Game-Changer NPCs: Leveling-Up Technology Acceptance and Flow in a Digital Learning Quest

References

• Ahmad, N., & Abdulkarim, H. (2019). The impact of flow experience and personality type on the intention to use virtual world. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(12), 1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1509500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajibade, P. (2018). Technology acceptance model limitations and criticisms: Exploring the practical applications and use in technology-related studies, mixed-method, and qualitative researches. Library Philosophy and Practice, 9, 1–13. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/194
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116
   Google Scholar
• Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Alturki, U., Alrobai, A., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Omar Alsayed, A., & Kamin, Y. B. (2022). Social media–based collaborative learning: The effect on learning success with the moderating role of cyberstalking and cyberbullying. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1434–1447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1728342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, G. (2018). Effect of demographics on use intention of gamified systems. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.2018010101
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barz, N., Benick, M., Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, L., & Perels, F. (2024). The effect of digital game-based learning interventions on cognitive, metacognitive, and affective-motivational learning outcomes in school: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 94(2), 193–227.
   Google Scholar
• Bichlmeier, C. (2023). Interaction with AI-controlled characters in AR worlds. In A. Y. C. Nee & S. K. Ong (Eds.), Springer handbook of augmented reality (pp. 131–155). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitrián, P., Buil, I., & Catalán, S. (2021). Making finance fun: The gamification of personal financial management apps. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(7), 1310–1332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-02-2021-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carenys, J., & Moya, S. (2016). Digital game-based learning in accounting and business education. Accounting Education, 25(6), 598–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1241951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, V. M., & Furtado, E. S. (2020). A framework used for analysis of user experience in games. Journal on Interactive Systems, 11(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2020.759
   Google Scholar
• Chan, H. Y., Liu, S. W., & Hou, H. T. (2023). Interacting with real-person non-player characters to learn history: Development and playing behavior pattern analysis of a remote scaffolding-based situated educational game. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2192745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. C., Liang, C., Chou, P. N., & Lin, G. Y. (2017). Is game-based learning better in flow experience and various types of cognitive load than non-game-based learning? Perspective from multimedia and media richness. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattaraman, V., Kwon, W. S., Gilbert, E., & Li., J. Y. (2014). Virtual shopping agents: Persona effects for older users. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 8(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-08-2013-0054
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, S., Akhtar, A., & Gupta, A. (2021). Gamification in banking: A review, synthesis and setting research agenda. Young Consumers, 22(3), 456–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2020-1229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H., Liu, J.-H., & Shou, W.-C. (2018). How competition in a game-based science learning environment influences students’ learning achievement, flow experience, and learning behavioral patterns. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 164–176. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/how-competition-game-based-science-learning/docview/2147876301/se-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. L., & Wu, C. T. (2021). A digital role-playing game for learning: Effects on critical thinking and motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 3018–3030. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1916765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. M. (2022). How different categories of gamified stimuli affect massive open online courses continuance intention and learning performance? Mediating roles of internal experiences. Social Science Computer Review, 41(2), 089443932211119. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221111928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (2009). Bootstrap cross-validation indices for PLS path model assessment. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 83–97). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cicco, R. D., Silva, S. C., & Alparone, F. R. (2020). Millennials’ attitude toward chatbots: An experimental study in a social relationship perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(11), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2019-0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and creativity. Namta Journal, 22(2), 60–97.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denden, M., Tlili, A., Chen, N. S., Abed, M., Jemni, M., & Essalmi, F. (2022). The role of learners’ characteristics in educational gamification systems: A systematic meta-review of the literature. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2098777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongas, R., & Grace, K. (2023). Designing to leverage presence in VR rhythm games. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7020018
   Google Scholar
• Faiola, A., Newlon, C., Pfaff, M., & Smyslova, O. (2013). Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: Enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1113–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng-Jung, L., & Chia-Mei, L. (2021). Design and implementation of a collaborative educational gamification authoring system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(17), 277–277. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i17.24087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franque, F. B., Oliveira, T., Tam, C., & Santini, F. D. O. (2021). A meta-analysis of the quantitative studies in continuance intention to use an information system. Internet Research, 31(1), 123–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2019-0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambino, A., Fox, J., & Ratan, R. A. (2020). Building a stronger CASA: Extending the computers are social actors paradigm. Human-Machine Communication, 1, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y. R., Goh, D. H. L., & Luyt, B. (2017). Tertiary students’ acceptance of a game to teach information literacy. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2016-0131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Z., Xu, W., Zhang, J., Wang, H., Lo, C. H., & Liang, H. N. (2023, October). Who’s watching me?: Exploring the impact of audience familiarity on player performance, experience, and exertion in virtual reality Exergames. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (pp. 622–631). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00077
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLSSEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, J. C., & Ng, R. (2022). Perspective-taking of non-player characters in prosocial virtual reality games: Effects on closeness, empathy, and game immersion. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(6), 1185–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1864018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr, M. (2023). Attitudes towards digital game-based language learning among Japanese university students. Japan Association for Language Teaching Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 19(1), 26–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, T., Cabrera, J., & Beaudoin, C. E. (2023). Disentangling real-world and virtual-world social norms: The persuasive elements and social psychological effects of a serious game. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 9, 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100038
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. Y., Chen, C. C., & Ting, P. F. (2018). Understanding MOOC continuance: An empirical examination of social support theory. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1100–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1446990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Chen, X., & Davison, R. M. (2019). Social support, source credibility, social influence, and impulsive purchase behavior in social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23(3), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2019.1619905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Su, C. Y., & Fu, A. (2022). Factors influencing younger adolescents’ intention to use game-based programming learning: A multigroup analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8203–8233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10973-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H., Chen, Y., & Rau, P. L. P. (2022). Exploring acceptance of intelligent tutoring system with pedagogical agent among high school students. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21(2), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00835-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. C., Li, L. N., Lee, H. Y., Browning, M. H., & Yu, C. P. (2023). Surfing in virtual reality: An application of extended technology acceptance model with flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 9, 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100252
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. M. (2017). Exploring students’ acceptance of team messaging services: The roles of social presence and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 1047–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. M. (2018). Reason and emotion: How they drive students to play a color game. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1911–1924. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. M. (2019). Exploring students’ acceptance of educational computer games from the perspective of learning strategy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. M. (2020). What drives students to continue using social Mindtools? The perspectives of social support and social influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106447–106447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humida, T., Mamun, M. H. A., & Keikhosrokiani, P. (2022). Predicting behavioral intention to use e-learning system: A case-study in Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2241–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10707-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, M. H., & Choi, E. Y. (2022). How will video conference fatigue affect participants of MICE in the with-COVID-19 era? Focusing on video conference quality, social presence theory, and flow. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jemmali, C., Bunian, S., Mambretti, A., & El-Nasr, M. S. (2018, August). Educational game design: An empirical study of the effects of narrative. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 1–10). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapakis, V., Dzardanova, E., & Agelada, A. (2023). Virtual reality in education: The impact of high-fidelity nonverbal cues on the learning experience. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100020.
   Google Scholar
• Khaldi, A., Bouzidi, R., & Nader, F. (2023). Gamification of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 10–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z
   Google Scholar
• Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2016). Research-based design of pedagogical agent roles: A review, progress, and recommendations. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0055-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krath, J., Schürmann, L., & Korflesch, H. F. V. (2021). Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106963–106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krouska, A., Troussas, C., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2022). Mobile game-based learning as a solution in COVID-19 era: Modeling the pedagogical affordance and student interactions. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10672-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, W. W., Du, H., King, R. B., Chu., & S. K., Hku. (2014). Why do some students learn better than others in digital game based learning? The role of hope and social support. CITE Research Symposium, CITERS 2014. The Center for Information Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C. C., Chen, Z.-H., Cheng, H. N. H., & Chan, T.-W. (2012). Unfolding learning behaviors: A sequential analysis approach in a game-based learning environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(1), 25–44. https://rptel.apsce.net/index.php/RPTEL/article/view/2012-07003
   Google Scholar
• Liew, T. W., & Tan, S. M. (2016, September). Virtual agents with personality: Adaptation of learner-agent personality in a virtual learning environment. In 2016 Eleventh International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM) (pp. 157–162). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Liew, T. W., & Tan, S. M. (2021). Social cues and implications for designing expert and competent artificial agents: A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 65, 101721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., & Gan, C. L. (2023, June). “I am disappointed with your results!": The effects of a pedagogical agent’s negative affective feedback on mental effort and learning performance. In Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies (pp. 57–64). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., & Jayothisa, C. (2013). The effects of peer-like and expert-like pedagogical agents on learners’ agent perceptions, task-related attitudes, and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 275–286. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.16.4.275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., & Kew, S. N. (2022). Can an angry pedagogical agent enhance mental effort and learning performance in a multimedia learning environment. Information and Learning Sciences, 123(9/10), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-09-2021-0079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., Pang, W. M., Khan, M., T., I., & Kew, S. N. (2023). I am Alexa, your virtual tutor!: The effects of Amazon Alexa’s text-to-speech voice enthusiasm in a multimedia learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1455–1489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11255-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52(3), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Yu, P., Liu, J., Pi, Z., & Cui, W. (2023). How do students’ self‐regulation skills affect learning satisfaction and continuous intention within desktop‐based virtual reality? A structural equation modelling approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(3), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Biocca, F., Freeman, J., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2015). Immersed in media: Telepresence theory, measurement & technology. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Z., Brown, C., & Steen, B. (2021). Factors contributing to teachers’ acceptance intention of gamified learning tools in secondary schools: An exploratory study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6337–6363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10622-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí-Parreño, J., Méndez-Ibáñez, E., & Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2016). The use of gamification in education: A bibliometric and text mining analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming, J., Jianqiu, Z., Bilal, M., Akram, U., & Fan, M. (2021). How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of SOR theory. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 17(4), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-02-2021-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosiane, S., & Brown, I. (2020). Factors influencing online game-based learning effectiveness. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 23(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJISE.20.23.1.006
   Google Scholar
• Mustafa, A. S., Garcia, M. B. (2021). Theories integrated with technology acceptance model (TAM) in online learning acceptance and continuance intention: A systematic review, in and others, (Ed.). 2021 1st Conference on Online Teaching for Mobile Education (OT4ME) (pp. 68–72). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofosu-Ampong, K., Boateng, R., Anning-Dorson, T., & Kolog, E. A. (2020). Are we ready for Gamification? An exploratory analysis in a developing country. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10057-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 114. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Joaquim, S., Toda, A. M., Palomino, P. T., Vassileva, J., & Isotani, S. (2022). The effects of personalized gamification on students’ flow experience, motivation, and enjoyment. Smart Learning Environments, 9(16), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00194-x
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratama, A. R. (2021). Fun first, useful later: Mobile learning acceptance among secondary school students in Indonesia. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1737–1753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10334-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 21–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, E. J., Fayek, H. M., & Zambetta, F. (2023). A case for personalized non-player character companion design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2181125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, H., Rau, P. L. P., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring player immersion in the computer game narrative. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802546732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. (2018). Social game elements in world of warcraft: Interpersonal relations, groups, and organizations for gamification design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(8), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1461760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiners, T., Wood, L. C., Gregory, S., & Teräs, H. (2015). Gamification design elements in business education simulations. In Encyclopedia of information science and technology (3rd ed., pp. 3048–3061). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch298
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C., Da Silva, D., & Bido, D. (2015). Structural equation modeling with SmartPLS. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v13i2.2717
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, L. F., Oliveira, A., & Costa, C. J. (2016). Playing seriously-How gamification and social cues influence bank customers to use gamified e-business applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence and flow. Information & Management, 53(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E. K., Gross, C., Stoll, A., Peck, B. S., Allen, M., & Kim, S. Y. (2017). Reflecting on connecting: Meta-analysis of differences between computer-mediated and face-to-face self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüth, M., Birke, A., & Kaspar, K. (2022). Teaching with digital games: How intentions to adopt digital game-based learning are related to personal characteristics of pre-service teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1412–1429. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sá, M. J., & Serpa, S. (2023). Metaverse as a learning environment: Some considerations. Sustainability, 15(3), 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, S. B. (2023). Toward better digital advertising: The role of the anthropomorphic virtual agent. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 44(3), 295–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2023.2218432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, S. B., & Choura, F. (2022). Effectiveness of virtual reality technologies in digital entrepreneurship: A comparative study of two types of virtual agents. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 24(1), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-01-2021-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajjadi, P., Zhao, J., Wallgrün, J. O., Furman, T., La Femina, P. C., Fatemi, A., Zidik, Z. E., & Klippel, A. (2020, December). The effect of virtual agent gender and embodiment on the experiences and performance of students in virtual field trips. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 221–228). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Salimon, M. G., Aliyu, O. A., Yusr, M. M., & Perumal, S. (2021). Smartphone banking usage in Nigeria: Gamification, technology acceptance and cultural factors empirical perspectives. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 87(4), 12174–12174. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salimon, M. G., Sanuri, S. M. M., Aliyu, O. A., Perumal, S., & Yusr, M. M. (2021). E-learning satisfaction and retention: A concurrent perspective of cognitive absorption, perceived social presence and technology acceptance model. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 23(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-02-2020-0029
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorer, A., & Protopsaltis, A. (2021, September). Learners’ user experience assessment of a serious game for social innovation education. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning (pp. 23–24). Academic Conferences International Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, L. M., & Valle, B. E. (2013). Social constructivist teaching strategies in the small group classroom. Small Group Research, 44(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413488422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, P. (2023). A social phenomenology of non-player characters (NPCs) in videogames. Techne: Research in Philosophy & Technology, 27(2), 620–630. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne202382182
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Stylidis, D., & Woosnam, K. M. (2023). From virtual to actual destinations: Do interactions with others, emotional solidarity, and destination image in online games influence willingness to travel? Current Issues in Tourism, 26(9), 1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2056001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. R., & Shih, J. L. (2015). Game factors and game-based learning design model. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2015, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/549684
   Google Scholar
• Shim, S. I., Kwon, W. S., Chattaraman, V., & Gilbert, J. E. (2012). Virtual sales associates for mature consumers: Technical and social support in e-retail service interactions. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(3), 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X12456903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications (Vol. 19, pp. 451–484). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shroff, R., Ting, F., & Lam, W. H. (2019). A conceptual framework for immersion and flow in digital game-based learning: An example of a game-based classroom response system. Ubiquitous Learning, 12(3), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v12i03/41-60
   Google Scholar
• Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikström, P., Valentini, C., Sivunen, A., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2022). How pedagogical agents communicate with students: A two-phase systematic review. Computers & Education, 188, 1–15. 104564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, R., Rodrigues, R., & Leal, C. (2019). Play it again: How game-based learning improves flow in Accounting and Marketing education. Accounting Education, 28(5), 484–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2019.1647859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., & Sivo, S. A. (2012). Predicting continued use of online teacher professional development and the influence of social presence and sociability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01223.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starks, K. (2014). Cognitive behavioral game design: A unified model for designing serious games. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer, J., Biocca, F., & Levy, M. R. (1995). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality, 33, 37–39. https://faculty.washington.edu/farkas/HCDE510-Fall2012/SteuerMediaRichnessTheory.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takatalo, J., Häkkinen, J., Kaistinen, J., & Nyman, G. (2010). Presence, involvement, and flow in digital games. In R. Bernhaupt (Ed.), Evaluating user experience in games (Human-Computer Interaction Series). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-963-3_3
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S. M., & Liew, T. W. (2020). Designing embodied virtual agents as product specialists in a multi-product category Ecommerce: The roles of source credibility and social presence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(12), 1136–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1722399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S. M., Liew, T. W., Gan, C. L., & Wong, W. M. (2021). Visual style of embodied virtual sales agents. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.2021010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tlili, A., Essalmi, F., & Jemni, M. (2016). Improving learning computer architecture through an educational mobile game. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0030-6
   Google Scholar
• Toh, W. (2023). The player experience and design implications of narrative games. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(13), 2742–2769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toh, W., & Kirschner, D. (2023). Developing social-emotional concepts for learning with video games. Computers & Education, 194, 104708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uludağlı, M. Ç., & Oğuz, K. (2023). Non-player character decision-making in computer games. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(12), 14159–14191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10491-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanduhe, V. Z., Nat, M., & Hasan, H. F. (2020). Continuance intentions to use gamification for training in higher education: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM), Social motivation, and task technology fit (TTF). IEEE Access. 8, 21473–21484. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D. C., & Huang, Y. M. (2023). Exploring the influence of competition and collaboration on learning performance in digital game-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1547–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10247-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., & Lee, K. (2020). Getting in the flow together: The role of social presence, perceived enjoyment and concentration on sustainable use intention of mobile social network game. Sustainability, 12(17), 6853–6853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. T., Lin, Y. L., & Lu, H. E. (2023). Exploring the effect of improved learning performance: A mobile augmented reality learning system. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7509–7541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11487-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, X., Liu, T., Wang, J., & Tian, J. (2022). Understanding learner continuance intention: A comparison of live video learning, pre-recorded video learning and hybrid video learning in COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1938389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warpefelt, H., & Verhagen, H. (2015). Towards an updated typology of non-player character roles. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Game and Entertainment Technologies (pp. 1–9). International Association for the Development of the Information Society.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, D., Liu, H., Meng-Lewis, Y., Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Gamified money: Exploring the effectiveness of gamification in mobile payment adoption among the silver generation in China. Information Technology & People, 35(1), 281–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-09-2019-0456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L. C., & Reiners, T. (2014). Game-based elements to upgrade bots to non-player characters in support of educators. In A. Hebbel-Seeger, T. Reiners, & D. Schäffer (Eds.), Synthetic worlds (Integrated series in information systems, Vol. 33, pp. 273–294). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6286-6_11
   Google Scholar
• Wu, R., & Yu, Z. (2023). Investigating users’ acceptance of the metaverse with an extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2241295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Lin, J., Chen, T., Lin, S., Chen, J., Miao, W., Wei, W., Sun, H., Sun, J., & Gu, C. (2022). A study on the effects of perceived playfulness and emotional support in interactive learning environments for German language acquisition—a role-playing library system case. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1073985. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1073985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, S., Lei, S. I., Shen, H., & Xiao, H. (2020). Social presence, telepresence and customers’ intention to purchase online peer-to-peer accommodation: A mediating model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 42, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, K., Wen, S., Xu, W., Caon, M., Baghaei, N., & Liang, H. N. (2023). Cheer for me: Effect of non-player character audience feedback on older adult users of virtual reality exergames. Virtual Reality, 27(3), 1887–1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00780-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Q., & Gao, Q. (2023). Being there, and being together: Avatar appearance and peer interaction in VR classrooms for video-based learning. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2189818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunanto, A. A., Herumurti, D., Rochimah, S., & Arifiani, S. (2021). A literature review for non-player character existence in educational game. In E. Joelianto, A. Turnip, & A. Widyotriatmo (Eds.), Cyber physical, computer and automation system (Advances in intelligent systems and computing, Vol. 1291). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4062-6_20
   Google Scholar
• Yunanto, A. A., Herumurti, D., Rochimah, S., & Kuswardayan, I. (2019). English education game using non-player character based on natural language processing. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.158
   Google Scholar
• Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaric, N., Roepke, R., Lukarov, V., & Schroeder, U. (2021). Gamified learning theory: The moderating role of learners’ learning tendencies. International Journal of Serious Games, 8(3), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v8i3.438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Cao, J., Liu, D., & Qi, J. (2022). Popularity of the metaverse: Embodied social presence theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 997751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Wang, A., & Sun, Y. (2020). Technological environment, virtual experience, and MOOC continuance: A stimulus-organism-response perspective. Computers & Education, 144, 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, D., Zhang, R., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). Digital game-based learning of information literacy: Effects of gameplay modes on university students’ learning performance, motivation, self-efficacy and flow experiences. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar