Exploring Robot Personality through Big Data Mining: A Century-Long Analysis from Google Books

References

• Aleksander, I. (2017). Partners of humans: A realistic assessment of the role of robots in the foreseeable future. Journal of Information Technology, 32(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0032-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aly, A., & Tapus, A. (2013). A model for synthesizing a combined verbal and nonverbal behavior based on personality traits in human–robot interaction [Paper presentation]. 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), Tokyo, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2013.6483606
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.245
   Google Scholar
• Ball, G., & Breese, J. (2000). Emotion and personality in a conversational agent. In J. Cassell, J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, & E. Churchill (Eds.), Embodied conversational agents (pp. 189–219). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge (no. 10). Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Billard, A., & Kragic, D. (2019). Trends and challenges in robot manipulation. Science (New York, N.Y.), 364(6446), eaat8414. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochkarev, V., Solovyev, V., & Wichmann, S. (2014). Universals versus historical contingencies in lexical evolution. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 11(101), 20140841. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher, J., & Osgood, C. E. (1969). The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80002-2
   Google Scholar
• Braun, M., Hummel, P., Beck, S., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(12), e3. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, E. (2017). Interactions with robots: The truths we reveal about ourselves. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-043958
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 42(1), 459–491. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, K., Fan, A., Her, E., Liu, Y., Almanza, B., & Leitch, S. (2021). Robot vs human: Expectations, performances and gaps in off-premise restaurant service modes. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(11), 3996–4016. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2020-0721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čapek, K. (1920). Rossumovi univerzálni roboti [Rossum’s universal robots]. Aventinum.
   Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivational structure and measurement. World Book.
   Google Scholar
• Celiktutan, O., & Gunes, H. (2015). Computational analysis of human–robot interactions through first-person vision: Personality and interaction experience [Paper presentation]. 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Kobe, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333602
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborti, T., Kambhampati, S., Scheutz, M., & Zhang, Y. (2017). AI challenges in human–robot cognitive teaming. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.04775.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, R. C.-S., Lu, H.-P., & Yang, P. (2018). Stereotypes or golden rules? Exploring likable voice traits of social robots as active aging companions for tech-savvy baby boomers in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, G. T., & Kozlowski, S. W. (1986). Employee perceptions on the implementation of robotic manufacturing technology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., & Rader, E. (2020). The role of conversational grounding in supporting symbiosis between people and digital assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392838
   Google Scholar
• Chuah, S. H. W., & Yu, J. (2021). The future of service: The power of emotion in human–robot interaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, W. S., & Loader, C. (1996). Smoothing by local regression: Principles and methods. In D. Härdle & M. G. Schimek (Eds.), Statistical Theory and Computational Aspects of Smoothing: Proceedings of the COMPSTAT’94 Satellite Meeting (pp. 10–49). Physica-Verlag HD.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, M., Pop, C., Simut, R., Peca, A., Pintea, S., David, D., & Vanderborght, B. (2016). A survey of expectations about the role of robots in robot-assisted therapy for children with ASD: Ethical acceptability, trust, sociability, appearance, and attachment. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9649-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craenen, B. G., Deshmukh, A. A., Foster, M. E., & Vinciarelli, A. (2018). Shaping gestures to shape personality: Big-Five traits, godspeed scores and the similarity-attraction effect. In M. Dastani, G. Sukthankar, E. André, & S. Koenig (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (pp. 2221–2223). AAMAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cully, A., Clune, J., Tarapore, D., & Mouret, J. B. (2015). Robots that can adapt like animals. Nature, 521(7553), 503–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Raad, B., & Mlačić, B. (2017). The lexical foundation of the Big-Five factor model. In T. A. Widiger (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 191–216). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the five-factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, P. S., Clark, E. M., Desu, S., Frank, M. R., Reagan, A. J., Williams, J. R., Mitchell, L., Harris, K. D., Kloumann, I. M., Bagrow, J. P., Megerdoomian, K., McMahon, M. T., Tivnan, B. F., & Danforth, C. M. (2015). Human language reveals a universal positivity bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(8), 2389–2394. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411678112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, A. (2019). The culture of AI: Everyday life and the digital revolution. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, D. W. (1994). Two cheers for the Big Five!. Psychological Inquiry, 5(2), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0502_5
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1996). The Big Five versus the Big Four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, J., & Kiesler, S. (2002). Cooperation with a robotic assistant [Paper presentation]. CHI'02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, MN. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506492
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. The American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano, W. G., & Tobin, R. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46–61). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gremsl, T., & Hödl, E. (2022). Emotional AI: Legal and ethical challenges 1. Information Polity, 27(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-211529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedaoo, S., Williams, A., Wadgaonkar, C., & Knight, H. (2019). A robot barista comments on its clients: Social attitudes toward robot data use [Paper presentation]. 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, South Korea. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673021
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, B., Meerbeek, B., Boess, S., Pauws, S., & Sonneveld, M. (2011). Robot vacuum cleaner personality and behavior. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0084-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henschel, A., Hortensius, R., & Cross, E. S. (2020). Social cognition in the age of human–robot interaction. Trends in Neurosciences, 43(6), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuser, R., & Le-Khac, L. (2011). Learning to read data: Bringing out the humanistic in the digital humanities. Victorian Studies, 54(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.2979/victorianstudies.54.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiah, L., Beursgens, L., Haex, R., Romero, L. P., Teh, Y. F., ten Bhömer, M., Van Berkel, R., & Barakova, E. I. (2013). Abstract robots with an attitude: Applying interpersonal relation models to human–robot interaction [Paper presentation]. 2013 IEEE RO-Man, Gyeongju, South Korea. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2013.6628528
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wigg (Ed.), The Five-Factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, Y. H., Young, K. Y., & Ko, C. H. (2015). Effective maneuver for passive robot walking helper based on user intention. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(10), 6404–6416. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2416679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Io, H. N., & Lee, C. B. (2020). Social media comments about hotel robots. Journal of China Tourism Research, 16(4), 606–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2020.1769785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joosse, M., Lohse, M., Perez, J. G., & Evers, V. (2013). What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality [Paper presentation]. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630863
   Google Scholar
• Kalan, S., Chauhan, S., Coelho, R. F., Orvieto, M. A., Camacho, I. R., Palmer, K. J., & Patel, V. R. (2010). History of robotic surgery. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 4(3), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0202-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanda, T., & Ishiguro, H. (2013). Human–robot interaction in social robotics. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2008). Robots at home: Understanding long-term human–robot interaction [Paper presentation]. 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nice, France. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2008.4651113
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Kwak, S. S., & Kim, M. (2008). Personality design of sociable robots by control of gesture design factors [Paper presentation]. RO-MAN 2008 – The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Munich, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600715
   Google Scholar
• Kishi, T., Kojima, T., Endo, N., Destephe, M., Otani, T., Jamone, L., Kryczka, P., Trovato, G., Hashimoto, K., Cosentino, S., & Takanishi, A. (2013). Impression survey of the emotion expression humanoid robot with mental model based dynamic emotions [Paper presentation]. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630793
   Google Scholar
• Kyrarini, M., Haseeb, M. A., Ristić-Durrant, D., & Gräser, A. (2019). Robot learning of industrial assembly task via human demonstrations. Autonomous Robots, 43(1), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018-9725-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leising, D., Scharloth, J., Lohse, O., & Wood, D. (2014). What types of terms do people use when describing an individual’s personality? Psychological Science, 25(9), 1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614541285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., & Paiva, A. (2013). The influence of empathy in human–robot relations. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 71(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., Michel, J. B., Lieberman, E. A., Orwant, J., Brockman, W., & Petrov, S. (2012). Syntactic annotations for the Google Books N-gram corpus. In M. Zhang (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations (pp. 169–174). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Ljungblad, S., Kotrbova, J., Jacobsson, M., Cramer, H., & Niechwiadowicz, K. (2012). Hospital robot at work: Something alien or an intelligent colleague? [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145233
   Google Scholar
• Lo Piano, S. (2020). Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: Cases from the field and possible ways forward. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0501-9
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C., & Tamó-Larrieux, A. (2020). The robot privacy paradox: Understanding how privacy concerns shape intentions to use social robots. Human-Machine Communication, 1, 87–111. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.6
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X. (2018). Towards human-engaged AI [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Early Career, Stockholm, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/809
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2003). Personality traits. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. The American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2007). From here to human-level AI. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Pickett, J. P., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, J., Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Aiden, E. L. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science (New York, N.Y.), 331(6014), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montiel, A., Lazkoz, R., Sendra, I., Escamilla-Rivera, C., & Salzano, V. (2014). Nonparametric reconstruction of the cosmic expansion with local regression smoothing and simulation extrapolation. Physical Review D, 89(4), 043007. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.043007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, R. (2014). From gorgeous to grumpy: Adjectives, age and gender. Gender and Language, 8(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v8i1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morante, S., Victores, J. G., & Balaguer, C. (2015). Cryptobotics: Why robots need cyber safety. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2, 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2015.00023
   Google Scholar
• Motschenbacher, H., & Roivainen, E. (2020). Personality traits, adjectives and gender: Integrating corpus linguistic and psychological approaches. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 4(1), 16–50. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.40370
   Google Scholar
• Mou, Y., Shi, C., Shen, T., & Xu, K. (2020). A systematic review of the personality of robot: Mapping its conceptualization, operationalization, contextualization and effects. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1663008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T. (2019). Citizen attitudes about job replacement by robotic automation. Futures, 109, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Paetzel-Prüsmann, M., Perugia, G., & Castellano, G. (2021). The influence of robot personality on the development of uncanny feelings. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, D., Vanijja, V., Thapliyal, H., & Zhang, X. (2023). What affects the usage of artificial conversational agents? An agent personality and love theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 145, 107788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paschkewitz, J., & Patt, D. (2020). Can AI make your job more interesting? Issues in Science and Technology, 37(1), 74–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26949200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, H. A., & Gashler, M. S. (2017). Deep learning in robotics: A review of recent research. Advanced Robotics, 31(16), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2017.1365009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podoletz, L. (2023). We have to talk about emotional AI and crime. AI & Society, 38(3), 1067–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01435-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L. (2018). Personality in the human robot interaction literature: A review and brief critique. In Proceedings of the 24th Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 16–18). Association for Information Systems (AIS) Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, L. P., Jr., Alahmad, R., Esterwood, C., Kim, S., You, S., & Zhang, Q. (2020). A review of personality in human–robot interactions. Foundations and Trends in Information Systems, 4(2), 107–212. https://doi.org/10.1561/2900000018
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G., & Meints, J. (2009). Conscientiousness. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 369–381). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roivainen, E. (2013). Frequency of the use of English personality adjectives: Implications for personality theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(4), 417–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roivainen, E. (2015a). The Big Five factor marker adjectives are not especially popular words. Are they superior descriptors? Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49(4), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9311-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roivainen, E. (2015b). Personality adjectives in twitter tweets and in the Google Books corpus. An analysis of the facet structure of the openness factor of personality. Current Psychology, 34(4), 621–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9274-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roivainen, E. (2020). Generational changes in personality: The evidence from corpus linguistics. Psychological Reports, 123(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118805937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey, K. L., & Fisher, P. (2001). Investigations of temperament at three to seven years: The children’s behavior questionnaire. Child Development, 72(5), 1394–1408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., Berman, L., & Royzman, E. (2010). Biases in use of positive and negative words across twenty natural languages. Cognition & Emotion, 24(3), 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902793462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salam, H., Celiktutan, O., Hupont, I., Gunes, H., & Chetouani, M. (2017). Fully automatic analysis of engagement and its relationship to personality in human–robot interactions. IEEE Access, 5, 705–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118805937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. (1996). Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199603)10:1 < 61::AID-PER246 > 3.0.CO;2-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, B., Piantadosi, S. T., & Mahowald, K. (2021). Uncontrolled corpus composition drives an apparent surge in cognitive distortions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(45), e2115010118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115010118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller, D., & Schuller, B. W. (2018). The age of artificial emotional intelligence. Computer Magazine, 51(9), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3620963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2016). Theories of personality. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Sirkin, D., Mok, B., Yang, S., & Ju, W. (2015). Mechanical ottoman: How robotic furniture offers and withdraws support. In J. A. Adams, & W. Smart (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (pp. 11–18). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Solovyev, V. D., Bochkarev, V. V., & Akhtyamova, S. S. (2020). Google Books Ngram: Problems of representativeness and data reliability. In A. Elizarov, B. Novikov, & S. Stupnikov (Eds.), Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains (DAMDID/RCDL 2019). Communications in computer and information (pp. 147–162). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51913-1_10
   Google Scholar
• Stone, W. L. (2018). The history of robotics. In T.R. Kurfess (Ed.), Robotics and automation handbook (pp. 8–19). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strait, M. K., Aguillon, C., Contreras, V., & Garcia, N. (2017). The public’s perception of humanlike robots: Online social commentary reflects an appearance-based uncanny valley, a general fear of a “Technology Takeover”, and the unabashed sexualization of female-gendered robots [Paper presentation]. 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Lisbon, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172490
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Jung, E. H., Waddell, T. F., & Kim, K. J. (2017). Cheery companions or serious assistants? Role and demeanor congruity as predictors of robot attraction and use intentions among senior citizens. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 97, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapus, A., Ţăpuş, C., & Matarić, M. J. (2008). User—Robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intelligent Service Robotics, 1(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-008-0017-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014). When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human–robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenner, E. (2015). The design of everyday things by Donald Norman. Technology and Culture, 56(3), 785–787. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2015.0104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00973.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcke, P., Clifford, D., & Dessers, V. K. (2021). Constitutional challenges in the emotional AI era. In H. M. Micklitz, O. Pollicino, A. Reichman, An. Simoncini, G. Sartor, & G. D. Gregorio (Eds.), Constitutional challenges in the algorithmic society (pp. 57–77). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914857.005
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P. (2019). On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2019-0002
   Google Scholar
• Waterloo, S. F., Baumgartner, S. E., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2018). Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1813–1831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817707349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, A., Van Dijk, B., & Evers, V. (2012). Knowing me knowing you: Exploring effects of culture and context on perception of robot personality [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intercultural Collaboration, Bengaluru, India. https://doi.org/10.1145/2160881.2160903
   Google Scholar
• Weistroffer, V., Paljic, A., Fuchs, P., Hugues, O., Chodacki, J.-P., Ligot, P., & Morais, A. (2014). Assessing the acceptability of human–robot co-presence on assembly lines: A comparison between actual situations and their virtual reality counterparts. In 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 377–384). IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, X., Xu, L., Ye, S., Sun, Z., Huang, P., & Qian, X. (2023). Personality differences between children and adults over the past two centuries: Evidence from corpus linguistics. Journal of Research in Personality, 102, 104336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A. (2009). Neuroticism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 129–146). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2009). Extraversion. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 27–45). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., Xu, M., Jiang, Z., Wen, X., Liu, Y., Sun, Z., Li, H., & Qian, X. (2023). How have music emotions been described in Google Books? Historical trends and corpus differences. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01853-1
   Google Scholar
• Yamashita, Y., Ishihara, H., Ikeda, T., & Asada, M. (2019). Investigation of causal relationship between touch sensations of robots and personality impressions by path analysis. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(1), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0483-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Chae, Y.-J., Kim, D., Lim, Y., Kim, D. H., Kim, C., Park, S.-K., & Nam, C. (2022). Effects of social behaviors of robots in privacy-sensitive situations. International Journal of Social Robotics, 14(2), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00809-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, S., Cai, S., Chen, C., Wan, Q., & Qian, X. (2018). How have males and females been described over the past two centuries? An analysis of Big-Five personality-related adjectives in the Google English Books. Journal of Research in Personality, 76, 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar