12,968
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Analyses of Teacher-Student Classroom Interactions

A Brief Review of Effective Teaching Practices That Maximize Student Engagement

, , &

References

  • Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1993). First-grade classroom behavior: Its short- and long-term consequences for school performance. Child Development, 64, 801–814.
  • Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Horsey, C. S. (1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70, 87–107.
  • Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teacher–student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system—secondary. School Psychology Review, 42, 76–98.
  • Apter, B., Arnold, C., & Swinson, J. (2010). A mass observation study of student and teacher behaviour in British primary classrooms. Educational Psychology in Practice, 26, 151–171.
  • Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Baker, J. A. (1999). Teacher–student interaction in urban at-risk classrooms: Differential behavior, relationship quality, and student satisfaction with school. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 57–70.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Beaman, R., & Wheldall, K. (2000). Teachers' use of approval and disapproval in the classroom. Educational Psychology, 20, 431–446.
  • Blondal, K. S., & Adalbjarnardottir, S. (2012). Student disengagement in relation to expected and unexpected educational pathways. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56, 85–100.
  • Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51, 5–32.
  • Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41, 1069–1077. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1069
  • Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Cambron-Mccabe, N. H. (2002). Educational accountability in the USA: Focus on state testing. Education and the Law, 14, 117–126.
  • Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational research, 64, 363–423.
  • Carnine, D. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199–206.
  • Chalk, K., & Bizo, L. (2004). Specific praise improves on-task behaviour and numeracy enjoyment: A study of year four pupils engaged in the numeracy hour. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20, 335–351.
  • Council for Exceptional Children. (1987). Academy for effective instruction: Working with mildly handicapped students. Reston, VA: Author.
  • Craft, M., Alber, S., & Heward, W. (1998). Teaching elementary students with developmental disabilities to recruit teacher attention in a general education classroom: Effects on teacher praise and academic productivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 399–415.
  • Davis, L. L., & O'Neil, R. E. (2004). Use of response cards with a group of students with learning disabilities including those for whom English is a second language. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 219–222.
  • Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence40, 1649–1660.
  • Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children's risk for school problems contribute to children's behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36, 413–432.
  • Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Eugene, OR: ADI Press.
  • Epstein, M. H., Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (1975). Implications of the reflectivity-impulsivity dimension for special education. Journal of Special Education, 9, 11–25.
  • Ferkis, M. A., Belfiore, P. J., & Skinner, C. H. (1997). The effects of response repetitions on sight word acquisition for students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 307–324.
  • Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement & students at risk. Buffalo, NY: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Lapp, D. (2011). Coaching middle-level teachers to think aloud improves comprehension instruction and student reading achievement. Teacher Educator, 46, 231–243.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
  • Fry, P. (1983). Process measures of problem and non-problem children's classroom behavior: The influence of teacher behaviour variables. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 79–88.
  • Gall, M. (1984). Synthesis of research on teachers' questioning. Educational Leadership, 42, 40–47.
  • Gardner, R., Heward, W. L., & Grossi, T. A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic reapplication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63–71.
  • Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Hafen, C. A., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Effects of a professional development program on behavioral engagement of students in middle and high school. Psychology in the Schools51, 143–163.
  • Hall, R., Lund, D., & Jackson, D. (1968). Effects of teacher attention on study behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 1–12.
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology94, 562–575.
  • Haston, W. (2007). Teacher modeling as an effective teaching strategy. Music Educators Journal, 93, 26–30. doi:10.1177/002743210709300414
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
  • Haydon, T., Conroy, M. A., Scott, T. M., Sindelar, P. T., Barber, B. R., & Orlando, A. M. (2010). A comparison of three types of opportunities to respond on student academic and social behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 27–40.
  • Haydon, T., Mancil, G. R., & Van Loan, C. (2009). Using opportunities to respond in a general education classroom: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 267–278.
  • Hollowood, T., Salisbury, C., Rainforth, B., & Palombaro, M. (1995). Use of instructional time in classrooms serving students with and without severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 242–252.
  • Housand, A., & Reis, S. M. (2008). Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 108–136. doi:10.4219/jaa-20080864
  • Kamps, D. M., Dugan, E. P., Leonard, B. R., & Daoust, P. M. (1994). Enhanced small group instruction using choral responding and student interaction for children with autism and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 60–73.
  • Kazdin, A. (1973). The effect of vicarious reinforcement on attentive behavior in the classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 71–78.
  • Kern, L., & Clemens, N. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 65–75. doi:10.1002/pits.20206
  • Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262–273.
  • Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children's achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology101, 190–206.
  • Lambert, M. C., Cartledge, G., Heward, W. L., & Lo, Y. (2006). Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 8, 88–99.
  • Lewis, T., Hudson, S., Richter, M., & Johnson, N. (2004). Scientifically supported practices in emotional and behavioral disorders: A proposed approach and brief review of current practices. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 247–259.
  • Madsen, C., Becker, W., & Thomas, D. (1968). Rules, praise, and ignoring: Elements of elementary classroom control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 139–150.
  • Matheson, A., & Shriver, M. (2005). Training teachers to give effective commands: Effects on student compliance and academic behaviors. School Psychology Review, 34, 202–219.
  • Methe, S. A., & Hintze, J. M. (2003). Evaluating teacher modeling as a strategy to increase student reading behavior. School Psychology Review, 32, 617–623. doi:10.1177/1053451211430117
  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 20 U.S.C. 6301 (2002).
  • Partin, T. C., Robertson, R. E., Maggin, D. M., Oliver, R. M., & Wehby, J. (2010). Using teacher praise and opportunities to respond to promote appropriate student behavior. Preventing School Failure, 54, 172–178.
  • Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology99, 83–98.
  • Pianta, R. C., Stuhlman, M. W., & Hamre, B. K. (2002). How schools can do it better: Fostering stronger connections between teachers and students. New Directions for Youth Development, 93, 91–107.
  • Pisacreta, J., Tincani, M., Connell, J. E., & Axelrod, S. (2011). Increasing teachers' use of a 1:1 praise to behavior correction ratio to decrease student disruption in general education classrooms. Behavioral Interventions, 26, 243–260.
  • Redfield, D. L., & Rousseau, E. W. (1981). A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 237–245.
  • Reinke, W., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Martin, E. (2007). The effect of visual performance feedback on teacher use of behavior-specific praise. Behavior Modification, 31, 247–263.
  • Rosen, L., O'Leary, S., Joyce, S., Conway, G., & Pfiffner, L. (1984). The importance of prudent negative consequences for maintaining the appropriate behavior of hyperactive students. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 581–604.
  • Rosenshine, B. (1976). Recent research on teaching behaviors and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 61–64.
  • Rosenshine, B. (1995). Advances in research on instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 262–268.
  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49, 26–33.
  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research64, 479–530.
  • Sandholtz, J. H. (2011). Preservice teachers' conceptions of effective and ineffective teaching practices. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38, 27–47.
  • Schutte, R., & Hopkins, B. (1970). The effects of teacher attention on following instructions in a Kindergarten class. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 117–122.
  • Scott, T. M., Anderson, C. M., & Alter, P. (2012). Managing classroom behavior using positive behavior supports. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making instructional design decisions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  • Silven, M., & Vaurus, M. (1992). Improving reading through thinking aloud. Learning and Instruction, 2, 69–88.
  • Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 351–380.
  • Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323–332.
  • Sterling, R. M., Barbetta, P. M., Heward, W. L., & Heron, T. E. (1997). A comparison of active student response and on-task instruction on the acquisition and maintenance of health facts by fourth grade special education students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 151–165.
  • Sutherland, K. S., Alder, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248.
  • Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). The effect of self-evaluation on teaching behavior in classrooms for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Special Education, 35, 161–171.
  • Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Copeland, S. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 2–8.
  • Svinicki, M. D. (2004). Learning and motivation in the postsecondary classroom. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
  • Thomas, D., Becker, W., & Armstrong, M. (1968). Production and elimination of disruptive classroom behavior by systematically varying teacher's behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 35–45.
  • Tierno, M. J. (1996). Teaching as modeling: The impact of teacher behaviors upon student character formation. The Educational Forum, 60, 174–180.
  • Trussell, R. (2008). Classroom universals to prevent problem behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic 43, 179–185.
  • VanDeWeghe, R. (2006). Research matters: Deep modeling and authentic teaching: Challenging students or challenging students? The English Journal, 95, 84–88.
  • Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents' perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal47, 633–662.
  • Watson, S. W., & Bradley, J. F. (2009). Modeling secondary instructional strategies in a teacher education class. Education, 130, 3–15.
  • Wheatley, R., West, R., Charlton, C., Sanders, R., Smith, T., & Taylor, M. (2009). Improving behavior through differential reinforcement: A praise note system for elementary school students. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 551–571.
  • White, M. A. (1975). Natural rates of teacher approval and disapproval in the classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 367–372.
  • Willingham, W. W., Pollack, J. M., & Lewis, C. (2002). Grades and test scores: Accounting for observed differences. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 1–37.
  • Winne, P. H. (1979). Experiments relating teachers' use of higher cognitive questions to student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 49, 13–49.
  • Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Doyle, P. M., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Choral and individual responding during small group instruction: Identification of interactional effects. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 289–309.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Pike, E. O. (1972). Effects of modeling and reinforcement on the acquisition and generalization of question-asking behavior. Child Development, 43, 892–907.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.