Teaming with a Robot in Mixed Reality: Dynamics of Trust, Self-Efficacy, and Mental Models Affected by Information Richness

References

• Andersen, E., O’Rourke, E., Liu, Y.-E., Snider, R., Lowdermilk, J., Truong, D., Cooper, S., & Popovic, Z. (2012). The impact of tutorials on games of varying complexity. [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207687
   Google Scholar
• Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F. (2013). The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 18, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J., Lottermoser, A., Richter, C., & Reinhart, G. (2019). Human-Robot-Interaction for mobile industrial robot teams. Procedia CIRP, 79, 614–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.080
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, E., & Munzel, U. (2000). The nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem: Asymptotic theory and a small-sample approximation. Biometrical Journal, 42(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(200001)42:1<17::AID-BIMJ17>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. (1996). Are art-museum visitors different from other people? The relationship between attendance and social and political attitudes in the United States. Poetics, 24(2–4), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(96)00008-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durso, F. T., Rawson, K. A., & Girotto, S. (2007). Comprehension and situation awareness. In F. T. Durso, R. S. Nickerson, S. T. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, & T. J. Perfect (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 163–193). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Edelmann, A., Stumper, S., Kronstorfer, R., & Petzoldt, T. (2020). Effects of user instruction on acceptance and trust in automated driving [Paper presentation]. 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), September 2020, Rhodes, Greece, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC45102.2020.9294511
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, M. R. (2000). Situation models: An avenue to the modeling of mental models. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44(1), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120004400117
   Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th). Sage Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U., & Gaskell, G. (2000). Episodic interviewing. In M. W. Bauer (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 75–92). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209731.n5
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. J., Swann, W. B., & Silvera, D. H. (1998). On the genesis of confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at work. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. A., & Bashir, M. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2019). JASP. https://jasp-stats.org/
   Google Scholar
• JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH. (2022). Mobile manipulation. Retrieved November 28, 2022, from https://www.joanneum.at/en/robotics/infrastructure/mobile-manipulation
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, D., Magana, A. J., & Mousas, C. (2021). Evaluating tutorial-based instructions for controllers in virtual reality games. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CHI PLAY), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474661
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kieras, D. E., & Bovair, S. (1984). The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device. Cognitive Science, 8(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0803_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchberg, V. (1996). Museum visitors and non-visitors in Germany: A representative survey. Poetics, 24(2–4), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(96)00007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, G., Woods, D., Bradshaw, J., Hoffman, R., & Feltovich, P. (2004). Ten challenges for making automation a "team player" in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(6), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2004.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körber, M. (2019). Theoretical considerations and development of a questionnaire to measure trust in automation [Series Title: Advances in intelligent systems and computing]. In S. Bagnara, R. Tartaglia, S. Albolino, T. Alexander, & Y. Fujita (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (pp. 13–30, Vol. 823). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_2
   Google Scholar
• Körber, M., Baseler, E., & Bengler, K. (2018). Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied Ergonomics, 66, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krampell, M., Solís-Marcos, I., & Hjälmdahl, M. (2020). Driving automation state-of-mind: Using training to instigate rapid mental model development. Applied Ergonomics, 83, 102986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, J., Scholz, D., Stiegemeier, D., & Baumann, M. (2020). The more you know: Trust dynamics and calibration in highly automated driving and the effects of take-overs, system malfunction, and system transparency. Human Factors, 62(5), 718–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819853686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuka, D., Elias, O., Martins, R., Lindinger, C., Pramböck, A., Jalsovec, A., Maresch, P., Hörtner, H., & Brandl, P. (2009). DEEP SPACE: High resolution VR platform for multi-user interactive narratives. In I. A. Iurgel, N. Zagalo, & P. Petta (Eds.), Interactive storytelling (pp. 185–196). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichtmann, B., Hartung, J., Wilhelm, O., & Nitsch, V. (2023). New short scale to measure workers’ attitudes toward the implementation of cooperative robots in industrial work settings: Instrument development and exploration of attitude structure. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15(6), 909–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-00996-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichtmann, B., Lottermoser, A., Berger, J., & Nitsch, V. (2022). Personal space in human-robot interaction at work: Effect of room size and working memory load. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 11(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3536167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichtmann, B., Meyer, K., & Mara, M. (2022). CoBot studio clean-up – Deep space edition: Effect of introductory information on evaluation and collaborative human-robot team performance in a mixed reality game. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7RKDB
   Google Scholar
• Leichtmann, B., & Nitsch, V. (2020). How much distance do humans keep toward robots? Literature review, meta-analysis, and theoretical considerations on personal space in human-robot interaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichtmann, B., Nitsch, V., & Mara, M. (2022). Crisis ahead? Why human-robot interaction user studies may have replicability problems and directions for improvement. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 838116. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.838116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mara, M., Meyer, K., Heiml, M., Pichler, H., Haring, R., Krenn, B., Gross, S., Reiterer, B., Layer-Wagner, T. (2021). CoBot Studio VR: A virtual reality game environment for transdisciplinary research on interpretability and trust in human-robot collaboration. 4th International Workshop on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality for HRI (VAM-HRI 2021), March 2021, Boulder, Colorado, USA. https://openreview.net/forum?id=ZlAhl-wrYqH
   Google Scholar
• Mastandrea, S., Bartoli, G., & Bove, G. (2007). Learning through ancient art and experiencing emotions with contemporary art: Comparing visits in two different museums. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.2190/R784-4504-37M3-2370
   Google Scholar
• Mastandrea, S., Bartoli, G., & Bove, G. (2009). Preferences for ancient and modern art museums: Visitor experiences and personality characteristics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobile Industrial Robots. (2022). Mobile robot from Mobile Industrial Robots - MiR100. Retrieved November 28, 2022, from https://www.mobile-industrial-robots.com/solutions/robots/mir100/
   Google Scholar
• Morin, R., Léger, P.-M., Senecal, S., Bastarache-Roberge, M.-C., Lefèbrve, M., Fredette, M. (2016). The effect of game tutorial: A comparison between casual and hardcore gamers. Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (CHI PLAY Companion '16), October 2016, New York, NY, USA, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1145/2968120.2987730
   Google Scholar
• Neyer, F. J., Felber, J., & Gebhardt, C. (2012). Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft. Diagnostica, 58(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, E., Ososky, S., Grove, J., & Jentsch, F. (2011). From tools to teammates: Toward the development of appropriate mental models for intelligent robots. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1491–1495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551310
   Google Scholar
• Reiterer, B., Brandstötter, M., Mara, M., Rammer, D., Haring, R., Heiml, M., Meyer, K., Hoffmann, T., Weyrer, M., Hofbaur, M. (2023). An immersive game projection setup for studies on collaboration with a real robot. Proceedings of the Austrian Robotics Workshop (ARW’23), April 2023, Linz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. L., Hicks, T.-N., Suddrey, G., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2020). The robot self-efficacy scale: Robot self-efficacy, likability and willingness to interact increases after a robot-delivered tutorial [Paper presentation]. 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), August 2020, Naples, Italy, 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223535
   Google Scholar
• Rueben, M., Klow, J., Duer, M., Zimmerman, E., Piacentini, J., Browning, M., Bernieri, F. J., Grimm, C. M., & Smart, W. D. (2021). Mental models of a mobile shoe rack: Exploratory findings from a long-term in-the-wild study. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 10(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science: a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 16(4), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966795
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2014). The sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (U. Flick (Ed.)). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243
   Google Scholar
• Sciutti, A., Mara, M., Tagliasco, V., & Sandini, G. (2018). Humanizing human-robot interaction: On the importance of mutual understanding. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 37(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2018.2795095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Clair, A., & Mataric, M. (2015). How robot verbal feedback can improve team performance in human-robot task collaborations. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’15), March 2015, New York, NY, USA, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696491
   Google Scholar
• Universal Robots. (2022). CB3 Family | Collaborative robots by Universal Robots. Retrieved November 28, 2022, from https://www.universal-robots.com/cb3/
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Haaf, J. M., Hinne, M., Kucharský, Š., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Gupta, A. R. K. N., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2021). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, N., Pynadath, D. V., & Hill, S. G. (2016). Trust calibration within a human-robot team: Comparing automatically generated explanations [Paper presentation]. 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), March 2016, Christchurch, New Zealand, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451741
   Google Scholar