When and How to Use AI in the Design Process? Implications for Human-AI Design Collaboration

References

• Alcaide-Marzal, J., Diego-Mas, J. A., & Acosta-Zazueta, G. (2020). A 3D shape generative method for aesthetic product design. Design Studies, 66, 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alomar, E. A., Aljedaani, W., Tamjeed, M., Mkaouer, M. W., & El-Glaly, Y. N. (2021). Finding the needle in a haystack: On the automatic identification of accessibility user reviews. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445281
   Google Scholar
• Ashbrook, D., & Starner, T. (2010). MAGIC: A motion gesture design tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2159–2168). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753653
   Google Scholar
• Bae, S. S., Kwon, O. H., Chandrasegaran, S., & Ma, K. L. (2020). Spinneret: Aiding creative ideation through non-obvious concept associations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376746
   Google Scholar
• Berger, M., & Ploennigs, J. (2023, November). ArchiGuesser–teaching architecture styles using generative AI. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation (pp. 284–285). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. S., Park, J. S., Morris, M. R., Amershi, S., Chilton, L. B., & Gordon, M. L. (2023, October). Architecting novel interactions with generative AI models. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 1–3). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586182.3617431
   Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, F., Schnell, N., Rasamimanana, N., Bloit, J., Flety, E., Caramiaux, B., Françoise, J., & Boyer, E. (2013). De-MO: Designing action-sound relationships with the MO interfaces. CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2907–2910). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479571
   Google Scholar
• Boulanger, S., & Smith, I. (2001). Multi-strategy workspace navigation for design education. Design Studies, 22(2), 111–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(00)00002-8
   Google Scholar
• Brazier, F. M., Jonker, C. M., Treur, J., & Wijngaards, N. J. (2001). Compositional design of a generic design agent. Design Studies, 22(5), 439–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(00)00044-2
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N. C. (2020). Design performance and designer preference in an interactive, data-driven conceptual building design scenario. Design Studies, 68, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Cai, A., Rick, S. R., Heyman, J. L., Zhang, Y., Filipowicz, A., Hong, M., Klenk, M., & Malone, T. (2023, November). DesignAID: Using generative AI and semantic diversity for design inspiration. In Proceedings of the ACM Collective Intelligence Conference (pp. 1–11). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582269.3615596
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., Dang, S., & Dow, S. P. (2016). Comparing different sensemaking approaches for large-scale ideation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2717–2728). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858178
   Google Scholar
• Chang, M., Druga, S., Fiannaca, A. J., Vergani, P., Kulkarni, C., Cai, C. J., & Terry, M. (2023, June). The prompt artists. In Proceedings of the 15th conference on creativity and cognition (pp. 75–87). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3593515
   Google Scholar
• Chinowsky, P., & Teicholz, P. (1993). The design of user interfaces for intelligent layout generation systems. Design Studies, 14(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(93)80023-6
   Google Scholar
• Chirkin, A. M., & König, R. (2016). Concept of interactive machine learning in urban design problems. In Proceedings of the SEACHI 2016 on Smart Cities for Better Living with HCI and UX, 10–13). https://doi.org/10.1145/2898365.2899795
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E., August, T., Serrano, S., Haduong, N., Gururangan, S., & Smith, N. A. (2021). All that’s’ human’is not gold: Evaluating human evaluation of generated text. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.00061
   Google Scholar
• Cooney, S. (2021). Toward co-creative tools for tactical urban revitalization. In Extended abstracts of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–5). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3443426
   Google Scholar
• Culverhouse, P. F., Ball, L., & Burton, C. J. (1992). A tool for tracking engineering design in action. Design Studies, 13(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x%2892%2980005-j
   Google Scholar
• Darwich, B. B. (2016, June). Re-cognition: Intuition as knowledge. In Conference proceedings. The future of education 2016. ACM. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Conference_Proceedings_The_Future_of_Edu/6rppDAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Re-cognition:±Intuition±as±knowledge&pg=PA437&printsec=frontcover
   Google Scholar
• Dayama, N. R., Todi, K., Saarelainen, T., & Oulasvirta, A. (2020). Grids: Interactive layout design with integer programming. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376553
   Google Scholar
• Devasia, N., Ali, S., & Breazeal, C. (2020, November). Escape! Bot: Child-robot interaction to promote creative expression during gameplay. In Extended abstracts of the 2020 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 219–223). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, C. M., Cross, N., & Johnson, J. H. (2000). Intelligent support for communication in design teams: Garment shape specifications in the knitwear industry. Design Studies, 21(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(99)00006-x
   Google Scholar
• El-Zanfaly, D., Huang, Y., & Dong, Y. (2023, July). Sand-in-the-loop: Investigating embodied co-creation for shared understandings of generative AI. In Companion publication of the 2023 ACM designing interactive systems conference (pp. 256–260). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563703.3596652
   Google Scholar
• Fails, J., & Olsen, D. (2003). A design tool for camera-based interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 449–456). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642690
   Google Scholar
• Françoise, J., Bevilacqua, F., & Schiphorst, T. (2016). GaussBox: Prototyping movement interaction with interactive visualizations of machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3667–3670). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2890257
   Google Scholar
• Fu, K., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2010). Design team convergence: The influence of example solution quality. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(11), 111005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilon, K., Chan, J., Ng, F. Y., Liifshitz-Assaf, H., Kittur, A., & Shahaf, D. (2018). Analogy mining for specific design needs. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–11). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173695
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M. D., Pardo, B., Hariharan, K., & Gerber, E. (2013). Crowdfunding support tools: Predicting success and failure. In CHI ’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1815–1820). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468682
   Google Scholar
• Guo, S., Jin, Z., Sun, F., Li, J., Li, Z., Shi, Y., & Cao, N. (2021). Vinci: An intelligent graphic design system for generating advertising posters. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–17). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445117
   Google Scholar
• Guzdial, M., Liao, N., Chen, J., Chen, S.-Y., Shah, S., Shah, V., Reno, J., Smith, G., & Riedl, M. O. (2019). Friend, collaborator, student, manager: How design of an ai-driven game level editor affects creators. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300854
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, T., Eoff, B., Paulson, B., Wolin, A., Dahmen, K., Johnston, J., & Rajan, P. (2008). Free-sketch recognition: Putting the chi in sketching. In CHI'08 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3027–3032). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358802
   Google Scholar
• Hassani, H., & Silva, E. S. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in data science: How ai-assisted conversational interfaces are revolutionizing the field. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020062
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, A. H. C. (2022, April). Too late to be creative? AI-empowered tools in creative processes. In CHI conference on human factors in computing systems extended abstracts (pp. 1–9). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503549
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Caldwell, D. M., Chaimani, A., Schmid, C. H., Cameron, C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Straus, S., Thorlund, K., Jansen, J. P., Mulrow, C., Catalá-López, F., Gøtzsche, P. C., Dickersin, K., Boutron, I., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2015). The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: Checklist and explanations. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162(11), 777–784. https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-2385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivory, M. Y., & Hearst, M. A. (2002). Statistical profiles of highly-rated web sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 367–374). https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503442
   Google Scholar
• Jakesch, M., Hancock, J. T., & Naaman, M. (2023). Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(11), e2208839120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208839120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin, X., Evans, M., Dong, H., & Yao, A. (2021). Design heuristics for artificial intelligence: Inspirational design stimuli for supporting UX designers in generating AI-powered ideas. In Extended abstracts of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451727
   Google Scholar
• Jordanous, A. K. (2009, October). Evaluating machine creativity. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on creativity and cognition (pp. 331–332). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Katan, S., Grierson, M., & Fiebrink, R. (2015). Using interactive machine learning to support interface development through workshops with disabled people. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 251–254). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702474
   Google Scholar
• Katsanos, C., Tselios, N., & Avouris, N. (2008). AutoCardSorter: Designing the information architecture of a web site using latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 875–878). Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357192
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarzi, M., & Rahmani-Asl, M. (2021). Genfloor: Interactive generative space layout system via encoded tree graphs. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(4), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbis, N., & Mossink, L. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, S., McCain, R. M., & Brundage, M. (2022). All the news that’s fit to fabricate: AI-generated text as a tool of media misinformation. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2020.37
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. J. (2020). Tracking Dynamics between digital design agencies and clients of hybrid outsourcing in the Double Diamond website development process. Archives of Design Research, 33(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2020.02.33.1.17
   Google Scholar
• Koch, J., & Oulasvirta, A. (2016). Computational layout perception using gestalt laws. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1423–1429). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892537
   Google Scholar
• Koch, J., Taffin, N., Lucero, A., & Mackay, W. E. (2020). SemanticCollage: Enriching digital mood board design with semantic labels. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM designing interactive systems conference (pp. 407–418). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395494
   Google Scholar
• Krause, M., Garncarz, T., Song, J., Gerber, E. M., Bailey, B. P., & Dow, S. P. (2017). Critique style guide: Improving crowdsourced design feedback with a natural language model. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4627–4639). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025883
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., Talton, J. O., Ahmad, S., & Klemmer, S. R. (2011). Bricolage: Example-based retargeting for web design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2197–2206). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979262
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakoullis, L., & Zaphiris, P. (2016). Culture and HCI: A review of recent cultural studies in HCI and social networks. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(4), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0445-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, M. V., Jeong, J., Kwatra, A., Jung, M. F., & Hoffman, G. (2019). Negotiating the creative space in human-robot collaborative design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on designing interactive systems conference (pp. 645–657). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322343
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Jin, T., Lee, S. H., & Saakes, D. (2019). Smartmanikin: Virtual humans with agency for design tools. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300814
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Srivastava, S., Kumar, R., Brafman, R., & Klemmer, S. R. (2010). Designing with interactive example galleries. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2257–2266). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753667
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, D. C. E., & Martelaro, N. (2021). Learning personal style from few examples. In Designing interactive systems conference 2021 (pp. 1566–1578). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462115
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Nah, K. (2020). Design Collaboration Mode of Man–Computer Symbiosis in the Age of Intelligence. In International conference on intelligent human systems integration (pp. 640–645). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39512-4_99
   Google Scholar
• Löwgren, J. (1995, August). Applying design methodology to software development. In Proceedings of the 1st conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, & techniques (pp. 87–95). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/225434.225444
   Google Scholar
• Löwgren, J., & Nordqvist, T. (1992). Knowledge-based evaluation as design support for graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 181–188). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142786
   Google Scholar
• Miroboard (2023). Miroboard. https://miro.com/app/
   Google Scholar
• Marathe, M., & Toyama, K. (2018). Semi-automated coding for qualitative research: A user-centered inquiry and initial prototypes. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–12). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173922
   Google Scholar
• Maudet, N., Leiva, G., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., & Mackay, W. (2017, February). Design breakdowns: Designer-developer gaps in representing and interpreting interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 630–641). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998190
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, J. (2008). Facing the future: Evolutionary possibilities for human-machine creativity. In The art of artificial evolution: A handbook on evolutionary art and music (pp. 417–451). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McInnes, M. D. F., Moher, D., Thombs, B. D., McGrath, T. A., Bossuyt, P. M., Clifford, T., Cohen, J. F., Deeks, J. J., Gatsonis, C., Hooft, L., Hunt, H. A., Hyde, C. J., Korevaar, D. A., Leeflang, M. M. G., Macaskill, P., Reitsma, J. B., Rodin, R., Rutjes, A. W. S., Salameh, J.-P., … Willis, B. H. (2018). Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: The PRISMA-DTA statement. Jama, 319(4), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.19163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, G. B., Dudley, J. J., & Kristensson, P. O. (2021). Gesture Knitter: A hand gesture design tool for head-mounted mixed reality applications. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445766
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Book.
   Google Scholar
• Noyman, A., & Larson, K. (2020). Deepscope: HCI platform for generative cityscape visualization. In Extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–9). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382809
   Google Scholar
• OpenAI (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat
   Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/gwdhk
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petridis, S., Diakopoulos, N., Crowston, K., Hansen, M., Henderson, K., Jastrzebski, S., Nickerson, J. V., & Chilton, L. B. (2023, April). Anglekindling: Supporting journalistic angle ideation with large language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580907
   Google Scholar
• Prato, G., Sallemi, F., Cremonesi, P., Scriminaci, M., Gudmundsson, S., & Palumbo, S. (2020). Outfit completion and clothes recommendation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383076
   Google Scholar
• Preston, W., Benford, S., Thorn, E.-C., Koleva, B., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Mortier, R., Quinn, A., Stell, J., & Worboys, M. (2017). Enabling hand-crafted visual markers at scale. In Proceedings of the 2017 conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 1227–1237). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064746
   Google Scholar
• Prochner, I., & Godin, D. (2022). Quality in research through design projects: Recommendations for evaluation and enhancement. Design Studies, 78, 101061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, J., & Adlin, T. (2010). The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout product design. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-566251-2.x5000-x
   Google Scholar
• Quiroz, J. C., Dascalu, S. M., & Louis, S. J. (2007). Human guided evolution of xul user interfaces. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2621–2626). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241052
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, S., Falk Olesen, J., & Halskov, K. (2019). notate: Exploring real-time annotations to capture situational design knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 on designing interactive systems conference (pp. 161–172). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322310
   Google Scholar
• Rietz, T., & Maedche, A. (2021). Cody: An AI-based system to semi-automate coding for qualitative research. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–14). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445591
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, P. A., & Huxor, A. P. (1998). The role of artificial intelligence as text within design. Design Studies, 19(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00032-X
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., Jung, S. G., Chowdhury, S., & Jansen, B. J. (2020, April). Analyzing demographic bias in artificially generated facial pictures. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382791
   Google Scholar
• Salminen, J., Santos, J. M., Jung, S. G., Eslami, M., & Jansen, B. J. (2020). Persona transparency: Analyzing the impact of explanations on perceptions of data-driven personas. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(8), 788–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1688946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Belz, B., & Hovestadt, L. (1996). Scenario of an integrated design support for architects. Design Studies, 17(4), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(96)00022-1
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90020-g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Cao, N., Ma, X., Chen, S., & Liu, P. (2020). EmoG: Supporting the sketching of emotional expressions for storyboarding. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–12). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376520
   Google Scholar
• Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2015). Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, 70–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slawson, D. A. (1985). Secret teachings in the art of japanese gardens: “Illustrations for designing mountain, water, and hillside field landscapes”. Indiana University. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/secret-teachings-art-japanese-gardens/docview/303383449/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Song, B., Gyory, J. T., Zhang, G., Soria Zurita, N. F., Stump, G., Martin, J., Miller, S., Balon, C., Yukish, M., McComb, C., & Cagan, J. (2022). Decoding the agility of artificial intelligence-assisted human design teams. Design Studies, 79, 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahlke, S., Nova, A., & Mirza-Babaei, P. (2019). Artificial playfulness: A tool for automated agent-based playtesting. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–6). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313039
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, L. A., Clarke, M., Rovers, M., Riley, R. D., Simmonds, M., Stewart, G., & Tierney, J. F. (2015). Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data: The PRISMA-IPD statement. Jama, 313(16), 1657–1665. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.3656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleri, S., Sermuga Pandian, V. P., Shishkovets, S., & Jarke, M. (2019). Eve: A sketch-based software prototyping workbench. In Extended abstracts of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312994
   Google Scholar
• Sun, L., Xiang, W., Chai, C., Wang, C., & Huang, Q. (2014). Creative segment: A descriptive theory applied to computer-aided sketching. Design Studies, 35(1), 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swearngin, A., Dontcheva, M., Li, W., Brandt, J., Dixon, M., & Ko, A. J. (2018). Rewire: Interface design assistance from examples. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–12). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174078
   Google Scholar
• Thieme, A., Belgrave, D., & Doherty, G. (2020). Machine learning in mental health: A systematic review of the HCI literature to support the development of effective and implementable ML systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 27(5), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3398069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomaz, A., Hoffman, G., & Cakmak, M. (2016). Computational human-robot interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Robotics, 4(2–3), 105–223. https://doi.org/10.1561/9781680832099
   Google Scholar
• Tizani, W. M., Davies, G., & McCarthy, T. J. (1994). A construction-led design process for tubular trusses. Design Studies, 15(3), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(94)90012-4
   Google Scholar
• Todi, K., Leiva, L. A., Buschek, D., Tian, P., & Oulasvirta, A. (2021). Conversations with GUIs. In Designing interactive systems conference 2021 (pp. 1447–1457). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462124
   Google Scholar
• Vaccaro, K., Agarwalla, T., Shivakumar, S., & Kumar, R. (2018). Designing the future of personal fashion. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–11). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174201
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, B. (2017). Bot personas as off-the-shelf users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 782–789). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3052767
   Google Scholar
• Van Esch, P., Cui, Y., & Jain, S. P. (2021). Self‐efficacy and callousness in consumer judgments of AI‐enabled checkouts. Psychology & Marketing, 38(7), 1081–1100. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheijden, M. P., & Funk, M. (2023, April). Collaborative diffusion: Boosting designerly co-creation with generative AI. In Extended abstracts of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585680
   Google Scholar
• Villalon, R., Lieberman, H., & Sass, L. (2009). Breaking down brick walls: Design, construction, and prototype fabrication knowledge in architecture. In CHI'09 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4261–4266). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520650
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B., Hilton, C., Nymoen, K., Torresen, J., Martin, C. P., & Fiebrink, R. (2023, June). Embodying an interactive AI for dance through movement ideation. In Proceedings of the 15th conference on creativity and cognition (pp. 454–464). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3593336
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, B., Martin, C. P., Tørresen, J., & Nymoen, K. (2021, June). Learning embodied sound-motion mappings: Evaluating AI-generated dance improvisation. In Creativity and cognition (pp. 1–9). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3465245
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Shen, S., & Lim, B. Y. (2023, April). RePrompt: Automatic prompt editing to refine AI-generative art towards precise expressions. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–29). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581402
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., He, F., & Andersen, E. (2017, May). A unified framework for knowledge assessment and progression analysis and design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 937–948). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025841
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A., Brooks, C. F., & Shmargad, Y. (2018). How algorithms discriminate based on data they lack: Challenges, solutions, and policy implications. Journal of Information Policy, 8, 78–115. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.8.2018.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, W., Schroh, D., Proulx, P., Skaburskis, A., & Cort, B. (2006). The Sandbox for analysis: Concepts and methods. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 801–810). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124890
   Google Scholar
• Yan, C., Chung, J. J. Y., Kiheon, Y., Gingold, Y., Adar, E., & Hong, S. R. (2022, April). FlatMagic: Improving flat colorization through AI-driven design for digital comic professionals. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–17). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502075
   Google Scholar
• Yan, J. N., Gu, Z., & Rzeszotarski, J. M. (2021). Tessera: Discretizing data analysis workflows on a task level. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, (pp. 1–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445728
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., Banovic, N., & Zimmerman, J. (2018a). Mapping machine learning advances from HCI research to reveal starting places for design innovation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–11). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173704
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., Steinfeld, A., Rosé, C., & Zimmerman, J. (2020). Re-examining whether, why, and how human-AI interaction is uniquely difficult to design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376301
   Google Scholar
• Yen, Y. C. G., Kim, J. O., & Bailey, B. P. (2020). Decipher: An interactive visualization tool for interpreting unstructured design feedback from multiple providers. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376380
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim, N., Kass, A., Tung, T., Upton, C., Costello, D., Giusti, R., Lacin, S., Lovic, S., O’Neill, J. M., Meehan, R. O., Ó Loideáin, E., Pini, A., Corcoran, M., Hayes, J., Cahalane, D. J., Shivhare, G., Castoro, L., Caruso, G., Oh, C., McCann, J., Forlizzi, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2022). How experienced designers of enterprise applications engage AI as a design material. In CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517491
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Raina, A., Cagan, J., & McComb, C. (2021). A cautionary tale about the impact of AI on human design teams. Design Studies, 72, 100990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.100990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Brown, H. F., & Shankar, A. (2016). Data-driven personas: Constructing archetypal users with clickstreams and user telemetry. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 5350–5359). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858523
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, N., Kim, N. W., Herman, L. M., Pfister, H., Lau, R. W., Echevarria, J., & Bylinskii, Z. (2020). Iconate: Automatic compound icon generation and ideation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376618
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Wang, H., & Carroll, J. M. (2019). Creating persona skeletons from imbalanced datasets-a case study using US older adults’ health data. In Proceedings of the 2019 on designing interactive systems conference (pp. 61–70). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322285
   Google Scholar