An Examination of Teacher and Student Behaviors in Classrooms for Students With Moderate and Severe Intellectual Disability

References

• Brophy, J. (2006). History of research on classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 17–43). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A. & Wakeman, S. Y. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 33–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y, Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W., Cushing, L. S., Clark, N. M., & Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students’ access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. W., Sisco, L. G., Brown, L., Brickham, D., Al-Khabbaz, Z. A. (2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 479–494.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C., & Timperley, H. (200&). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, PL 108-466, 20 U. S. C. §1400, H. R. 1350.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, O., & Hupp, S. C. (2005). Teacher interaction styles and task engagement of elementary students with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 293–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, T. G., Singer, G. H. S., & Carranza, F. D. (2006). A national survey of the educational planning and language instruction practices for students with moderate to severe disabilities who are English Language Learners. Research & Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 242–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, G. (1978). The relationship of reliability in classroom research to the amount of observation: An extension of the Spearman-Brown formula. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15, 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppar, A. L., Dymond, S. K., & Gaffney, J. S. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives on literacy instruction for students with severe disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 100–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. M., Alter, P. J., & Hirn, R. G. (2011). An examination of typical classroom context and instruction for students with and without behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 619–641.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. M., Anderson, C. M., & Alter, P. (2012). Managing classroom behavior using positive behavior supports. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D., Jimenez, B. A., & DiBiase, W. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 36, 62–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooner, F., Knight, V. F., Browder, D. M., & Smith, B. R. (2012). Evidence-based practice for teaching academics to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 374–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., Adler, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effects of varying rates of opportunities to respond to academic requests on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with E/BD. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapp, J., Wehby, J., & Ellis, D. (1992). The multiple option observation system for experimental studies (MOOSES). Nashville, TN: Tapp and Associates.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2011). 30th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2008. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, T., Reschly Anderson, A., Bartholomay, T. & Hupp, S. (2002). An ecobehavioral examination of high school classrooms that include students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehby, J. H., Symons, F. J., & Shores, R. E. (1995). A descriptive analysis of aggressive behavior in classrooms for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 87–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar