0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Factors Influencing University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior and AI Literacy

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 20 Mar 2024, Accepted 17 Jul 2024, Published online: 29 Jul 2024

References

  • Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
  • Adelana, O. P., Ayanwale, M. A., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). Exploring pre-service biology teachers’ intention to teach genetics using an AI intelligent tutoring-based system. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2310976. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2310976
  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
  • Alajmi, Q., Al-Sharaf, M. A., & Abuali, A. (2020). Smart learning gateways for Omani HEIs towards educational technology: Benefts, challenges and solutions. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies, 4(1), 12–17.
  • Arkorful, V. E., Hammond, A., Lugu, B. K., Basiru, I., Sunguh, K. K., & Charmaine‐Kwade, P. (2020). Investigating the intention to use technology among medical students: An application of an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(2), e2460. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2460
  • Arteaga Sánchez, R., Duarte Hueros, A., & García Ordaz, M. (2013). E‐learning and the University of Huelva: A study of WebCT and the technological acceptance model. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741311306318
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  • Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x
  • Bazelais, P., Doleck, T., & Lemay, D. J. (2017). Investigating the predictive power of TAM: A case study of CEGEP students’ intentions to use online learning technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9587-0
  • Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
  • Brown, J. D. (2011). Likert items and scales of measurement. Statistics, 15(1), 10–14. https://teval.jalt.org/test/bro_34.htm
  • Cai, Q., Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Factors influencing learner attitudes towards ChatGPT-assisted language learning in higher education. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2261725
  • Calvani, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2009). Assessing digital competence in secondary education—Issues, models and instruments. In Issues in information and media literacy: Education, practice and pedagogy (Vol. 2). Informing Science Press. https://flore.unifi.it/handle/2158/328911
  • Carolus, A., Koch, M. J., Straka, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Wienrich, C. (2023). MAILS-Meta AI literacy scale: Development and testing of an AI literacy questionnaire based on well-founded competency models and psychological change-and meta-competencies. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014
  • Çelebi, C., Yılmaz, F., Demir, U., & Karakuş, F. (2023). Artificial intelligence literacy: An adaptation study. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 4(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1401740
  • Chai, C. S., Chiu, T. K., Wang, X., Jiang, F., & Lin, X. F. (2022). Modeling Chinese secondary school students’ behavioral intentions to learn artificial intelligence with the theory of planned behavior and self-determination theory. Sustainability, 15(1), 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010605
  • Chai, C. S., Lin, P. Y., Jong, M. S. Y., Dai, Y., Chiu, T. K., & Qin, J. (2021). Perceptions of and behavioral intentions towards learning artificial intelligence in primary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 89–101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032858
  • Chai, C. S., Wang, X., & Xu, C. (2020). An extended theory of planned behavior for the modelling of Chinese secondary school students’ intention to learn artificial intelligence. Mathematics, 8(11), 2089. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112089
  • Cham, T. H., Cheng, B. L., Low, M. P., & Cheok, J. B. C. (2020). Brand image as the competitive edge for hospitals in medical tourism. European Business Review, 33(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2019-0269
  • Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  • Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010
  • Chen, X. J., Hu, Z. B., & Wang, C. L. (2024). Empowering education development through AIGC: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12549-7
  • Chen, X. J., Zhu, K. K., Jing, Y. H., & Wang, C. L. (2023). The application landscape and research status of artificial intelligence in language learning: A visual analysis [Paper presentation]. The 15th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers (ICETC 2023), Barcelona, Spain (pp. 461–468). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3629296.3629370
  • Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). Past, present, and future of smart learning: A topic-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6
  • Cheng, E. W. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Ma, C. S. M. (2015). Tertiary students’ intention to e-collaborate for group projects: Exploring the missing link from an extended theory of planned behaviour model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 958–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12379
  • Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii–xvi. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249674
  • Chu, J., & Dai, Y.-Y. (2021). Extending the UTAUT model to study the acceptance behavior of MOOCs by university students and the moderating roles of free time management and leisure-study conflict. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 17(4), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.2021100103
  • Cong-Lem, N., Soyoof, A., & Tsering, D. (2024). A systematic review of the limitations and associated opportunities of ChatGPT. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2344142
  • Dai, J., Zhang, X., & Wang, C. L. (2024). A meta-analysis of learners’ continuance intention toward online education platforms. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12654-7
  • Dai, Y. (2024). Dual-contrast pedagogy for AI literacy in upper elementary schools. Learning and Instruction, 91, 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101899
  • Dawes, J. (2002). Five point vs. eleven point scales: Does it make a difference to data characteristics? Australasian Journal of Market Research, 10(1), 1–17.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  • Foroughi, B., Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Khanfar, A., Ghobakhloo, M., Annamalai, N., & Naghmeh-Abbaspour, B. (2023). Determinants of intention to use ChatGPT for educational purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2226495
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206
  • Habibi, A., Riady, Y., Samed Al-Adwan, A., & Awni Albelbisi, N. (2023). Beliefs and knowledge for pre-service teachers’ technology integration during teaching practice: An extended theory of planned behavior. Computers in the Schools, 40(2), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2124752
  • Hadi Mogavi, R., Deng, C., Juho Kim, J., Zhou, P., D. Kwon, Y., Hosny Saleh Metwally, A., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., Nacke, L. E., & Hui, P. (2024). ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters’ utilization and perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027
  • Hagger, M. S., Cheung, M. W. L., Ajzen, I., & Hamilton, K. (2022). Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology: official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 41(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001153
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., & Krey, N. (2017). Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281777
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
  • Hamad, F., Shehata, A., & Al Hosni, N. (2024). Predictors of blended learning adoption in higher education institutions in Oman: Theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00443-8
  • Han, H., Hsu, L.-T., & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism Management, 31(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.013
  • Hayduk, L. S. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
  • Ho, S. M., Ocasio-Velázquez, M., & Booth, C. (2017). Trust or consequences? Causal effects of perceived risk and subjective norms on cloud technology adoption. Computers & Security, 70, 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.08.004
  • Holland, D. D., & Piper, R. T. (2016). A technology integration education (tie) model for millennial preservice teachers: Exploring the canonical correlation relationships among attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral controls, motivation, and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) competencies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1172448
  • Hornberger, M., Bewersdorff, A., & Nerdel, C. (2023). What do university students know about artificial intelligence? Development and validation of an AI literacy test. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100165
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
  • Hwang, G. J., Tu, Y. F., & Lin, C. J. (2021). Advancements and hot research topics of artificial intelligence in mobile learning: A review of journal publications from 1995 to 2019. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(4), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2021.118444
  • Hyde, M. K., & Knowles, S. R. (2013). What predicts Australian university students’ intentions to volunteer their time for community service? Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(3), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12014
  • Ivanov, S., Soliman, M., Tuomi, A., Alkathiri, N. A., & Al-Alawi, A. N. (2024). Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the theory of planned behaviour. Technology in Society, 77, 102521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521
  • Jing, Y. H., Wang, H. M., Chen, X. J., & Wang, C. L. (2024). What factors will affect the effectiveness of using ChatGPT to solve programming problems? A quasi-experimental study. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 11, 319. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02751-w
  • Jong, M. S. Y., Chan, T., Hue, M. T., & Tam, V. W. (2018). Gamifying and mobilising social enquiry-based learning in authentic outdoor environments. Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 277–292. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26511554
  • Kang, E. Y. N., Chen, D. R., & Chen, Y. Y. (2023). Associations between literacy and attitudes toward artificial intelligence–assisted medical consultations: The mediating role of perceived distrust and efficiency of artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107529
  • Khan, T. A., Alam, M., Rizvi, S. A., Shahid, Z., & Mazliham, M. S. (2024). Introducing AI applications in engineering education (PBL): An implementation of power generation at minimum wind velocity and turbine faults classification using AI. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(1), e22691. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22691
  • Kong, S. C., Cheung, W. M. Y., & Zhang, G. (2021). Evaluation of an artificial intelligence literacy course for university students with diverse study backgrounds. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100026
  • Kooli, C., & Yusuf, N. (2024). Transforming educational assessment: Insights into the use of ChatGPT and large language models in grading. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2338330
  • Lam, T., Cho, V., & Qu, H. (2007). A study of hotel employee behavioral intentions towards adoption of information technology. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2005.09.002
  • Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Haverkamp, N., & Raupach, T. (2023). Development of the “scale for the assessment of non-experts’ AI literacy”-An exploratory factor analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100338
  • Liang, J.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, M.-R. A., & Darmawansah, D. (2023). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: An integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4270–4296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348
  • Liesa-Orús, M., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Sierra-Sánchez, V., & Vázquez-Toledo, S. (2023). Links between ease of use, perceived usefulness and attitudes towards technology in older people in university: A structural equation modelling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2419–2436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11292-1
  • Lin, W.-S. (2012). Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(7), 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.006
  • Liu, T., Yang, B., Geng, Y., & Du, S. (2021). Research on face recognition and privacy in China—based on social cognition and cultural psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 809736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.809736
  • Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2021). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/qualitative-research-methods-for-the-social-sciences/P200000002971/9780137561469
  • Lung-Guang, N. (2019). Decision-making determinants of students participating in MOOCs: Merging the theory of planned behavior and self-regulated learning model. Computers & Education, 134, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.004
  • Ma, S., & Lei, L. (2024). The factors influencing teacher education students’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence technology for information-based teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305155
  • Mac Callum, K., Jeffrey, L., Kinshuk. (2014). Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.024
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83
  • Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181001
  • Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865–1883. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597
  • Mei, B., Brown, G. T. L., & Teo, T. (2017). Toward an understanding of preservice English as a foreign language teachers’ acceptance of computer-assisted language learning 2.0 in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 74–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117700144
  • Meng, B., & Choi, K. (2019). Tourists’ intention to use location-based services (LBS). International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(8), 3097–3115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2018-0734
  • Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
  • Moore, D. R. (2010). Technology literacy: The extension of cognition. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9113-9
  • Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D., & Dewaard, J. (2015). Research methods in the social sciences. Worth Publishers, A Macmillan Education Company.
  • Ng, D. T. K., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054
  • Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy questionnaire with confirmatory factor analysis [Paper presentation]. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 233–235). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT58122.2023.00074
  • Obenza, B., Salvahan, A., Rios, A. N., Solo, A., Alburo, R. A., & Gabila, R. J. (2024). University students’ perception and use of ChatGPT: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. International Journal of Human Computing Studies, 5(12), 5–18. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4724968
  • Onesi-Ozigagun, O., Ololade, Y. J., Eyo-Udo, N. L., & Ogundipe, D. O. (2024). Revolutionizing education through AI: A comprehensive review of enhancing learning experiences. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1011
  • Otache, I. (2019). Entrepreneurship education and undergraduate students’ self- and paid-employment intentions. Education + Training, 61(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2017-0148
  • Pan, Y., Huang, Y., Kim, H., & Zheng, X. (2023). Factors influencing students’ intention to adopt online interactive behaviors: Merging the theory of planned behavior with cognitive and motivational factors. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00629-y
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Revythi, A., & Tselios, N. (2019). Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2341–2355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09869-4
  • Schiavo, G., Businaro, S., & Zancanaro, M. (2024). Comprehension, apprehension, and acceptance: Understanding the influence of literacy and anxiety on acceptance of artificial intelligence. Technology in Society, 77, 102537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102537
  • Shiau, W.-L., Sarstedt, M., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Internet research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Internet. Internet Research, 29(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2018-0447
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
  • Su, J., & Yang, W. (2024). AI literacy curriculum and its relation to children’s perceptions of robots and attitudes towards engineering and science: An intervention study in early childhood education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12867
  • Sungur-Gül, K., & Ateş, H. (2021). Understanding pre-service teachers’ mobile learning readiness using theory of planned behavior. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 44–57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27004930
  • Tang, K.-Y., Chang, C.-Y., & Hwang, G.-J. (2023). Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–2019). Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2134–2152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1875001
  • Tawafak, R., Malik, S., Mathew, R., Ashfaque, M., Jabbar, J., AlNuaimi, M., et al. (2021). A combined model for continuous intention to use e-learning system. International Association of Online Engineering. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/219005/
  • Teo, T. (2012). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: An integration of the technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003714632
  • UNESCO (2022). Enabling AI in adult education the role of artificial intelligence in adult education. https://www.uil.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2022/06/Mario_Franco_FINAL_CONFITEA_AI%40EDU-final.pptx_.pdf
  • UNESCO (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ChatGPT-and-Artificial-Intelligence-in-higher-education-Quick-Start-guide_EN_FINAL.pdf
  • Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., & Bakır, E. (2019). The effect of subjective norms on preservice and in‐service teachers’ behavioural intentions to use technology: A multigroup multimodel study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2501–2519. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12834
  • Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Sormunen, K., Dillon, P., & Sointu, E. (2015). The impact of authentic learning experiences with ICT on pre-service teachers’ intentions to use ICT for teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 81, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.008
  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2011). Handbook of theories of social psychology. SAGE publications.
  • Vicente, G., & Partidário, M. R. (2006). SEA–Enhancing communication for better environmental decisions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(8), 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.06.005
  • Vujinović, A., Luburić, N., Slivka, J., & Kovačević, A. (2024). Using ChatGPT to annotate a dataset: A case study in intelligent tutoring systems. Machine Learning with Applications, 16, 100557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100557
  • Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
  • Wang, C. L., Chen, X. J., Yu, T., Liu, Y. D., & Jing, Y. H. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: A bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 11, 256. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y
  • Wang, C. L., Dai, J., Zhu, K. K., Yu, T., & Gu, X. Q. (2023). Understanding the continuance intention of college students toward new e-learning spaces based on an integrated model of the TAM and TTF. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2291609
  • Wang, C., Dai, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, X., & Xu, L. (2022). A learning analytics model based on expression recognition and affective computing: Review of techniques and survey of acceptance [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Educational Innovation and Multimedia Technology (EIMT 2022) (pp. 169–178). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-012-1_19
  • Wilson, M., Scalise, K., & Gochyyev, P. (2015). Rethinking ICT literacy: From computer skills to social network settings. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.05.001
  • Winkler-Schwartz, A., Bissonnette, V., Mirchi, N., Ponnudurai, N., Yilmaz, R., Ledwos, N., Siyar, S., Azarnoush, H., Karlik, B., & Del Maestro, R. F. (2019). Artificial intelligence in medical education: Best practices using machine learning to assess surgical expertise in virtual reality simulation. Journal of Surgical Education, 76(6), 1681–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.015
  • WIPO (2019). Artificial intelligence. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_1055.pdf.
  • Xia, Y. Q., Deng, Y. L., Tao, X. Y., Zhang, S. N., & Wang, C. L. (2024). Digital art exhibitions and psychological well-being in Chinese Generation Z: An analysis based on the S-O-R framework. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 11, 266. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02718-x
  • Yan, J., Huang, T., & Xiao, Y. (2023). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurial education activity on entrepreneurial intention and behavior: Role of behavioral entrepreneurial mindset. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(10), 26292–26307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23878-w
  • Yang, M., Shao, Z., Liu, Q., & Liu, C. (2017). Understanding the quality factors that influence the continuance intention of students toward participation in MOOCs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1195–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9513-6
  • Yilmaz, F. G. K., Yilmaz, R., & Ceylan, M. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence acceptance scale: A validity and reliability study. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2288730
  • Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023a). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
  • Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023b). Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining student views on the use of ChatGPT for programming learning. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100005
  • Yu, T., Dai, J., & Wang, C. (2023). Adoption of blended learning: Chinese university students’ perspectives. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10, 390. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01904-7
  • Yu, X., Xu, S., & Ashton, M. (2023). Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption and application in the workplace: The socio-technical system theory perspective. Information Technology & People, 36(1), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0254
  • Yusoff, R., & Mohd Janor, R. (2014). Generation of an interval metric scale to measure attitude. SAGE Open, 4(1), 215824401351676. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013516768
  • Zhang, W., Cai, M., Lee, H. J., Evans, R., Zhu, C., & Ming, C. (2024). AI in medical education: Global situation, effects and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4611–4633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12009-8
  • Zhang, Y., Yang, X., & Tong, W. (2024). University students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT profiles and their relation to ChatGPT intentions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2331882
  • Zhuang, X., Hou, X., Feng, Z., Lin, Z., & Li, J. (. (2021). Subjective norms, attitudes, and intentions of AR technology use in tourism experience: The moderating effect of millennials. Leisure Studies, 40(3), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2020.1843692

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.