Exploring the Role of AR Cognitive Interface in Enhancing Human-Vehicle Collaborative Driving Safety: A Design Perspective

References

• Baldwin, C. L., Spence, C., Bliss, J. P., Brill, J. C., Wogalter, M. S., Mayhorn, C. B., & Ferris, T. K. (2012). Multimodal cueing: The relative benefits of the auditory, visual, and tactile channels in complex environments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(3), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561404
   Google Scholar
• Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2835587.2835589
   Google Scholar
• Bark, K., Tran, C., Fujimura, K., & Ng-Thow-Hing, V. (2014). Personal Navi: Benefits of an augmented reality navigational aid using a see-thru 3d volumetric HUD. In AutomotiveUI '14: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Benderius, O., Berger, C., & Lundgren, V. M. (2018). The best rated human–machine interface design for autonomous vehicles in the 2016 grand cooperative driving challenge. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(4), 1302–1307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2749970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, S. L., Lachter, J., Russell, R., & Shively, R. J. (2018). A human-autonomy teaming approach for a flight-following task. In C. Baldwin (Ed.), Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 586, pp. 12–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60642-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, O., & Martens, M. H. (2019). How can humans understand their automated cars? HMI principles, problems and solutions. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0484-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, F., Dragicevic, P., & Franconeri, S. (2014). The not-so-staggering effect of staggered animated transitions on visual tracking. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 2241–2250. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, E. K., & Lee, J. D. (2023). Trusting automation: Designing for responsivity and resilience. Human Factors, 65(1), 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211009995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, K., & Woods, D. D. (2002). 1. How to make automated systems team players. In Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (Vol. 2, pp 1–12). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3601(02)02003-9
   Google Scholar
• Cila, N. (2022). Designing human-agent collaborations: Commitment, responsiveness, and support. Paper Presented at the CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans LA USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517500
   Google Scholar
• Colley, M., Krauss, S., Lanzer, M., & Rukzio, E. (2021). How should automated vehicles communicate critical situations? A comparative analysis of visualization concepts. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 5(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478111
   Google Scholar
• Colley, M., Rädler, M., Glimmann, J., & Rukzio, E. (2022). Effects of scene detection, scene prediction, and maneuver planning visualizations on trust, situation awareness, and cognitive load in highly automated vehicles. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3534609
   Google Scholar
• Crouser, R. J., & Chang, R. (2012). An affordance-based framework for human computation and human-computer collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2859–2868. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currano, R., Park, S. Y., Moore, D. J., Lyons, K., & Sirkin, D. (2021). Little road driving HUD: Heads-Up Display complexity influences drivers’ perceptions of automated vehicles. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445575
   Google Scholar
• de Almeida Correia, G. H., & van Arem, B. (2016). Solving the user optimum privately owned automated vehicles assignment problem (UO-POAVAP): A model to explore the impacts of self-driving vehicles on urban mobility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 87, 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Visser, E. J., Pak, R., & Shaw, T. H. (2018). From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: The importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction. Ergonomics, 61(10), 1409–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1457725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debernard, S., Chauvin, C., Pokam, R., & Langlois, S. (2016). Designing human-machine interface for autonomous vehicles. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(19), 609–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.629
   Google Scholar
• Delmerico, J., Poranne, R., Bogo, F., Oleynikova, H., Vollenweider, E., Coros, S., Nieto, J., & Pollefeys, M. (2022). Spatial computing and intuitive interaction: Bringing mixed reality and robotics together. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 29(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2021.3138384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, W., Ying, Q., Yang, Y., Tang, S., Zhan, Z., Liu, B., & Meng, L. (2018). Using eye tracking to explore the impacts of geography courses on map-based spatial ability. Sustainability, 11(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkor, R. A., & Burnett, G. E. (2012). Evaluating the impact of head-up display complexity on peripheral detection performance: A driving simulator study. Advances in Transportation Studies, 28(28), 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, A., Petermeijer, S. M., Zimmermann, M., de Winter, J., Bengler, K. J., & Stanton, N. A. (2019). Rolling out the red (and green) carpet: Supporting driver decision making in automation-to-manual transitions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 49(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2883862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemisch, F. O., Bengler, K., Bubb, H., Winner, H., & Bruder, R. (2014). Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-Mode and Conduct-by-Wire. Ergonomics, 57(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.869355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., & Neukum, A. (2017). Increasing anthropomorphism and trust in automated driving functions by adding speech output. 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995746
   Google Scholar
• Fuste, A., Reynolds, B., Hobin, J., & Heun, V. (2020). Kinetic AR: A framework for robotic motion systems in spatial computing. CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382814
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, J. L., Fitch, G. M., & Kim, H. (2014). Behind the glass: Driver challenges and opportunities for AR automotive applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2013.2294642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyer, S., Baltzer, M., Franz, B., Hakuli, S., Kauer, M., Kienle, M., Meier, S., Weißgerber, T., Bengler, K., Bruder, R., Flemisch, F., & Winner, H. (2014). Concept and development of a unified ontology for generating test and use-case catalogues for assisted and automated vehicle guidance. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 8(3), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2012.0188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, B. J. (2005). Beyond mice and menus. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 149(4), 529–543. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4598959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S. (1996). Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence, 86(2), 269–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(95)00103-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H., Song, L., Liu, J., Wang, F., Cao, D., Chen, H., Lv, C., & Luk, P. C. (2018). Hazard-evaluation-oriented moving horizon parallel steering control for driver-automation collaboration during automated driving. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 5(6), 1062–1073. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2018.7511225
   Google Scholar
• Haspiel, J., Du, N., Meyerson, J., Robert Jr, L. P., Tilbury, D., Yang, X. J., & Pradhan, A. K. (2018). Explanations and expectations: Trust building in automated vehicles. HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• He, D., Kanaan, D., & Donmez, B. (2021). In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 149, 105842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537–562). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50027-6
   Google Scholar
• Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., & Krems, J. F. (2016). Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human Factors, 58(3), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815625744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, G., & Breazeal, C. (2004). Collaboration in human-robot teams. Proceedings of AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference, Chicago, IL. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-6434
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, C. P., Donker, S. F., Brumby, D. P., & Kun, A. L. (2019). History and future of human-automation interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, C. P., Iqbal, S. T., Kun, A. L., & Donker, S. F. (2019). Interrupted by my car? Implications of interruption and interleaving research for automated vehicles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130(C), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Jian, J. S. U. N., Bisantz, A. M. O., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
   Google Scholar
• Jung, M. F., Martelaro, N., & Hinds, P. J. (2015). Using robots to moderate team conflict: The case of repairing violations. HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, J., Korte, A., Ratmer, A., Edler, D., & Dickmann, F. (2020). Augmented reality (AR) and spatial cognition: Effects of holographic grids on distance estimation and location memory in a 3D indoor scenario. PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science, 88(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-020-00104-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Gabbard, J. L., Anon, A. M., & Misu, T. (2018). Driver behavior and performance with augmented reality pedestrian collision warning: An outdoor user study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(4), 1515–1524. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2793680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., Isleib, J. D., & Gabbard, J. L. (2016). Virtual shadow: Making cross traffic dynamics visible through augmented reality head up display. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 2093–2097. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601474
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Gabbard, J. L. (2019). Assessing distraction potential of augmented reality head-up displays for vehicle drivers. Human Factors, 64(5), 852–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819844845
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, S., van Egmond, R., & Happee, R. (2021). Effects of user interfaces on take-over performance: A review of the empirical evidence. Information, 12(4), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12040162
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G., Woods, D. D., Bradshaw, J. M., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (2004). Ten challenges for making automation a “team player” in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(06), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2004.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo, B., & Collins, C. (2014). DimpVis: Exploring time-varying information visualizations by direct manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 20(12), 2003–2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze, A., Summerskill, S. J., Marshall, R., & Filtness, A. J. (2018). Augmented reality displays for communicating uncertainty information in automated driving. Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, S., & Soualmi, B. (2016). Augmented reality versus classical HUD to take over from automated driving: An aid to smooth reactions and to anticipate maneuvers. 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Cordeil, M., Prouzeau, A., Jenny, B., & Dwyer, T. (2022). A design space for data visualisation transformations between 2D and 3D in mixed-reality environments. Paper Presented at the CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501859
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Rheem, H., Lee, J. D., Szczerba, J. F., & Tsimhoni, O. (2022). Teaming with your car: Redefining the driver–automation relationship in highly automated vehicles. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 17(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434221132636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., & Schumann, J. (2014). Designing take over scenarios for automated driving: How does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58(1), 1681–1685.
   Google Scholar
• Mirnig, A. G., Wintersberger, P., Sutter, C., & Ziegler, J. (2016). A framework for analyzing and calibrating trust in automated vehicles. AutomotiveUI '16 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3004323.3004326
   Google Scholar
• Müller, T., Colley, M., Dogru, G., & Rukzio, E. (2022). AR4CAD: Creation and exploration of a taxonomy of augmented reality visualization for connected automated driving. proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(MHCI), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546712
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munzner, T. (2014). Visualization analysis and design. A K Peters/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nofi, A. A. (2000). Defining and measuring shared situational awareness. Center For Naval Analyses.
   Google Scholar
• Pammer, K., Bairnsfather, J., Burns, J., & Hellsing, A. (2015). Not all hazards are created equal: The significance of hazards in inattentional blindness for static driving scenes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 782–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauzie, A. (2008). A method to assess the driver mental workload: The driving activity load index (DALI). Iet Intelligent Transport Systems, 2(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its:20080023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichen, J., Stoll, T., & Baumann, M. (2021). From SAE-levels to cooperative task distribution: An efficient and usable way to deal with system limitations?. 13th ACM International Conference onAutomotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, C., Sidner, C. L., & Lesh, N. (2001). Applying collaborative discourse theory to human-computer interaction. AI Magazine, 22(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v22i4.1589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffarian, M., De Winter, J. C., & Happee, R. (2012). Automated driving: Human-factors issues and design solutions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 2296–2300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561483
   Google Scholar
• Schall, M. C., Rusch, M. L., Lee, J. D., Dawson, J. D., Thomas, G., Aksan, N., & Rizzo, M. (2013). Augmented reality cues and elderly driver hazard perception. Human Factors, 55(3), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812462029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, F., & Fastenmeier, W. (2017). Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 101, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, F., & Fastenmeier, W. (2018). Visual advisory warnings about hidden dangers: Effects of specific symbols and spatial referencing on necessary and unnecessary warnings. Applied Ergonomics, 72, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharfi, T., & Shinar, D. (2014). Enhancement of road delineation can reduce safety. Journal of Safety Research, 49, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shladover, S. E. (2016). The truth about “self-driving” cars. Scientific American, 314(6), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0616-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Chen, J. Y. C., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., Fang, X., Fidopiastis, C., Fragomeni, G., Fu, L. P., Guo, Y., Harris, D., Ioannou, A., Jeong, K. K., Konomi, S. I., Krömker, H., Kurosu, M., Lewis, J. R., Marcus, A., … Zhou, J. (2019). Seven HCI grand challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(14), 1229–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, R., Karim, A., Xia, T., Hedayati, H., & Marquardt, N. (2022). Augmented reality and robotics: A survey and taxonomy for AR-enhanced human-robot interaction and robotic interfaces [Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at the CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517719
   Google Scholar
• Tönnis, M. (2008). Towards automotive augmented reality [Doctoral dissertation]. Technische Universität München.
   Google Scholar
• Tönnis, M., & Klinker, G. (2023). Survey and classification of head-up display presentation principles. In Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA).
   Google Scholar
• Van Krevelen, D., & Poelman, R. (2010). A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20870/IJVR.2010.9.2.2767
   Google Scholar
• Verberne, F. M. F., Ham, J., & Midden, C. J. H. (2015). Trusting a virtual driver that looks, acts, and thinks like you. Human Factors, 57(5), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815580749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, K. J. (2003). Cognitive work analysis toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46(1), 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2002.808348
   Google Scholar
• von Sawitzky, T., Wintersberger, P., Riener, A., & Gabbard, J. L. (2019). Increasing trust in fully automated driving: Route indication on an augmented reality head-up display. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis ’19). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner Filho, J. A., Freitas, C. M. D. S., & Nedel, L. (2018). VirtualDesk: A comfortable and efficient immersive information visualization approach. Computer Graphics Forum, 37(3), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walch, M., Mühl, K., Kraus, J., Stoll, T., Baumann, M., & Weber, M. (2017). From car-driver-handovers to cooperative interfaces: Visions for driver–vehicle interaction in automated driving. In G. Meixner and C. Müller (Eds.), Automotive user interfaces (pp. 273–294). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. (2019). A framework of the non-critical spontaneous intervention in highly automated driving scenarios. Paper Presented at the AutomotiveUI '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings, Utrecht Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349263.3351326
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Chen, C., Wu, B., Ma, S., Wang, D., Li, H., & Yang, Z. (2022). Inattentional blindness in augmented reality head-up display-assisted driving. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(9), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1970434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Bai, X., Zhang, S., Wang, Y., Han, S., Zhang, X., Yan, Y., & Xiong, Z. (2021). User-oriented AR assembly guideline: A new classification method of assembly instruction for user cognition. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 112(1–2), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06291-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegand, G., Mai, C., Holländer, K., & Hussmann, H. (2019). InCarAR: A design space towards 3D augmented reality applications in vehicles. AutomotiveUI '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, S., Kazazi, J., Vollrath, M. (2015). Distractive or supportive - how warnings in the head-up display affect drivers’ gaze and driving behavior. 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, (pp. 1035–1040). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wintersberger, P., Schartmüller, C., & Riener, A. (2019). Attentive user interfaces to improve multitasking and take-over performance in automated driving: The auto-net of things. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 11(3), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMHCI.2019070103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, T. J., Samuel, S., Borowsky, A., Zilberstein, S., & Fisher, D. L. (2016). Experienced drivers are quicker to achieve situation awareness than inexperienced drivers in situations of transfer of control within a Level 3 autonomous environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601062
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Abdel-Aty, M., Zheng, O., Cai, Q., & Yue, L. (2019). Developing a crash warning system for the bike lane area at intersections with connected vehicle technology. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(4), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119840617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, Y., Lv, C., Cao, D., & Hang, P. (2021). Toward human-vehicle collaboration: Review and perspectives on human-centered collaborative automated driving. Transportation Research Part C, 128(5), 103199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103199
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Shi, J. L., Zhang, Y., Wang, D. M., Li, H. T., Wu, C. X., Zhang, Y. Q., & Wan, J. Y. (2019). Head-up display graphic warning system facilitates simulated driving performance. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(9), 796–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1496970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Robert, L. J., Du, N., & Yang, X. J. (2018). Trust in AVs: The impact of expectations and individual differences. Conference on Autonomous Vehicles in Society: Building a Research Agenda.
   Google Scholar