78
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Chinese Version of the Aesthetics Scale: Cultural Adaptation and Psychological Measurement

, , &
Received 19 Dec 2023, Accepted 30 Apr 2024, Published online: 16 May 2024

References

  • Abbas, A., Hirschfeld, G., & Thielsch, M. T. (2022). An Arabic version of the visual aesthetics of websites inventory (AR-VisAWI): Translation and psychometric properties. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(14), 2785–2795. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085409
  • AlGhannam, B. A., Albustan, S. A., Al-Hassan, A. A., & Albustan, L. A. (2018). Towards a standard Arabic system usability scale: Psychometric evaluation using communication disorder app. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(9), 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1388099
  • Al-Shamaileh, O., & Sutcliffe, A. (2023). Why people choose Apps: An evaluation of the ecology and user experience of mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 170, 102965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102965
  • Altaboli, A., & Lin, Y. (2012). Effects of unity of form and symmetry on visual aesthetics of website interface design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 56(1), 728–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561152
  • Al-Tahat, K. S. (2020). An Arabic adaptation of the usability metric for user experience (UMUX). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(11), 1050–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1709332
  • Assila, A., & Ezzedine, H. (2016). Standardized usability questionnaires: Features and quality focus. Electronic Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 6(1), 15–31.
  • Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Hornbæk, K. (2011, May). Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: A critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2689–2698). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979336
  • Baskerville, R. L., Kaul, M., & Storey, V. C. (2018). Aesthetics in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2017.1395545
  • Blažica, B., & Lewis, J. R. (2015). A Slovene translation of the system usability scale: The SUS-SI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(2), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.986634
  • Blijlevens, J., Thurgood, C., Hekkert, P., Chen, L. L., Leder, H., & Whitfield, T. W. A. (2017). The Aesthetic Pleasure in Design Scale: The development of a scale to measure aesthetic pleasure for designed artifacts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000098
  • Buker, T., Schmitt, T., Miehling, J., & Wartzack, S. (2022). What’s more important for product design – usability or emotionality? An examination of influencing factors. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(8–9), 635–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2022.2142902
  • Cai, S., & Xu, Y. (2011). Designing not just for pleasure: Effects of web site aesthetics on consumer shopping value. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415150405
  • Cao, H., Zhang, Z., Evans, R. D., Dai, W., Bi, Q., Zhu, Z., Xu, J., & Shen, L. (2023). Barriers and Enablers to the Implementation of Intelligent Guidance Systems for Patients in Chinese Tertiary Transfer Hospitals: Usability Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(8), 2634–2643. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3066564
  • Cao, Z. (2015). Research on emotional aesthetic and expression forms of new media interactive art. Hefei University of Technology.
  • Carins, J. E., Rundle-Thiele, S. R., & Ong, D. L. (2020). Keep them coming back: The role of variety and aesthetics in institutional food satisfaction. Food Quality and Preference, 80, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103832
  • Cawthon, N., & Moere, A. V. (2007). The effect of aesthetic on the usability of data visualization [Paper presentation]. 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV'07) (pp. 637–648). Zurich, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2007.147
  • Chattaraman, V., Deshpande, G., Kim, H., & Sreenivasan, K. R. (2016). Form ‘defines’ function: Neural connectivity between aesthetic perception and product purchase decisions in an fMRI study. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(4), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1575
  • Chen, X., Hu, Y., Zhu, D., Li, J., & Zhou, L. (2016). Chinese version of the Aging Perceptions Questionnaire (C-APQ): Assessment of reliability and validity. Aging & Mental Health, 20(6), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1028332
  • Chen, X. (2020). Research on aesthetics development and design method for the mobile application interface visual design. Art & Design, 2020(01), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.16272/j.cnki.cn11-1392/j.2020.01.022
  • Chevalier, A., Maury, A. C., & Fouquereau, N. (2014). The influence of the search complexity and the familiarity with the website on the subjective appraisal of aesthetics, mental effort and usability. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.819936
  • da Costa, V. K., Sias Rodrigues, A., Agostini, L. B., Machado, M. B., Darley, N. T., da Cunha Cardoso, R., & Tavares, T. A. (2019, July 26–31). 2019, Proceedings, part IV design, user experience, and usability. Practice and Case Studies: 8th International Conference, DUXU 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL. The potential of user experience (UX) as an approach of evaluation in tangible user interfaces (TUI) (Vol. 21). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_3
  • Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
  • DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x
  • Everyone is a Product Manager. (2020, August). The beauty of each: A measurement of the aesthetic flatness of objects. https://www.woshipm.com/pd/4148348.html
  • Fagundes, V., Fernandes, R., Santos, C., & Tavares, T. (2017, July 9–14). Visualization of climate data from user perspective: Evaluating user experience in graphical user interfaces and immersive interfaces [Paper presentation]. Human Interface and the Management of Information: Information, Knowledge and Interaction Design: 19th International Conference, HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2017, Proceedings, Part I 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58521-5_4
  • Feng, L., & Wei, W. (2019). An empirical study on user experience evaluation and identification of critical UX issues. Sustainability, 11(8), 2432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082432
  • Finstad, K. (2006). The system usability scale and non-native English speakers. Journal of Usability Studies, 1(4), 185–188.
  • Finstad, K. (2010). The usability metric for user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004
  • Gaeta, E., Beltrán-Jaunsaras, M. E., Cea, G., Spieler, B., Burton, A., García-Betances, R. I., Cabrera-Umpiérrez, M. F., Brown, D., Boulton, H., & Arredondo Waldmeyer, M. T. (2019). Evaluation of the Create@School game-based learning–teaching approach. Sensors, 19(15), 3251. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/15/3251. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19153251
  • Garrido-Possauner, L. M., & Maya, J. (2019, July 26–31). Cross-cultural design. Methods, tools and user experience. 11th International Conference, CCD 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL. The Aesthetic Pleasure in Design Scale for Spanish Speaking Countries: A Method for the Cross-Cultural Implementation and Adaptation of Psychometric Scales. 2019, Proceedings, Part I 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22577-3_35
  • Gou, R., Fu, D., & Mo, Y. (2019). Comparison of preferences and operational efficiency of different ages on interface design styles. Packaging Engineering, 40(16), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2019.16.003
  • Gronier, G., & Baudet, A. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of the F-SUS: Creation and validation of the French version of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(16), 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898828
  • Gupta, T., & Hagtvedt, H. (2021). Safe together, vulnerable apart: How interstitial space in text logos impacts brand attitudes in tight versus loose cultures. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(3), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab006
  • Hagtvedt, H., & Brasel, S. A. (2017). Color saturation increases perceived product size. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2), ucx039. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx039
  • Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Advances in psychology. (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
  • Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., & Angeli, A. D. (2008). Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460355.1460357
  • Hassenzahl, M., & Monk, A. (2010). The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2010.500139
  • Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330331
  • Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. Mensch & computer 2003: Interaktion in bewegung (pp. 187–196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80058-9_19
  • He, H., Li, H., & Ge, L. (2011). Progress in the research of aesthetic characteristics of interactive products. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 17(01), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.13837/j.issn.1006-8309.2011.01.018
  • He, T., Isenberg, P., Dachselt, R., & Isenberg, T. (2023). BeauVis: A validated scale for measuring the aesthetic pleasure of visual representations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(1), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209390
  • Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. Journal of Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76–83. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5168
  • Hoegg, J., Alba, J. W., & Dahl, D. W. (2010). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Influence of aesthetics on product feature judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.07.002
  • Ivory, M. Y., & Hearst, M. A. (2001). The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys, 33(4), 470–516. https://doi.org/10.1145/503112.503114
  • Jahani, A., Saffariha, M., & Ghiyasi, S. (2019). Evaluating the aesthetic quality of the landscape in the environment: A review of the concepts and scientific developments in the world. IJESB, 12(2019), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.22034/uoe.2019.103618
  • Jahani, A., & Saffariha, M. (2020). Aesthetic preference and mental restoration prediction in urban parks: An application of environmental modeling approach. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 54, 126775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126775
  • Jahani, A., Allahverdi, S., Saffariha, M., Alitavoli, A., & Ghiyasi, S. (2022). Environmental modeling of landscape aesthetic value in natural urban parks using artificial neural network technique. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 8(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01068-2
  • Jahani, A., Saffariha, M., & Barzegar, P. (2023). Landscape aesthetic quality assessment of forest lands: An application of machine learning approach. Soft Computing, 27(10), 6671–6686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07642-3
  • Jiang, S., Lv, M., Wu, T., Chen, W., & Zhang, J. (2022). A smartphone application for remote adjustment of warfarin dose: Development and usability study. Applied Nursing Research, 63, 151521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151521
  • Jiang, Z., Wang, W., Tan, B. C., & Yu, J. (2016). The determinants and impacts of aesthetics in users’ first interaction with websites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(1), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1172443
  • Karvonen, K. (2000). The Beauty of Simplicity Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability, Arlington, VI. https://doi.org/10.1145/355460.355478
  • Kivijärvi, H., & Pärnänen, K. (2023). Instrumental usability and effective user experience: Interwoven drivers and outcomes of human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2016236
  • Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
  • Kortum, P. T., & Bangor, A. (2013). Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.681221
  • Kurosu, M., & Kashimura, K. (1995). Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability [Paper presentation]. Computing Systems. Conference Companion on Human Factors, Denver, CO. https://doi.org/10.1145/223355.223680
  • Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008). Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: A. Holzinger (Eds.), HCI and usability for education and work. USAB 2008. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 5298, pp. 63–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6
  • Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002
  • Lavie, T., Oron-Gilad, T., & Meyer, J. (2011). Aesthetics and usability of in-vehicle navigation displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(1–2), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.10.002
  • Lazard, A. J., & King, A. J. (2020). Objective design to subjective evaluations: Connecting visual complexity to aesthetic and usability assessments of ehealth. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1606976
  • Lee, S., & Koubek, R. J. (2010). The effects of usability and web design attributes on user preference for e-commerce web sites. Computers in Industry, 61(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2009.12.004
  • Lewis, J. R. (2018a). Measuring perceived usability: The CSUQ, SUS, and UMUX. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(12), 1148–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1418805
  • Lewis, J. R. (2018b). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
  • Lewis, J. R., Utesch, B. S., & Maher, D. E. (2013). UMUX-LITE [Paper presentation]. When There’s No Time for the SUS Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481287
  • Lima, A. L. D. S., & Gresse von Wangenheim, C. (2022). Assessing the visual esthetics of user interfaces: A ten-year systematic mapping. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1926118
  • Lin, J. S., & Huang, S. Y. (2013). Apply web-based analytic tool and eye tracking to study the consumer preferences of DSLR cameras. International Journal of Business Research and Management, 4(4), 99–110.
  • Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression!. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330448
  • Liu, L., & Wu, K. (2022). The impact of smart phone interface aesthetic design on user performance from a generational perspective. Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute: Fine Arts & Design, 2022(04), 159–165.
  • Liu, S. Q., Bogicevic, V., & Mattila, A. S. (2018). Circular vs. angular servicescape: “Shaping” customer response to a fast service encounter pace. Journal of Business Research, 89, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.007
  • Locher, P., Overbeeke, K., & Stappers, P. J. (2005). Spatial balance of color triads in the abstract art of piet mondrian. Perception, 34(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5033
  • Lommel, A., Uszkoreit, H., & Burchardt, A. (2014). Multidimensional quality metrics (MQM): A framework for declaring and describing translation quality metrics. Tradumàtica Tecnologies de la Traducció, (12), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tradumatica.77
  • Lorenzo‐Romero, C., Constantinides, E., & Alarcón‐del‐Amo, M. D. C. (2011). Consumer adoption of social networking sites: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 5(2–3), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/17505931111187794
  • Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
  • Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. (2013). A short version of the visual aesthetics of websites inventory. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12), 1305–1311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.694910
  • Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006
  • Ng, S. M., & Sun, Y. S. (2011). Validation of the concise Chinese level of expressed emotion scale. Social Work in Mental Health, 9(6), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2011.570653
  • Noiwan, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2006). Cultural differences on attention and perceived usability: Investigating color combinations of animated graphics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.004
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Book Company.
  • Palmer, S. E., & Schloss, K. B. (2010). An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(19), 8877–8882. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906172107
  • Papachristos, E. (2019). Assessing the performance of short multi-item questionnaires in aesthetic evaluation of websites. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(5), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1539521
  • Park, J., Han, S. H., Kim, H. K., Cho, Y., & Park, W. (2013). Developing elements of user experience for mobile phones and services: Survey, interview, and observation approaches. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(4), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20316
  • Perrig, S. A. C., von Felten, N., Honda, M., Opwis, K., & Brühlmann, F. (2023). Development and validation of a positive-item version of the cisual aesthetics of websites inventory: The VisAWI-Pos. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2258634
  • Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  • Prinsen, C. A. C., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 27(5), 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
  • Purchase, H. C., Hamer, J., Jamieson, A., Ryan, O. (2011). Investigating objective measures of web page aesthetics and usability. Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian User Interface Conference, 117, 19–28.
  • Reichheld, F. F. (2004). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 82(6), 133–133.
  • Ruf, A., Zahn, C., Agotai, D., Iten, G., & Opwis, K. (2022). Aesthetic design of app interfaces and their impact on secondary students’ interest and learning. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100075
  • Sadita, L., Santoso, H. B., Windrawan, L. I., & Khotimah, P. H. (2023). An Indonesian Adaption of Visual Aesthetics of Website Inventory (VisAWI) Questionnaire for Evaluating Video Game User Interface [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications, Virtual Event, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1145/3575882.3575956
  • Saremi, M., Sadeghi, V., Khodakarim, S., & Maleki-Ghahfarokhi, A. (2023). Farsi version of visual aesthetics of website inventory (FV-VisAWI): Translation and psychometric evaluation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(4), 834–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049138
  • Sauer, J., & Sonderegger, A. (2009). The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: Effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.006
  • Sauer, J., & Sonderegger, A. (2011). The influence of product aesthetics and user state in usability testing. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(6), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2010.503352
  • Sauer, J., Sonderegger, A., & Schmutz, S. (2020). Usability, user experience and accessibility: Towards an integrative model. Ergonomics, 63(10), 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1774080
  • Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Seckler, M., Opwis, K., & Tuch, A. N. (2015). Linking objective design factors with subjective aesthetics: An experimental study on how structure and color of websites affect the facets of users’ visual aesthetic perception. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.056
  • Seo, K. K., Lee, S., & Chung, B. D. (2016). Effects of perceived usability and aesthetics on emotional responses in different contexts of use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(6), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1160537
  • Sonderegger, A., Sauer, J., & Eichenberger, J. (2014). Expressive and classical aesthetics: Two distinct concepts with highly similar effect patterns in user–artefact interaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(11), 1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.853835
  • Sonderegger, A., Zbinden, G., Uebelbacher, A., & Sauer, J. (2012). The influence of product aesthetics and usability over the course of time: A longitudinal field experiment. Ergonomics, 55(7), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.672658
  • Thielsch, M. T., Blotenberg, I., & Jaron, R. (2014). User evaluation of websites: From first impression to recommendation. Interacting with Computers, 26(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwt033
  • Thielsch, M. T., Scharfen, J., Masoudi, E., & Reuter, M. (2019). Visual aesthetics and performance: A first meta-analysis [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2019, Hamburg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340794
  • Thüring, M., & Mahlke, S. (2007). Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction. International Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701396674
  • Tractinsky, N. (1997). Aesthetics and apparent usability: Empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 115–122), Atlanta, GA. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258626
  • Tractinsky, N., Cokhavi, A., Kirschenbaum, M., & Sharfi, T. (2006). Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(11), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.009
  • Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0953-5438(00)00031-x
  • Trevisan, B., Willach, A., Jakobs, E. M., & Schmitt, R. (2012). Gender-specific kansei engineering: Using AttrakDiff2. In M. Szomszor & P. Kostkova (Eds.), Electronic healthcare. eHealth 2010. Lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering (Vol 69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23635-8_21
  • Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2001). Research methods knowledge base (Vol. 2). Atomic Dog Pub. Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • Tuch, A. N., Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Opwis, K. (2010). Symmetry and aesthetics in website design: It’s a man’s business. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1831–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.016
  • Tuch, A. N., Roth, S. P., Hornbæk, K., Opwis, K., & Bargas-Avila, J. A. (2012). Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1596–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.024
  • Wallach, D., Conrad, J., & Steimle, T. (2017). The UX metrics table: A missing artifact. In A. Marcus & W. Wang (Eds.), Design, user experience, and usability: Theory, methodology, and management. DUXU 2017. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 10288). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58634-2_37
  • Wang, H. F., & Lin, C. H. (2019). An investigation into visual complexity and aesthetic preference to facilitate the creation of more appropriate learning analytics systems for children. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.032
  • Wang, X., Zhang, L., Yang, W., Lu, X., Xu, W., & Gao, Z. (2021). How online learning resources affect academic emotions and learning outcomes–A meta-analysis based on the control-value theory. Modern Distance Education Research, 33(05), 82–93. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1580.G4.20210922.1959.008.html
  • Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Measuring perceived usability in Chinese questionnaires: MTAM, SUS, and UMUX. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(11), 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1979291
  • Wang, Y., Chai, J., & Lei, T. (2021). Chinese UMUX: Cross-cultural adaptation for perceived usability measurement. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(16), 1538–1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898826
  • Wang, Y., Lei, T., & Liu, X. (2020). Chinese system usability scale: Translation, revision, psychological measurement. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(10), 953–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1700644
  • Wu, F., Samper, A., Morales, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2017). It’s too pretty to use! When and how enhanced product aesthetics discourage usage and lower consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx057
  • Ye, L. (2005). Outline of the history of Chinese aesthetics. Shanghai People’s Publishing Press.
  • Yu, X., & Liu, S. Q. (2023). Is your food organic? Examining the role of food aesthetics in restaurant marketing. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(6), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211067275
  • Zhao, Y., Li, P., Wang, X., Kong, L., Wu, Y., & Liu, X. (2020). The Chinese version of the behavioral emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric properties among university students. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 16, 1889–1897. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S258806
  • Zhou, L., Xue, C. Q., Tang, W. C., Li, J., & Niu, Y. (2013). Aesthetic evaluation method of interface elements layout design. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 25(5), 758–766.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.