A Qualitative Exploration of a User-Centered Model for Smartwatch Comfort Using Grounded Theory

References

• Ackerley, R., Saar, K., McGlone, F., & Backlund Wasling, H. (2014). Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: Differences between glabrous and hairy skin. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Lal, B., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Consumer adoption of Internet banking in Jordan: Examining the role of hedonic motivation, habit, self-efficacy and trust. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 20(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1057/fsm.2015.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, M., Naaman, M. (2007, April). Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 971–980.).
   Google Scholar
• Anggraini, N., Kaburuan, E. R., Wang, G., & Jayadi, R. (2019). Usability study and users’ perception of smartwatch: Study on Indonesian customer. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.241
   Google Scholar
• Basha, N. K., Aw, E. C. X., & Chuah, S. H. W. (2022). Are we so over smartwatches? Or can technology, fashion, and psychographic attributes sustain smartwatch usage? Technology in Society, 69, 101952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basoglu, N., Ok, A. E., & Daim, T. U. (2017). What will it take to adopt smart glasses: A consumer choice based review? Technology in Society, 50, 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, F. R., Metcalf, C. J. (2007). Sharing motion information with close family and friends [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1361–1370). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240831
   Google Scholar
• Bodine, K., Gemperle, F. (2003). Effects of functionality on perceived comfort of wearables [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’03) (Vol. 1530, No. 0811/03, pp. 17–00).
   Google Scholar
• Boulding, W., Lee, E., & Staelin, R. (1994). Mastering the mix: Do advertising, promotion, and sales force activities lead to differentiation? Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canhoto, A. I., & Arp, S. (2017). Exploring the factors that support adoption and sustained use of health and fitness wearables. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(1–2), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1234505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, J. M. (2009). Consumer acceptance model of smart clothing according to innovation. International. Journal of Human Ecology, 10(1), 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, L., Qin, T., & Wang, H. (2023). Vibration strength comfort of smartwatch in notification scene. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 128–140). Springer Nature Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2011). A constructivist grounded theory analysis of losing and regaining a valued self. In Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry (pp. 165–204). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., & Kim, S. (2016). Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chon, K. H., & McManus, D. D. (2018). Detection of atrial fibrillation using a smartwatch. Nature Reviews. Cardiology, 15(11), 657–658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0057-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah, S. H. W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, J., Dey, A., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2018). A qualitative study of smartwatch usage and its usability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28(4), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clawson, J., Pater, J. A., Miller, A. D., Mynatt, E. D., Mamykina, L. (2015, September). No longer wearing: Investigating the abandonment of personal health-tracking technologies on craigslist [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 647–658).
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counts, S., Fellheimer, E. (2004). Supporting social presence through lightweight photo sharing on and off the desktop [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 599–606). https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985768
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dargahi, J., & Najarian, S. (2004). Human tactile perception as a standard for artificial tactile sensing—A review. The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery: MRCAS, 1(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawi, N. M., Hwang, H. J., Jusoh, A., & Kim, H. K. (2022). Examining the Factors that Influence Customers’ Intention to Use Smartwatches in Malaysia Using UTAUT2 Model. In International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Applications (pp. 1–15). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dehghani, M. (2018). Exploring the motivational factors on continuous usage intention of smartwatches among actual users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1424246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delabrida Silva, S. E., Rabelo Oliveira, R. A., & Loureiro, A. A. F. (Eds.). (2017). Examining developments and applications of wearable devices in modern society. IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (2004). Grounded theory. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 80–93). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eagle, N., & Pentland, A. (2006). Reality mining: Sensing complex social systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(4), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0046-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Li, H., & Luo, Y. (2015). An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(9), 1704–1723. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, H., Kim, H., & Oakley, I. (2018). Fingers and angles: Exploring the comfort of touch input on smartwatches. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287042
   Google Scholar
• Gimhae, G. N. (2013). Six human factors to acceptability of wearable computers. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 8(3), 103–114.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Z., Wei, J., & Xu, F. (2016). An empirical study on factors influencing consumers’ initial trust in wearable commerce. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 56(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2015.11645804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience – A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, S. D., & Feldman, S. R. (2017). Contact urticaria caused by the Apple Watch–A case report. Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery, 21(2), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdds.2016.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollender, N., Hofmann, C., Deneke, M., & Schmitz, B. (2010). Integrating cognitive load theory and concepts of human–computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1278–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. C., Lin, P. H., & Hsieh, P. C. (2017). The effect of consumer innovativeness on perceived value and continuance intention to use smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, K. L. (2017). What drives smartwatch adoption intention? Comparing Apple and non-Apple watches. Library Hi Tech, 35(1), 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2016-0105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C., Chung, T. L., & Sanders, E. A. (2016). Attitudes and purchase intentions for smart clothing: Examining US consumers’ functional, expressive, and aesthetic needs for solar-powered clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 34(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X16646447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isakadze, N., & Martin, S. S. (2020). How useful is the smartwatch ECG? Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, 30(7), 442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2019.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacucci, G., Oulasvirta, A., & Salovaara, A. (2007). Active construction of experience through mobile media: A field study with implications for recording and sharing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(4), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0084-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, Y. K. (2014). Determinants of users’ intention to adopt mobile fitness applications: An extended technology acceptance model approach [Unpublished PhD theses]. Albuquerque, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Jat, A. S., & Grønli, T. M. (2022). Smart watch for smart health monitoring: A literature review. In International Work-Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (pp. 256–268). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., Kim, H., Kim, R., Lee, U., & Jeong, Y. (2017). Smartwatch wearing behavior analysis: A longitudinal study. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131892
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, S., Song, J., Kim, H., Lee, S., Kim, J., Lee, J., Kim, Y., Kim, S., & Song, J. (2017). Design and analysis of wireless power transfer system using flexible coil and shielding material on smartwatch strap [Paper presentation]. 2017 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC) (pp. 1–3). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WPT.2017.7953853
   Google Scholar
• Jin, H., Abu‐Raya, Y. S., & Haick, H. (2017). Advanced materials for health monitoring with skin‐based wearable devices. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 6(11), 1700024. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumisko-Pyykkö, S., & Vainio, T. (2010). Framing the context of use for mobile HCI. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 2(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmhci.2010100101
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., Kim, S., & Choi, B. (2016). Consumer valuation of the wearables: The case of smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 899–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantari, M., & Rauschnabel, P. (2018). Exploring the early adopters of augmented reality smart glasses: The case of Microsoft HoloLens. In Augmented reality and virtual reality: Empowering human, place and business (pp. 229–245). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H., & Jung, E. H. (2021). The smart wearables-privacy paradox: A cluster analysis of smartwatch users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(16), 1755–1768. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1778787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, J. (1999). Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(6), 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599902100603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J. (2017). Shape and size matter for smartwatches: Effects of screen shape, screen size, and presentation mode in wearable communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., & Shin, D. H. (2015). An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Research, 25(4), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2014-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C. E., & Sarrafzadeh, M. (2018). A survey of smartwatches in remote health monitoring. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 2(1–2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41666-017-0012-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ko, E., Sung, H., & Yun, H. (2009). Comparative analysis of purchase intentions toward smart clothing between Korean and US consumers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 27(4), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X08327086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. F., & Baber, C. (2005). A tool to assess the comfort of wearable computers. Human Factors, 47(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720053653875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. F., Baber, C., Schwirtz, A., & Bristow, H. W. (2002). The comfort assessment of wearable computers. The Sixth International Symposium of Wearable Computers, 2, 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. F., Deen-Williams, D., Arvanitis, T. N., Baber, C., Sotiriou, S., Anastopoulou, S., & Gargalakos, M. (2006). Assessing the wearability of wearable computers. In 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (pp. 75–82). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2006.286347
   Google Scholar
• Kwee-Meier, S. T., Bützler, J. E., & Schlick, C. (2016). Development and validation of a technology acceptance model for safety-enhancing, wearable locating systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(5), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1141986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-M., Lee, S.-H., & Park, J. (2022). A multidimensional approach to wearability assessment of an electronic wrist bracelet for the criminal justice system. Fashion and Textiles, 9(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-022-00301-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limketkai, B. N., Mauldin, K., Manitius, N., Jalilian, L., & Salonen, B. R. (2021). The age of artificial intelligence: Use of digital technology in clinical nutrition. Current Surgery Reports, 9(7), 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-021-00297-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K. Y., Chien, C. F., & Kerh, R. (2016). UNISON framework of data-driven innovation for extracting user experience of product design of wearable devices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99, 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. W., Yang, C. C., Sia, W. Y., & Tang, K. Y. (2019). Examining the success factors of smart watch: A behavioral perspective on consumers. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(2), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.20.2.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren, M., & Witell, L. (2008). Two decades of using Kano’s theory of attractive quality: A literature review. Quality Management Journal, 15(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2008.11918056
   Google Scholar
• Mailangkay, A. (2023). Determinants of user satisfaction on interest of smartwatch usage after Covid-19 [Paper presentation]. 2023 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech) (pp. 517–522). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech59029.2023.10277879
   Google Scholar
• Marbach, J., Lages, C., Nunan, D., & Ekinci, Y. (2019). Consumer engagement in online brand communities: The moderating role of personal values. European Journal of Marketing, 53(9), 1671–1700. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2017-0721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauldin, T. R., Canby, M. E., Metsis, V., Ngu, A. H., & Rivera, C. C. (2018). SmartFall: A smartwatch-based fall detection system using deep learning. Sensors, 18(10), 3363. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, D., Brown, B., Lampinen, A., McGregor, M., Hoggan, E., Pizza, S. (2017). Situating wearables: Smartwatch use in context [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2017 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3582–3594).
   Google Scholar
• Mostafazadeh Davani, A., Nazari Shirehjini, A. A., & Daraei, S. (2018). Towards interacting with smarter systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 9(1), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-016-0433-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motti, V. G., Caine, K. (2014). Human factors considerations in the design of wearable devices [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 1820–1824). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581381
   Google Scholar
• Motti, V. G., Caine, K. (2016). Smart wearables or dumb wearables? Understanding how context impacts the UX in wrist worn interaction [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (pp. 1–10).
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, S., & Yurder, Y. (2015). Consumers’ and physicians’ perceptions about high tech wearable health products. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(2015), 1261–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.279
   Google Scholar
• Ogbanufe, O., & Gerhart, N. (2020). The mediating influence of smartwatch identity on deep use and innovative individual performance. Information Systems Journal, 30(6), 977–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer-Muti, B. (2009). A review of Corbin and Strauss’ basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 14(2), 140–143.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, D., Funilkul, S., & Vanijja, V. (2020). The future of smartwatches: Assessing the end-users’ continuous usage using an extended expectation-confirmation model. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(2), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0639-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K., Jeong, M., & Kim, K. (2020). Usability evaluation of menu interfaces for smartwatches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2018.1425644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, E. J. M. (2009). Comfort and its measurement–A literature review. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 4(5), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100902980950
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poggio, T., Rifkin, R., Mukherjee, S., & Niyogi, P. (2004). General conditions for predictivity in learning theory. Nature, 428(6981), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potnis, D., Demissie, D., & Deosthali, K. (2017). Students’ intention to adopt Internet-based personal safety wearable devices: Extending UTAUT with trusting belief. First Monday 22, 9. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i9.7808
   Google Scholar
• Raptis, D., Papachristos, E., Bruun, A., & Kjeldskov, J. (2022). Why did you pick that? A study on smartwatch design qualities and people’s preferences. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(4), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1836259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., Brem, A., & Ivens, B. S. (2015). Who will buy smart glasses? Empirical results of two pre-market-entry studies on the role of personality in individual awareness and intended adoption of Google Glass wearables. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., Hein, D. W., He, J., Ro, Y. K., Rawashdeh, S., & Krulikowski, B. (2016). Fashion or technology? A fashnology perspective on the perception and adoption of augmented reality smart glasses. i-com, 15(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2016-0021
   Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.075690
   Google Scholar
• Rawassizadeh, R., & Rong, Y. (2023). ODSearch: Fast and resource efficient on-device natural language search for fitness trackers’ data. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3569488
   Google Scholar
• Rihacek, T., & Danelova, E. (2016). The journey of an integrationist: A grounded theory analysis. Psychotherapy, 53(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp, M. A., Michaelis, J. R., McConnell, D. S., & Smither, J. A. (2018). The role of individual differences on perceptions of wearable fitness device trust, usability, and motivational impact. Applied Ergonomics, 70, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Service, R. W. (2009). Book Review: Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 614–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108324514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siepmann, C., & Kowalczuk, P. (2021). Understanding continued smartwatch usage: The role of emotional as well as health and fitness factors. Electronic Markets, 31(4), 795–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00458-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z., Ji, Z., Zhang, P., Chen, C., Qian, X., Du, X., & Wan, Q. (2017). Automatic labeling of mobile apps by the type of psychological needs they satisfy. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
   Google Scholar
• Tang, J., & Kim, S. (2015). A Service-oriented device selection solution based on user satisfaction and device performance in a ubiquitous environment. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 74(23), 10761–10783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-2205-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomico, O., Hallnäs, L., Liang, R. H., & Wensveen, S. A. (2017). Towards a next wave of wearable and fashionable interactions. International Journal of Design, 11(3), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turakhia, M. P., Desai, M., Hedlin, H., Rajmane, A., Talati, N., Ferris, T., Desai, S., Nag, D., Patel, M., Kowey, P., Rumsfeld, J. S., Russo, A. M., Hills, M. T., Granger, C. B., Mahaffey, K. W., & Perez, M. V. (2019). Rationale and design of a large-scale, app-based study to identify cardiac arrhythmias using a smartwatch: The Apple Heart Study. American Heart Journal, 207, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turhan, G. (2013). An assessment towards the acceptance of wearable technology to consumers in Turkey: The application to smart bra and t-shirt products. Journal of the Textile Institute, 104(4), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2012.736191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaizman, Y., Ellis, K., & Lanckriet, G. (2017). Recognizing detailed human context in the wild from smartphones and smartwatches. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 16(4), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2017.3971131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visuri, A., Sarsenbayeva, Z., Van Berkel, N., Goncalves, J., Rawassizadeh, R., Kostakos, V., Ferreira, D. (2017). Quantifying sources and types of smartwatch usage sessions [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3569–3581). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025817
   Google Scholar
• Vuković, M., Car, Ž., Fertalj, M., Penezić, I., Miklaušić, V., Ivšac, J., Pavlin-Bernardić, N., & Mandić, L. (2016). Location-based smartwatch application for people with complex communication needs [Paper presentation]. 2016 International Multidisciplinary Conference on Computer and Energy Science (SpliTech) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SpliTech.2016.7555937
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Hsu, Y. (2020). The relationship of symmetry, complexity, and shape in mobile interface aesthetics, from an emotional perspective—A case study of the smartwatch. Symmetry, 12(9), 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091403
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Wang, Z., & Qiu, S. (2021). Investigate symmetry, complexity, and screen shapes in interface design aesthetics to promote users’ quality perceptions and continuous usage intention of the smartwatch. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(20), 1966–1980. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1921366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Wang, J. (2023). Do the emotions evoked by interface design factors affect the user’s intention to continue using the smartwatch? The mediating role of quality perceptions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3), 546–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2041903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witell, L., Löfgren, M., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2013). Theory of attractive quality and the Kano methodology–the past, the present, and the future. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(11–12), 1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.791117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, L. H., Wu, L. C., & Chang, S. C. (2016). Exploring consumers’ intention to accept smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, T., Cui, L., Zhang, C., & Qiu, Y. (2023). Electroneurophysiological responses to fabric-skin dynamic contact with different fabrics among different types of people. Textile Research Journal, 93(17–18), 4140–4152. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175231171946
   Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang. (2022). Research on User Perceived Intelligence of Personal Intelligent Assistants. Zhejiang University (Master’s Theses.)
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Luo, M., Nie, R., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Technical attributes, health attribute, consumer attributes and their roles in adoption intention of healthcare wearable technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 108, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar