Mental Workload and Human-Robot Interaction in Collaborative Tasks: A Scoping Review

References

• Abeliansky, A., & Beulmann, M. (2019). Are they coming for us? Industrial robots and the mental health of workers (cege Discussion Papers, No. 379). University of Göttingen, Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research (cege).
   Google Scholar
• Alsuraykh, N. H., Wilson, M. L., Tennent, P., & Sharples, S. (2019). How stress and mental workload are connected [Paper presentation].Proceedings of the 13th EAI international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare, 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1145/3329189.3329235
   Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø., Andresen, A., & Bråten, I. (2019). Cognitive load and working memory in multimedia learning: Conceptual and measurement issues. Educational Psychologist, 54(2), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1554484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai, T., Kato, R., & Fujita, M. (2010). Assessment of operator stress induced by robot collaboration in assembly. CIRP Annals, 59(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Arntz, A., Eimler, S. C., & Hoppe, H. U. (2020). Augmenting the human-robot communication channel in shared task environments (vol. 12324). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58157-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Baltrusch, S., Krause, F., de Vries, A., Dijk, W., & Looze, M. P. (2022). What about the human in human robot collaboration? A literature review on HRC’s effects on aspects of job quality. Ergonomics, 65(5), 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1984585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, A., Kresge, L., & Suleiman, R. (2023). The data-driven workplace and the case for worker technology rights. ILR Review, 76(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939221131558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, A., Kresge, L., Suleiman, R. (2021). Data and algorithms at work: The case for worker. UC Berkeley Labor Center. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2186631/data-and-algorithms-at-work/2942608/
   Google Scholar
• Bettoni, A., Montini, E., Righi, M., Villani, V., Tsvetanov, R., Borgia, S., Secchi, C., & Carpanzano, E. (2020). Mutualistic and adaptive human-machine collaboration based on machine learning in an injection moulding manufacturing line. Procedia CIRP, 93, 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.119
   Google Scholar
• Brolin, A., Thorvald, P., & Case, K. (2017). Experimental study of cognitive aspects affecting human performance in manual assembly. Production & Manufacturing Research, 5(1), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1374893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun, L., & Wioland, L. (2021). Prevention of occupational risks related to the human-robot collaboration (vol. 1253). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55307-4_67
   Google Scholar
• Butmee, T., Lansdown, T., & Walker, G. (2019). Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task: A review literature. Transport Ergonomics and Human Factors (TEHF), Aerospace Human Factors and Ergonomics, VI, 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_31
   Google Scholar
• Cain, B. (2007). A Review of the Mental Workload Literature. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA474193
   Google Scholar
• Carayon, P., Smith, M. J., & Haims, M. C. (1999). Work organization, job stress, and work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Human Factors, 41(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779656743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, J. M., Galy, E., & Thérouanne, P. (2021). Étude de la charge mentale et du stress généré par l’usage du numérique dans le milieu professionnel. Comité D’organisation Des Doctoriales Comité De Lecture, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Chacón, A., Ponsa, P., & Angulo, C. (2021). Cognitive interaction analysis in human–robot collaboration using an assembly task. Electronics, 10(11), 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10111317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, S. F., & Greca, A. M. L. (2013). Perceived stress scale (PSS). In Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine (pp. 1454–1455). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_773
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. Y. C., Barnes, M. J., Selkowitz, A. R., & Stowers, K. (2016). Effects of agent transparency on human-autonomy teaming effectiveness [Paper presentation].2016 IEEE international conference ON systems, Man, AND Cybernetics (Smc), 1838–1843. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2016.7844505
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (1994). Perceived stress scale.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., Kessler, R. C., & Gordon, L. U. (1997). Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corujeira, J., Silva, J. L., & Ventura, R. (2017). Effects of haptic feedback in dual-task teleoperation of a mobile robot. In R. Bernhaupt, G. Dalvi, A. Joshi, D. K. Balkrishan, J. O’Neill, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (pp. 267–286). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67687-6_18
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. The experience of play in work and games. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-12701-000
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. The psychology of optimal experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. HarperCollins. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-Fromm/frontdoor/index/index/docId/27641
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08434-000
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-bass.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darvishmotevali, M., & Ali, F. (2020). Job insecurity, subjective well-being and job performance: The moderating role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rivecourt, M., Kuperus, M. N., Post, W. J., & Mulder, L. J. M. (2008). Cardiovascular and eye activity measures as indices for momentary changes in mental effort during simulated flight. Ergonomics, 51(9), 1295–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802120267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Simone, Valentina, V. D., Di Pasquale, V. D., Giubileo, V., & Miranda, S. (2022). Human-robot collaboration: An analysis of worker’s performance. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 1540–1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.355
   Google Scholar
• Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: social empowerment through personal growth. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Delliaux, S., Delaforge, A., Deharo, J.-C., & Chaumet, G. (2019). Mental workload alters heart rate variability, lowering non-linear dynamics. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 565. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E. (2006). Job characteristics, flow, and performance: The moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.3.266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., Hewett, R., Haun, V., De Gieter, S., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A., & Skakon, J. (2020). From job crafting to home crafting: A daily diary study among six European countries. Human Relations, 73(7), 1010–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719848809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzi, R., Huang, S., Scurati, G. W., Lyu, S., Ferrise, F., Gallace, A., Gaggioli, A., Chirico, A., Carulli, M., & Bordegoni, M. (2020). Using virtual reality to test human-robot interaction during a collaborative task [Paper presentation]. Proceedings OF THE asme international design engineering technical conferences AND computers AND information IN engineering conference, 2019, Vol 1, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2019-97415
   Google Scholar
• European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA). (2013). European opinion poll on occupational safety and health (p. 83). Publications Office of the European Union. https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/safety-health-in-figures/eu-poll-press-kit-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EU-OSHA. (2015). Second European survey of enterprises on new and emerging risks (ESENER-2). Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg. https://op.europa.eu/s/xmNU
   Google Scholar
• Faccio, M., Granata, I., Menini, A., Milanese, M., Rossato, C., Bottin, M., Minto, R., Pluchino, P., Gamberini, L., Boschetti, G., & Rosati, G. (2023). Human factors in cobot era: A review of modern production systems features. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 34(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01953-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahi, M., Motamedzade, M., Heidarimoghadam, R., Soltanian, A. R., & Miyake, S. (2016). Effects of mental workload on physiological and subjective responses during traffic density monitoring: A field study. Applied Ergonomics, 52, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S. R., & Webb, P. (2017). Industrial robot ethics: The challenges of closer human collaboration in future manufacturing systems. In Intelligent systems, control and automation (vol. 84, pp. 159–169). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_12
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, É., Kilgus, D., Landry, A., Hmedan, B., Pellier, D., Fiorino, H., & Jeoffrion, C. (2022). The impacts of human-cobot collaboration on perceived cognitive load and usability during an industrial task: An exploratory experiment. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 10(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2022.2072021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujita, M., Kato, R., & Tamio, A. (2010). Assessment of operators’ mental strain induced by hand-over motion of industrial robot manipulator [Paper presentation]. Proceedings - IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598689
   Google Scholar
• Fullagar, C., & Delle Fave, A. (Eds.). (2017). Flow at Work: Measurement and Implications (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315871585
   Google Scholar
• Gaab, J. (2009). PASA – Primary appraisal secondary appraisal—Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung von situations-bezogenen kognitiven Bewertungen. Verhaltenstherapie, 19(2), 114–115. https://doi.org/10.1159/000223610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaillard, A. W. (1993). Comparing the concepts of mental load and stress. Ergonomics, 36(9), 991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaillard, A. W. K. (2001). Stress, workload, and fatigue as three biobehavioral states: A general overview. In Stress, workload, and fatigue (pp. 623–639). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gaillard, A. W. K., & Wientjes, C. J. E. (1994). Mental load and work stress as two types of energy mobilization. Work & Stress, 8(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379408259986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervasi, R., Digiaro, F. N., Mastrogiacomo, L., Maisano, D. A., & Franceschini, F. (2020). Comparing quality profiles in human-robot collaboration: Empirical evidence in the automotive sector (pp. 79–104). Universidade do Minho. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85093842708&partnerID=40&md5=74b8bba40739bf784c45ab644c1e8704
   Google Scholar
• Gervasi, R., Mastrogiacomo, L., & Franceschini, F. (2020). A conceptual framework to evaluate human-robot collaboration. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 108(3), 841–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05363-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjoreski, M., Luštrek, M., Gams, M., & Gjoreski, H. (2017). Monitoring stress with a wrist device using context. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 73, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Muñoz, E. L., & Gutiérrez-Martínez, R. E. (2007). Contribution of mental workload to job stress in industrial workers. Work (Reading, Mass), 28(4), 355–361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammerling, J. H. (2022). Technological change in five industries: Threats to jobs, wages, and working conditions.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52(2), 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
   Google Scholar
• Helton, W. S. (2004). Validation of a short stress state questionnaire. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48(11), 1238–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120404801107
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo-Muñoz, A. R., Mouratille, D., Matton, N., Causse, M., Rouillard, Y., & El-Yagoubi, R. (2018). Cardiovascular correlates of emotional state, cognitive workload and time-on-task effect during a realistic flight simulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology : official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 128, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjortskov, N., Rissén, D., Blangsted, A. K., Fallentin, N., Lundberg, U., & Søgaard, K. (2004). The effect of mental stress on heart rate variability and blood pressure during computer work. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 92(1-2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1055-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, A. (2010). Developing neurophysiological metrics for the assessment of mental workload and the functional state of the brain. Aalto-yliopiston teknillinen korkeakoulu. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi:443/handle/123456789/4769
   Google Scholar
• Holm, A., Lukander, K., Korpela, J., Sallinen, M., & Müller, K. M. I. (2009). Estimating brain load from the EEG. TheScientificWorldJournal, 9, 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2009.83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopko, S. K., Khurana, R., Mehta, R. K., & Pagilla, P. R. (2021). Effect of cognitive fatigue, operator sex, and robot assistance on task performance metrics, workload, and situation awareness in human-robot collaboration. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(2), 3049–3056. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3062787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopko, S., Wang, J., & Mehta, R. (2022). Human factors considerations and metrics in shared space human-robot collaboration: A systematic review. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 799522. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.799522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, X., Liu, Y., Sourina, O., Tan, Y. R. E., Wang, L., & Mueller-Wittig, W. (2015). EEG based stress monitoring [Paper presentation]. 2015 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, 3110–3115. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2015.540
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO/TS 15066:2016—Robots and robotic devices—Collaborative robots. ISO. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:ts:15066:ed-1:v1:en
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2017). 10075-1: Ergonomic principles related to mental workload–Part 1: General issues and concepts, terms and definitions. CEN.
   Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, Y., Navarro, B., Iwata, H., & Ganesh, G. (2022). Embodiment modifies attention allotment for the benefit of dual task performance. Communications Biology, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03603-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. V., Hettinger, L. J., Huang, Y.-H., Jeffries, S., Lesch, M. F., Simmons, L. A., Verma, S. K., & Willetts, J. L. (2019). Employee acceptance of wearable technology in the workplace. Applied Ergonomics, 78, 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantowitz, B. H. (1987). 3. Mental workload. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Advances in psychology (vol. 47, pp. 81–121). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62307-9
   Google Scholar
• Kato, R., Fujita, M., & Arai, T. (2010). Development of advanced cellular manufacturing system with human-robot collaboration-assessment of mental strain on human operators induced by the assembly support [Paper presentation]. Proceedings - IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2010.5598700
   Google Scholar
• Kolbeinsson, A., Thorvald, P., & Lindblom, J. (2017). Coordinating the interruption of assembly workers in manufacturing. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenborg, M., Nickel, P., Naber, B., Lungfiel, A., & Huelke, M. (2017). Effects of movement speed and predictability in human–robot collaboration. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 27(4), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körner, U., Müller‐Thur, K., Lunau, T., Dragano, N., Angerer, P., & Buchner, A. (2019). Perceived stress in human–machine interaction in modern manufacturing environments—Results of a qualitative interview study. Stress and Health, 35(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, M., Lorenzini, M., Balatti, P., Momi, E. D., & Ajoudani, A. (2022). Pick the right co-worker: Online assessment of cognitive ergonomics in human-robot collaborative assembly. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2022.3182811
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Li, R., Xie, X., & Chang, Y. (2022). Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight. Brain and Behavior, 12(4), e2489. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzenberger, G. (2019). IFR publishes collaborative industrial robot definition and estimates supply. International Federation of Robotics [Online].
   Google Scholar
• Llorens, S., Salanova, M., & Rodriguez, A. M. (2013). How is flow experienced and by whom? Testing flow among occupations. Stress and Health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 29(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, L. (2015). A defeasible reasoning framework for human mental workload representation and assessment. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(8), 758–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1015166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, L., Wickens, C. D., Hancock, G., & Hancock, P. A. (2022). Human Mental Workload: A Survey and a Novel Inclusive Definition. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 883321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzini, M., Lagomarsino, M., Fortini, L., Gholami, S., & Ajoudani, A. (2023). Ergonomic human-robot collaboration in industry: A review. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 262.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, L., Xie, Z., Wang, H., Li, L., & Xu, X. (2022). Mental stress and safety awareness during human-robot collaboration—Review. Applied Ergonomics, 105, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, W. (2003). The impact of job demands and workload on stress and fatigue. Australian Psychologist, 38(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060310001707107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D. (2002). Emotional intelligence: Science and myth. MIT Press. https://books.google.it/books?hl=it&lr=&id=Fy9gXBgREtQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Emotional+Intelligence+Science+and+Myth&ots=lskQqRlGMC&sig=8sB8tgBWz5-beywGlGmgWM2pmCA#v=onepage&q=EmotionalIntelligence Science and Myth&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Maurtua, I., Fernandez, I., Kildal, J., Susperregi, L., Tellaeche, A., & Ibarguren, A. (2016). Enhancing safe human-robot collaboration through natural multimodal communication [Paper presentation]. IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation, ETFA, 2016-Novem. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2016.7733573
   Google Scholar
• McAleenan, P., McAleenan, C., Ayers, G., Behm, M., & Beachem, Z. (2019). The ethics deficit in occupational safety and health monitoring technologies. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, 172(3), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.18.00027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, A., Trübswetter, A., Conti-Kufner, A. S., & Schmidtler, J. (2020). Friend or foe understanding assembly workers’ acceptance of human-robot collaboration. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3399433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messeri, C., Masotti, G., Zanchettin, A. M., & Rocco, P. (2021). Human-robot collaboration: optimizing stress and productivity based on game theory. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(4), 8061–8068. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2021.3102309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messeri, C., Zanchettin, A. M., Rocco, P., Gianotti, E., Chirico, A., Magoni, S., & Gaggioli, A. (2023). On the effects of leader-follower roles in dyadic human-robot synchronisation. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 15(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2020.2991864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelis, J. E., Siebert-Evenstone, A., Shaffer, D. W., & Mutlu, B. (2020). Collaborative or simply uncaged? Understanding human-cobot interactions in automation [Paper presentation]. Conference on human factors in computing systems - proceedings, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376547
   Google Scholar
• Midha, S., Wilson, M. L., & Sharples, S. (2022). Lived experiences of mental workload in everyday life [Paper presentation]. CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517690
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2001). Workload measures. National advanced driving simulator. http://www.nads-sc.uiowa.edu/publicationstorage/200501251347060.n01-006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minowa, H. (2000). The workload of computer system engineers and mental health. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi = Journal of Occupational Health, 42(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.kj00002552186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mital, A., & Pennathur, A. (2004). Advanced technologies and humans in manufacturing workplaces: An interdependent relationship. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 33(4), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2003.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J., Vanneste, P., Larmuseau, C., Van Acker, B., Raes, A., Bombeke, K., Cornillie, F., Saldien, J., & De Marez, L. (2019). Identifying predictive EEG features for cognitive overload detection in assembly workers in Industry 4.0. Human mental workload: Models and applications: Third international symposium, H-WORKLOAD 2019., November 14–15, 2019, Proceedings. 3rd international symposium on human mental workload: models and applications (H-WORKLOAD). http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8629814
   Google Scholar
• Müller, S. L., Stiehm, S., Jeschke, S., & Richert, A. (2017). Subjective stress in hybrid collaboration. In Kheddar, A., Yoshida, E., Ge, SS., Suzuki, K., Cabibihan, J. J., Eyssel, F., and He, H. (Ed.), Social robotics, ICSR 2017. (vol. 10652, pp. 597–606). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_59
   Google Scholar
• Nenna, F., Orso, V., Zanardi, D., & Gamberini, L. (2023). The virtualization of human–robot interactions: A user-centric workload assessment. Virtual Reality, 27(2), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00667-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicora, M. L., André, E., Berkmans, D., Carissoli, C., D’Orazio, T., Delle Fave, A., … Malosio, M. (2021). A human-driven control architecture for promoting good mental health in collaborative robot scenarios [Paper presentation]. 2021 30th IEEE international conference on robot & human interactive communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 285–291). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515315
   Google Scholar
• Niculescu, A. I., Cao, Y., Nijholt, A. (2009). Stress and cognitive load in multimodal conversational interactions. HCI international. 13th international conference on human-computer interaction, 891–895. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/stress-and-cognitive-load-in-multimodal-conversational-interactio
   Google Scholar
• Panchetti, T., Pietrantoni, L., Puzzo, G., Gualtieri, L., & Fraboni, F. (2023). Assessing the relationship between cognitive workload, workstation design, user acceptance and trust in collaborative robots. Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1720. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031720
   Google Scholar
• Pande, D. T. (1992). Stress and mental workload: A study in an industrial organisation (IIMA working paper No. WP1992-05-01_01099). Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad. Research and Publication Department. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/iimiimawp/wp01099.htm
   Google Scholar
• Parent-Thirion, A., Fernández-Macías, E., Hurley, J., & Vermeylen, G. (2007). Fourth European working conditions survey.
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier, D. D., Van Acker, B. B., Detand, J., & Saldien, J. (2020). Design for assembly meaning: A framework for designers to design products that support operator cognition during the assembly process. Cognition, Technology & Work, 22(3), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00588-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, M. C. W., & Plomp, J. (2022). For better or for worse: The impact of workplace automation on work characteristics and employee well-being. In Digital transformation [working title]. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102980
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, A., Paliga, M., Pulopulos, M. M., Kozusznik, B., & Kozusznik, M. W. (2020). Stress in manual and autonomous modes of collaboration with a cobot. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Publications Office of the European Union. (2013). European agency for safety and health at work – EU-OSHA. European Opinion Poll on Occupational Safety and Health (p. 83). Publications Office of the European Union. https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/safety-health-in-figures/eu-poll-press-kit-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rabby, K. M., Khan, M., Karimoddini, A., & Jiang, S. X. (2019). An effective model for human cognitive performance within a human-robot collaboration framework [Paper presentation]. Conference proceedings - IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, 2019-Octob, 3872–3877. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2019.8914536
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, S., & Wang, Y. (2015). Dynamic affection-based motion control of a humanoid robot to collaborate with human in flexible assembly in manufacturing [Paper presentation].ASME 2015 dynamic systems and control conference, DSCC 2015, 3 (October 2015). https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2015-9841
   Google Scholar
• Rajavenkatanarayanan, A., Nambiappan, H. R., Kyrarini, M., & Makedon, F. (2020). Towards a real-time cognitive load assessment system for industrial human-robot cooperation [Paper presentation]. 2020 29th IEEE international conference ON robot AND human interactive communication (Ro-Man), 698–705. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223531
   Google Scholar
• Rial-Gonzalez, E., Cockburn, W., & Irastorza, X. (2010). European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER): How is occupational safety and health managed in European workplaces? PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e572992012-015
   Google Scholar
• Robelski, S., & Wischniewski, S. (2016). Scoping review on human-machine interaction and health and safety at work. In Lecture Notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) (vol. 9752, pp. 337–347). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_32
   Google Scholar
• Robelski, S., & Wischniewski, S. (2018). Human-machine interaction and health at work: A scoping review. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 5(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHFE.2018.092226
   Google Scholar
• Roncone, A., Mangin, O., & Scassellati, B. (2017). Transparent role assignment and task allocation in human robot collaboration [Paper presentation]. Proceedings - IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 1014–1021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989122
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5
   Google Scholar
• Sato, Y., Miyake, H., & Thériault, G. (2009). Overtime work and stress response in a group of Japanese workers. Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England), 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqn141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauppé, A., Mutlu, B., Sauppe, A., & Mutlu, B. (2015). The social impact of a robot co-worker in industrial settings [Paper presentation]. Chi 2015: Proceedings OF THE 33rd annual chi conference ON human factors IN computing systems, 2015, 3613–3622. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702181
   Google Scholar
• Schmidtler, J., Knott, V., Hölzel, C., & Bengler, K. (2015). Human centered assistance applications for the working environment of the future. Occupational Ergonomics, 12(3), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-150226
   Google Scholar
• Segura Parra, P., Lobato Calleros, O., & Ramirez-Serrano, A. (2020). Human-robot collaboration systems: Components and applications [Paper presentation]. The 7th international conference of control, dynamic systems, and robotics. https://doi.org/10.11159/cdsr20.150
   Google Scholar
• Shao, S., Wang, T., Wang, Y., Su, Y., Song, C., & Yao, C. (2020). Research of HRV as a measure of mental workload in human and dual-arm robot interaction. Electronics, 9(12), 2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9122174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smids, J., Nyholm, S., & Berkers, H. (2020). Robots in the workplace: A threat to—Or opportunity for—Meaningful work? Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00377-4
   Google Scholar
• Storm, F. A., Chiappini, M., Dei, C., Piazza, C., André, E., Reißner, N., Brdar, I., Delle Fave, A., Gebhard, P., Malosio, M., Peña Fernández, A., Štefok, S., & Reni, G. (2022). Physical and mental well-being of cobot workers: A scoping review using the software-hardware-environment-liveware-liveware-organization model. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 32(5), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalma, J. L., & Taylor, G. S. (2011). Individual differences in response to automation: The five factor model of personality. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 17(2), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J. T. C., Duan, F., Zhang, Y., Watanabe, K., Kato, R., & Arai, T. (2009). Human-robot collaboration in cellular manufacturing: Design and development [Paper presentation]. 2009 IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS 2009, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5354155
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, L. C., Chiu, D., Minielly, N., Hrincu, V., Talhouk, A., & Illes, J. (2022). Wearable biosensors in the workplace: Perceptions and perspectives. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 800367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.800367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-Y., Marshall, J. D., Choudhury, A., Serban, A., Tsung-Yu Hou, Y., Jung, M. F., Dionne, S. D., & Yammarino, F. J. (2022). Human-robot collaboration: A multilevel and integrated leadership framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(1), 101594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustunel, Z., & Gunduz, T. (2017). Human-robot collaboration on an assembly work with extended cognition approach. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, 11(5), JAMDSM0057. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2017jamdsm0057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Acker, B. B., Parmentier, D. D., Vlerick, P., & Saldien, J. (2018). Understanding mental workload: From a clarifying concept analysis toward an implementable framework. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0481-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. (2021). Getting collaborative robots to work: A study of ethics emerging during the implementation of cobots. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 12(1), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2021-0019
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. V., Seira, A., & Wang, L. (2018). Classification, personalised safety framework and strategy for human-robot collaboration [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of international conference on computers and industrial engineering, CIE, 2018-Decem. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061345176&partnerID=40&md5=d35c4fc39b3988eabc4a833f26f2c19c
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Yang, L., & Ding, J. (2005). Application of heart rate variability in evaluation of mental workload. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi = Zhonghua Laodong Weisheng Zhiyebing Zazhi = Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases, 23(3), 182–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warm, S. J., Matthews, G., & Finomore, V. (2008). Vigilance, workload, and stress (pp. 115–141). Performance Under Stress.
   Google Scholar
• Welfare, K. S., Hallowell, M. R., Shah, J. A., & Riek, L. D. (2019). Consider the human work experience when integrating robotics in the workplace [Paper presentation]. ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 2019 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673139
   Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D., Gordon, S. E., & Liu, Y. (1998). An introduction to human factors engineering. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wierwille, W. W., Rahimi, M., & Casali, J. G. (1985). Evaluation of 16 measures of mental workload using a simulated flight task emphasizing mediational activity. Human Factors, 27(5), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088502700501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnen, L., Bremner, P., Lemaignan, S., & Giuliani, M. (2020). Performing human-robot interaction user studies in virtual reality [Paper presentation]. 2020 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), 794–794. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223521
   Google Scholar
• Wijnen, L., Lemaignan, S., & Bremner, P. (2020). Towards using virtual reality for replicating HRI studies [Paper presentation]. Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, 514–516. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378374
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. R., & Sharples, S. (2015). Evaluation of Human Work. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wixted, F., & O’Sullivan, L. (2014). The effect of automated manufacturing environments on employee health. Proceedings of the Irish Ergonomics Society Annual Conference, 1, 80–91. Retrieved from https://ihfes.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/IESConferenceReview2014Volume1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D. D. (1996). Decomposing automation: Apparent simplicity, real complexity. In Automation and Human Performance. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wullenkord, R., & Eyssel, F. (2020). Societal and ethical issues in HRI. Current Robotics Reports, 1(3), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00010-9
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2015). State of science: Mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics, 58(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.956151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanchettin, A. M., Croft, E., Ding, H., & Li, M. (2018). Collaborative robots in the workplace. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 25(2), 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2018.2822083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F., Henrichs, C., & Mutlu, B. (2020, August). Task interdependence in human-robot teaming. In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 1143–1149). IEEE.
   Google Scholar