Planned Behavior in the Use of Dating Apps by Women in Korea

References

• Ahn, S. T., Kim, J. W., Park, H. S., Kim, H. J., Park, H. J., Ahn, H. S., Lee, S. W., & Moon, D. G. (2021). Analysis of sexual behaviors among adults in Korea: Results from the “Korean National Survey on Sexual Consciousness. The World Journal of Men’s Health, 39(2), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.190137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264000974_The_Influence_of_Attitudes_on_Behavior
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29, 203–232. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Sheikh, S. (2013). Action versus inaction: Anticipated affect in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00989.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos. http://www.smallwaters.com.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(Pt 4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In R. Hancock (Ed.), Dynamic marketing for a changing world (pp. 389–398). American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2014). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1117–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144481452159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg (2019). To Win Over Asia, Tinder Is Trying to Shed Its Hookup Image. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-27/to-win-over-asia-tinder-is-trying-to-shed-its-hookup-image
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., & Goodstein, R. C. (2001). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers’ evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1086/323731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, D., Singu, H. B., Kar, A. K., & Biswas, W. (2023). From fear to faith in the adoption of medicine delivery application: An integration of SOR framework and IRT theory. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. K.-S., & Fishbein, M. (1993). Determinants of college women’s intentions to tell their partners to use condoms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(18), 1455–1470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. S. (2017). Who uses dating apps? Exploring the relationships among trust, sensation-seeking, smartphone use, and the intent to use dating apps based on the Integrative Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, K., Edelstein, R. S., & Vernon, P. A. (2018). Attached to dating apps: Attachment orientations and preferences for dating apps. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918770696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChosunBiz (2020). Korea’s SNS usage rate is 3rd in the world… The most used one is ‘Naver Band’. https://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2020/09/07/2020090700514.html
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (2005). Theory of planned behaviour and health behaviour. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behaviour (2nd ed., pp. 170–222). Open University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235356420_The_Theory_of_Planned_Behaviour_and_Health_Behaviour
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dholakia, U. M. (2001). A Motivational Process Model of Product Involvement and Consumer Risk Perception. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1340–1362. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006479
   Google Scholar
• Echevarria, S. G., Peterson, R., & Woerner, J. (2023). College students’ experiences of dating app facilitated sexual violence and associations with mental health symptoms and well-being. Journal of Sex Research, 60(8), 1193–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2022.2130858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embrain (n.d). Modern people look for ‘new encounters’ and ‘romance’ through smartphone apps. https://www.trendmonitor.co.kr/tmweb/trend/allTrend/detail.do?bIdx=1756&code=0401&trendType=CKOREA
   Google Scholar
• Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting E-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00111-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherman, M. S., Valacich, J. S., & Wells, J. D. (2006). Is that authentic or artificial? understanding consumer perceptions of risk in e-service encounters. Information Systems Journal, 16(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillett, R. (2023). “This is not a nice safe space”: investigating women’s safety work on Tinder. Feminist Media Studies, 23(1), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1948884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, D. A., & Armstrong, H. L. (2024). “They were talking to an idea they had about me”: A qualitative analysis of transgender individuals’ experiences using dating apps. Journal of Sex Research, 61(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2176422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, M., Jeger, M., & Frajman Ivković, A. (2015). The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1083875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, A., & Flores, C. (2018). Simply more than swiping left: A critical analysis of toxic masculine performances on Tinder Nightmares. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1085–1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816681540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the Natural Environment: The Role of Affective Connection and Identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinge (n.d). The dating app designed to be deleted. https://hinge.co/
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Scientific Software International, Inc. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-97878-000
   Google Scholar
• Kang, H., Kim, H. W., Baek, G., & Park, D. (2023). Recalling the past within a social network’s collective memory work: How did Korean Twitter users shape # Equal_Punishment_for_Equal _Crime from their experiences? Social Media + Society, 9(1), 20563051231156365. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305123115636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, L. B., Szybillo, G. J., & Jacoby, J. (1974). Components of Perceived Risk in Product Purchase: A Cross-Validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(3), 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korol, L., Fietzer, A. W., Bevelander, P., & Pasichnyk, I. (2022). Are Immigrants Scapegoats? The Reciprocal Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being, Political Distrust, and Anti-immigrant Attitudes in Young Adulthood. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1392–1415. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211065951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krettenauer, T., Wang, W., Jia, F., & Yao, Y. (2019). Connectedness with nature and the decline of pro-environmental behavior in adolescence: A comparison of Canada and China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2006). Predicting behavioral intention of choosing a travel destination. Tourism Management, 27(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, J. E., Steele, A. R., & Monson, O. (2023). Swiping right for “Mr Right”: An investigation into the relationship between tinder use and relationship attitudes and behaviors in Australian female emerging adults. Psychology of Popular Media, 12(4), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000420
   Google Scholar
• Laroche, M., McDougall, G. H. G., Bergeron, J., & Yang, Z. (2004). Exploring how intangibility affects perceived risk. Journal of Service Research, 6(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670503262955
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W. (2008). Investigation on the model of consumers’ perceived risk—integrated viewpoint. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(2), 977–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.10.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littler, D., & Melanthiou, D. (2006). Consumer perceptions of risk and uncertainty and the implications for behaviour towards innovative retail services: The case of internet banking. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(6), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Lobb, A. E., Mazzocchi, M., & Traill, W. B. (2007). Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour. Food Quality and Preference, 18(2), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, M., & Vogel, C. (2017). Gender bias on Tinder: Transforming an exploratory qualitative survey into statistical data for contextualized interpretation. In A. Costa, L. Luís, & A. Moreira (Eds.), Computer Supported Qualitative Research. (pp. 225–236). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, W., Davies, S., Smith, J., & Terry, D. (2007). Pizza and pop and the student identity: The role of referent group norms in healthy and unhealthy eating. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.1.57-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, R., Eves, F., & Carroll, D. (2002). The influence of affective and instrumental beliefs on exercise intentions and behavior: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(6), 1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, C. M. L., & Schmitt, M. T. (2019). Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, M. (2009). The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(Pt 4), 649–705. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608x393136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, M. S., Oliver, M., Simnadis, T., Beck, E. J., Coltman, T., Iverson, D., Caputi, P., & Sharma, R. (2015). The theory of planned behaviour and dietary patterns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 81, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V.-W. (2001). Re-conceptualizing consumer store image processing using perceived risk. Journal of Business Research, 54(2), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(99)00086-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montano, E., & Kasprzyk, D. (2015). Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. In K. Glanz, B. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior: Theory, research and practice (5th ed., pp. 95–124). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. (2022). Sheriff: Man raped woman after they met on dating app. Times Union. https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Sheriff-Man-rapes-woman-after-meeting-on-dating-16754580.php
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. G., Venkatesh, V., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2004.839967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moutinho, L. (1987). Consumer behaviour in tourism. European Journal of Marketing, 21(10), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisson, C., & Earl, A. (2020). The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. In K. Sweeny, M. Robbins, & L. Cohen (Eds.), The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology (pp. 755–761). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2016). Persuasion: Theory and Research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Paquin, R. S., & Keating, D. M. (2017). Fitting identity in the reasoned action framework: A meta-analysis and model comparison. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1152217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2020). The Virtues and Downsides of Online Dating. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/06/the-virtues-and-downsides-of-online-dating/
   Google Scholar
• Pruchniewska, U. (2020). “I like that it’s my choice a couple different times”: Gender, affordances, and user experience on Bumble dating. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2422–2439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahiem, M. D. H. (2020). Technological barriers and challenges in the use of ICT during the COVID-19 emergency remote learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 6124–6133. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082248
   Google Scholar
• Ranzini, G., & Lutz, C. (2016). Love at first swipe? Explaining tinder self-presentation and motives. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916664559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, A. E., Turrisi, R., Abar, B., & Peters, K. E. (2009). Social–cognitive correlates of protective drinking behaviors and alcohol-related consequences in college students. Addictive Behaviors, 34(11), 911–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richner, D. C., & Lynch, S. M. (2023). Sexual health knowledge and sexual self-efficacy as predictors of sexual risk behaviors in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 48(1), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843231172183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehl, W. S., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (1992). Risk perceptions and pleasure travel: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 30(4), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759203000403
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the united states displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(36), 17753–17758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908630116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeri, A. K., Ogilvie, C., La Macchia, S. T., Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Predicting facebook users’ online privacy protection: Risk, trust, norm focus theory, and the theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154(4), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.914881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, M. W., Menegatos, L., & Roberto, A. J. (2017). When do friends prevent friends from hooking up intoxicated? An examination of sex differences and hypothetical intoxication in peer interventions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1819–1829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0969-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel, R. P., DAvernas, J. R., Zanna, M. P., DeCourville, N. H., & Manske, S. R. (1992). Problem drinking: A problem for the theory of reasoned action? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(5), 358–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevi, B. (2019). The dark side of tinder. Journal of Individual Differences, 40(4), 242–246.), https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., & Christopoulos, G. (2021). Caring for you vs. caring for the planet: empathic concern and emotions associated with energy-saving preferences in Singapore. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 101879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, A., Chakraborty, D., & Siddiqui, M. (2023). Dating dilemma: Predicting the barriers to adoption of Online Dating Apps (ODAs) applying innovation resistance theory. Journal of Promotion Management, 29(8), 1082–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2023.2187001
   Google Scholar
• Sivo, S., Pan, C., & Brophy, J. (2004). Temporal cross-lagged effects between subjective norms and students’ attitudes regarding the use of technology. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 42(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.200409_42(1).0006.RS.CE
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(Pt 4), 647–666. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607x269748
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sowmya, G., Chakraborty, D., Polisetty, A., & Jain, R. K. (2024). Exploring the adoption patterns of matrimonial apps: An analysis of user gratifications. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, 103731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddard, J. E., & Fern, E. F. (1999). Risk-taking propensity in supplier choice: differences by sex and decision frame in a simulated organizational buying context. Psychology and Marketing, 16(7), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199910)16:7<563::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumter, S. R., & Vandenbosch, L. (2018). Dating gone mobile: demographic and personality-based correlates of using smartphone-based dating applications among emerging adults. New Media & Society, 21(3), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818804773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-k
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. (2016). What are you doing on tinder? Impression management on a matchmaking mobile app. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1644–1659. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S., & Trottier, D. (2022). Dating apps: A literature review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 46(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2069046
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Zhu, J., & Liu, Q. (2012). A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1902–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar