ERP Evidence for the Effects of Anthropomorphic Icons on Attention and Perceptual Decision Making

References

• Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1086/518544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. K., Christoff, K., Panitz, D., Rosa, E. D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003). Neural correlates of the automatic processing of threat facial signals. Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 23(13), 5627–5633. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05627.2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, M., Rubens, M. T., & Johnstone, T. (2018). Simultaneous EEG-fMRI reveals attention-dependent coupling of early face processing with a distributed cortical network. Biological Psychology, 132(2017), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentin, S., & Deouell, L. Y. (2000). Structural encoding and identification in face processing: Erp evidence for separate mechanisms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432900380472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, R., & Orquin, J. L. (2022). A meta-analysis on the effect of visual attention on choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 151(10), 2265–2283. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocanegra, B. R., & Zeelenberg, R. (2009). Emotion improves and impairs early vision. Psychological Science, 20(6), 707–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02354.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocanegra, B. R., Huijding, J., & Zeelenberg, R. (2012). Beyond attentional bias: A perceptual bias in a dot-probe task. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 12(6), 1362–1366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Proctor, R. W., Ding, Y., Duffy, V. G., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). Is an anthropomorphic app icon more attractive than a non-anthropomorphic one? A case study using multimodal measurement. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 20(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2022.123789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Zhang, Y., Ding, Y., Duffy, V. G., & Zhang, X. (2021). Is an anthropomorphic app icon more attractive? Evidence from neuroergonomomics. Applied Ergonomics, 97(2021), 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daryanto, A., Alexander, N., & Kartika, G. (2022). The anthropomorphic brand logo and its effect on perceived functional performance. Journal of Brand Management, 29(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-022-00271-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2003). From seduction to fulfillment: The use of anthropomorphic form in design [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/782896.782913
   Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When we need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition, 26(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. J. (2016). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers (p. 310) American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-020
   Google Scholar
• Fleetwood, M. D., & Byrne, M. D. (2002). Modeling icon search in ACT-R/PM. Cognitive Systems Research, 3(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0417(01)00041-9
   Google Scholar
• Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J., Tortell, R., & McClelland, J. L. (2011). Dynamic integration of reward and stimulus information in perceptual decision-making. PloS One, 6(3), e16749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavril, L., Roșan, A., & Szamosközi, Ș. (2021). The role of visual-spatial attention in reading development: A meta-analysis. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 38(6), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2022.2043839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. E. (1997). Anthropomorphism: A definition and a theory. In Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals (pp. 50–58). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. M., Jones, S. R., & Royne, M. B. (2013). The human lens: How anthropomorphic reasoning varies by product complexity and enhances personal value. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1–2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.759993
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C.-H., & Hou, K.-C. (2015). Exploring the attractive factors of app icons. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 9(6), 2251–2271. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2015.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K.-C. (2008). Effects of computer icons and figure/background area ratios and color combinations on visual search performance on an LCD monitor. Displays, 29(3), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Zheng, C., & Li, J. (2023). The effect of icon patterns on user attention and memory. Displays, 80(2023), 102557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2023.102557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, T., Wang, W., He, J., Wu, Z., & Gu, H. (2023). Influence mechanism of icon semantics on visual search performance: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 93(2023), 103402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, K. (2016). The inevitable: Understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Koster, E. H. W., Verschuere, B., Burssens, B., Custers, R., & Crombez, G. (2007). Attention for emotional faces under restricted awareness revisited: Do emotional faces automatically attract attention? Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 7(2), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Wu, F.-G. (2016). A study on the relationships between different presentation modes of graphical icons and users’ attention. Computers in Human Behavior, 63(2016), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Lin, W., Tsai, W.-C., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Wu, F.-G. (2015). How different presentation modes of graphical icons affect viewers’ first fixation and attention. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Interaction (pp. 226–237). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20681-3_21
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, T., & Näsänen, R. (2003). The effect of icon spacing and size on the speed of icon processing in the human visual system. Displays, 24(3), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-9382(03)00035-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, S., Reppa, I., Kulik, J., & Taylor, A. (2016). What makes icons appealing? The role of processing fluency in predicting icon appeal in different task contexts. Applied Ergonomics, 55(2016), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez-Bértolo, C., Moratti, S., Toledano, R., Lopez-Sosa, F., Martínez-Alvarez, R., Mah, Y. H., Vuilleumier, P., Gil-Nagel, A., & Strange, B. A. (2016). A fast pathway for fear in human amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 19(8), 1041–1049. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr, S., & Esteky, H. (2009). A study of N250 event-related brain potential during face and non-face detection tasks. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 5.1–514. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.5.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez, M. D., Vandekerckhove, J., & Srinivasan, R. (2017). How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 76(Pt B), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.03.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orquin, J. L., Perkovic, S., & Grunert, K. G. (2018). Visual biases in decision making. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40(4), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppy020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quek, G., Nemdorov, D., Rossion, B., & Liu-Shuang, J. (2018). Selective attention to faces in a rapid visual stream: Hemispheric differences in enhancement and suppression of category-selective neural activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweinberger, S. R., Huddy, V., & Burton, A. M. (2004). N250r: A face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions. Neuroreport, 15(9), 1501–1505. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000131675.00319.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweinberger, S. R., Pfütze, E.-M., & Sommer, W. (1995). Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 722–736. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Jentzsch, I., Burton, A. M., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(3), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00142-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shang, Z., Wang, Y., & Bi, T. (2021). How does fearful emotion affect visual attention? Frontiers in Psychology, 11(2020), 584412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Z., Zhang, L., Xiao, X., Li, R., & Liang, R. (2020). Icon familiarity affects the performance of complex cognitive tasks. i-Perception, 11(2), 2041669520910167. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520910167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. L., Ratcliff, R., & Wolfgang, B. J. (2004). Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: Response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays. Vision Research, 44(12), 1297–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, A., & Voss, J. (2007). Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 767–775. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, A., Voss, J., & Lerche, V. (2015). Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: A tutorial based on fast-dm-30. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(2015), 336. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S. L., Zhang, Y., Duberg, K., Mistry, P., Cai, W., Qin, S., Bostan, S.-N., Padmanabhan, A., Carrion, V. G., & Menon, V. (2020). Anxiety and stress alter decision-making dynamics and causal amygdala-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex circuits during emotion regulation in children. Biological Psychiatry, 88(7), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 410–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C. N., Liebman, E., & Stone, P. (2018). Decision mechanisms underlying mood-congruent emotional classification. Cognition & Emotion, 32(2), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1296820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C.-T. (2017). Attention and perceptual decision making. In D. R. Little, N. Altieri, M. Fifić, & C.-T. Yang (Eds.), Systems factorial technology (pp. 199–217). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804315-8.00013-6
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Cao, Y., Proctor, R. W., & Liu, Y. (2023). Emotional experiences of service robots’ anthropomorphic appearance: A multimodal measurement method. Ergonomics, 66(12), 2039–2057. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2023.2182751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar