Smartphone Games Heuristics (SmGH) – Towards a Standard Set of Platform-Centric Heuristic for Smartphone Games Evaluation

References

• Aker, Ç., Bostan, B., & Rızvanoğlu, K. (2020). Methodological review of playability heuristics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347840687
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, R., Nadal, C., Morrissey, K., Thieme, A., & Doherty, G. (2023). Using thematic analysis in healthcare HCI at CHI: A scoping review. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–18). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581203
   Google Scholar
• Christina, K., Wolfgang, H., Leitner, J., Michael, H., Arjan, G., & Manfred, T. (2010). Using heuristics to evaluate the overall user experience of video games and advanced interaction games. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-963-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desurvire, H., & Wiberg, C. (2009). LNCS 5621 - game usability heuristics (PLAY) for evaluating and designing better games: The next iteration. In LNCS (Vol. 5621, pp. 557–566). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_60
   Google Scholar
• Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., & Toth, J. A. (2004). Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games [Paper presentation]. CHI extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986102
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, L., & Jonsson, F. (2012). Time to play: The rationalization of leisure time. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 145–151). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2132176.2132195
   Google Scholar
• Fang, X., & Zhan, J. (2015). Sentiment analysis using product review data. Journal of Big Data, 2(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-015-0015-2
   Google Scholar
• Federoff, M. A. (2002). Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games [MS thesis]. Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh, A., Ndulue, C., & Orji, R. (2021). PERMARUN- a persuasive game to improve user awareness and self-efficacy towards secure smartphone behaviour. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451781
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh, A., Ndulue, C., & Orji, R. (2023, April 23–28). Tailoring a per-suasive game to promote secure smartphone behaviour [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2023. CHI '23; Hamburg, Germany. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581038
   Google Scholar
• Hochleitner, C., Haller, M., & Köffel, C. (2008, April 5–10). Heuristics for the evaluation of tabletop games [Paper presentation]. Evaluating User Experiences in Games, Workshop at the 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '08, Florence, Italy. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228636463
   Google Scholar
• Iyer, R. S., & Orji, R. (2020). Cognitive load in Games for Health - A discussion. In 2020 IEEE 8th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health, SeGAH 2020. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SeGAH49190.2020.9201767
   Google Scholar
• Khandkar, S. H. (2009). Open coding. University of Calgary, 23, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, H., & Koivisto, E. M. I. (2006). Playability heuristics for mobile games. In MobileHCI ’06: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on HumanComputer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 9–16). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1152215.1152218
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, H., & Koivisto, E. M. I. (2007). Playability heuristics for mobile multi-player games. In DIMEA 2007 (pp. 28–35). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1306813.1306828
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen, H., Paavilainen, J., & Saarenpää, H. (2009). Expert review method in game evaluations: Comparison of two playability heuristic sets. In MindTrek 2009 - 13th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era (pp. 74–81). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1621841.1621856
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, N., Schoenebeck, S., & Forte, A. (2019). Reliability and inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: Norms and guidelines for CSCW and HCI practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndulue, C., Oyebode, O., & Orji, R. (2020). PHISHER CRUSH: A mobile persuasive game for promoting online security. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 12064 LNCS, pp. 223–233). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45712-9_17
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 249–256). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
   Google Scholar
• Olagunju, T., Oyebode, O., & Orji, R. (2020). Exploring key issues affecting African mobile ecommerce applications using sentiment and thematic analysis. IEEE Access, 8, 114475–114486. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994). Technological frames. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 174–207. https://doi.org/10.1145/196734.196745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyebode, O., Alqahtani, F., & Orji, R. (2020). Using machine learning and thematic analysis methods to evaluate mental health apps based on user reviews. IEEE Access, 8, 111141–111158. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdowska, A., Sweetser, P., & Daiiani, M. (2023). A scoping review of heuristics in videos games research: Definitions, development, application, and operationalisation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CHI PLAY), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611035
   Google Scholar
• Paavilainen, J. (2010). Critical review on video game evaluation heuristics: Social games perspective. In Future Play 2010: Research, Play, Share - International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology (pp. 56–65). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/1920778.1920787
   Google Scholar
• Petrovskaya, E., Deterding, S., & Zendle, D. (2022). Prevalence and salience of problematic microtransactions in top-grossing mobile and PC games: A content analysis of user reviews. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502056
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., Klarkowski, M., Frommel, J., Gutwin, C., & Mandryk, R. L. (2021). Identifying commercial games with therapeutic potential through a content analysis of steam reviews. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CHI PLAY), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474682
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinelle, D., Wong, N., & Stach, T. (2008). Heuristic evaluation for games: Usability principles for video game design. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 1453–1462). https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357282
   Google Scholar
• Robson, R. S., & Sabahat, N. (2020). Heuristic based approach for usability evaluation of mobile games. In Proceedings - 2020 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Communications Engineering, ICCECE 2020 (pp. 156–161). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCECE49321.2020.9231175
   Google Scholar
• Rodio, F., & Bastien, J. M. C. (2013). Heuristics for video games evaluation: How players rate their relevance for different game genres according to their experience. In IHM 2013 - Actes de La 25ieme Conference Francophone Sur L’Interaction Homme-Machine (pp. 89–93). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/2534903.2534915
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, R. R. (1997). Moore’s law: Past, present, and future. IEEE Spectrum, 34(6), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/6.591665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjott Linneberg, M., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012/FULL/XML
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soomro, S., Ahmad, W. F. W., & Sulaiman, S. (2012). A preliminary study on heuristics for mobile games. In 2012 International Conference on Computer and Information Science, ICCIS 2012 - A Conference of World Engineering, Science and Technology Congress, ESTCON 2012 - Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 1030–1035). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCISCI.2012.6297177
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, X. (2021). Positioning game review as a crucial element of game user feedback in the ongoing development of independent video games. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100077
   Google Scholar
• Ülger, G. (2013). Playability heuristics for mobile games using touchscreen displays a thesis submitted to the graduate school of informatics of Middle East Technical University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Information Systems. Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Zammitto, V., Kobayashi, M., Mirza-Babaei, P., Nacke, L. E., & Livingston, I. (2014). Player experience: Mixed methods and reporting results. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 147–150). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2559239
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., Zhao, F., Fang, X., & Moser, C. (2017). Developing playability heuristics based on nouns and adjectives from online game reviews. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1240283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar