3,670
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Study on Factors Influencing Designers’ Behavioral Intention in Using AI-Generated Content for Assisted Design: Perceived Anxiety, Perceived Risk, and UTAUT

Received 28 Sep 2023, Accepted 22 Jan 2024, Published online: 06 Mar 2024

References

  • Abou-Shouk, M., & Soliman, M. (2021). The impact of gamification adoption intention on brand awareness and loyalty in tourism: The mediating effect of customer engagement. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 20, 100559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100559
  • Al Qeisi, K. I., & Al-Abdallah, G. M. (2014). Website design and usage behaviour: An application of the UTAUT model for internet banking in UK. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 6(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v6n1p75
  • Anouze, A. L. M., & Alamro, A. S. (2019). Factors affecting intention to use e-banking in Jordan. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-10-2018-0271
  • Bae, S. Y., & Chang, P.-J. (2021). The effect of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) risk perception on behavioural intention towards ‘intact’ tourism in South Korea during the first wave of the pandemic (March 2020). Current Issues in Tourism, 24(7), 1017–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1798895
  • Bardeen, J. R., Fergus, T. A., & Orcutt, H. K. (2013). Experiential avoidance as a moderator of the relationship between anxiety sensitivity and perceived stress. Behavior Therapy, 44(3), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2013.04.001
  • Beaudry, A. and A. Pinsonneault (2005). "Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation." MIS Quarterly, 29(3): 493–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148693
  • Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2003). Emerging markets finance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 10(1–2), 3–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5398(02)00054-3
  • Bendary, N., & I. Al-Sahouly. (2018). Exploring the extension of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, UTAUT2, factors effect on perceived usefulness and ease of use on mobile commerce in Egypt. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 12(2).
  • Birch, A., & Irvine, V. (2009). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: Applying the UTAUT model. Educational Media International, 46(4), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980903387506
  • Bobrow, D. G., & Whalen, J. (2002). Community knowledge sharing in practice: The Eureka story. Reflections, 4(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/152417302762251336
  • Burns, W. J., Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2012). Risk perception and the economic crisis: A longitudinal study of the trajectory of perceived risk. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01733.x
  • Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., & Sun, L. (2023). A comprehensive survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A history of generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04226.
  • Celik, H. (2016). Customer online shopping anxiety within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT) framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2015-0077
  • Cetinic, E., & She, J. (2022). Understanding and creating art with AI: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 18(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799
  • Chan, R., Troshani, I., Rao Hill, S., & Hoffmann, A. (2022). Towards an understanding of consumers’ FinTech adoption: The case of open banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(4), 886–917. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2021-0397
  • Chang, A. (2012). UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A review and agenda for future research. The Winners, 13(2), 10–114. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v13i2.656
  • Chao, C.-M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
  • Chen, C., Fu, J., & Lyu, L. (2023). A pathway towards responsible AI generated content. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01325.
  • Chen, C., Wu, Z., Lai, Y., Ou, W., Liao, T., & Zheng, Z. (2023). Challenges and remedies to privacy and security in AIGC: Exploring the potential of privacy computing, blockchain, and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00419.
  • Chen, S.-C., & Chen, H.-H. (2009). The empirical study of customer satisfaction and continued behavioural intention towards self-service banking: Technology readiness as an antecedent. International Journal of Electronic Finance, 3(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEF.2009.024270
  • Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Students’ motivational beliefs and strategies, perceived immersion and attitudes towards science learning with immersive virtual reality: A partial least squares analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2140–2159. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12956
  • Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2010). A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks. Decision Support Systems, 49(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.12.006
  • Chiu, C.-Y., Chen, C.-L., & Chen, S. (2022). Broadband mobile applications’ adoption by SMEs in Taiwan—a multi-perspective study of determinants. Applied Sciences, 12(14), 7002. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147002
  • Chuang, H. (2016). Factors influencing behavioral intention of wearable symbiotic devices–case study of the MI band. Soochow Journal of Economics and Business, 93, 1–24.
  • Dahlman, C. J., & Westphal, L. E. (1981). The meaning of technological mastery in relation to transfer of technology. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 458(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271628145800102
  • Dave, A., Saxena, A., & Jha, A. (2023). Understanding user comfort and expectations in AI-based systems. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3135320/v1
  • de Sena Abrahão, R., Moriguchi, S. N., & Andrade, D. F. (2016). Intention of adoption of mobile payment: An analysis in the light of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.003
  • Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6(6), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  • Gmeiner, F., Yang, H., Yao, L., Holstein, K., & Martelaro, N. (2023). Exploring challenges and opportunities to support designers in learning to co-create with AI-based manufacturing design tools [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580999
  • Goldschmidt, G. (1995). The designer as a team of one. Design Studies, 16(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00009-3
  • Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews-Neuroscience, 14(7), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524
  • Habibi, A., Yusop, F. D., & Razak, R. A. (2020). The role of TPACK in affecting pre-service language teachers’ ICT integration during teaching practices: Indonesian context. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1929–1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10040-2
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados Bookman editora.
  • Hair Jr, J., Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
  • Hamilton, M. A., Rouse, R. A., & Rouse, J. (1994). Dentist communication and patient utilization of dental services: Anxiety inhibition and competence enhancement effects. Health Communication, 6(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0602_4
  • Heron, K. E., & Smyth, J. M. (2010). Ecological momentary interventions: Incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(Pt 1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910709X466063
  • Hinds, P. J. (1999). The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.5.2.205
  • Hong, J.-W., & Curran, N. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence, artists, and art: Attitudes toward artwork produced by humans vs. artificial intelligence. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 15(2s), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326337
  • Hu, L-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.3.4.424
  • Hussain, S., Guangju, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Ilyas, Z., Mustafa, G., & Jianzhou, Y. (2018). Consumers’ online information adoption behavior: Motives and antecedents of electronic word of mouth communications. Computers in Human Behavior, 80(C), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.019
  • Jiao, H., Qian, L., Liu, T., & Ma, L. (2021). Why do people support online crowdfunding charities? A case study from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 582508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.582508
  • Kandoth, S., & Shekhar, S. K. (2022). Social influence and intention to use AI: The role of personal innovativeness and perceived trust using the parallel mediation model. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 10(3), 131–150.
  • Kumar, J. A., Bervell, B., Annamalai, N., & Osman, S. (2020). Behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the role of self-efficacy, subjective norm, and WhatsApp use habit. IEEE Access, 8, 208058–208074. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3037925
  • Lang, C. (2018). Perceived risks and enjoyment of access-based consumption: Identifying barriers and motivations to fashion renting. Fashion and Textiles, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-018-0139-z
  • Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified. Routledge.
  • Lee, J.-H., & Song, C.-H. (2013). Effects of trust and perceived risk on user acceptance of a new technology service. Social Behavior and Personality, 41(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.4.587
  • Lee, M.-C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006
  • Lin, H. C., Ho, C. F., & Yang, H. (2022). Understanding adoption of artificial intelligence-enabled language e-learning system: An empirical study of UTAUT model. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2022.119966
  • Liu, X. (2020). Artistic reflection on artificial intelligence digital painting. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1648(3), 032125. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1648/3/032125
  • Lovreglio, R., Ronchi, E., & Nilsson, D. (2016). An evacuation decision model based on perceived risk, social influence and behavioural uncertainty. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 66, 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2016.03.006
  • Lu, H.-P., & Yang, Y.-W. (2014). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a social networking site: An extension of task-technology fit to social-technology fit. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.020
  • Maillet, É., Mathieu, L., & Sicotte, C. (2015). Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an electronic patient record in acute care settings: An extension of the UTAUT. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.09.004
  • Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S., & Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236
  • Moorthy, K., Chun T'ing, L., Ming, K. S., Ping, C. C., Ping, L. Y., Joe, L. Q., & Jie, W. Y. (2019). Behavioral intention to adopt digital library by the undergraduates. International Information & Library Review, 51(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2018.1463049
  • Nayak, R. D. (2014). Anxiety and mental health of software professionals and mechanical professionals. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3(2), 52–56. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ramyashilpa-Nayak/publication/346486234_Anxiety_and_Mental_Health_of_Software_Professionals_and_Mechanical_Professionals/links/5fdb229492851c13fe90c6bb/Anxiety-and-Mental-Health-of-Software-Professionals-and-Mechanical-Professionals.pdf
  • Paredes, M. R., Apaolaza, V., Fernandez-Robin, C., Hartmann, P., & Yañez-Martinez, D. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on subjective mental well-being: The interplay of perceived threat, future anxiety and resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110455
  • Patil, P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Raghavan, V. (2020). Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Pratama, A. R. (2021). Fun first, useful later: Mobile learning acceptance among secondary school students in Indonesia. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1737–1753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10334-w
  • Reddy, M. D. M., Basha, M. S. M., Hari, M. M. C., & Penchalaiah, M. N. (2021). Dall-e: Creating images from text. UGC Care Group I Journal, 8(14), 71–75. https://www.journal-dogorangsang.in/no_1_NECG_21/14.pdf
  • Rezvani, S., Heidari, S., Roustapisheh, N., & Dokhanian, S. (2022). The effectiveness of system quality, habit, and effort expectation on library application use intention: The mediating role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user satisfaction. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2022.10049515
  • Roskes, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2012). Necessity is the mother of invention: Avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028442
  • Russell, S. (2016). Rationality and intelligence: A brief update. Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence (vol 1132, pp. 2016). Pearson.
  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., & Hair, J.F. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
  • Shiferaw, K. B., Mengiste, S. A., Gullslett, M. K., Zeleke, A. A., Tilahun, B., Tebeje, T., Wondimu, R., Desalegn, S., & Mehari, E. A. (2021). Healthcare providers’ acceptance of telemedicine and preference of modalities during COVID-19 pandemics in a low-resource setting: An extended UTAUT model. PLOS One, 16(4), e0250220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250220
  • Slade, E. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Piercy, N. C., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Modeling consumers’ adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8), 860–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20823
  • Strohmaier, D., Zeng, J., & Hafeez, M. (2019). Trust, distrust, and crowdfunding: A study on perceptions of institutional mechanisms. Telematics and Informatics, 43, 101252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101252
  • Tao, W., Gao, S., & Yuan, Y. (2023). Boundary crossing: An experimental study of individual perceptions toward AIGC. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1185880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185880
  • Thanigan, J., Reddy, S. N., Sethuraman, P., & Rajesh, J. I. (2021). Understanding consumer acceptance of M-Wallet apps: The role of perceived value, perceived credibility, and technology anxiety. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 19(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.4018/JECO.2021010104
  • Venkatesh, V. (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: A research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308(1–2), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03918-9
  • Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, Davis. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3): 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Verma, P., & Sinha, N. (2018). Integrating perceived economic wellbeing to technology acceptance model: The case of mobile based agricultural extension service. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.08.013
  • Wang, Y., & Dong, Y. (2023). AIGC assisted generation craft based on dialogue interface. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 57, 242–246. https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v57i.10008
  • Wijaya, T. T., Cao, Y., Bernard, M., Rahmadi, I. F., Lavicza, Z., & Surjono, H. D. (2022). Factors influencing microgame adoption among secondary school mathematics teachers supported by structural equation modelling-based research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 952549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952549
  • Wrycza, S., Marcinkowski, B., & Gajda, D. (2017). The enriched UTAUT model for the acceptance of software engineering tools in academic education. Information Systems Management, 34(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2017.1254446
  • Wu, C.-H., & Chen, S.-C. (2015). Understanding the relationships of critical factors to Facebook educational usage intention. Internet Research, 25(2), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2013-0232
  • Wu, J., Gan, W., Chen, Z., Wan, S., & Lin, H. (2023). AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06632
  • Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001
  • Wu, S. (2020). Retracted: Development of graphic design based on artificial intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1533(3), 032022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1533/3/032022
  • Xu, M., Du, H., Niyato, D., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Mao, S., Han, Z., Jamalipour, A., Kim, D. I., & Leung, V. (2023). Unleashing the power of edge-cloud generative AI in mobile networks: A survey of AIGC services. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16129. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3353265
  • Zhang, W. (2020). A study on the user acceptance model of artificial intelligence music based on UTAUT. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 25(6), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2020.25.06.025
  • Zhang, C., Zhang, C., Li, C., Qiao, Y., Zheng, S., Dam, S. K., Zhang, M., Kim, J. U., Kim, S. T., & Choi, J. (2023). One small step for generative AI, one giant leap for AGI: A complete survey on ChatGPT in AIGC era. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06488. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24789.70883
  • Zou, C., Li, P., & Jin, L. (2022). Integrating smartphones in EFL classrooms: Students’ satisfaction and perceived learning performance. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12667–12688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11103-7