291
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Determinants of ChatGPT Use and its Impact on Learning Performance: An Integrated Model of BRT and TPB

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Received 14 Jan 2024, Accepted 24 May 2024, Published online: 07 Jun 2024

References

  • Adu-Gyamfi, G., Song, H., Asamoah, A. N., Li, L., Nketiah, E., Obuobi, B., Adjei, M., & Cudjoe, D. (2022). Towards sustainable vehicular transport: Empirical assessment of battery swap technology adoption in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121995
  • Aguirre-Urreta, M. I., & Hu, J. (2019). Detecting common method bias: Performance of the Harman’s single-factor test. ACM SIGMIS Database, 50(2), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330472.3330477
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Al-Emran, M. (2024). Unleashing the role of ChatGPT in Metaverse learning environments: Opportunities, challenges, and future research agendas. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2324326
  • Al-Sharafi, M. A., Al-Emran, M., Al-Qaysi, N., Iranmanesh, M., & Ibrahim, N. (2023). Drivers and barriers affecting Metaverse adoption: A systematic review, theoretical framework, and avenues for future research. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2260984
  • Albanna, H., Alalwan, A. A., & Al-Emran, M. (2022). An integrated model for using social media applications in non-profit organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102452
  • Alhamad, H., & Donyai, P. (2021). The validity of the theory of planned behaviour for understanding people’s beliefs and intentions toward reusing medicines. Pharmacy, 9(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010058
  • Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. SSRN.
  • Billanes, J., & Enevoldsen, P. (2022). Influential factors to residential building Occupants’ acceptance and adoption of smart energy technologies in Denmark. Energy and Buildings, 276, 112524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112524
  • Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019
  • Cai, Q., Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Factors influencing learner attitudes towards ChatGPT-assisted language learning in higher education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2261725
  • Chai, L., Xu, J., & Li, S. (2023). Investigating the intention to adopt telecommuting during COVID-19 outbreak: An integration of TAM and TPB with risk perception. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(18), 3516–3526. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2098906
  • Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
  • Choi, W. (2023). Assessment of the capacity of ChatGPT as a self-learning tool in medical pharmacology: A study using MCQs. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 864. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2647520/v1
  • Claudy, M. C., Garcia, R., & O’Driscoll, A. (2015). Consumer resistance to innovation – A behavioral reasoning perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(4), 528–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11747-014-0399-0/TABLES/9
  • Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Cristofaro, M. (2020). “I feel and think, therefore I am”: an affect-cognitive theory of management decisions. European Management Journal, 38(2), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.09.003
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • Duong, C. D., Bui, D. T., Pham, H. T., Vu, A. T., & Nguyen, V. H. (2023). How effort expectancy and performance expectancy interact to trigger higher education students’ uses of ChatGPT for learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0096/FULL/XML
  • Duong, C. D., Vu, T. N., & Ngo, T. V. N. (2023). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100883
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  • Erdfelder, E., FAul, F., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  • Ferdous, A. (2010). Applying the theory of planned behavior to explain marketing managers’ perspectives on sustainable marketing. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 22(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2010.505883
  • Foroughi, B., Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Khanfar, A., Ghobakhloo, M., Annamalai, N., & Naghmeh-Abbaspour, B. (2023). Determinants of intention to use ChatGPT for educational purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2226495
  • Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: Is Chat GPT a blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1166682. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2023.1166682/BIBTEX
  • Gantt, C. (2001). The theory of planned behavior and postpartum smoking relapse. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(4), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1547-5069.2001.00337.X
  • Gao, P., Li, J., & Liu, S. (2021). An introduction to key technology in artificial intelligence and big data driven e-Learning and e-Education. Mobile Networks and Applications, 26(5), 2123–2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01777-7
  • Gopi, M., & Ramayah, T. (2007). Applicability of theory of planned behavior in predicting intention to trade online. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2(4), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468800710824509
  • Gui, J., Sun, Z., Wen, Y., Tao, D., & Ye, J. (2023). A review on generative adversarial networks: Algorithms, theory, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(4), 3313–3332. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3130191
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  • Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  • Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
  • Hair, J. F., Jr, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  • Harb, A., Fowler, D., Chang, H., Blum, S., & Alakaleek, W. (2019). Social media as a marketing tool for events. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-03-2017-0027
  • Hassan, A., Bhatti, S. H., Shujaat, S., & Hwang, Y. (2022). To adopt or not to adopt? The determinants of cloud computing adoption in information technology sector. Decision Analytics Journal, 5, 100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100138
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Heuckmann, B., Hammann, M., & Asshoff, R. (2018). Using the theory of planned behaviour to develop a questionnaire on teachers’ beliefs about teaching cancer education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.006
  • Hosen, M., Ogbeibu, S., Giridharan, B., Cham, T. H., Lim, W. M., & Paul, J. (2021). Individual motivation and social media influence on student knowledge sharing and learning performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Computers & Education, 172, 104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104262
  • Huang, X. (2021). Aims for cultivating students’ key competencies based on artificial intelligence education in China. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5127–5147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10530-2
  • Huang, Y., & Qian, L. (2021). Understanding the potential adoption of autonomous vehicles in China: The perspective of behavioral reasoning theory. Psychology & Marketing, 38(4), 669–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21465
  • İpek, Z. H., Gözüm, A. I. C., Papadakis, S., & Kallogiannakis, M. (2023). Educational applications of the ChatGPT AI System: A systematic review research. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(3), 26–55.
  • Islam, M. N. (2023). Factors affecting adoption of self-service E-ticketing technology: A study on heritage sites in Bangladesh. Heliyon, 9(3), e14691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14691
  • Jaboob, M., Hazaimeh, M., & Al-Ansi, A. M. (2024). Integration of generative AI techniques and applications in student behavior and cognitive achievement in Arab Higher Education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2300016
  • Jan, I. U., Ji, S., & Kim, C. (2023). What (de) motivates customers to use AI-powered conversational agents for shopping? The extended behavioral reasoning perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103440
  • Kao, W. K., & Huang, Y. S. S. (2023). Service robots in full- and limited-service restaurants: Extending technology acceptance model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 54, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.11.006
  • Karras, T., Aila, T., Laine, S., Lehtinen, J. (2017). (). Progressive growing of gans for improved quality, stability, and variation. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.10196Focus to learn more
  • Kim, A. J., Yang, J., Jang, Y., & Baek, J. S. (2021). Acceptance of an Informational Antituberculosis Chatbot Among Korean Adults: Mixed Methods Research. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9(11), e26424. https://doi.org/10.2196/26424
  • Kim, H., Garrido, P., Tewari, A., Xu, W., Thies, J., Niessner, M., Pérez, P., Richardt, C., Zollhöfer, M., & Theobalt, C. (2018). Deep video portraits. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 37(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197517.3201283
  • Kokab, S., Arif, M., & Qaisar, N. (2023). Factors affecting the university librarians’ use of social media technologies in Pakistan: A structural equation modelling approach. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(3), 102719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102719
  • Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J., I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
  • Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., Verma, S., & Chaturvedi, R. (2022). Alexa, what do we know about conversational commerce? Insights from a systematic literature review. Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1129–1155. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21654
  • Lo, C. K. (2023). What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI13040410/S1
  • Lucy, L., & Bamman, D. (2021). Gender and representation bias in GPT-3 generated 20 stories. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Narrative Understanding, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.nuse-1.5
  • Mobarak, A. M. A., Dakrory, M. I., Elsotouhy, M. M., Ghonim, M. A., & Khashan, M. A. (2022). Drivers of mobile payment services adoption: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(7), 1518–1531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2144122
  • Morren, M., & Grinstein, A. (2021). The cross-cultural challenges of integrating personal norms into the Theory of Planned Behavior: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75, 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101593
  • Nisar, S., & Aslam, M. S. (2023). Is ChatGPT a good tool for T&CM students in studying pharmacology? SSRN 4324310. 16.
  • Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Capatina, A., Chakraborty, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Huang, T.-L., Kar, A. K., Lee, V.-H., Loh, X.-M., Micu, A., Mikalef, P., Mogaji, E., Pandey, N., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Sarker, P., Sharma, A., … Wong, L.-W. (2023). The potential of generative artificial intelligence across disciplines: Perspectives and future directions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2261010
  • Paek, H., Oh, H., & Hove, T. (2012). How media campaigns influence children’s physical activity: Expanding the normative mechanisms of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Health Communication, 17(8), 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.650832
  • Pataranutaporn, P., Danry, V., Leong, J., Punpongsanon, P., Novy, D., Maes, P., & Sra, M. (2021). AI-generated characters for supporting personalized learning and well-being. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(12), 1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00417-9
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  • Popovici, M. D. (2023). ChatGPT in the classroom. Exploring its potential and limitations in a functional programming course. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2269006
  • Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121
  • Qian, L., Yin, J., Huang, Y., & Liang, Y. (2023). The role of values and ethics in influencing consumers’ intention to use autonomous vehicle hailing services. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122267
  • Quinton, T., Morris, B., & Trafimow, D. (2021). Untangling the Theory of Planned Behavior’s auxiliary assumptions and theoretical assumptions: Implications for predictive and intervention studies. New Ideas in Psychology, 60, 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100818
  • Raj, V. A., Jasrotia, S. S., & Rai, S. S. (2023). Role of privacy concerns and trust in consumers’ intention to use buy-now, pay-later (BNPL): An extended TPB model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2269005
  • Rasheed, H. M. W., Chen, Y., Khizar, H. M. U., & Safeer, A. A. (2023). Understanding the factors affecting AI services adoption in hospitality: The role of behavioral reasons and emotional intelligence. Heliyon, 9(6), e16968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16968
  • Rawas, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education (pp. 1–14). Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-023-12114-8/FIGURES/4
  • Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2020). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
  • Salas-Pilco, S. Z., & Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w
  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Seo, E. H., Jang, H. W., & Cho, M. (2023). Enabling the foodservice industry to transition consumers toward plant-based meat alternatives: A behavioral reasoning perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 114, 103559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103559
  • Setiawan, B., Afiff, A., & Heruwasto, I. (2020). Integrating the theory of planned behavior with norm activation in a pro-environmental context. Social Marketing Quarterly, 26(3), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500420949220
  • Silva, M. B. (2016). Percepção da população assistida sobre a inserção de estudantes de medicina na Unidade Básica de Saúde. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso, 1(9), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should professors worry. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7
  • Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
  • Taneja, S., & Ali, L. (2020). Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: Testing the structural model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102418
  • Tiwari, C. K., Bhat, M. A., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I. (2023). What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2023-0061
  • Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40561-023-00237-X/FIGURES/13
  • Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
  • Tweneboah-Koduah, E., Adams, M., & Nyarku, K. (2020). Using theory in social marketing to predict waste disposal behaviour among households in Ghana. Journal of African Business, 21(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2019.1597323
  • Ulker‐Demirel, E., & Ciftci, G. (2020). A systematic literature review of the theory of planned behavior in tourism, leisure and hospitality management research. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.04.003
  • Virmani, N., Sharma, S., Kumar, A., & Luthra, S. (2023). Adoption of industry 4.0 evidence in emerging economy: Behavioral reasoning theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122317
  • Wang, J., Shen, M., & Chu, M. (2021). Why is green consumption easier said than done? Exploring the green consumption attitude-intention gap in China with behavioral reasoning theory. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 2, 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100015
  • Wei, X., Peng, X., & Prybutok, V. (2024). Consumer behavioral intention of adopting emerging healthcare technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 888–898. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3140952
  • Westaby, J. D., Probst, T. M., & Lee, B. C. (2010). Leadership decision-making: A behavioral reasoning theory analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.011
  • Xu, B. (2021). Artificial intelligence teaching system and data processing method based on big data. Complexity, 2021, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9919401
  • Yadav, R., Giri, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2022). Understanding the users’ motivation and barriers in adopting healthcare apps: A mixed-method approach using behavioral reasoning theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121932
  • Yang, D., Oh, E. S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Hybrid physical education teaching and curriculum design based on a voice interactive artificial intelligence educational robot. Sustainability, 12(19), 8000. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198000
  • Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
  • Ying, S., Huang, Y., Qian, L., & Song, J. (2023). Privacy paradox for location tracking in mobile social networking apps: The perspectives of behavioral reasoning and regulatory focus. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122412
  • Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: Current status, issues, and prospects. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1183162. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162
  • Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Guillaumie, L. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660
  • Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
  • Zhang, P., & Tur, G. (2023). A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K-12 education. European Journal of Education, 59(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12599
  • Zhu, W., Huang, L., Zhou, X., Li, X., Shi, G., Ying, J., & Wang, C. (2024). Could AI ethical anxiety, perceived ethical risks and ethical awareness about AI influence university students’ use of generative AI products? An ethical perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2323277
  • Zhu, X., Ma, Y., Kong, L., & Yang, J. (2023). Understand consumers’ true views on new energy vehicles through behavioral reasoning and brand extension fit. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 49, 100974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.100974

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.