Response to Intervention: Where It Came From and Where It's Going

References

• Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J. S., Schatschneider, C., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Meadows,  ... Connor, C. M. (2011). Predicting first-grade reading performance from kindergarten response to tier 1 instruction. Exceptional Children, 77, 453–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batsche, G., Elliott, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., ... Tilley, W. D. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bergan, J. R. (1977). Behavioral consultation. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R., & Danielson, L. (2004). The office of special education program's LD initiative: A context for inquiry and consensus. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 186–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Doolittle, J. (2007). Responsiveness to intervention: 1997–2007. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R., Scammacca, N., & Chavez, M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first and second grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdette, P. (2007). Response to intervention as it relates to early intervening services: Recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.projectforum.org
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, T. J., Zopluoglu, C., Monaghen, B. D., & Van Norman, E. R. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Multi-study evaluation of schedule, duration, and dataset quality on progress monitoring outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 19–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Smolkowski, K., Baker, S., Fien, H., Doabler, C. T., & Chard, D. J. (2011). The impact of a comprehensive tier I kindergarten program on the achievement of students at risk in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 111, 561–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Gilbert, J. K., Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Choo, E., & Bouton, B. (2012). Accelerating chronically unresponsive children to tier 3 instruction: What level of data is necessary to ensure selection accuracy? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Harn, B. A. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First grade reading performance of strong responders to kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370020101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Minneapolis, MN: Leadership Training Institute for Special Education.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Lembke, E. S., Magnusson, D., Callender, S. A., Windram, H., & Stachel, N. (2008). Developing a school-wide progress monitoring system. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 44–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, A. C., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., Barth, A. E., Vaughn, S., & Francis, D. J. (2013). Effects of tier 3 intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties and characteristics of inadequate responders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 633–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. (1975). PL 94–142, 20 U.S.C. § 1401, et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Stecker, P. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important? Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157–171.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1991). Curriculum-based measurements. Preventing School Failure, 35, 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204–219.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Enhancing mathematical problem solving for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hollenbeck, K. H. (2007). Extending responsiveness to intervention to mathematics at first and third grades. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., & Powell, S. R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children's mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychology Review, 31, 569–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009–4045). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities (pp. 467–519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, D. P., & Mercer, C. D. (2002). Learning disabilities: Historical perspectives. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities (pp. 1–67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, D. P., Pullen, P. C., & Ward, D. (2013). A brief history of the field of learning disabilities. In H. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A., Holtzman, W. H., & Messick, S. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, M. J., Tilly, W. D., Stumme, J., Volmer, L., & Allison, R. (1996). Agency-wide implementation of problem solving consultation: Foundations, current implementation, and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 228–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400, (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. A., & Spaulding, L. S. (2008). Is response to intervention good policy for specific learning disability? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 169–179.
   Google Scholar
• Kerins, M. R., Trotter, D., & Schoenbrodt, L. (2010). Effects of a Tier 2 intervention on literacy measures: Lessons learned. Child Language Teaching & Therapy, 26(3), 287–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265659009349985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, S. A. (1962). Educating exceptional children. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Martson, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 187–200.
   Google Scholar
• Moore-Brown, B. J., Montgomery, J. K., Bielinski, J., & Shubin, J. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention: Teaching before testing helps avoid labeling. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 148–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of School Psychologists. (2002). Rights without labels. Retrieved from http://www.caspsurveys.org/NEW/pdfs/nasppp4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI). (2010, March). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, S. R., & Stecker, P. M. (2014). Using data-based individualization to intensify mathematics intervention for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, K., & Mandal, A. (2011). Tier III assessments, data-based decision making, and interventions. Contemporary School Psychology, 15, 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, A. L., Busch, T. W., Betts, J., Deno, S. L., & Long, J. D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement: Oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 427–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R., & Wilson, V. L. (1984). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 18, 451–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(3), 155–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A., Wagner, R., Rashotte, G., Voeller, K., & Gonway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Education. (1977). Assistance to states for education of handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 42, 65082–65085.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Denton, C. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (2010). Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 432–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Sganlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S., Ghen, R., Pratt, A., & Dengkla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., & Epps, S. (1983). A logical and empirical analysis of current practices in classifying students as learning disabled. Exceptional Children, 50, 160–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond, N. P., & Kloo, A. (2011). General and special education are (and should be) different. In J. M. Kauffman, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 160–172). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar