A Chinese Version of the Aesthetics Scale: Cultural Adaptation and Psychological Measurement

References

• Abbas, A., Hirschfeld, G., & Thielsch, M. T. (2022). An Arabic version of the visual aesthetics of websites inventory (AR-VisAWI): Translation and psychometric properties. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(14), 2785–2795. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlGhannam, B. A., Albustan, S. A., Al-Hassan, A. A., & Albustan, L. A. (2018). Towards a standard Arabic system usability scale: Psychometric evaluation using communication disorder app. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(9), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1388099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Shamaileh, O., & Sutcliffe, A. (2023). Why people choose Apps: An evaluation of the ecology and user experience of mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 170, 102965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaboli, A., & Lin, Y. (2012). Effects of unity of form and symmetry on visual aesthetics of website interface design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 728–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561152
   Google Scholar
• Al-Tahat, K. S. (2020). An Arabic adaptation of the usability metric for user experience (UMUX). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(11), 1050–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1709332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assila, A., & Ezzedine, H. (2016). Standardized usability questionnaires: Features and quality focus. Electronic Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 6(1), 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Hornbæk, K. (2011, May). Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: A critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2689–2698). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979336
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. L., Kaul, M., & Storey, V. C. (2018). Aesthetics in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2017.1395545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažica, B., & Lewis, J. R. (2015). A Slovene translation of the system usability scale: The SUS-SI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(2), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.986634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blijlevens, J., Thurgood, C., Hekkert, P., Chen, L. L., Leder, H., & Whitfield, T. W. A. (2017). The Aesthetic Pleasure in Design Scale: The development of a scale to measure aesthetic pleasure for designed artifacts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buker, T., Schmitt, T., Miehling, J., & Wartzack, S. (2022). What’s more important for product design – usability or emotionality? An examination of influencing factors. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(8–9), 635–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2022.2142902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S., & Xu, Y. (2011). Designing not just for pleasure: Effects of web site aesthetics on consumer shopping value. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415150405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, H., Zhang, Z., Evans, R. D., Dai, W., Bi, Q., Zhu, Z., Xu, J., & Shen, L. (2023). Barriers and Enablers to the Implementation of Intelligent Guidance Systems for Patients in Chinese Tertiary Transfer Hospitals: Usability Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(8), 2634–2643. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3066564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Z. (2015). Research on emotional aesthetic and expression forms of new media interactive art. Hefei University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Carins, J. E., Rundle-Thiele, S. R., & Ong, D. L. (2020). Keep them coming back: The role of variety and aesthetics in institutional food satisfaction. Food Quality and Preference, 80, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawthon, N., & Moere, A. V. (2007). The effect of aesthetic on the usability of data visualization [Paper presentation]. 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV'07) (pp. 637–648). Zurich, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2007.147
   Google Scholar
• Chattaraman, V., Deshpande, G., Kim, H., & Sreenivasan, K. R. (2016). Form ‘defines’ function: Neural connectivity between aesthetic perception and product purchase decisions in an fMRI study. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(4), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Hu, Y., Zhu, D., Li, J., & Zhou, L. (2016). Chinese version of the Aging Perceptions Questionnaire (C-APQ): Assessment of reliability and validity. Aging & Mental Health, 20(6), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1028332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2020). Research on aesthetics development and design method for the mobile application interface visual design. Art & Design, 2020(01), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.16272/j.cnki.cn11-1392/j.2020.01.022
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, A., Maury, A. C., & Fouquereau, N. (2014). The influence of the search complexity and the familiarity with the website on the subjective appraisal of aesthetics, mental effort and usability. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.819936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa, V. K., Sias Rodrigues, A., Agostini, L. B., Machado, M. B., Darley, N. T., da Cunha Cardoso, R., & Tavares, T. A. (2019, July 26–31). 2019, Proceedings, part IV design, user experience, and usability. Practice and Case Studies: 8th International Conference, DUXU 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL. The potential of user experience (UX) as an approach of evaluation in tangible user interfaces (TUI) (Vol. 21). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_3
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
   Google Scholar
• DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everyone is a Product Manager. (2020, August). The beauty of each: A measurement of the aesthetic flatness of objects. https://www.woshipm.com/pd/4148348.html
   Google Scholar
• Fagundes, V., Fernandes, R., Santos, C., & Tavares, T. (2017, July 9–14). Visualization of climate data from user perspective: Evaluating user experience in graphical user interfaces and immersive interfaces [Paper presentation]. Human Interface and the Management of Information: Information, Knowledge and Interaction Design: 19th International Conference, HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2017, Proceedings, Part I 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58521-5_4
   Google Scholar
• Feng, L., & Wei, W. (2019). An empirical study on user experience evaluation and identification of critical UX issues. Sustainability, 11(8), 2432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finstad, K. (2006). The system usability scale and non-native English speakers. Journal of Usability Studies, 1(4), 185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Finstad, K. (2010). The usability metric for user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeta, E., Beltrán-Jaunsaras, M. E., Cea, G., Spieler, B., Burton, A., García-Betances, R. I., Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M. F., Brown, D., Boulton, H., & Arredondo Waldmeyer, M. T. (2019). Evaluation of the Create@School game-based learning–teaching approach. Sensors, 19(15), 3251. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/15/3251. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19153251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido-Possauner, L. M., & Maya, J. (2019, July 26–31). Cross-cultural design. Methods, tools and user experience. 11th International Conference, CCD 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL. The Aesthetic Pleasure in Design Scale for Spanish Speaking Countries: A Method for the Cross-Cultural Implementation and Adaptation of Psychometric Scales. 2019, Proceedings, Part I 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22577-3_35
   Google Scholar
• Gou, R., Fu, D., & Mo, Y. (2019). Comparison of preferences and operational efficiency of different ages on interface design styles. Packaging Engineering, 40(16), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2019.16.003
   Google Scholar
• Gronier, G., & Baudet, A. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of the F-SUS: Creation and validation of the French version of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(16), 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, T., & Hagtvedt, H. (2021). Safe together, vulnerable apart: How interstitial space in text logos impacts brand attitudes in tight versus loose cultures. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(3), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, H., & Brasel, S. A. (2017). Color saturation increases perceived product size. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), ucx039. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Advances in psychology. (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., & Angeli, A. D. (2008). Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460355.1460357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Monk, A. (2010). The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2010.500139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. Mensch & computer 2003: Interaktion in bewegung (pp. 187–196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80058-9_19
   Google Scholar
• He, H., Li, H., & Ge, L. (2011). Progress in the research of aesthetic characteristics of interactive products. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 17(01), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.13837/j.issn.1006-8309.2011.01.018
   Google Scholar
• He, T., Isenberg, P., Dachselt, R., & Isenberg, T. (2023). BeauVis: A validated scale for measuring the aesthetic pleasure of visual representations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(1), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209390
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. Journal of Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76–83. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5168
   Google Scholar
• Hoegg, J., Alba, J. W., & Dahl, D. W. (2010). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Influence of aesthetics on product feature judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivory, M. Y., & Hearst, M. A. (2001). The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys, 33(4), 470–516. https://doi.org/10.1145/503112.503114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahani, A., Saffariha, M., & Ghiyasi, S. (2019). Evaluating the aesthetic quality of the landscape in the environment: A review of the concepts and scientific developments in the world. IJESB, 12(2019), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.22034/uoe.2019.103618
   Google Scholar
• Jahani, A., & Saffariha, M. (2020). Aesthetic preference and mental restoration prediction in urban parks: An application of environmental modeling approach. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 54, 126775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahani, A., Allahverdi, S., Saffariha, M., Alitavoli, A., & Ghiyasi, S. (2022). Environmental modeling of landscape aesthetic value in natural urban parks using artificial neural network technique. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 8(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01068-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahani, A., Saffariha, M., & Barzegar, P. (2023). Landscape aesthetic quality assessment of forest lands: An application of machine learning approach. Soft Computing, 27(10), 6671–6686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07642-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, S., Lv, M., Wu, T., Chen, W., & Zhang, J. (2022). A smartphone application for remote adjustment of warfarin dose: Development and usability study. Applied Nursing Research, 63, 151521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Z., Wang, W., Tan, B. C., & Yu, J. (2016). The determinants and impacts of aesthetics in users’ first interaction with websites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(1), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1172443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, K. (2000). The Beauty of Simplicity Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability, Arlington, VI. https://doi.org/10.1145/355460.355478
   Google Scholar
• Kivijärvi, H., & Pärnänen, K. (2023). Instrumental usability and effective user experience: Interwoven drivers and outcomes of human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2016236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kortum, P. T., & Bangor, A. (2013). Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.681221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurosu, M., & Kashimura, K. (1995). Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability [Paper presentation]. Computing Systems. Conference Companion on Human Factors, Denver, CO. https://doi.org/10.1145/223355.223680
   Google Scholar
• Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008). Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: A. Holzinger (Eds.), HCI and usability for education and work. USAB 2008. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 5298, pp. 63–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, T., Oron-Gilad, T., & Meyer, J. (2011). Aesthetics and usability of in-vehicle navigation displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(1–2), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazard, A. J., & King, A. J. (2020). Objective design to subjective evaluations: Connecting visual complexity to aesthetic and usability assessments of ehealth. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1606976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Koubek, R. J. (2010). The effects of usability and web design attributes on user preference for e-commerce web sites. Computers in Industry, 61(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R. (2018a). Measuring perceived usability: The CSUQ, SUS, and UMUX. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(12), 1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1418805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R. (2018b). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. R., Utesch, B. S., & Maher, D. E. (2013). UMUX-LITE [Paper presentation]. When There’s No Time for the SUS Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481287
   Google Scholar
• Lima, A. L. D. S., & Gresse von Wangenheim, C. (2022). Assessing the visual esthetics of user interfaces: A ten-year systematic mapping. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1926118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J. S., & Huang, S. Y. (2013). Apply web-based analytic tool and eye tracking to study the consumer preferences of DSLR cameras. International Journal of Business Research and Management, 4(4), 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression!. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., & Wu, K. (2022). The impact of smart phone interface aesthetic design on user performance from a generational perspective. Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute: Fine Arts & Design, 2022(04), 159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. Q., Bogicevic, V., & Mattila, A. S. (2018). Circular vs. angular servicescape: “Shaping” customer response to a fast service encounter pace. Journal of Business Research, 89, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locher, P., Overbeeke, K., & Stappers, P. J. (2005). Spatial balance of color triads in the abstract art of piet mondrian. Perception, 34(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lommel, A., Uszkoreit, H., & Burchardt, A. (2014). Multidimensional quality metrics (MQM): A framework for declaring and describing translation quality metrics. Tradumàtica Tecnologies de la Traducció, (12), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tradumatica.77
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo‐Romero, C., Constantinides, E., & Alarcón‐del‐Amo, M. D. C. (2011). Consumer adoption of social networking sites: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 5(2–3), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/17505931111187794
   Google Scholar
• Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. (2013). A short version of the visual aesthetics of websites inventory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12), 1305–1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.694910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, S. M., & Sun, Y. S. (2011). Validation of the concise Chinese level of expressed emotion scale. Social Work in Mental Health, 9(6), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2011.570653
   Google Scholar
• Noiwan, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2006). Cultural differences on attention and perceived usability: Investigating color combinations of animated graphics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. E., & Schloss, K. B. (2010). An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(19), 8877–8882. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906172107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papachristos, E. (2019). Assessing the performance of short multi-item questionnaires in aesthetic evaluation of websites. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(5), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1539521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Han, S. H., Kim, H. K., Cho, Y., & Park, W. (2013). Developing elements of user experience for mobile phones and services: Survey, interview, and observation approaches. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(4), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrig, S. A. C., von Felten, N., Honda, M., Opwis, K., & Brühlmann, F. (2023). Development and validation of a positive-item version of the cisual aesthetics of websites inventory: The VisAWI-Pos. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2258634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 27(5), 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purchase, H. C., Hamer, J., Jamieson, A., Ryan, O. (2011). Investigating objective measures of web page aesthetics and usability. Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian User Interface Conference, 117, 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Reichheld, F. F. (2004). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 82(6), 133–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruf, A., Zahn, C., Agotai, D., Iten, G., & Opwis, K. (2022). Aesthetic design of app interfaces and their impact on secondary students’ interest and learning. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100075
   Google Scholar
• Sadita, L., Santoso, H. B., Windrawan, L. I., & Khotimah, P. H. (2023). An Indonesian Adaption of Visual Aesthetics of Website Inventory (VisAWI) Questionnaire for Evaluating Video Game User Interface [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications, Virtual Event, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1145/3575882.3575956
   Google Scholar
• Saremi, M., Sadeghi, V., Khodakarim, S., & Maleki-Ghahfarokhi, A. (2023). Farsi version of visual aesthetics of website inventory (FV-VisAWI): Translation and psychometric evaluation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(4), 834–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., & Sonderegger, A. (2009). The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: Effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., & Sonderegger, A. (2011). The influence of product aesthetics and user state in usability testing. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(6), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2010.503352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., Sonderegger, A., & Schmutz, S. (2020). Usability, user experience and accessibility: Towards an integrative model. Ergonomics, 63(10), 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1774080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Seckler, M., Opwis, K., & Tuch, A. N. (2015). Linking objective design factors with subjective aesthetics: An experimental study on how structure and color of websites affect the facets of users’ visual aesthetic perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, K. K., Lee, S., & Chung, B. D. (2016). Effects of perceived usability and aesthetics on emotional responses in different contexts of use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(6), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1160537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonderegger, A., Sauer, J., & Eichenberger, J. (2014). Expressive and classical aesthetics: Two distinct concepts with highly similar effect patterns in user–artefact interaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(11), 1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.853835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonderegger, A., Zbinden, G., Uebelbacher, A., & Sauer, J. (2012). The influence of product aesthetics and usability over the course of time: A longitudinal field experiment. Ergonomics, 55(7), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.672658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielsch, M. T., Blotenberg, I., & Jaron, R. (2014). User evaluation of websites: From first impression to recommendation. Interacting with Computers, 26(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwt033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielsch, M. T., Scharfen, J., Masoudi, E., & Reuter, M. (2019). Visual aesthetics and performance: A first meta-analysis [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019, Hamburg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340794
   Google Scholar
• Thüring, M., & Mahlke, S. (2007). Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701396674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N. (1997). Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 115–122), Atlanta, GA. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258626
   Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N., Cokhavi, A., Kirschenbaum, M., & Sharfi, T. (2006). Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(11), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0953-5438(00)00031-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevisan, B., Willach, A., Jakobs, E. M., & Schmitt, R. (2012). Gender-specific kansei engineering: Using AttrakDiff2. In M. Szomszor & P. Kostkova (Eds.), Electronic healthcare. eHealth 2010. Lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering (Vol 69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23635-8_21
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2001). Research methods knowledge base (Vol. 2). Atomic Dog Pub. Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tuch, A. N., Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Opwis, K. (2010). Symmetry and aesthetics in website design: It’s a man’s business. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1831–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuch, A. N., Roth, S. P., Hornbæk, K., Opwis, K., & Bargas-Avila, J. A. (2012). Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1596–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach, D., Conrad, J., & Steimle, T. (2017). The UX metrics table: A missing artifact. In A. Marcus & W. Wang (Eds.), Design, user experience, and usability: Theory, methodology, and management. DUXU 2017. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 10288). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58634-2_37
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H. F., & Lin, C. H. (2019). An investigation into visual complexity and aesthetic preference to facilitate the creation of more appropriate learning analytics systems for children. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Zhang, L., Yang, W., Lu, X., Xu, W., & Gao, Z. (2021). How online learning resources affect academic emotions and learning outcomes–A meta-analysis based on the control-value theory. Modern Distance Education Research, 33(05), 82–93. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1580.G4.20210922.1959.008.html
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Measuring perceived usability in Chinese questionnaires: MTAM, SUS, and UMUX. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(11), 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1979291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Chai, J., & Lei, T. (2021). Chinese UMUX: Cross-cultural adaptation for perceived usability measurement. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(16), 1538–1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Lei, T., & Liu, X. (2020). Chinese system usability scale: Translation, revision, psychological measurement. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(10), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1700644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., Samper, A., Morales, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2017). It’s too pretty to use! When and how enhanced product aesthetics discourage usage and lower consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, L. (2005). Outline of the history of Chinese aesthetics. Shanghai People’s Publishing Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, X., & Liu, S. Q. (2023). Is your food organic? Examining the role of food aesthetics in restaurant marketing. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(6), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211067275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Li, P., Wang, X., Kong, L., Wu, Y., & Liu, X. (2020). The Chinese version of the behavioral emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric properties among university students. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 16, 1889–1897. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S258806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., Xue, C. Q., Tang, W. C., Li, J., & Niu, Y. (2013). Aesthetic evaluation method of interface elements layout design. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 25(5), 758–766.
   Google Scholar