141
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Behavioral Intentions of Low-Achieving Students to Use Mobile English Learning: Integrating Self-Determination Theory, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Technology Acceptance Model Approaches

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Received 12 Mar 2024, Accepted 31 May 2024, Published online: 11 Jun 2024

References

  • Abu Al-Majd, O., & Belton, B. (2024). Which one? Technology or non-technology-assisted vocabulary learning: A probe into the state of academic buoyancy, creativity, and academic achievement. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00262-4
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Al Zieni, H. (2019). The effect of mobile learning on learner autonomy: A suggested measurement tool to assess the development of learner autonomy. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 16(3), 1020–1031. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.3.19.1020
  • Al-Adwan, A. S., Al-Madadha, A., & Zvirzdinaite, Z. (2018). Modeling students’ readiness to adopt mobile learning in higher education: An empirical study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3256
  • Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125(10), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
  • Alamer, A., Al Khateeb, A., & Jeno, L. M. (2023). Using WhatsApp increases language students’ self-motivation and achievement, and decreases learning anxiety: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12753
  • Almaiah, M. A., Jalil, M. A., & Man, M. (2016). Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(4), 453–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1
  • Alowayr, A., & Al-Azawei, A. (2021). Predicting mobile learning acceptance: An integrated model and empirical study based on higher education students’ perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6154
  • Alshurideh, M., Al Kurdi, B., Salloum, S. A., Arpaci, I., & Al-Emran, M. (2023). Predicting the actual use of m-learning systems: A comparative approach using PLS-SEM and machine learning algorithms. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1214–1228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1826982
  • Ateş, H., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2023). A comprehensive model explaining teachers’ intentions to use mobile-based assessment. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2194928
  • Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Weil-Being in Two Work Settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045–2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
  • Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). Predicting students’ intention to adopt mobile learning. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2017-0004
  • Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2023). Learning from anywhere, anytime: Utilitarian motivations and facilitating conditions for mobile learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(4), 1687–1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09608-8
  • Chang, S.-Y. (2023). Re-envisioning professional development for English medium instruction: A decolonial option. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2183960
  • Chao, C.-M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
  • Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
  • Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., Talaee, E., & Noroozi, O. (2021). Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 934–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298
  • Ebadi, S., & Raygan, A. (2023). Investigating the facilitating conditions, perceived ease of use and usefulness of mobile-assisted language learning. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00250-0
  • Elaish, M. M., Shuib, L., Ghani, N. A., Yadegaridehkordi, E., & Alaa, M. (2017). Mobile learning for English language acquisition: Taxonomy, challenges, and recommendations. IEEE Access, 5, 19033–19047. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2749541
  • Fathali, S., & Okada, T. (2018). Technology acceptance model in technology-enhanced OCLL contexts: A self-determination theory approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 138–154. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3629
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
  • García Botero, G., Questier, F., Cincinnato, S., He, T., & Zhu, C. (2018). Acceptance and usage of mobile assisted language learning by higher education students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1
  • Ghasemy, M., Teeroovengadum, V., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). This fast car can move faster: A review of PLS-SEM application in higher education research. Higher Education, 80(6), 1121–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00534-1
  • Graham, K. M., Pan, W. Y., & Eslami, Z. R. (2021). A critique of Taiwan’s bilingual education policy through a ROAD-MAPPING of teacher experiences. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(5), 516–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1884434
  • Habibi, A., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2023). m-Learning Management System use during Covid-19. Information Development, 39(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211035473
  • Hair, J., Jr, Hair, Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
  • Hajiheydari, N., & Ashkani, M. (2018). Mobile application user behavior in the developing countries: A survey in Iran. Information Systems, 77, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2018.05.004
  • Hameed, F., Qayyum, A., & Khan, F. A. (2024). A new trend of learning and teaching: Behavioral intention towards mobile learning. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(1), 149–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00252-w
  • He, L., & Li, C. (2023). Continuance intention to use mobile learning for second language acquisition based on the technology acceptance model and self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1185851. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185851
  • Huang, R.-T. (2023). Reducing the Perceived Complexity of Mobile Learning in Organizations: A Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2276523
  • Jeno, L. M., Adachi, P. J. C., Grytnes, J.-A., Vandvik, V., & Deci, E. L. (2019). The effects of m-learning on motivation, achievement and well-being: A self-determination theory approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12657
  • Kucuk, S., Baydas Onlu, O., & Kapakin, S. (2020). A model for medical students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 7(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120520973222
  • Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). University students’ use of mobile technology in self-directed language learning: Using the integrative model of behavior prediction. Computers & Education, 179, 104413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104413
  • Lan, P. S., Liu, M. C., & Baranwal, D. (2023). Applying contracts and online communities to promote student self-regulation in English learning at the primary-school level. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789674
  • Leguina, A. (2015). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(2), 220–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
  • Li, H. (2013). Rural students’s experiences in a Chinese elite university: Capital, habitus and practices. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5-6), 829–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.821940
  • Li, Q., & Chan, K. K. (2024). Test takers’ attitudes of using exam-oriented mobile application as a tool to adapt in a high-stakes speaking test. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12297-0
  • Liu, G. (2023). To Transform or Not to Transform? Understanding the Digital Literacies of Rural Lower-Class EFL Learners. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2023.2236217
  • Liu, G. L., & Wang, Y. (2024). Modeling EFL teachers’ intention to integrate informal digital learning of English (IDLE) into the classroom using the theory of planned behavior. System, 120, 103193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103193
  • Liu, G.-Z., Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Using digital gamification to improve language achievement, foreign language enjoyment, and ideal L2 self: A case of English as a foreign language learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12954
  • Liu, G., & Darvin, R. (2024). From Rural China to the Digital Wilds: Negotiating digital repertoires to claim the right to speak. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 334–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3233
  • Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2024). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316
  • Lu, A., Deng, R., Huang, Y., Song, T., Shen, Y., Fan, Z., & Zhang, J. (2022). The roles of mobile app perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in app-based Chinese and English learning flow and satisfaction. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 10349–10370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11036-1
  • Luo, Y., Lin, J., & Yang, Y. (2021). Students’ motivation and continued intention with online self-regulated learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(6), 1379–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01042-3
  • Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
  • McDonald, R. P. (1978). Generalizability in Factorable Domains: “Domain Validity and Generalizability”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800111
  • Ministry of Education Taiwan. (2021). The program on bilingual education for students in college. https://ws.moe.edu.tw/Download.ashx?u=C099358C81D4876CE33C455F1B761E1E9C1B1C9D4C5C3D019362B3EBA00C12B8583D175C3AB2D82A705C8923B466EA55407DC122305ED2A061282E74599BB469C4A6057CF373431D2BAEFE64631CF7EA&n=D4F6265130DEAC0E6D2E22249327FA4FF2F79F658734CBD9F9464531835FF6B017D5D196774DB6EFB9EAD188BE07FFB344B15159206CA061CE3F9F9199F0D977&icon=.pdf.
  • Nie, J., Zheng, C., Zeng, P., Zhou, B., Lei, L., & Wang, P. (2020). Using the theory of planned behavior and the role of social image to understand mobile English learning check-in behavior. Computers & Education, 156, 103942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103942
  • Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.020
  • Park, S. Y., Nam, M.-W., & Cha, S.-B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x
  • Peng, M. Y. P., Xu, Y., & Xu, C. (2023). Enhancing students’ English language learning via M-learning: Integrating technology acceptance model and S-O-R model. Heliyon, 9(2), e13302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13302
  • Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Shadiev, R., Hwang, W.-Y., & Liu, T.-Y. (2018). Investigating the effectiveness of a learning activity supported by a mobile multimedia learning system to enhance autonomous EFL learning in authentic contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9590-1
  • Sun, J. C.-Y., & Hsieh, P.-H. (2018). Application of a gamified interactive response system to enhance the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, student engagement, and attention of English Learners. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 104–116. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26458511
  • Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2020). An investigation of the influence of intrinsic motivation on students’ intention to use mobile devices in language learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09733-9
  • Teo, T. (2012). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: An integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003714632
  • Togaibayeva, A., Ramazanova, D., Yessengulova, M., Yergazina, A., Nurlin, A., & Shokanov, R. (2022). Effect of mobile learning on students’ satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and academic performance when learning a foreign language. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.946102
  • Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Wang, Y.-M., Chiu, W.-C., Lin, H.-H., Wang, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-Y., & Chen, I. F. (2024). Determinants of students’ adoption of virtual reality-based learning systems: An individual difference perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2098512
  • Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
  • Yang, S., Zhou, S., & Cheng, X. (2019). Why do college students continue to use mobile learning? Learning involvement and self-determination theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12634

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.