Ethical Challenges for Human–Agent Interaction in Virtual Collaboration at Work

References

• AI HLEG. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Futurium. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation.1.html
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., Santos, C., & Farias, J. S. (2020). Artificial intelligence regulation: A meta-framework for formulation and governance. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 5257–5266). Scholarspace. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.647
   Google Scholar
• Aymerich-Franch, L., & Ferrer, I. (2022). Investigating the use of speech-based conversational agents for life coaching. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 159(March), 102745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102745
   Google Scholar
• Benke, I., Knierim, M. T., & Maedche, A. (2020). Chatbot-based emotion management for distributed teams: A participatory design study. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415189
   Google Scholar
• Brachten, F., Brünker, F., Frick, N. R. J., Ross, B., & Stieglitz, S. (2020). On the ability of virtual agents to decrease cognitive load: An experimental study. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 18(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-020-00471-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, W. F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.4468068
   Google Scholar
• Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., Sarker, S., & Fuller, M. (2009). A deontological approach to designing ethical collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(3), 138–169. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastin, J. (2022). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Ethics of data and analytics. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK08G
   Google Scholar
• de Melo, C. M., & Terada, K. (2019). Cooperation with autonomous machines through culture and emotion. PLOS One, 14(11), e0224758. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreede, G.-J., & Briggs, R. O. (2005). Collaboration engineering: Designing repeatable processes for high-value collaborative tasks. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 17c). Scholarspace. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.144
   Google Scholar
• Elshan, E., & Ebel, P. (2020). Let’s team up: Designing conversational agents as teammates. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2020. AISel.
   Google Scholar
• European’s Commission: High Level Expert Group (HLEG). (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick, N. R. J., Brünker, F., Ross, B., & Stieglitz, S. (2019). Towards successful collaboration: Design guidelines for AI-based services enriching information systems in organisations. In Proceedings of the 30th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, arXiv:1912.01077. arXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Fylan, F. (2005). Semi-structured interviewing. In J. Miles & P. Gilbert (Eds.), A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 65–78). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., Maedche, A. (2018, December). Towards designing cooperative and social conversational agents for customer service. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems 2017. AISel.
   Google Scholar
• Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2002). A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11(3–4), 411–446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021271517844
   Google Scholar
• Hafez, K. (2002). Journalism ethics revisited: A comparison of ethics codes in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and Muslim Asia. Political Communication, 19(2), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600252907461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, P., Sinha, K., Angelard-Gontier, N., Ke, N. R., Fried, G., Lowe, R., & Pineau, J. (2018). Ethical challenges in data-driven dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 123–129). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278777
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickx, I., van Waterschoot, J., Khan, A., ten Bosch, L., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2021, April 13–17). Take back control: User privacy and transparency concerns in personalized conversational agents. Joint Proceedings of the ACM IUI 2021 Workshops, College Station, Texas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hofeditz, L., Clausen, S., Rieß, A., Mirbabaie, M., & Stieglitz, S. (2022). Applying XAI to an AI-based system for candidate management to mitigate bias and discrimination in hiring. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2207–2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00600-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofeditz, L., Mirbabaie, M., Luther, A., Mauth, R., & Rentemeister, I. (2022). Ethics guidelines for using AI-based algorithms in recruiting: Learnings from a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Scholarspace. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.018
   Google Scholar
• Hofeditz, L., Mirbabaie, M., Stieglitz, S., & Holstein, J. (2021). Do you trust an AI-journalist? A credibility analysis of news content with AI-authorship. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). AISel.
   Google Scholar
• Hofeditz, L., Nissen, A., Schütte, R., & Mirbabaie, M. (2022). Trust me, I’m an influencer! A comparison of perceived trust in human and virtual. In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (pp. 1–11). AISel.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, L., & Wigand, R. T. (2003). Understanding virtual collaboration through structuration. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 475–484).
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, L., & Wigand, R. T. (2006). ICT enabled virtual collaboration through trust. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), JCMC1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00233.x
   Google Scholar
• Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, R. (2014). Qualitative experteninterviews. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2020). Rulers of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 63(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffeld, S., Handke, L., & Straube, J. (2016). Verteilt und doch verbunden: Virtuelle Teamarbeit. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 47(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-016-0308-8
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, A. (2021). Virtual assistants and ethical implications. IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, M., Schwabe, G., & Briggs, R. O. (2015). CSCW and social computing. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(3), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0376-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2000). Benefits for virtual organizations from distributed groups. Communications of the ACM, 43(11), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/353360.353372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivunen, S., Ala-Luopa, S., Olsson, T., & Haapakorpi, A. (2022). The march of chatbots into recruitment: Recruiters’ experiences, expectations, and design opportunities. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 31(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09429-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2007). Management virtueller Teams. Von der Telearbeit zum virtuellen Unternehmen. Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Kristof, A. L., Brown, K. G., Sims, H. P., & Smith, K. A. (1995). The virtual team: A case study and inductive model. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Knowledge work in teams (pp. 229–253).
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembcke, T.-B., Diederich, S., & Brendel, A. B. (2020). Supporting design thinking through creative and inclusive education facilitation: The case of anthropomorphic conversational agents for persona building. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth European Conference on Information Systems. AISel.
   Google Scholar
• Lengen, J. C., Kordsmeyer, A.-C., Rohwer, E., Harth, V., & Mache, S. (2021). Soziale Isolation im Homeoffice im Kontext der COVID-19-Pandemie. Zentralblatt fur Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie, 71(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40664-020-00410-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindner, D. (2020). Chancen und Risiken durch virtuelle Teams. In Virtuelle teams und homeoffice (pp. 9–12). Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Luengo-Oroz, M. (2019). Solidarity should be a core ethical principle of AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 494. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0115-3
   Google Scholar
• Maedche, A., Legner, C., Benlian, A., Berger, B., Gimpel, H., Hess, T., Hinz, O., Morana, S., & Söllner, M. (2019). AI-based digital assistants. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(4), 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00600-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maedche, A., Morana, S., Schacht, S., Werth, D., & Krumeich, J. (2016). Advanced user assistance systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(5), 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0444-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateescu, A., & Nguyen, A. (2019). Algorithmic management in the workplace (pp. 1–15). Data & Society Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (12. Auflag). Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer von Wolff, R., Hobert, S., & Schumann, M. (2019). How may i help you? – State of the art and open research questions for chatbots at the digital workplace. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 95–104). Scholarspace. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.013
   Google Scholar
• Mirbabaie, M., Brendel, A. B., & Hofeditz, L. (2022). Ethics and AI in information systems research. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 50(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirbabaie, M., Stieglitz, S., Brünker, F., Hofeditz, L., Ross, B., & Frick, N. R. J. (2021). Understanding collaboration with virtual assistants – The role of social identity and the extended self. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00672-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6), 1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mysirlaki, S., & Paraskeva, F. (2020). Emotional intelligence and transformational leadership in virtual teams: Lessons from MMOGs. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2019-0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederfranke, A., & Drewes, M. (2017). Neue Formen der Erwerbstätigkeit in einer globalisierten Welt: Risiko der Aushöhlung von Mindeststandards für Arbeit und soziale Sicherung? Sozialer Fortschritt, 66(12), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.66.12.919
   Google Scholar
• Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. SSRN Electronic Journal, (1745302). Available at SSRN 4375283. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4375283
   Google Scholar
• Orta-Castañon, P., Urbina-Coronado, P., Ahuett-Garza, H., Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2018). Social collaboration software for virtual teams: Case studies. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 12(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-017-0372-5
   Google Scholar
• Ozmen Garibay, O., Winslow, B., Andolina, S., Antona, M., Bodenschatz, A., Coursaris, C., Falco, G., Fiore, S. M., Garibay, I., Grieman, K., Havens, J. C., Jirotka, M., Kacorri, H., Karwowski, W., Kider, J., Konstan, J., Koon, S., Lopez-Gonzalez, M., Maifeld-Carucci, I., … Xu, W. (2023). Six human-centered artificial intelligence grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3), 391–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320
   Google Scholar
• Paraman, P., & Anamalah, S. (2023). Ethical artificial intelligence framework for a good AI society: Principles, opportunities and perils. AI & Society, 38(2), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01458-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyöriä, P. (2009). Virtual collaboration in knowledge work: From vision to reality. Team Performance Management, 15(7/8), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590911002140
   Google Scholar
• Rädiker, S., & Kuckartz, U. (2019). Analyse qualitativer Daten mit MAXQDA. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, C. E., & Choi, J. (2020). Effects of personalization and social role in voice shopping: An experimental study on product recommendation by a conversational voice agent. Computers in Human Behavior, 109(2019), 106359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106359
   Google Scholar
• Rheu, M., Shin, J. Y., Peng, W., & Huh-Yoo, J. (2021). Systematic review: Trust-building factors and implications for conversational agent design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1807710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D., Vythilingam, R., & Formosa, P. (2023). A principlist-based study of the ethical design and acceptability of artificial social agents. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 172(2023), 102980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röbken, H., & Wetzel, K. (2017). Qualitative und quantitative Forschungsmethoden. Carl von Ossietzky Universität.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Cantelar, M., Estecha-Garitagoitia, M., D’Haro, L., Matía, F., & Córdoba, R. (2023). Automatic detection of inconsistencies and hierarchical topic classification for open-domain chatbots. Applied Sciences, 13(16), 9055. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.1588.v1
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberger, L., Fabian, B., & Arunov, E. (2019). Relevance of ethical guidelines for artificial intelligence – A survey and evaluation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2019 (pp. 1–11). AISel.
   Google Scholar
• Ruane, E., Birhane, A., & Ventresque, A. (2019). Conversational AI: Social and ethical considerations (pp. 104–115). AICS.
   Google Scholar
• Saat, R. M., & Salleh, N. M. (2010). Issues related to research ethics in e-research collaboration (pp. 249–261). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12257-6_15
   Google Scholar
• Sağlam, R. B., & Nurse, J. R. C. (2020). Is your chatbot GDPR compliant? In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (pp. 1–3). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406131
   Google Scholar
• Sands, S., Ferraro, C., Campbell, C., & Tsao, H. Y. (2021). Managing the human–chatbot divide: How service scripts influence service experience. Journal of Service Management, 32(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-06-2019-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaran, S., Zhang, C., Funk, M., Aarts, H., & Markopoulos, P. (2020). Do I have a say? In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (pp. 1–3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406135
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, J. F., Eaton, A. A., & Aguilar, S. (2020). From self(ie)-objectification to self-empowerment: The meaning of selfies on social media in eating disorder recovery. Computers in Human Behavior, 111(May), 106420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106420
   Google Scholar
• Schuetzler, R. M., Giboney, J. S., Grimes, G. M., & Rosser, H. K. (2021). Deciding whether and how to deploy chatbots. MIS Quarterly Executive, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, T., Zinnikus, I., Krieger, H., Christian, B., Pirkl, G., Folz, J., Kiefer, B., Hevesi, P., & Christoph, L. (2016). Hybrid teams: Flexible collaboration between humans, robots and virtual agents. In M. Klusch, R. Unland, O. Shehory, A. Pokahr, & S. Ahrndt (Eds.), German Conference on Multiagent System Technologies (pp. 131–146). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Seeber, I., Bittner, E., Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, T., de Vreede, G. J., Elkins, A., Maier, R., Merz, A. B., Oeste-Reiß, S., Randrup, N., Schwabe, G., & Söllner, M. (2020). Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration. Information & Management, 57(2), 103174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seerat, B., Samad, M., & Abbas, M. (2013). Software project management in virtual teams. In Proceedings of the Science and Information Conference (pp. 139–143). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, H., Warwick, K., Vallverdú, J., & Wu, D. (2016). Can machines talk? Comparison of Eliza with modern dialogue systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 58(May), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahriari, K., & Shahriari, M. (2017). IEEE standard review – Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems. In IHTC 2017 – IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference 2017 (pp. 197–201). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IHTC.2017.8058187
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D., Kim, S., Shang, R., Lee, J., & Hsieh, G. (2023). IntroBot: Exploring the use of chatbot-assisted familiarization in online collaborative groups. In A. Schmidt, K. Väänänen, T. Goyal, P. O. Kristensson, A. Peters, S. Mueller, J. R. Williamson, & M. L. Wilson (Eds.), CHI ’23: ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580930
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (2020). Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: Guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 10(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowa, K., Przegalinska, A., & Ciechanowski, L. (2021). Cobots in knowledge work. Journal of Business Research, 125(November), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.038
   Google Scholar
• Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Chen, J. Y. C., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., Fang, X., Fidopiastis, C., Fragomeni, G., Fu, L. P., Guo, Y., Harris, D., Ioannou, A., Jeong, K-a., Konomi, S., Krömker, H., Kurosu, M., Lewis, J. R., Marcus, A., … Zhou, J. (2019). Seven HCI grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(14), 1229–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., Frick, N. R. J., Mirbabaie, M., Hofeditz, L., & Ross, B. (2021). Recommendations for managing AI-driven change processes: When expectations meet reality. International Journal of Management Practice, 16(4), 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2023.132074
   Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., Hofeditz, L., Brünker, F., Ehnis, C., Mirbabaie, M., & Ross, B. (2022). Design principles for conversational agents to support emergency management agencies. International Journal of Information Management, 63(April), 102469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, S. G. (1996). Getting a clue the effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496271006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohmann, T., Fischer, S., Siemon, D., Brachten, F., Lattemann, C., Robra-Bissantz, S., & Stieglitz, S. (2018, December). Virtual moderation assistance: Creating design guidelines for virtual assistants supporting creative workshops. In Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems – Opportunities and Challenges for the Digitized Society: Are We Ready?, PACIS 2018. AISel.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez-Gonzalo, S., Mas-Manchón, L., & Guerrero-Solé, F. (2019). Tay is you. The attribution of responsibility in the algorithmic culture. Observatorio (OBS*), 13(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS13220191432
   Google Scholar
• Tenório, N., & Bjørn, P. (2019). Online harassment in the workplace: The role of technology in labour law disputes. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28(3–4), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09351-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science (New York, N.Y.), 379(6630), 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainfan, L., & Davis, P. K. (2004). Challenges in virtual collaboration: Videoconferencing, audioconferencing, and computer-mediated communications. Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Y., Lu, W., Cheng, Q., Jiang, T., & Liu, S. (2022). How humans obtain information from AI: Categorizing user messages in human–AI collaborative conversations. Information Processing & Management, 59(2), 102838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuo, T. Y., Huang, Y., Chen, C., & Xing, Z. (2023). Exploring AI ethics of ChatGPT: A diagnostic analysis. http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12867
   Google Scholar
• Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. (2018). AI can be sexist and racist—It’s time to make it fair. Nature, 559(7714), 324–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05707-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar