89
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluation of an Internet of Things Device-Based Educational Approach to Engage a More Diverse Cybersecurity Workforce

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Received 14 Mar 2023, Accepted 29 Jan 2024, Published online: 20 Feb 2024

References

  • Abdel‐Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Mohamed, M., & Rushdy, E. (2019). Internet of things in smart education environment: Supportive framework in the decision‐making process. Concurrency and Computation, 31(10), e4515. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4515
  • Air Force Association. (2022). Cyberpatriot XIV National Youth Cyber Defense Competition Registration Report 2021–2022. – Google Search. (n.d.). Retrieved 7 March 2023, from https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C5CHFA_enQA870QA870&q=Air+Force+Association.+2022.+Cyberpatriot+XIV+National+Youth+Cyber+Defense+Competition+Registration+Report+2021-2022.&spell=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjw2Nya7cr9AhUpRDABHdQIB9UQBSgAegQICBAB&biw=830&bih=796&dpr=2
  • Arora, B. (2019). Teaching cyber security to non-tech students. Politics, 39(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718760960
  • Ashcraft, C., Eger, E., Friend, M. (2012). Girls in IT: The facts. National Center for Women & IT. Boulder, CO. https://bcwt.bg/wp-content/uploads/documents/girlsInIT.pdf.
  • Avery, Z., Castillo, M., Guo, H., Guo, J., Warter-Perez, N., Won, D. S., Dong, J. (2010, October). Implementing collaborative project-based learning using the Tablet PC to enhance student learning in engineering and computer science courses. In 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. F1E-1.). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2010.5673215
  • Balakrishnan, B., & Low, F. S. (2016). Learning experience and socio-cultural influences on female engineering students’ perspectives on engineering courses and careers. Minerva, 54(2), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9295-8
  • Ban, Y., Okamura, K., Kaneko, K. (2017). July). Effectiveness of experiential learning for keeping knowledge retention in IoT security education. In 2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 699–704.). Ieee https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2017.206
  • Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924
  • Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A Framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.838920
  • Beveridge, R. (2021). Addressing the gender gap in the cybersecurity workforce. International Journal of Cyber Research and Education, 3(2), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCRE.2021070105
  • Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. McGraw-Hill.
  • Bradberry, L. A., & De Maio, J. (2019). Learning by doing: The long-term impact of experiential learning programs on student success. Journal of Political Science Education, 15(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1485571
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Burd, B., Barker, L., Divitini, M., Perez, F. A. F., Russell, I., Siever, B., Tudor, L. (2018, January). Courses, content, and tools for internet of things in computer science education. In Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports (pp. 125–139.). https://doi.org/10.1145/3174781.3174788
  • Burrell, D. N. (2020). An exploration of the cybersecurity workforce shortage. In Cyber warfare and terrorism: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1072–1081). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2466-4.ch063
  • Carlson, S., Maxa, S. (1998). Pedagogy applied to nonformal education. http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/125490.
  • Carroll, M., Lindsey, S., Chaparro, M., & Winslow, B. (2021). An applied model of learner engagement and strategies for increasing learner engagement in the modern educational environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636083
  • Cherry, D., Cummings, R. T., Moon, D., Gosha, K. (2020). Exploring Computing Career Recruitment Strategies and Preferences for Black Computing Undergraduates at HBCUs. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Southeast Conference (pp. 47–54.). https://doi.org/10.1145/3374135.3385269
  • Cheryan, S., Drury, B. J., & Vichayapai, M. (2013). Enduring influence of stereotypical computer science role models on women’s academic aspirations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312459328
  • Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
  • Chiu, T. K. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124(2021), 106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909
  • Chothia, T., De Ruiter, J. (2016). Learning from {Others’} mistakes: Penetration testing {IoT} devices in the classroom. In 2016 USENIX Workshop on Advances in Security Education (ASE 16).
  • Chounta, I. A. (2020). Collaborative learning and patterns of practice. In Encyclopedia of education and information technologies (pp. 310–323). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_83
  • Cobb, S. (2018). “I’d like Y’all to get a black friend”: The politics of race in friends. Television & New Media, 19(8), 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418778420
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow and education. In Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9_6
  • Daud, F. (2022). Benefits of teaching technology through experiential learning: Exploring the experiences of students of color [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Kansas.
  • Delle Fave, A. (2013). Past, present, and future of flow. In I. Boniwell, S. A. David, & A. Conley A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (2013; online edn). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557257.013.0005.
  • Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2425–2428). https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575
  • Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. advances in learning and instruction series. Elsevier Science, Inc. PO Box 945 10160-0757.
  • Dunn, M. H., Merkle, L. D. (2018, February). Assessing the impact of a national cybersecurity competition on students’ career interests. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 62–67.). https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159462
  • Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self‐and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02946.x
  • Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4
  • Ericson, B. (2016). Detailed race and gender information 2015. http://home.cc.gatech.edu/ice-gt/594.
  • Esin, J. O. (2020). A call for concern: The unbalanced representation of minorities and women in cybersecurity profession. J Women Minor Technol, 2, 1–11.
  • Fan, Y.-C. (2015). Fostering learner autonomy through a socio-cognitive model of reading comprehension instruction. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 9(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/18161
  • Fernández-Caramés, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2020). Teaching and learning iot cybersecurity and vulnerability assessment with shodan through practical use cases. Sensors, 20(11), 3048. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113048
  • Giannakas, F., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Voyiatzis, I., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2022). Blending cybersecurity education with IoT devices: A u-Learning scenario for introducing the man-in-the-middle attack. Information Security Journal, 32(5), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2022.2100297
  • Gray, T., & Ross, C. (2020). The effects of an experiential learning course on secondary student achievement and motivation in Geometry [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Missouri-Saint Louis.
  • Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2014). Measuring flow in gamification: Dispositional flow scale-2. Computers in Human Behavior, 40(2014), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.048
  • Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? – A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
  • Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54(2016), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216655542
  • Hosaka, M. (2014). Women’s experiences in the engineering laboratory in Japan. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(4), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.883363
  • Hoyne, G., Alessandrini, J., & Fellman, M. (2016). Doctoral education for the future: Through the looking glass. In Emerging directions in doctoral education (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 6, pp. 21–38). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120160000006010
  • Huang, Y. M., & Chiu, P. S. (2015). The effectiveness of a meaningful learning-based evaluation model for context-aware mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12147
  • Hurtado, S., Cabrera, N. L., Lin, M. H., Arellano, L., & Espinosa, L. L. (2009). Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Research in Higher Education, 50(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9114-7
  • Hwang, G.-J., Lai, C.-L., & Wang, S.-Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0
  • Iosup, A., & Epema, D. (2014). An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538899
  • Jethwani, M. M., Memon, N., Seo, W., & Richer, A. (2017). I can actually be a super sleuth. promising practices for engaging adolescent girls in cybersecurity education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116651971
  • Jin, G., Tu, M., Kim, T.-H., Heffron, J., White, J. (2018). Game based cybersecurity training for high school students. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159591
  • Jin, Y., Sun, J., Ma, H., Wang, X. (2021, December). The impact of different types of scaffolding in project-based learning on girls’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. In 2021 Tenth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT) (pp. 362–366). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT53287.2021.00077
  • Johnson, A. E., Barrack, J., Fitzgerald, J. M., Sobieraj, D. M., & Holle, L. M. (2021). Integration of a virtual dispensing simulator “MyDispense” in an experiential education program to prepare students for community introductory pharmacy practice experience. Pharmacy, 9(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010048
  • Kang, H., Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., D Simpkins, S., Rhee, H. Y., & Turner, C. (2019). How do middle school girls of color develop STEM identities? Middle school girls’ participation in science activities and identification with STEM careers. Science Education, 103(2), 418–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21492
  • Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Axelrod, D. (2018). Scaffolding for optimal challenge in K–12 problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(1), 1712. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1712
  • Konak, A. (2018). Experiential learning builds cybersecurity self-efficacy in K-12 students. Education, Research and Practice, Journal of Cybersecurity, 2018(1), 6. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jcerp/vol2018/iss1/6
  • Kornegay, M. A., Arafin, M. T., & Kornegay, K. (2021, July). Engaging underrepresented students in cybersecurity using Capture-the-Flag (CTF) competitions (experience). In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. https://peer.asee.org/37048
  • Kricorian, K., Seu, M., Lopez, D., Ureta, E., & Equils, O. (2020). Factors influencing participation of underrepresented students in STEM fields: Matched mentors and mindsets. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00219-2
  • Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2012), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092
  • Laskowski, M., & Badurowicz, M. (2014). Gamification in higher education: A case study. Human capital without borders: Knowledge and learning for quality of life. In Proceedings of the management, knowledge and learning international conference.
  • Leune, K., & Petrilli, S. J. (2017). Using Capture-the-Flag to enhance the effectiveness of cybersecurity education. In Proceedings of the. In 18th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125659.3125686
  • Li, L. (2022). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4.0 and Beyond. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y
  • Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., & De Fraine, B. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers’ autonomy support, structure, and involvement. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12095
  • Lingelbach, K. K. (2018). Perceptions of female cybersecurity professionals toward factors that encourage females to the cybersecurity field [Doctoral dissertation]. Nova Southeastern University.
  • Mäenpää, H., Tarkoma, S., Varjonen, S., Vihavainen, A. (2015, February). Blending problem-and project-based learning in internet of things education: Case greenhouse maintenance. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 398–403). https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677262
  • Malecki, A. (2018). Cybersecurity in the classroom: Bridging the gap between computer access and online safety. https://scholar.valpo.edu/cscrpr/1.
  • Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
  • McEwan, T., McConnell, A. (2013, October). Young people’s perceptions of computing careers. In 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1597–1603). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6685108
  • McGill, M. M., Decker, A., & Settle, A. (2016). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of the impact of pre-college computing activities on choices of major. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 16(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2920214
  • Mirkovic, J., Peterson, P. (2014). Class Capture-the-Flag exercises. 3GSE. Retrieved from https://www.usenix.org/conference/3gse14/summit-program/presentation/mirkovic.
  • Mountrouidou, X., Vosen, D., Kari, C., Azhar, M. Q., Bhatia, S., Gagne, G., Maguire, J., Tudor, L., Yuen, T. T. (2019). Securing the human: A review of literature on broadening diversity in cybersecurity education. Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3344429.3372507
  • Mubarok, H., Sofia, N., Kristina, D., & Rochsantiningsih, D. (2022). Meaningful Learning Model: The impact on students’ reading comprehension. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(1), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0027
  • Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. Handbook of Positive Psychology, 89, 105.
  • Nygard, K., Chowdhury, M., Kambhampaty, K., Kotala, P. (2018, April). Cybersecurity materials for K-12 education. The Midwest Instruction and Computing Symposium 2018. Retrieved from https://micsymposium.org/mics2018/proceedings/MICS_2018_paper_59.pdf.
  • Ošlejšek, R., Rusňák, V., Burská, K., Švábenský, V., & Vykopal, J. (2019). Visual feedback for players of multi-level Capture the Flag games: Field usability study. In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security (VizSec), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/VizSec48167.2019.9161386
  • Osman, M. C., Namukasa, M., Ficke, C., Piasecki, I., OConnor, T. J., & Carroll, M. (2023). Understanding how to diversify the cybersecurity workforce: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Cybersecurity Education, Research, and Practice, 2023(2), 4. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jcerp/vol2023/iss2/4/
  • Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Aubteen Darabi, A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504795
  • Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83
  • Peacock, D., & Irons, A. (2017). Gender inequality in cybersecurity: Exploring the gender gap in opportunities and progression. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 9(1), 25–44. https://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/449
  • Pedro, L. Z., Lopes, A. M., Prates, B. G., Vassileva, J., Isotani, S. (2015). Does gamification work for boys and girls? An exploratory study with a virtual learning environment. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1145/2695664.2695752
  • Petersen, R., Santos, D., Smith, M., & Witte, G. (2020). Workforce framework for cybersecurity (NICE framework). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-181r1
  • Pietri, E. S., Johnson, I. R., Majid, S., & Chu, C. (2021). Seeing what’s possible: Videos are more effective than written portrayals for enhancing the relatability of scientists and promoting black female students’ interest in STEM. Sex Roles, 84(1–2), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01153-x
  • Pinchot, J., Cellante, D., Mishra, S., & Paullet, K. (2020). Student Perceptions of Challenges and Role of Mentorship in Cybersecurity Careers: Addressing the Gender Gap. Information Systems Education Journal, 18(3), 44–53. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1258205
  • Plauska, I., & Damaševičius, R. (2014, October 9–10, 2014). Educational robots for internet-of-things supported collaborative learning. In Information and Software Technologies: 20th International Conference, ICIST 2014, Druskininkai, Lithuania. Proceedings 20 (pp. 346–358). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11958-8_28
  • Pöysä, S., Vasalampi, K., Muotka, J., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2019). Teacher–student interaction and lower secondary school students’ situational engagement. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12244
  • Preston, E. (2023). Lack of black female diversity within the cybersecurity workforce. Old Dominion University Digital Commons. https://doi.org/10.25776/k9m2-2r57
  • Procci, K., Singer, A. R., Levy, K. R., & Bowers, C. (2012). Measuring the flow experience of gamers: An evaluation of the DFS-2. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2306–2312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.039
  • Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2015). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771045
  • Reychav, I., & McHaney, R. (2017). The relationship between gender and mobile technology use in collaborative learning settings: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 113, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.005
  • Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Engeser, S. (2003). Die erfassung des flow-erlebens [The assessment of flow experience]. In J. Stiensmeier-Pelster & F. Rheinberg (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 261–279). Hogrefe.
  • Riley, M., Elgin, B., Lawrence, D., Matlack, C. (2014, March 17). Missed alarms and 40 million stolen credit card numbers: How Target blew it. Bloomberg.Com. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-03-13/target-missed-warnings-in-epic-hack-of-credit-card-data.
  • Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Wendt, J. L., & Stephen, J. S. (2021). The efficacy of a blended peer mentoring experience for racial and ethnic minority women in STEM pilot study: Academic, professional, and psychosocial outcomes for mentors and mentees. Journal for STEM Education Research, 4, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00048-6
  • Rowland, P. (2018). The CybHER program supported by CISSE framework to engage and anchor middle-school girls in cybersecurity. https://scholar.dsu.edu/theses/337.
  • Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Jacobs, J. A., Kanny, M. A., Lim, G., Monje-Paulson, L., & Zimmerman, H. B. (2017). Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: The evolution of women’s participation in computer science. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(2), 258–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257306
  • Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x
  • Schneider, B., Krajcik, J., Lavonen, J., Salmela‐Aro, K., Broda, M., Spicer, J., Bruner, J., Moeller, J., Linnansaari, J., Juuti, K., & Viljaranta, J. (2016). Investigating optimal learning moments in US and Finnish science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21306
  • Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
  • Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. Springer.
  • Shernoff, D. J., & Anderson, B. (2014). Enacting flow and student engagement in the college classroom (pp. 194–212). The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Positive Psychological Interventions.
  • Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools, 131, 145.
  • Shumba, R., Ferguson-Boucher, K., Sweedyk, E., Taylor, C., Franklin, G., Turner, C., Sande, C., Acholonu, G., Bace, R., & Hall, L. (2013, June). Cybersecurity, women and minorities: Findings and recommendations from a preliminary investigation. In Proceedings of the ITiCSE working group reports conference on innovation and technology in computer science education-working group reports (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1145/2543882.2543883
  • Simons, K. D., & Klein, J. D. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5
  • Strandberg-Long, P. (2021). Staying on task – How the concept of skill-challenge balance provides a key element to the teaching of the Meisner technique. Stanislavski Studies, 9(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2021.1969762
  • Stull, A. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.808
  • Tariq, U., Ahmed, I., Bashir, A. K., & Shaukat, K. (2023). A critical cybersecurity analysis and future research directions for the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors, 23(8), 4117. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23084117
  • Tse, D. C., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2020). Beyond challenge-seeking and skill-building: Toward the lifespan developmental perspective on flow theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1579362
  • Tobey, D. H., Pusey, P., & Burley, D. L. (2014). Engaging learners in cybersecurity careers: Lessons from the launch of the national cyber league. ACM Inroads, 5(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/2568195.2568213
  • Toda, A. M., Oliveira, W., Shi, L., Bittencourt, I. I., Isotani, S., Cristea, A. (2019). Planning gamification strategies based on user characteristics and DM: A dender-based case study (arXiv:1905.09146). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.09146.
  • Varma, R. (2010). Why so few women enroll in computing? Gender and ethnic differences in students’ perception. Computer Science Education, 20(4), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2010.527697
  • Verenikina, I. (2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/381/.
  • Wahsheh, L. A., Mekonnen, B. (2019, December). Practical cyber security training exercises. In 2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) (pp. 48–53). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI49370.2019.00015
  • Walker, A., Leary, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (Eds.) (2015). Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows. Purdue University Press.
  • Wang, L., & Chen, M. (2010). The effects of game strategy and preference‐matching on flow experience and programming performance in game‐based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903525838
  • Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2015). The gamification toolkit: Dynamics, mechanics, and components for the win. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Weston, T. J., Dubow, W. M., & Kaminsky, A. (2020). Predicting women’s persistence in Computer Science- and technology-related majors from high school to college. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343195
  • White, V., Alexander, J., Prince, D., & Verdell, A. (2018). The impact of student engagement, institutional environment, college preparation, and financial support on the persistence of underrepresented minority students in engineering at a predominately White institution: A perspective from students. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 18(2), 64. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10078664
  • Whitson, C., & Consoli, J. (2009). Flow theory and student engagement. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 2(1), 40–49.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
  • Yıldırım, S. (2012). Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: A multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.596855
  • Zahedi, L., Batten, J., Ross, M., Potvin, G., Damas, S., Clarke, P., & Davis, D. (2021). Gamification in education: A mixed-methods study of gender on computer science students’ academic performance and identity development. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(2), 441–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09271-5
  • Zimmerman, T. G., Johnson, D., Wambsgans, C., & Fuentes, A. (2011). Why Latino high school students select computer science as a major: Analysis of a success story. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993069.1993074

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.