Designing for Trust: How Human-Machine Interface Can Shape the Future of Urban Air Mobility

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Haddad, C., Chaniotakis, E., Straubinger, A., Plötner, K., & Antoniou, C. (2020). Factors affecting the adoption and use of urban air mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132(November 2019), 696–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.020
   Google Scholar
• Bakdash, J. Z., & Marusich, L. R. (2017). Repeated measures correlation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(MAR), 456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauranov, A., & Rakas, J. (2021). Designing airspace for urban air mobility: A review of concepts and approaches. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 125, 100726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beller, J., Heesen, M., & Vollrath, M. (2013). Improving the driver–automation interaction: An approach using automation uncertainty. Human factors, 55(6), 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813482327
   Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., & Kaernbach, C. (2010). A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 190(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.04.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chancey, E. T., & Politowicz, M. S. (2020). Public trust and acceptance for concepts of remotely operated Urban Air Mobility transportation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 64(1), 1044–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181320641251
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. F. (2019). Factors affecting the decision to use autonomous shuttle services: Evidence from a scooter-dominant urban context. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 67, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., & Shaheen, S. (2021). Urban air mobility: Opportunities and obstacles. In International Encyclopedia of Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10764-X.
   Google Scholar
• Colley, M., Rädler, M., Glimmann, J., & Rukzio, E. (2022). Effects of scene detection, scene prediction, and maneuver planning visualizations on trust, situation awareness, and cognitive load in highly automated vehicles. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3534609
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diels, C., & Thompson, S. (2018). Information expectations in highly and fully automated vehicles. In Advances in human aspects of transportation: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 international conference on human factors in transportation (pp. 742–748). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Du, N., Yang, X. J., & Zhou, F. (2020). Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 148, 105804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrow, L. A., German, B. J., & Leonard, C. E. (2021). Urban air mobility: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis with autonomous and electric ground transportation for informing future research. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 132, 103377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J. D., & Boyle, L. N. (2012). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrich, K. H., Theodore, C. R. (2021, January) Description of the NASA Urban Air Mobility Maturity Level (UML) Scale [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum (pp. 11–21). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1627
   Google Scholar
• Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K. (2015). Trust in automation – before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3025–3032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.847
   Google Scholar
• Goyal, R., Reiche, C., Fernando, C., Serrao, J., Kimmel, S., Cohen, A., Shaheen, S. (2018). Urban air mobility (UAM) market study. Booz-Allen-Hamilton, Washington, DC. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20190001472
   Google Scholar
• Haeuslschmid, R., von Buelow, M., Pfleging, B., Butz, A. (2017). Supporting trust in autonomous driving [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI (pp. 319–329). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025198
   Google Scholar
• Hartwich, F., Hollander, C., Johannmeyer, D., & Krems, J. F. (2021). Improving passenger experience and trust in automated vehicles through user-adaptive HMIs: “The more the better” does not apply to everyone. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3, 669030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2021.669030
   Google Scholar
• He, J., Becic, E., Lee, Y. C., & McCarley, J. S. (2011). Mind wandering behind the wheel: Performance and oculomotor correlates. Human Factors, 53(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810391530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegner, S. M., Beldad, A. D., & Brunswick, G. J. (2019). In automatic we trust: Investigating the impact of trust, control, personality characteristics, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(19), 1769–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1572353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., & Krems, J. F. (2016). Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human Factors, 58(3), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815625744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. S., Rice, S., Trafimow, D., & Clayton, K. (2009). The automated cockpit: A comparison of attitudes towards human and automated pilots. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(5), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2009.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, K., & Rampersad, G. (2018). Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 48, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Khawaji, A., Zhou, J., Chen, F., Marcus, N. (2015, April). Using galvanic skin response (GSR) to measure trust and cognitive load in the text-chat environment [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1989–1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732766
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. W., Lim, C., & Ji, Y. G. (2023). Exploring the user acceptance of urban air mobility: Extending the technology acceptance model with trust and service quality factors. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(14), 2893–2904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. C., de Visser, E. J., Wiese, E., Lee, Y. C., & Shaw, T. H. (2021). Measurement of trust in automation: A narrative review and reference guide. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 604977. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, J., Kwac, J., Ju, W., Steinert, M., Leifer, L., & Nass, C. (2015). Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 9(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2
   Google Scholar
• Körber, M. (2018, August) Theoretical considerations and development of a questionnaire to measure trust in automation. In Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (pp. 13–30). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Körber, M., Baseler, E., & Bengler, K. (2018). Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 66, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Yang, R., Wang, L., & Liu, P. (2019). Evaluating initial public acceptance of highly and fully autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(11), 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löcken, A., Frison, A. K., Fahn, V., Kreppold, D., Götz, M., Riener, A. (2020, October 5). Increasing user experience and trust in automated vehicles via an ambient light display [Paper presentation]. Conference Proceedings - 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services: Expanding the Horizon of Mobile Interaction, MobileHCI 2020. https://doi.org/10.1145/3379503.3403567
   Google Scholar
• Manchon, J. B., Bueno, M., & Navarro, J. (2022). How the initial level of trust in automated driving impacts drivers’ behaviour and early trust construction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 86, 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcknight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F. (2011). Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/1985347.1985353
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, R., Rice, S., Winter, S., & Eudy, M. (2017). Perceptions of cockpit configurations: A culture and gender analysis. The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 27(1-2), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2017.1365609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague, E., Xu, J., & Chiou, E. (2014). Shared experiences of technology and trust: An experimental study of physiological compliance between active and passive users in technology-mediated collaborative encounters. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 44(5), 614–624. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2014.2325859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühl, K., Strauch, C., Grabmaier, C., Reithinger, S., Huckauf, A., & Baumann, M. (2020). Get ready for being chauffeured: passenger’s preferences and trust while being driven by human and automation. Human Factors, 62(8), 1322–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819872893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, B. M. (1994). Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11), 1905–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408964957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhoff, S., Stapel, J., He, X., Gentner, A., & Happee, R. (2021). Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire. PloS One, 16(12), e0260953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, L., Burns, C., Luton, J., Iyer, S., & Birrell, S. (2020). The influence of system transparency on trust: Evaluating interfaces in a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 72, 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubagotti, M., Tusseyeva, I., Baltabayeva, S., Summers, D., & Sandygulova, A. (2022). Perceived safety in physical human–robot interaction—A survey. In Robotics and autonomous systems (Vol. 151). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104047
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., Farrar, E. (2018). The potential societal barriers of urban air mobility (UAM). National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7p69d2bg
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., Kacker, S., & Sharma, M. (2016). A brief introduction and review on galvanic skin response. International Journal of Medical Research Professionals, 2(6), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.21276/ijmrp.2016.2.6.003
   Google Scholar
• Straubinger, A., Rothfeld, R., Shamiyeh, M., Büchter, K. D., Kaiser, J., & Plötner, K. O. (2020). An overview of current research and developments in urban air mobility – Setting the scene for UAM introduction. Journal of Air Transport Management, 87, 101852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, J. F., Ahs, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers, J. J., & Wager, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2), 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UBER Elevate. (2018). UberAir vehicle requirements and missions. https://s3.amazonaws.com/uber-static/elevate/SummaryþMissionþandþ Requirements.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vongvit, R., Lee, J., Itoh, M., Lee, S. C. (2022, September). Meta-trend of trust factors in autonomous vehicles [Paper presentation]. Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 94–98). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544999.3552528
   Google Scholar
• von Sawitzky, T., Wintersberger, P., Riener, A., Gabbard, J. L. (2019, June 12). Increasing trust in fully automated driving: Route indication on an augmented reality head-up display [Paper presentation]. Proceedings - Pervasive Displays 2019 - 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, PerDis 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324947
   Google Scholar
• Walker, F., Wang, J., Martens, M. H., & Verwey, W. B. (2019). Gaze behaviour and electrodermal activity: Objective measures of drivers’ trust in automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Reimer, B., Dobres, J., & Mehler, B. (2014). The sensitivity of different methodologies for characterizing drivers’ gaze concentration under increased cognitive demand. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26(PA), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
   Google Scholar
• Wintersberger, P., von Sawitzky, T., Frison, A. K., Riener, A. (2017). Traffic augmentation as a means to increase trust in automated driving systems [Paper presentation]. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F131371. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125571.3125600
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Zhang, K., Min, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., & Liu, P. (2018). What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95, 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Sense and avoid technologies with applications to unmanned aircraft systems: Review and prospects. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 74, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Lin, R., & Zhang, W. (2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Zeng, J., Zhu, H., & Zhu, H. (2020). Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112, 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar