Note-Taking Interventions to Assist Students With Disabilities in Content Area Classes

References

• Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175–199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boch, F., & Piolat, A. (2005). Note taking and learning: A summary of research. Writing Across the Curriculum, 16, 101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, K., & Warren, W. J. (2007). Methods practiced in social studies instruction: A review of public school teachers’ strategies. International Journal of Social Education, 22, 68–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, J., & Holliday, W. (2006). How college science students engage in note taking strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 786–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. R. (2010a). Note-taking skills of middle school students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 530–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. R. (2010b). Strategic note-taking for middle school students with learning disabilities in science classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. R. (2013). Strategic note-taking for inclusive middle school science classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 78–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. R., Forchelli, G. A., & Cariss, K. (2013). Note-taking difficulties survey data. Unpublished raw data. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. R., & Rivera (2012). Note-taking techniques for students with disabilities: A systematic review of the research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 131–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, J. R., & Weishaar, M. (2001). The effects of a strategic note-taking technique on the comprehension and long term recall of lecture information for high school students with LD. LD Research and Practice, 16, 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Brigham, F. J., Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2011). Science education and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulgren, J., Sampson, P., & Deshler, D. (2013). Literacy challenges and opportunities for students with learning disabilities in social studies and history. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castello, M., & Monereo, C. (2005). Students’ note-taking as a knowledge-construction tool. Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 5, 265–285.
   Google Scholar
• Center on Education Policy. (2012). State high school exit exams: A policy in transition. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, E., Cohn, S., & Bradley, J. (1995). Note-taking, working memory, and learning in principles of economics. Journal of Economics Education, 26, 291–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshler, D., Schumaker, J., Bui, Y., & Vernon, S. (2006). High schools and adolescents with disabilities: Challenges at every turn. In D. D. Deshler & J. B. Schumaker (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with disabilities: Accessing the general education curriculum (pp. 1–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deshler, D., Warner, M., Shumaker, J., & Alley, G. (1983). Learning strategies intervention model: Key components and current status. In J. D. McKinney & L. Feagans (Eds.), Current topics in learning disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 254–284). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 522–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. S., Lenz, K., & Sabornie, E. J. (1987). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part1: Critical agents. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 6–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evernote. (2013). Penultimate (Version 4.1.2) [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/penultimate/id354098826?mt=8
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, M., Healey, M., Bradley, A., & Hall, T. (2004). Barriers to learning: A systematic study of the experience of disabled students in one university. Studies in Higher Education 29, 303–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulp, S. L. (2002). 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of elementary science teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, C. (2008). Paper-based computing. Educause, 31, 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., & Marshall, S. (1974). On notes and note-taking. Higher Education Quarterly, 28, 225–235.
   Google Scholar
• Haydon, T., Mancil, G. R., Kroeger, S. D., McLeskey, J., & Lin, W. J. (2011). A review of the effectiveness of guided notes for students who struggle learning academic content. Preventing School Failure, 55, 226–231.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C. A., & Suritsky, S. K. (1994). Note-taking skills of university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issacs, G. (1994). Lecturing practices and note-taking purposes. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 203–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivie, S. D. (1998). Ausubel's learning theory: An approach to teaching higher order thinking skills. The High School Journal, 82, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kagohara, D. (2011). Three students with developmental disabilities learn to operate an iPod to access age-appropriate entertainment videos. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26, 459–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, B. D. (1991). Guided notes, review, and achievement of secondary students with learning disabilities in mainstream content courses. Education & Treatment of Children, 14, 112–127.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, B. D. (1993). Guided notes: Effects with secondary and post secondary students with mild disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 16, 272–289.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, B. D. (1996). Flexible skeletons: Guided notes for adolescents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(3), 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., Lan, W., Hamman, D., & Hendricks, B. (2008). The effects of teaching note-taking strategies on elementary students’ science learning. Instructional Science, 36, 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leming, J., Ellington, L., & Schug, M. (2006). The state of social studies: A national random survey of elementary and middle school social studies teachers. Social Education, 70, 322–327.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. (1977). An empirical study of lecture note taking among college students. Journal of Educational Research, 71, 93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luminant Software. (2013). AudioNote (Version 3.3.1) [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from http://luminantsoftware.com/iphone/audionote.html
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. C. (2008). An explanatory framework detailing the process and product of high- quality secondary science practice. Science Educator, 17, 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (1993). How classroom teachers approach the teaching of thinking. Theory Into Practice, 32, 154–160.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Norland, J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H., & Conners, N. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 40, 130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydosz, A., & Raver, S. A. (2010). Note taking and university students with learning difficulties: What supports are needed? Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3, 177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, K. (2010). Harry Potter and the ghost teacher: Resurrecting the lost art of lecturing. The History Teacher, 43, 289–295.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, L., & Krishnan, K. (2007). Executive function difficulties and learning disabilities: Understandings and misunderstandings. In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice (pp 77–105). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moin, L., Magiera, K., & Zigmond, N. (2009). Instructional activities and group work in the US inclusive high school co-taught science class. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 677– 697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, L. (2004, January 8). Enveloping expectations [Special issue]. Education Week, 23, 8–26.
   Google Scholar
• Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. (2005). Cognitive effort during note-taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 291–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, M. L. (1992). Testing practices of mainstream secondary classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, M. L., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. S. (1993). The investigation of setting demands: A missing link in learning strategy instruction. In L. S. Meltzer (Ed.), Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities (pp. 325–354). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Quintus, L., Borr, M., Duffield, S., Napoleon, L., & Welch, A. (2012). The impact of the Cornell note-taking method on students’ performance in a high school family and consumer sciences class. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, 30, 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhl, K. L., Hughes, C. A., & Gajar, A. H. (1990). Efficacy of the pause procedure for enhancing learning disabled college students’ long- and short-term recall of facts presented through lecture. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 13, 55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhl, K. L., & Suritsky, S. (1995). The pause procedure and/or an outline: Effect on immediate free recall and lecture notes taken by college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 2–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Beattie, C., & Lambert, J. (2012). An observational study of undergraduate students' adoption of (mobile) note-taking software. Computers in Human Behaviors, 28, 308–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T., Brigham, F., & Mastropieri, M. (2013). Common core science standards: Implications for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T., Mastropieri, M. A., & Okolo, C. (2008). Science and social studies for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sola, A., & Ojo, O. (2007). Effects of project, inquiry and lecture-demonstration teaching methods on senior secondary students’ achievement in separation of mixtures practical test. Educational Research and Review, 2, 124–132.
   Google Scholar
• Stachowiak, J. R. (2010). Universal design for learning in postsecondary institutions. New Horizons for Learning, 8. Retrieved from http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/Journals/spring2010/universialdesignforlearning/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfellow, J. L., & Miller, S. P. (2005). Enhancing student performance in secondary classrooms while providing access to the general education curriculum using lecture formats. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 1, 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Suritsky, S. K. (1992). Note-taking approaches and specific areas of difficulty reported by university students with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 10, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Suritsky, S. K., & Hughes, C. A. (1996). Note-taking strategy instruction. In D. D. Deshler, E. S. Ellis, & B. K. Lenz (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 267–312). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, W. J., Ehrhardt, A. M., Gardner, R., III., Jones, L., Green- field, R., & Fribley, S. (1999). Using guided notes with academically at-risk high school students during a remedial summer social studies class. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titsworth, B. S. (2001). Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students’ affective learning. Communication Studies, 52, 169–179.
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, B. S. (2004). Students’ note-taking: The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity. Communication Education, 50, 283–297.
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, B. S., & Kiewra, K. A. (2004). Spoken organizational lecture cues and student note-taking as facilitators of student learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 447–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanSchaack, A. J. (2012). Enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of instruction through in-class pencasting using the Livescribe Smartpen. Retrieved from http://www.engaging-technologies.com/smartpen-research.html#sthash.FggBkzIA.dpbs
   Google Scholar
• Viet Train. (2012). Notes Plus (Version 3.0.8) [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from http://notesplusapp.com
   Google Scholar
• Ward-Lonergan, J. M., Lilies, B. Z., & Anderson, A. M. (1998). Listening comprehension and recall abilities in adolescents with language learning disabilities and without disabilities for social studies lectures. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 1–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward-Lonergan, J. M., Lilies, B. Z., & Anderson, A. M. (1999). Verbal retelling abilities in adolescents with language learning disabilities and without disabilities for social studies lectures. Journal of learning Disabilities, 32, 213–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman, E. M., & Hansen, L. E. (2007). Strategies for teaching social studies to English language learners. The Social Studies, 98(5), 180–184.
   Google Scholar