Not Always Good: Mitigating Pedestrians’ Less Careful Crossing Behavior by External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles

References

• Ackermann, C., Beggiato, M., Schubert, S., & Krems, J. F. (2019). An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? Applied Ergonomics, 75, 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackermans, S., Dey, D., Ruijten, P., Cuijpers, R. H., & Pfleging, B. (2020, April). The effects of explicit intention communication, conspicuous sensors, and pedestrian attitude in interactions with automated vehicles [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2020 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376197
   Google Scholar
• Bazilinskyy, P., Dodou, D., & De Winter, J. (2019). Survey on eHMI concepts: The effect of text, color, and perspective. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 67, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazilinskyy, P., Kooijman, L., Dodou, D., & De Winter, J. C. F. (2021). How should external Human-Machine Interfaces behave? Examining the effects of colour, position, message, activation distance, vehicle yielding, and visual distraction among 1,434 participants. Applied Ergonomics, 95, 103450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengler, K., Rettenmaier, M., Fritz, N., & Feierle, A. (2020). From HMI to HMIs: Towards an HMI Framework for Automated Driving. Information, 11(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020061
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Zhuang, X., & Ma, G. (2019). Shorten pedestrians’ perceived waiting time: The effect of tempo and pitch in audible pedestrian signals at red phase. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 123, 336–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, J., Guindel, C., Garcia, F., & de la Escalera, A. (2021). eHMI: Review and guidelines for deployment on autonomous vehicles. Sensors, 21(9), 2912. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21092912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley, M., Bajrovic, E., & Rukzio, E. (2022)., April). Effects of pedestrian behavior, time pressure, and repeated exposure on crossing decisions in front of automated vehicles equipped with external communication [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–11). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517571
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. J., Barton, B. K., Pugliese, B. J., & Lopez, G. (2021). The influences of listening and speaking on pedestrians’ assessments of approaching vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 82, 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clercq, K., Dietrich, A., Núñez Velasco, J. P., De Winter, J., & Happee, R. (2019). External human-machine interfaces on automated vehicles: Effects on pedestrian crossing decisions. Human Factors, 61(8), 1353–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819836343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, S., Strawderman, L. J., & Carruth, D. W. (2018). Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, D., Habibovic, A., Berger, M., Bansal, D., Cuijpers, R. H., & Martens, M. (2022)., September). Investigating the Need for Explicit Communication of Non-Yielding Intent through a Slow-Pulsing Light Band (SPLB) eHMI in AV-Pedestrian Interaction. In Proceedings of the [Paper presentation]. 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 307–318). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546086
   Google Scholar
• Dey, D., Habibovic, A., Löcken, A., Wintersberger, P., Pfleging, B., Riener, A., Martens, M., & Terken, J. (2020). Taming the eHMI jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles’ external human-machine interfaces. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 7, 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100174
   Google Scholar
• Dozza, M., Boda, C. N., Jaber, L., Thalya, P., & Lubbe, N. (2020). How do drivers negotiate intersections with pedestrians? The importance of pedestrian time-to-arrival and visibility. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 141, 105524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisma, Y. B., van Bergen, S., Ter Brake, S. M., Hensen, M. T. T., Tempelaar, W. J., & de Winter, J. C. (2019). External human–machine interfaces: The effect of display location on crossing intentions and eye movements. Information, 11(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisma, Y. B., & De Winter, J. C. F. (2020). How do people perform an inspection time task? An examination of visual illusions, task experience, and blinking. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.123
   Google Scholar
• Eisma, Y. B., Reiff, A., Kooijman, L., Dodou, D., & de Winter, J. C. (2021). External human-machine interfaces: Effects of message perspective. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 78, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faas, S. M., & Baumann, M. (2019). Light-based external human machine interface: Color evaluation for self-driving vehicle and pedestrian interaction [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 1232–1236) https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631049
   Google Scholar
• Faas, S. M., Mathis, L. A., & Baumann, M. (2020). External HMI for self-driving vehicles: Which information shall be displayed? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 68, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faas, S. M., & Baumann, M. (2021). Pedestrian assessment: Is displaying automated driving mode in self-driving vehicles as relevant as emitting an engine sound in electric vehicles? Applied Ergonomics, 94, 103425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenchak, N. N., & Shafique, S. (2022). Pedestrians’ perceptions of autonomous vehicle external human-machine interfaces. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 8(3), 034501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, H., Tolmie, A., Thomson, J., McLaren, B., & Whelan, K. (1999). Recognizing the hazards. The Psychologist, 12, 400–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratini, E., Welsh, R., Thomas, P. (2021). Instruction or intention? Investigating eHMIs’ intuitiveness as allocentric or egocentric messages for different light animations, road priorities and vehicle behaviours [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Humanist Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman, L., Mehler, B., Xia, L., Yang, Y., Facusse, L. Y., & Reimer, B. (2019). To walk or not to walk: Crowdsourced assessment of external vehicle-to-pedestrian displays [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, O., Markkula, G., Pekkanen, J., Yokota, N., Matsunaga, N., Merat, N., Daimon, T. (2019). At the zebra crossing: Modelling complex decision processes with variable-drift diffusion models [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 366–372). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., Vasardani, M., & Winter, S. (2019). Negotiation between vehicles and pedestrians for the right of way at intersections. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(3), 888–899. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2836957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibovic, A., Lundgren, V. M., Andersson, J., Klingegård, M., Lagström, T., Sirkka, A., Fagerlönn, J., Edgren, C., Fredriksson, R., Krupenia, S., Saluäär, D., & Larsson, P. (2018). Communicating intent of automated vehicles to pedestrians. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1336. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holländer, K., Wintersberger, P., & Butz, A. (2019, September). Overtrust in external cues of automated vehicles: An experimental investigation. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 211–221).
   Google Scholar
• ITARDA (2021). Traffic Statistics in 2020. Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Kaleefathullah, A. A., Merat, N., Lee, Y. M., Eisma, Y. B., Madigan, R., Garcia, J., & Winter, J. D. (2022). External human–machine interfaces can be misleading: An examination of trust development and misuse in a CAVE-based pedestrian simulation environment. Human Factors, 64(6), 1070–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820970751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. W., Han, J. H., Ji, Y. G., & Lee, S. C. (2020)., September). Exploring the effectiveness of external human-machine interfaces on pedestrians and drivers [Paper presentation]. 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 65–68). https://doi.org/10.1145/3409251.3411725
   Google Scholar
• Koh, P. P., & Wong, Y. D. (2014). Gap acceptance of violators at signalised pedestrian crossings. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 62, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooijman, L., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. (2019). How do eHMIs affect pedestrians’ crossing behavior? A study using a head-mounted display combined with a motion suit. Information, 10(12), 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10120386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larue, G. S., Watling, C. N., Black, A. A., Wood, J. M., & Khakzar, M. (2020). Pedestrians distracted by their smartphone: Are in-ground flashing lights catching their attention? A laboratory study. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 134, 105346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, M., Jipp, M., & Oehl, M. (2022a). One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian’s Perspective. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 171, 106641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, M., Jipp, M., & Oehl, M. (2022b). Toward a Holistic Communication Approach to an Automated Vehicle’s Communication With Pedestrians: Combining Vehicle Kinematics With External Human-Machine Interfaces for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 882394. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Daimon, T., & Kitazaki, S. (2021). Negative effect of external human-machine interfaces in automated vehicles on pedestrian crossing behaviour: A virtual reality experiment. In N. L. Black, W. P. Neumann, & I. Noy (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (Vol. 221, pp. 718–725). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Daimon, T., & Kitazaki, S. (2022). Exploring Assistance Methods for Communication between Pedestrians and Automated Vehicles: A Need-Driven Study in Japanese Depopulated Areas [Paper presentation]. 2022 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), IEEE (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS56717.2022.9980751
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. M., Madigan, R., Uzondu, C., Garcia, J., Romano, R., Markkula, G., & Merat, N. (2022). Learning to interpret novel eHMI: The effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI familiarity on pedestrian’crossing behavior. Journal of Safety Research, 80, 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren, V. M., Habibovic, A., Andersson, J., Lagström, T., Nilsson, M., Sirkka, A., … Saluäär, D. (2017). Will there be new communication needs when introducing automated vehicles to the urban context? [Paper presentation]. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA (pp. 485–497). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Driver-automated vehicle interaction in mixed traffic: Types of interaction and drivers’ driving styles. Human Factors, 66(2), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221088358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madigan, R., Nordhoff, S., Fox, C., Ezzati Amini, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A., & Merat, N. (2019). Understanding interactions between Automated Road Transport Systems and other road users: A video analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 66, 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merat, N., Louw, T., Madigan, R., Wilbrink, M., & Schieben, A. (2018). What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 118, 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D., Currano, R., & Sirkin, D. (2020)., September). Sound decisions: How synthetic motor sounds improve autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interactions [Paper presentation]. 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 94–103). https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410667
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis (2022). Traffic safety facts 2020: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data. (Report No. DOT HS 813 375). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkanen, J., Giles, O. T., Lee, Y. M., Madigan, R., Daimon, T., Merat, N., & Markkula, G. (2022). Variable-drift diffusion models of pedestrian road-crossing decisions. Computational Brain & Behavior, 5(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-021-00116-z
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Jiang, Q., Chen, W., Zhuang, X., & Ma, G. (2023). Pedestrians’ road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 188, 107115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soshiroda, J., Lee, J., Daimon, T., & Kitazaki, S. (2021). Stopping position matters: Drawing a better communication between pedestrian and driverless automated vehicles on narrow roads [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 1531–1535). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651156
   Google Scholar
• Sucha, M., Dostal, D., & Risser, R. (2017). Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 102, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, F., Boelhouwer, A., Alkim, T., Verwey, W. B., & Martens, M. H. (2018). Changes in trust after driving level 2 automated cars. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1045186
   Google Scholar
• Weber, F., Chadowitz, R., Schmidt, K., Messerschmidt, J., & Fuest, T. (2019). Crossing the Street Across the Globe: A Study on the Effects of eHMI on Pedestrians in the US, Germany and China [Paper presentation]. HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems: First International Conference, MobiTAS 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA July 26-31 Proceedings 21 (pp. 515–530). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbrink, M., Lau, M., Illgner, J., Schieben, A., & Oehl, M. (2021). Impact of External Human–Machine Interface Communication Strategies of Automated Vehicles on Pedestrians’ Crossing Decisions and Behaviors in an Urban Environment. Sustainability, 13(15), 8396. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafri, N. M., Tabassum, T., Himal, M. R. H., Sultana, R., & Debnath, A. K. (2022). Effect of pedestrian characteristics and their road crossing behaviors on driver yielding behavior at controlled intersections. Journal of Safety Research, 81, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar