Risk-Taking Driving Behavior in Interacting With an Autonomous Vehicle at Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashfaq, M., Zhang, Q., Ali, F., Waheed, A., & Nawaz, S. (2021). You plant a virtual tree, we’ll plant a real tree: Understanding users’ adoption of the Ant Forest mobile gaming application from a behavioral reasoning theory perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 310, 127394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atombo, C., Wu, C., Zhong, M., & Zhang, H. (2016). Investigating the motivational factors influencing drivers intentions to unsafe driving behaviours: Speeding and overtaking violations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baidu. (2019). First appearance in Changsha! Baidu’s first mass-produced L4 robotaxi fleet played in the national test area. Retrieved from https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1641085497448405497&wfr=spider&for=pc
   Google Scholar
• Baidu. (2024). Thousands of miles of journey, trickle-down journey into a majestic force. https://www.apollo.auto/robotaxi
   Google Scholar
• Bel, M., & Coeugnet, S. (2023). The delegation-level choice of an automated vehicle: An analysis by structural equation modeling. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2170368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordarie, J. (2019). Predicting intentions to comply with speed limits using a ‘decision tree’ applied to an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 63, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. C., Wu, A. M., & Hung, E. P. (2010). Invulnerability and the intention to drink and drive: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 42(6), 1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, S., & Mohan, M. (2018). Analysis of driver behaviour at unsignalized intersections. Journal of Indian Roads Congress, 79(2), 5–10.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mithun-Mohan-2/publication/328851963_Analysis_of_Driver_Behaviour_at_Unsignalized_Intersections/links/5be6624a4585150b2bab8a27/Analysis-of-Driver-Behaviour-at-Unsignalized-Intersections.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C., Zhang, K., Zhang, J., Li, S., & Li, L. (2022). Driving safety monitoring and warning for connected and automated vehicles via edge computing. In 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC55140.2022.9922076
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, S. (2016). First self-driving cars will be unmarked so that other drivers don’t try to bully them. The Guardian, 30. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/30/volvo-self-driving-car-autonomous
   Google Scholar
• Cristea, M., & Gheorghiu, A. (2016). Attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention to adopt risky behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deery, H. A. (1999). Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 30(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4375(99)00018-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, G., Nanchen, B., Ramseyer, R., & Evéquoz, F. (2017). On the road with an autonomous passenger shuttle: Integration in public spaces. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (paperback and webassign) (4th ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gesser-Edelsburg, A., Zemach, M., Lotan, T., Elias, W., & Grimberg, E. (2018). Perceptions, intentions and behavioral norms that affect pre-license driving among Arab youth in Israel. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 111, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibovic, A., Andersson, J., Lundgren, V. M., Klingegård, M., Englund, C., & Larsson, S. (2019). External vehicle interfaces for communication with other road users? In Road vehicle automation 5 (pp. 91–102). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, I.-Y., Su, T.-S., Kao, C.-S., Shu, Y.-L., Lin, P.-R., & Tseng, J.-M. (2012). Analysis of business safety performance by structural equation models. Safety Science, 50(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, K., Yang, Z. W., Feng, Z. X., Yu, Z. H., Bao, S., & Huang, Z. P. (2019). Mobile phone use while cycling: A study based on the theory of planned behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johe, M. H., & Bhullar, N. (2016). To buy or not to buy: The roles of self-identity, attitudes, perceived behavioral control and norms in organic consumerism. Ecological Economics, 128, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. W., Lim, C., & Ji, Y. G. (2023). Exploring the user acceptance of urban air mobility: Extending the technology acceptance model with trust and service quality factors. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(14), 2893–2904. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2087662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, P., & Wagner, M. (2017). Autonomous vehicle safety: An interdisciplinary challenge. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 9(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2016.2583491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummeneje, A.-M., & Rundmo, T. (2020). Attitudes, risk perception and risk-taking behaviour among regular cyclists in Norway. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 69, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Baig, F., & Li, X. (2022). Media influence, trust, and the public adoption of automated vehicles. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 14(6), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2021.3082404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Wu, J., Zhu, C., & Hu, K. (2020). A study on public adoption of robo-taxis in China. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020(Pt.7), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8877499
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Zhai, S. M., & Li, T. T. (2022). Is it OK to bully automated cars? Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 173, 106714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Wang, X., Wu, X., Glaser, Y., & He, L. (2021). Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 159, 106281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, M., Yan, X., Huang, H., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2010). Safety of public transportation occupational drivers: Risk perception, attitudes, and driving behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2145(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.3141/2145-09
   Google Scholar
• Madigan, R., Nordhoff, S., Fox, C., Amini, R. E., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A., & Merat, N. (2019). Understanding interactions between automated road transport systems and other road users: A video analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66, 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moan, I. S., & Rise, J. (2011). Predicting intentions not to “drink and drive” using an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 43(4), 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, M., & Chandra, S. (2020). Influence of major stream composition on critical gap at two-way stop-controlled intersections–A case study. Transportation Letters, 12(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2018.1494896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (Vol. 2). Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA (2019). Traffic safety facts annual report tables. Retrieved from https://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Vehicles/VehiclesLocation.aspx
   Google Scholar
• O'Callaghan, F. V., Chang, D. C., Callan, V. J., & Baglioni, A. (1997). Models of alcohol use by young adults: An examination of various attitude-behavior theories. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58(5), 502–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595239800187511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohn-Bar, E., & Trivedi, M. M. (2016). Looking at humans in the age of self-driving and highly automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 1(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2016.2571067
   Google Scholar
• Prat, F., & Gras, M. E. (2015). Psychological predictors of texting while driving among university students. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 34, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenau, M., & Müller, M. (2017). What affects our urban travel behavior? A GPS-based evaluation of internal and external determinants of sustainable mobility in Stuttgart (Germany). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 48, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2017). Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 694–696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0202-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., & Brussel, A. V. (2009). Accidents, aberrant behaviours, and speeding of young moped riders. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(6), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbakk, R. T., Ulleberg, P., Sagberg, F., & Fostervold, K. I. (2019). Speed preferences in work zones: The combined effect of visible roadwork activity, personality traits, attitudes, risk perception and driving style. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., Hamvas, L., Rice, J., Newman, D. L., & DeJong, W. (2011). Perceived social norms, expectations, and attitudes toward corporal punishment among an urban community sample of parents. Journal of Urban Health, 88(2), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9548-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Techer, F., Ojeda, L., Barat, D., Marteau, J. Y., Rampillon, F., Feron, S., & Dogan, E. (2019). Anger and highly automated driving in urban areas: The role of time pressure. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 64, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treat, J. R., Tumbas, N. S., McDonald, S. T., Shinar, D., Hume, R. D., Mayer, R., Stansifer, R., & Castellan, N. J. (1979). Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents: Final report. Executive summary. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/64993
   Google Scholar
• Ulleberg, P., & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41(5), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00077-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco, J. P. N., Farah, H., van Arem, B., & Hagenzieker, M. P. (2019). Studying pedestrians’ crossing behavior when interacting with automated vehicles using virtual reality. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Li, G., Chen, J., Long, Y., Chen, T., Chen, L., & Xia, Q. (2020). The adaptability and challenges of autonomous vehicles to pedestrians in urban China. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 145, 105692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Xu, L., & Hao, Y. (2019). What factors predict drivers’ self-reported lane change violation behavior at urban intersections? A study in China. PLOS One, 14(5), e0216751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO (2022). Road traffic injuries. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M. (2009). Structural equation model: Operation and application of AMOS (pp. 394–395). Chongqing University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, C., Feng, C., Xie, X. P., Shi, B. T., Lu, H., Lv, Y. S., Yang, M. C., & Niu, Z. D. (2023). Multi-sensor fusion and cooperative perception for autonomous driving: A review. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 15(5), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2023.3283864
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, G., Lee, J., Jiang, Q., Huang, H., Abdel-Aty, M., & Wang, L. (2021). Safety improvements by intelligent connected vehicle technologies: A meta-analysis considering market penetration rates. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 159, 106234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Li, S., & Li, L. (2023). Coordinating CAV swarms at intersections with a deep learning model. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(6), 6280–6291. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3250704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar