Labor as a Linchpin in Ecosystem Services Conservation: Appropriating Value from Collective Institutions?

References

• Adams, W. M. 2004. Against Extinction: The Story of Conservation. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, K. 2018. “Why Exchange Values Are Not Environmental Values: Explaining the Problem with Neoliberal Conservation.” Conservation and Society 16 (3): 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andolina, R. 2012. “The Values of Water: Development Cultures and Indigenous Cultures in Highland Ecuador.” Latin American Research Review 47 (2): 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrán, K., S. Salgado, F. Cuesta, S. León-Yanez, K. Romoleroux, E. Ortiz, A. Cárdenas, and A. Velástegui. 2009. Distribución Espacial, Sistemas Ecológicos y Caracterización Florística de los Páramos en el Ecuador [Spatial Distribution, Ecological Systems and Floristic Characterization of the Paramos in Ecuador]. Quito: Ecociencia.
   Google Scholar
• Bétrisey, F., J. Bastiaensen, and C. Mager. 2018. “Payments for Ecosystem Services and Social Justice: Using Recognition Theories to Assess the Bolivian Acuerdos Recíprocos por el Agua.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 92: 134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, R. 2014. “Cultural Politics and the Hydrosocial Cycle: Water, Power and Identity in the Andean Highlands.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 57: 234–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., J. Hoogesteger, and J. C. Rodriguez-de-Francisco. 2014. “Commoditizing Water Territories: The Clash Between Andean Water Rights Cultures and Payment for Environmental Services Policies.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 25 (3): 84–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, L. L., D. A. Auerbach, J. H. Goldstein, A. L. Vogl, D. Shemie, T. Kroeger, J. L. Nelson, et al. 2016. “One Size Does not Fit All: Natural Infrastructure Investments Within the Latin American Water Funds Partnership.” Ecosystem Services 17: 217–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., A. Tesfaye, and P. Pauw. 2011. “Meta-analysis of Institutional-Economic Factors Explaining the Environmental Performance of Payments for Watershed Services.” Environmental Conservation 38 (4): 380–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, B., S. Sullivan, K. Neves, J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2012. “Towards a Sythesized Critique of Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 23 (2): 4–30.
   Google Scholar
• Buytaert, W., R. Cellari, B. De Bièvre, F. Cisneros, G. Wyseure, J. Deckers, and R. Hofstede. 2006. “Human Impact on the Hydrology of the Andean Páramos.” Earth Science Reviews 79: 53–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J. 2010. Struggles for Local Democracy in the Andes. Boulder: First Forum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2010. “Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment: A Synthesis and Evaluation of the Research.” Environment and Society 1 (1): 5–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chiriboga, M., and C. Chehab. 2007. The Role of Institutions in Rural Territories That Have Undergone Land Reform. IPPG Discussion Paper Series No. 16. University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• De Bievre, B. 2004. “The Properties of Soils of the South Ecuadorian Páramo and the Impact of Land Use Changes on their Hydrology.” PhD Diss., Kotholieke Universiteit Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, R., and L. Moore. 2010. “Neoliberalising Nature? Elephant-Back Tourism in Thailand and Botswana.” Antipode 42 (3): 742–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, S., S. Pagiola, and S. Wunder. 2008. “Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues.” Ecological Economics 65 (4): 663–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faas, A. J. 2015. “Disaster Resettlement Organizations and the Culture of Cooperative Labor in the Ecuadorian Andes.” In Disaster's Impact on Livelihood and Cultural Survival: Losses, Opportunities, and Mitigation, edited by M. Companion, 51–62. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. “Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature?” Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (2): 237–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley, K. A., and L. L. Bremer. 2017. “‘Water is Life’: Local Perceptions of Páramo Grasslands and Land Management Strategies Associated with Payment for Ecosystem Services.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (2): 371–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., and S. Gäcther. 2000. “Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 159–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and J. Breitling. 2012. “Market Mechanism or Subsidy in Disguise? Governing Payment for Environmental Services in Costa Rica.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 43: 402–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., and B. Büscher. 2017. “The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation.” Ecological Economics 132: 224–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FONAG (Fondo para la Protección del Agua). 2013. Mejoramiento de la produccion agropecuaria en Quinchucajas [Improvement of Agricultural Production in Quinchucajas]. FONAG Productive Project Contract. Quito: FONAG.
   Google Scholar
• Gauvin, C., E. Uchida, S. Rozelle, J. Xu, and J. Zhan. 2010. “Cost-Effectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services with Dual Goals of Environment and Poverty Alleviation.” Environmental Management 45 (3): 488–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman-Benner, R. L., S. Benitez, T. Boucher, A. Calvache, G. Daily, P. Kareiva, T. Kroeger, and A. Ramos. 2012. “Water Funds and Payments for Ecosystem Services: Practice Learns from Theory and Theory Can Learn from Practice.” Oryx 46 (1): 55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun, E., and R. Muradian. 2015. “In Markets We Trust? Setting the Boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in Ecosystem Services Governance.” Ecological Economics 117: 217–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, J., and D. Airely. 2004. “Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets.” Psychological Science 15 (11): 787–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, G., and C. J. Cavanagh. 2016. “A Review of the Social Impacts of Neoliberal Conservation: Formations, Inequalities, Contestations.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 75: 199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T. 2017. “Value, Nature, and Labor: A Defense of Marx.” Capitalism Nature Socialism 28: 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. 2018. “Resource Geographies I: Valuing Nature (or Not).” Progress in Human Geography 42 (1): 148–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igoe, J., and D. Brockington. 2007. “Neoliberal Conservation: A Brief Introduction.” Conservation and Society 5 (4): 432–449.
   Google Scholar
• Isch, E. L., and I. Gentes, eds. 2006. Agua y Servicios Ambientales: Visiones Criticas desde los Andes [Water and Environmental Services: Critical Visions from the Andes]. Quito: Abya-Yala.
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara, H., U. Pascual, and I. Hodge. 2017. “Dancing with Storks: The Role of Power Relations in Payments for Ecosystem Services.” Ecological Economics 139: 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslin, A. J. 2019. “Unpacking ‘Success’: Applying Local Perceptions to Interpret Influence of Water Fund Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Ecuadorian Andes.” Society & Natural Resources 32 (6): 617–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslin, A. 2020. “Translating Water Fund Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Ecuadorian Andes.” Development and Change 51 (1): 94–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslin, A. J., and W. E. Jepson. 2018. “Territory and Authority of Water Fund Payments for Ecosystem Services in Ecuador's Andes.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 91: 10–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, C. M. 2014. “Financing Watershed Conservation: Lessons from Ecuador's Evolving Water Trust Funds.” Agricultural Water Management 145: 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, C. M. 2017. Grassroots Global Governance: Local Watershed Management Experiments and the Evolution of Sustainable Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, K., and M. Kenney-Lazar. 2017. “Value in Capitalist Natures: An Emerging Framework.” Dialogues in Human Geography 7 (3): 295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Ortega, J., E. Ojea, and C. Roux. 2013. “Payments for Water Ecosystem Services in Latin America: A Literature Review and Conceptual Model.” Ecosystem Services 6: 122–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, E. 2002. The Articulated Peasant: Household Economies in the Andes. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, K., and E. N. Shapiro. 2010. “Payments for Ecosystem Services in Mexico: Nature, Neoliberalism, Social Movements, and the State.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (3): 579–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElwee, P. 2017. “The Metrics of Making Ecosystem Services.” Environment and Society 8 (1): 96–124.
   Google Scholar
• Moates, A. S., and B. C. Campbell. 2005. “Incursion, Fragmentation and Tradition: Historical Ecology of Andean Cotocachi.” In Development with Identity: Community, Culture, and Sustainability in the Andes, edited by R. E. Rhoades, 27–45. Cambridge: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Muradian, R. 2013. “Payments for Ecosystem Services as Incentives for Collective Action.” Society & Natural Resources 26: 1155–1169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradian, R., E. Corbera, U. Pascual, N. Kosoy, and P. H. May. 2010. “Reconciling Theory and Practice: An Alternative Conceptual Framework for Understanding Payments for Environmental Sevices.” Ecological Economics 69: 1202–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradian, R., and E. Gómez-Baggethun. 2013. “The Institutional Dimension of ‘Market-Based Instruments’ for Governing Ecosystem Services: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Society & Natural Resources 26 (10): 1113–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlove, B. 1977. “Inequality Among Peasants: The Forms and Uses of Reciprocal Exchange in Andean Peru.” In Peasant Livelihood: Studies in Economic Anthropology and Cultural Ecology, edited by R. Halperin, and J. Dow, 201–214. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. M. 2011. “Carbon Forestry and Agrarian Change: Access and Land Control in a Mexican Rainforest.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4): 859–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L., and C. Lund. 2011. “New Frontiers of Land Control: Introduction.” Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4): 667–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramón, G. 2009. “Conocimiento y Prácticas Ancestrales.” [Knowledge and Ancestral Practices.] In Gente y Ambiente de Páramo: Realidades y Perspectivas en el Ecuador [People and Environment of the Paramo: Realities and Perspectives in Ecuador], edited by J. S. Martínez, 13–22. Quito: Ecociencia-Abya Yala.
   Google Scholar
• Recharte, J., and J. Gearheard. 2001. “Los Páramos Altamente Diversos del Ecuador: Ecología Política de una Ecorregión.” [The Highly Diverse Paramos of Ecuador: Political Ecology of an Ecoregion.] In Los Páramos del Ecuador: Particularidades, Problemas y Perspectivas, edited by P. Mena Vásconez, G. Medina, and R. Hofstede, 55–85. Quito: Abya-Yala/Proyecto Páramo.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. M., and J. D. Wainwright. 2013. “The Value of Nature to the State.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (4): 890–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode, J., E. Gómez-Baggethun, and T. Krause. 2015. “Motivation Crowding by Economic Incentives in Conservation Policy: A Review of the Empirical Evidence.” Ecological Economics 117: 270–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-de-Francisco, J. C., and R. Boelens. 2014. “Payment for Environmental Services and Power in the Chamachán Watershed in Ecuador.” Human Organization 73 (4): 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-de-Francisco, J. C., J. Budds, and R. Boelens. 2013. “Payments for Environmental Services and Unequal Resource Control in Pimampiro, Ecuador.” Society & Natural Resources 26 (10): 1217–1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro-Garza, E., P. McElwee, G. Van Hecken, and E. Corbera. 2020. “Beyond Market Logics: Payments for Ecosystem Services as Alternative Development Practices in the Global South.” Development and Change 51 (1): 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklenar, P., and P. Jorgensen. 1999. “Distribution Patterns of Paramo Plants in Ecuador.” Journal of Biogeography 26 (4): 681–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USAID (United States Agency for International Development). 2012. Protecting Water Sources to Conserve Biodiversity: Financial Mechanisms for Watershed Protection in Ecuador. Cooperative Agreement No. 518-A-00-07-00056-00 Narrative Report: April–June.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hecken, G., and J. Bastiaensen. 2010. “Payments for Ecosystem Services in Nicaragua: Do Market-Based Approaches Work?” Development and Change 41 (3): 421–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga, F., A. Calvache, S. Benitez, J. Leon, and A. Ramos. 2015. “Water Funds as a Tool for Urban Water Provision and Watershed Conservation in Latin America.” In Water and Cities in Latin America: Challenges for Sustainable Development, edited by I. Aguilar-Barajas, J. Malhknecht, J. Kaledin, M. Kjellen, and A. Mejia-Betancourt, 235–255. New York: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• vonHedemann, N., and T. Osborne. 2016. “State Forestry Incentives and Community Stewardship: A Political Ecology of Payments and Compensation for Ecosystem Services in Guatemala’s Highlands.” Journal of Latin American Geography 15 (1): 83–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunder, S. 2005. “Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts.” CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Wunder, S. 2015. “Revisiting the Concept of Payment for Environmental Services.” Ecological Economics 117: 234–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar