Development and Validation of Cloud Applications Usability Development Scale

References

• Abraham, A., & Yang, J. (2023). A comparative analysis of performance and usability on serverless and server-based google cloud services. In International Conference on Advances in Computing Research (pp. 408–422). Springer Nature Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Alhejji, S., Albesher, A., Wahsheh, H., & Albarrak, A. (2022). Evaluating and comparing the usability of mobile banking applications in Saudi Arabia. Information, 13(12), 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13120559
   Google Scholar
• Alnasser, A., Alnabit, N., & Alanazi, W. (2017). Usability evaluation of prototypes designed for a Saudi university website. International Journal of Computing & Information Sciences, 13(1), 15–25. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Alnasser%2C+A.%2C+N.+Alnabit%2C+and+W.+Alanazi.+%22Usability+evaluation+of+prototypes+designed+for+a+Saudi+university+website.%22+International+Journal+of+Computing+%26+Information+Sciences+13%2C+no.+1+%282017%29%3A+15-25.&btnG=
   Google Scholar
• Alqahtani, A. (2019). Usability testing of google cloud applications: Students’ perspective. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.585
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sharafat, B., & Qadoumi, B. (2016). Generic usability monitoring model for cloud computing environment (GUM). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things and Cloud Computing (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1145/2896387.2896430
   Google Scholar
• Al-Sumaty, R. M., & Umar, I. N. (2018). Design and evaluation of cloud-based students data management system usability. In 2018 International Conference on Smart Computing and Electronic Enterprise (ICSCEE) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCEE.2018.8538428
   Google Scholar
• Arain, A., Ahmed, Z., Hussain, Wajid, H., Rizvi., & M. S., Vighio. (2016). Evaluating usability of M-learning application in the context of higher education institute. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Third International Conference, LCT 2016, Held as Part of HCI International 2016, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17–22, Proceedings 3 (pp. 259–268). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, P., & Wilkinson, B. (2016). Preliminary usability testing of ClaMApp: A classroom management app for tablets. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 654–656). https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3011855
   Google Scholar
• Avram, M.-G. (2014). Advantages and challenges of adopting cloud computing from an enterprise perspective. Procedia Technology, 12, 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.525
   Google Scholar
• Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barradas, R., Lencastre, J. A., Soares, S., & Valente, A. (2019). Usability evaluation of an educational robot for STEM areas.
   Google Scholar
• Benaida, M., Namoun, A., & Taleb, A. (2018). Evaluation of the impact of usability in Arabic university websites: Comparison between Saudi Arabia and the UK. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(8), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090848
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, N., & Macleod, M. (1994). Usability measurement in context. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13(1–2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299408914592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blecken, A., Bruggemann, D., & Marx, W. (2010). Usability evaluation of a learning management system. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.422
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Botta, A., De Donato, W., Persico, V., & Pescapé, A. (2016). Integration of cloud computing and internet of things: A survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 56, 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). Sus: A “quick and dirty” usability. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(3), 189–194. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781498710411-35/sus-quick-dirty-usability-scale-john-brooke
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-M., Li, M.-C., & Chen, Y.-T. (2022). The effects of web-based inquiry learning mode with the support of collaborative digital reading annotation system on information literacy instruction. Computers & Education, 179, 104428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Day, A. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings (Vol. 351). Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Delucchi, M. (2014). Measuring student learning in social statistics: A pretest-posttest study of knowledge gain. Teaching Sociology, 42(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X14527909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirkan, H., & Delen, D. (2013). Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: Putting analytics and big data in cloud. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Devi, T., & Ganesan, R. (2015). Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS): Model and security issues. TELKOMNIKA Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering, 15(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.11591/telkomnika.v15i1.8073
   Google Scholar
• Earthy, J. V., & Downs, J. L. (2018). Human-system interaction standards for robotic, intelligent, autonomous systems. In NATO-STO HF/EM-300 Symposium on “Human Autonomy Teaming” (pp. 15–17).
   Google Scholar
• El Mhouti, A., & Erradi, M. (2021). Harnessing cloud computing services for e-learning systems in higher education: Impact and effects. In Research anthology on architectures, frameworks, and integration strategies for distributed and cloud computing (pp. 1466–1480). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Eom, H. (1996). Methodology for sport psychology. Bogyeong.
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğmuş, F., Kokoç, M., Pinal, E., Bilgi, Ş., & Murat, Z. (2015). Investigation of an online learning environment in terms of usability. Participatory Educational Research, 3(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.15.34.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Implementing and interpreting exploratory factor analysis. In Exploratory factor analysis (pp. 104–142). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199734177.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Faisal, C. M. N. (2009). Usability evaluation of cloud based application.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, F. (2013). Usability testing of cloud file storage systems. https://doi.org/10.17615/55x9-kg20
   Google Scholar
• Ghafarian, A. (2015). Foreniscs analysis of cloud computing services. In 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2015.7237316
   Google Scholar
• González, M. P., Lorés, J., & Granollers, A. (2008). Enhancing usability testing through datamining techniques: A novel approach to detecting usability problem patterns for a context of use. Information and Software Technology, 50(6), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, G. (2010). Basic research methods: An entry to social science research. SAGE Publications India.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289162
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, J. III, Wiley, D., Stein, J., & Johnson, A. (2010). The four ‘R’s of openness and ALMS analysis: Frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning the Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning, 25(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510903482132
   Google Scholar
• Hornbæk, K. (2006). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64(2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. (1997). 9241: Ergonomic requirements for office systems with visual display terminals (VDTs). International Standards Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241-11:1998. (2000). 9241–11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs), 45(9). The International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Kaewsaiha, P. (2019). Usability of the learning management system and choices of alternative. In The International Conference on Education, Psychology, and Social Sciences (ICEPS) (pp. 252–259).
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber, A., Beintner, I., Burchert, S., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2023). Effects of a self-guided transdiagnostic smartphone app on patient empowerment and mental health: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 10(1), e45068. https://doi.org/10.2196/45068
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, K. (2007). Structural equation modeling. Hannarae.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-M. (2009). Validation of psychometric research instruments: The case of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1178–1191. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufteros, X. A. (1999). Testing a model of pull production: A paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(99)00002-9
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 14(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC143&4_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H.-C K., Chen, N.-S., Sun, R.-T., & Tsai, I.-H. (2014). Usability of affective interfaces for a digital arts tutoring system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.702356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, C.-S., Lai, K.-H., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2007). Application of structural equation modeling to evaluate the intention of shippers to use internet services in liner shipping. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), 845–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, B. L., & Sockel, H. (2001). A confirmatory factor analysis of IS employee motivation and retention. Information & Management, 38(5), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00055-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Gonzalez, A., Chi-Poot, A., & Uc-Cetina, V. (2016). Usability evaluation of an augmented reality system for teaching Euclidean vectors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2009). Brand portfolio strategy and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. B. (2023). Meta-analysis in organizational research: A guide to methodological options. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 225–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031921-021922
   Google Scholar
• Naifjabli, H. A., & Demir, F. (2018). The usability of King Khalid university website: Assessing effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. International Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(7), 10–16. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=The+Usability+of+King+Khalid+University+Website%3A+Assessing+Effectiveness%2C+Efficiency%2C+and+Satisfaction%E2%80%99&btnG=
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. L. (1994). Usability inspection methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Orfanou, K., Tselios, N., & Katsanos, C. (2015). Perceived usability evaluation of learning management systems: Empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.1955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, D., & Vanijja, V. (2020). Perceived usability evaluation of microsoft teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Perry Hinton, D., Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2004). SPSS explained. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Qasem, Y. A. M., Abdullah, R., Yah Jusoh, Y., Atan, R., & Asadi, S. (2019). Cloud computing adoption in higher education institutions: A systematic review. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 7, 63722–63744. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ransome, J. W. R. J. F. (2010). Cloud computing implementation, management.
   Google Scholar
• Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–54, 124. https://www.nashc.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/the-one-number-you-need-to-know.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revythi, A., & Tselios, N. (2019). Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2341–2355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09869-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, J., & Chisnell, D. (2008). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Scholtz, J., & Consolvo, S. (2004). Toward a framework for evaluating ubiquitous computing applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2004.1316826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şengel, E. (2013). Usability level of a university web site. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 3246–3252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.373
   Google Scholar
• Shackel, B. (2009). Usability–Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interacting with Computers, 21(5–6), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (1997). Designing information-abundant web sites: Issues and recommendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1997.0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton, B., Theofanos, M., & Joshi, K. P. (2015). Framework for cloud usability. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 664–671). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20376-8_59
   Google Scholar
• Subashini, S., & Kavitha, V. (2011). A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2010.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suyidno, S., Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & Prahani, B. K. (2017). Validity of creative responsibility based learning: An innovative physics learning to prepare the generation of creative and responsibility. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701025661
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497–516). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tak, J. (1996). Psychological examination. Hakjisa.
   Google Scholar
• Taqi, F., Batool, S. H., & Arshad, A. (2023). Examining differences in perceived usability of Google Drive among public library users. Library Hi Tech, 162, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2022-0275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuseethan, S., Achchuthan, S., & Kuhanesan, S. (2014). Usability evaluation of learning management systems in Sri Lankan universities. arXiv [Cs.HC], arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.0197.
   Google Scholar
• Tullis, T. S., & Stetson, J. N. (2004). A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. Paper presented at the Usability Professionals Association Annual Conference, UPA, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Retrieved September 13, 2017, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228609327_A_Comparison_of_Questionnaires_for_Assessing_Website_Usability
   Google Scholar
• Vouk, M. A. (2008). Cloud computing–issues, research and implementations. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 16(4), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1001391
   Google Scholar
• Wade, M. R., & Nevo, S. (2005). Development and validation of a perceptual instrument to measure e-commerce performance. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415100205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Ranjan, R., Chen, J., & Benatallah, B. (Eds.). (2017). Cloud computing: Methodology, systems, and applications. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415100205
   Google Scholar
• Waters, B. (2005). Software as a service: A look at the customer benefits. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 1(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.dam.3640007
   Google Scholar
• Widyanto, R. A., Hadi Avisenna, M., & Rahadyan, R. V. (2023). Usability e-learning system at university: A systematic literature. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 2706). AIP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (2020). Methods to test website usability. In Learning disabilities and e-information (pp. 35–44). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-151-420201005
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, K. (2014). Role of cloud computing in education. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 2(2), 3108–3112. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Yadav%2C+K.+%E2%80%98Role+of+Cloud+Computing+in+Education%E2%80%99.+International+Journal+of+Innovative+Research+in+Computer+and+Communication+Engineering+2%2C+no.+2+%282014%29%3A+3108%E2%80%9312.&btnG=
   Google Scholar
• Yadegaridehkordi, E., Shuib, L., Nilashi, M., & Asadi, S. (2019). Decision to adopt online collaborative learning tools in higher education: A case of top Malaysian universities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9761-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamane, Y. (1967). Mathematical formulae for sample size determination. Journal of Mathematics, 1, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B. (2006). Multivariate behavioral research for social sciences & marketing, communication books.
   Google Scholar
• Yöntemleri, B. A. (2006). Scientific research methods. Nobel Publication Distribution.
   Google Scholar