Teacher and Student Behaviors in the Contexts of Grade-Level and Instructional Grouping

References

• Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., & Spence, J. C. (2000). Why should we group students within-class for learning? Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 158–179.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. A., Clark, T. P., Maier, K. S., & Viger, S. (2008). The differential influence of instructional context on the academic engagement of students with behavior problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1876–1883. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher–pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21, 715–730. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, K., & Thurston, L. P. (2010). English language learner academic engagement and instructional grouping configurations. American Secondary Education, 39, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children's risk for school problems contribute to children's behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36, 413–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M., & Moody, S. W. (1999). Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 65, 399–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. L., Cancelli, A. A., & Yoshida, R. K. (1988). Academic engagement of elementary school children with learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 327–340. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(88)90041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31, 328–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbour, K. E., Evanovich, L. L., Sweigart, C. A., & Hughes, L. E. (2015). A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Preventing School Failure, 59(1), 5–13. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayling, C. C., Cook, C., Gresham, F. M., State, T., & Kern, L. (2008). An analysis of the status and stability of the behaviors of students with emotional and behavioral difficulties. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, R. R., Chen, X., & Goldman, G. (1999). What happens in classrooms? Instructional practices in elementary and secondary schools, 1994–95, NCES 1999-348. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Imeraj, L., Antrop, I., Sonuga-Barke, E., Deboutte, D., Deschepper, E., Bal, S., & Roeyers, H. (2013). The impact of instructional context on classroom on-task behavior: A matched comparison of children with ADHD and non-ADHD classmates. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 487–498. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415–428. doi:10.3102/00028312019003415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Appolonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458. doi:10.3102/00346543066004423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marulis, L. M., & Neuman, S. B. (2010). The effects of vocabulary intervention on young children's word learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 300–335. doi:10.3102/0034654310377087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. M., Alter, P. J., & Hirn, R. G. (2011). An examination of typical classroom context and instruction for students with and without behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 619–641. doi:10.1353/etc.2011.0039
   Google Scholar
• Stright, A. D., & Supplee, L. H. (2002). Children's self-regulatory behaviors during teacher-directed, seat-work, and small-group instructional contexts. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 235–244. doi:10.1080/00220670209596596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapp, J., Wehby, J., & Ellis, D. (1992). The multiple option observation system for experimental studies (MOOSES). Nashville, TN: Tapp and Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., Wotruba, J. W., & Algozzine, B. (1993). Instruction in special education classrooms under varying student–teacher ratios. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 305–320. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1001897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N. K., Metz, K., Murray, C. S., Roberts, G., & Danielson, L. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83, 163–195. doi:10.3102/0034654313477212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Fung, I. Y. Y (2002). Small-group composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 425–447. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00014-4
   Google Scholar
• Wills, H., Kamps, D., Abbot, M., Bannister, H., & Kaufman, J. (2010). Classroom observations and effects of reading interventions for students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar