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 7(3–4), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2019.1573770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysamen, K., de Looze, M., Bosch, T., Ortiz, J., Toxiri, S., & O'Sullivan, L. W. (2018). Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamics lifting and lowering manual handling tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 68(2017), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs, A., Elprama, S. A., & Jewell, C. I. C. (2020). Evaluating human-robot interaction with ethnography. In C. Jost, B. Le Pévédic, T. Belpaeme, C. Bethel, D. Chrysostomou, N. Crook, M. Grandgeorge, & N. Mirnig (Eds.), Human-robot interaction: Evaluation methods and their standardization (pp. 269–286). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42307-0_11
   Google Scholar
• Kerangueven, L., Atain-Kouadio, J.-J., Turpin-Legendre, E. (2020). Acquisition and integration of exoskeletons in establishments. Guide for safety professionals. http://www.inrs.fr
   Google Scholar
• Kermavnar, T., de Vries, A. W., de Looze, M. P., & O'Sullivan, L. W. (2021). Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: An updated systematic review. Ergonomics, 64(6), 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1870162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Moore, A., Srinivasan, D., Akanmu, A., Barr, A., Harris-Adamson, C., Rempel, D. M., & Nussbaum, M. A. (2019). Potential of exoskeleton technologies to enhance safety, health, and performance in construction: Industry perspectives and future research directions. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 7(3–4), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2018.1561557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Nussbaum, M. A. (2019). A follow-up study of the effects of an arm support exoskeleton on physical demands and task performance during simulated overhead work. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 7(3–4), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2018.1551255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, H. K., Lee, S. W., Koo, D. H., Lee, I., & Hyun, D. J. (2018). Waist-assistive exoskeleton powered by a singular actuation mechanism for prevention of back-injury. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 107(C), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2018.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Kuber, P. M., & Rashedi, E. (2021). Product ergonomics in industrial exoskeletons: Potential enhancements for workforce efficiency and safety. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 22(6), 729–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1850905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marino, M. (2019). Impacts of using passive back assist and shoulder assist exoskeletons in a wholesale and retail trade sector environment. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 7(3–4), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2019.1645057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurice, P., Allienne, L., Malaisé, A., Ivaldi, S., Maurice, P., Allienne, L., Malaisé, A., Ethical, S. I., Considerations, S., Maurice, P., Allienne, L., Malais, A., & Ivaldi, S. (2018). Ethical and social considerations for the introduction of human-centered technologies at work [Paper presentation]. 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO) (pp. 131–138). https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625830
   Google Scholar
• Maurice, P., Camernik, J., Gorjan, D., Schirrmeister, B., Bornmann, J., Tagliapietra, L., Latella, C., Pucci, D., Fritzsche, L., Ivaldi, S., & Babic, J. (2020). Objective and subjective effects of a passive exoskeleton on overhead work. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28(1), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2019.2945368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyon, A., Petiot, J., Poirson, E. (2020). Investigating the effects of passive exoskeletons and familiarization protocols on arms-elevated tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2019 Annual Conference (pp. 187–203).
   Google Scholar
• Näf, M. B., Koopman, A. S., Baltrusch, S., Rodriguez-Guerrero, C., Vanderborght, B., & Lefeber, D. (2018). Passive back support exoskeleton improves range of motion using flexible beams. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5 (2018, June), 72. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omoniyi, A., Trask, C., Milosavljevic, S., & Thamsuwan, O. (2020). Farmers’ perceptions of exoskeleton use on farms: Finding the right tool for the work(er). International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 80(8), 103036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103036
   Google Scholar
• Salvador, T., Bell, G., & Anderson, K. (1999). Design ethnography. Design Management Journal, Fall, 10(4), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474282901.0019
   Google Scholar
• Schwerha, D. J., McNamara, N., Nussbaum, M. A., & Kim, S. (2021). Adoption potential of occupational exoskeletons in diverse enterprises engaged in manufacturing tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 82(5), 103103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103103
   Google Scholar
• Schwerha, D., McNamara, N., Kim, S., & Nussbaum, M. A. (2022). Exploratory field testing of passive exoskeletons in several manufacturing environments: Perceived usability and user acceptance. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 10(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2022.2059594
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shore, L., Power, V., Hartigan, B., Schülein, S., Graf, E., de Eyto, A., & O’Sullivan, L. (2020). Exoscore: A design tool to evaluate factors associated with technology acceptance of soft lower limb exosuits by older adults. Human Factors, 62(3), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819868122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedl, S. M., & Mara, M. (2022). What drives acceptance of occupational exoskeletons? Focus group insights from workers in food retail and corporate logistics. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2108969
   Google Scholar
• Smets, M. (2019). A field evaluation of arm-support exoskeletons for overhead work applications in automotive assembly. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 7(3–4), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2018.1563010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søraa, R. A., & Fosch-Villaronga, E. (2020). Exoskeletons for all: The interplay between exoskeletons, inclusion, gender, and intersectionality. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 11(1), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2020-0036
   Google Scholar
• Spada, S., Ghibaudo, L., Gilotta, S., Gastaldi, L., & Cavatorta, M. P. (2017). Investigation into the applicability of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton in automotive industry. Procedia Manufacturing, 11(C), 1255–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.252
   Google Scholar
• Upasani, S., Franco, R., Niewolny, K., & Srinivasan, D. (2019). The potential for exoskeletons to improve health and safety in agriculture—perspectives from service providers. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 7(3–4), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2019.1575930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, T. K. M., Man, S. S., & Chan, A. H. S. (2020). Critical factors for the use or non-use of personal protective equipment amongst construction workers. Safety Science, 126(5–6), 104663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104663
   Google Scholar
• Yandell, M. B., Wolfe, A. E., Marino, M. C., Harris, M. P., & Zelik, K. E. (2022). Effect of a back-assist exosuit on logistics worker perceptions, acceptance, and muscle activity. In J. C. Moreno, J. Masood, U. Schneider, C. Maufroy, & J. L. Pons (Eds.), Wearable Robotics: Challenges and Trends: Vol 27. Biosystems & Biorobotics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69547-7_2
   Google Scholar