Sense of Self-Agency and Other-Agency Under Social Interaction Contexts

References

• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas, Z. (2019). When robots tell you what to do: Sense of agency in human-and robot-guided actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 75, 102819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas, Z., Hockley, W. E., & Obhi, S. S. (2018). Effects of free choice and outcome valence on the sense of agency: Evidence from measures of intentional binding and feelings of control. Experimental Brain Research, 236(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5112-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas, Z., & Kopp, S. (2018). Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Bonicalzi, S., & Haggard, P. (2017). Beyond self-serving bias: Diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, F., Sidarus, N., Fleming, S., & Haggard, P. (2018). Losing control in social situations: How the presence of others affects neural processes related to sense of agency. eNeuro, 5(1), ENEURO.0336-17.2018. https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0336-17.2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01907-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, N. K., & Loehr, J. D. (2017). The predictability of a partner’s actions modulates the sense of joint agency. Cognition, 161, 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandi, M. L., Kaifel, D., Bolis, D., & Schilbach, L. (2019). The Interactive self–A review on simulating social interactions to understand the mechanisms of social agency. i-com, 18(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2018-0018
   Google Scholar
• Braun, N., Thorne, J. D., Hildebrandt, H., & Debener, S. (2014). Interplay of agency and ownership: The intentional binding and rubber hand illusion paradigm combined. PLoS One, 9(11), e111967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehner, M. J. (2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1490–1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976124446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspar, E. A., Cleeremans, A., & Haggard, P. (2015). The relationship between human agency and embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciardo, F., Beyer, F., De Tommaso, D., & Wykowska, A. (2020). Attribution of intentional agency towards robots reduces one’s own sense of agency. Cognition, 194, 104109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cravo, A. M., Claessens, P., & Baldo, M. (2009). Voluntary action and causality in temporal binding. Experimental Brain Research, 199(1), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1969-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Q., Liu, M., Liu, C. H., Long, Z., Zhao, K., & Fu, X. (2021). Unpredictable fearful stimuli disrupt timing activities: Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 163, 108057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Q., Zhao, K., Chen, Y.-H., Zheng, W., & Fu, X. (2018). Opposing subjective temporal experiences in response to unpredictable and predictable fear-relevant stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbert, K., Wohlschläger, A., & Haggard, P. (2008). Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition, 107(2), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using GPower 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R., Zyzniewski, L. E., & Giammanco, C. A. (2002). Responsibility diffusion in cooperative collectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202281005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. D., Blakemore, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000). Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews, 31(2-3), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00052-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frith, C. D., & Haggard, P. (2018). Volition and the brain–revisiting a classic experimental study. Trends in Neurosciences, 41(7), 405–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup, G. G. Jr, (1985). Do minds exist in species other than our own? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 9(4), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(85)90010-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentsch, A., & Synofzik, M. (2014). Affective coding: The emotional dimension of agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giersiepen, M., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Kaiser, J. (2023). Freedom of choice boosts midfrontal theta power during affective feedback processing of goal-directed actions. Biological Psychology, 183, 108659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, P. (2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 18(4), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, P., & Clark, S. (2003). Intentional action: Conscious experience and neural prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00052-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, P., & Tsakiris, M. (2009). The experience of agency: Feelings, judgments, and responsibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. R., & Buehner, M. J. (2009). Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1542–1549. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, D. C., Simon, C. E., Ting, F., & Nikolaeva, J. I. (2018). Functional organization of the temporal-parietal junction for theory of mind in preverbal infants: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 38(18), 4264–4274. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0264-17.2018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.9) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1961). Small corrections in the theory of surface waves. Geophysical Journal International, 6(1), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1961.tb02965.x
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J., Buciuman, M., Gigl, S., Gentsch, A., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2021). The interplay between affective processing and sense of agency during action regulation: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 716220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J., & Schütz-Bosbach, S. (2018). Sensory attenuation of self‐produced signals does not rely on self‐specific motor predictions. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 47(11), 1303–1310. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.1393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalighinejad, N., Bahrami, B., Caspar, E. A., & Haggard, P. (2016). Social transmission of experience of agency: An experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1315–1315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilner, J. M., & Blakemore, S. J. (2007). How does the mirror neuron system change during development? Developmental Science, 10(5), 524–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00632.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 546–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mynatt, C., & Sherman, S. J. (1975). Responsibility attribution in groups and individuals: A direct test of the diffusion of responsibility hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obhi, S. S., & Hall, P. (2011). Sense of agency in joint action: Influence of human and computer co-actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3-4), 663–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2662-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacherie, E. (2012). The phenomenology of joint action: Self-agency vs. joint-agency. In A. Seemann (Ed.), Joint attention: New developments (pp. 343–389). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfister, R., Obhi, S. S., Rieger, M., & Wenke, D. (2014). Action and perception in social contexts: Intentional binding for social action effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poonian, S. K., & Cunnington, R. (2013). Intentional binding in self-made and observed actions. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3505-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poonian, S. K., McFadyen, J., Ogden, J., & Cunnington, R. (2015). Implicit agency in observed actions: Evidence for N1 suppression of tones caused by self-made and observed actions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(4), 752–764. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahaï, A., Pacherie, E., Grynszpan, O., & Berberian, B. (2017). Predictive mechanisms are not involved the same way during human-human versus human-machine interactions: A review. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 11, 52. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2017.00052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidarus, N., Travers, E., Haggard, P., & Beyer, F. (2020). How social contexts affect cognition: Mentalizing interferes with sense of agency during voluntary action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 89, 103994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, C. A., Tatler, B. W., Chakravarthi, R., & Timmermans, B. (2021). Social Agency as a continuum. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(2), 434–453. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01845-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sophie, V., & Haselager, P. (2017). When robots appear to have a mind: The human perception of machine agency and responsibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 54, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenzel, A., Chinellato, E., Bou, M. A. T., Del Pobil, Á. P., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2012). When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: Corepresentation of robotic actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1073–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenzel, A., Dolk, T., Colzato, L. S., Sellaro, R., Hommel, B., & Liepelt, R. (2014). The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, T., & Kawabata, H. (2021). Sense of agency is modulated by interactions between action choice, outcome valence, and predictability. Current Psychology, 40(4), 1795–1806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0121-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonn, S., Pfister, R., Klaffehn, A. L., Weller, L., & Schwarz, K. A. (2021). Two faces of temporal binding: Action-and effect-binding are not correlated. Consciousness and Cognition, 96, 103219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuvo, E., Ricciardelli, P., & Ciardo, F. (2022). The Effect of Anthropomorphism on Diffusion or Responsibility in HRI. In International Conference on Social Robotics (pp. 488–497). Springer Nature Switzerland. December.
   Google Scholar
• Vastano, R., Deschrijver, E., Pozzo, T., & Brass, M. (2018). Temporal binding effect in the action observation domain: Evidence from an action-based somatosensory paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition, 60, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., Morey, R. D., & Lee, M. D. (2016). Bayesian benefits for the pragmatic researcher. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214166432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54(7), 480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlschläger, A., Haggard, P., Gesierich, B., & Prinz, W. (2003). The perceived onset time of self-and other-generated actions. Psychological Science, 14(6), 586–591. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1469.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science (New York, N.Y.), 269(5232), 1880–1882. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7569931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, B. M., Tan, E., Yuen, F. L., & Hamlin, J. K. (2023). Socially evaluative contexts facilitate mentalizing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapparoli, L., Paulesu, E., Mariano, M., Ravani, A., & Sacheli, L. M. (2022). The sense of agency in joint actions: A theory-driven meta-analysis. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 148, 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, K., Chen, Y. H., Yan, W. J., & Fu, X. (2013). To bind or not to bind? Different temporal binding effects from voluntary pressing and releasing actions. PLoS One, 8(5), e64819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar