Collaborative co-teaching models and specially designed instruction in secondary education: A new inclusive consultation model

References

• Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities, 34 CFR §300 and §301 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, J., Friend, M., & Hourcade, J. J. (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 17–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N. B., Howerter, C. S., & Morgan, J. J. (2013). Tools and strategies for making co-teaching work. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(2), 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conderman, G., & Hedin, L. (2013). Co-teaching with strategy instruction. (2013). Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(3), 156–163. doi:10.1177/1053451213496158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A., & Murawski, W. W. (2003). Co-teaching at the secondary level: Unique issues, current trends, and suggestions for success. High School Journal, 86(4), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L., & Rodriguez, J. (2013). Enhancing secondary cotaught science and mathematics classrooms through collaboration. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49(1), 46–53. doi:10.1177/3451213480028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. B., & Giangreco, M. (2013). Guiding principles for including high school students with intellectual disabilities in general education classes. American Secondary Education, 42(1), 57.
   Google Scholar
• Education Act. 22 Pa. Code §12.2 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Eisenman, L., Pleet, A., Wandry, D., & McGinley, V. (2011). Voices of special education teachers in an inclusive high school: Redefining responsibilities. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 91–104. doi:10.1177/0741932510361248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, M. (2008). Co-teaching: A simple solution that isn't simple after all. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2(2), 9–19. doi:10.3776/joci.2008.v2n2p9-19
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M., Cook, L., Hurley-Chamberlain, D., & Shamberger, C. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, M., Embury, D., & Clarke, L. (2014). Co-teaching versus apprentice teaching: An analysis of similarities and differences. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(2), 79–87. doi:10.1177/0888406414529308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, L., & Ferreira, J. G. (2014). Co-teaching in the natural science classroom: A case study. Journal of Sociology & Social Anthropology, 5(2), 153–159.
   Google Scholar
• Idol, L. (2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education: A program evaluation of eight schools. Remedial and Special Education, 27(2), 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Isherwood, R., & Barger-Anderson, R. (2008). Factors affecting the adoption of teaching models in inclusive classrooms: One school's journey from mainstreaming to inclusion. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 2(2), 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Keystone Exams Act of 2012, P.L. 684, No.82, § 4.24, 2012, PA Gen. Assemb. (2016).
   Google Scholar
• King-Sears, M., Brawand, A., Jenkins, M., & Preston-Smith, S. (2014). Co-teaching perspectives from secondary science co-teachers and their students with disabilities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(6), 651–680. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9391-2
   Google Scholar
• Kloo, A., & Zigmond, N. (2008). Coteaching revisited: Redrawing the blueprint. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52(2), 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 34–62. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41064522.
   Google Scholar
• Magiera, K., & Zigmond, N. (2004). Coteaching in middle school classrooms under routine conditions: Does the instructional experience differ for students with disabilities in cotaught and solo-taught classes? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20(2), 79–85.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M., & Scruggs, T. (2001). Promoting inclusion in secondary classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24(4), 265–274. doi:10.2307/1511115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, J. W., Muething, C., Flower, A., Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. (2015). Use and relationships among effective practices in co-taught inclusive high school classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(1), 53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski, W. W. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: How can we improve? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22(3), 258–267. doi:10.1080/10573560500455703
   Google Scholar
• Murawski, W. W., & Lochner, W. W. (2011). Observing co-teaching: What to ask for, look for, and listen for. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46(3), 174–183. doi:10.1177/1053451210378165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Mental Health (2010, October). Fact sheet: Attention deficit disorders. Retrieved from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/autism-spectrum-disorders-asd/index.shtml/index.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Mental Health (2016, March). Autism Spectrum Disorders. Retrieved from https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/autism-spectrum-disorders-asd/index.shtml/index.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center. (2006). NSTTAC Indicator 13 Checklist. Charlotte, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P. L. 107–110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Rea, P. J., McLaughlin, V. L., & Walther-Thomas, C. (2002). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Exceptional Children, 68(2), 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247–256.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shogren, K., Gross, J., Forger-Pratt, A., Francis, G., Satter, A., Blue-Banning, M., & Hill, C. (2015). The perspectives of students with and without disabilities on inclusive schools. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(4), 243–260. doi:10.1177/1540796915583493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis, M., Vaughn, S., Swanson, E., & Mcculley, L. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49(5), 498–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, S. M., Imbody, S. M., Wolf, L. D., & Patterson, A. L. (2016). Co-planning in co-teaching: A practical solution. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(4), 243–249.doi:10.1177/10534512166594741053451216659474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thousand, J., Villa, R., & Nevin, A. (2006). The many faces of collaborative planning and teaching. Theory into Practice, 45(3), 239–248. doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4503_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trent, S. C., Driver, B. L., Wood, M. H., Parrott, P. S., Martin, T. F., & Smith, W. G. (2003). Creating and sustaining a special education/general education partnership: A story of change and uncertainty. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Figure 1: Percentage of distribution of children ages 3–21 served under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by disability type: School year 2012–13. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://inventory.data.gov/dataset/8715a3e8-bf48-4eef-9deb-fd9bb76a196e/resource/a68a23f3-3981-47db-ac75-98a167b65259
   Google Scholar
• Vlachou, A., Didaskalou, E., & Kontofryou, M. (2015). Roles, duties and challenges of special/support teachers at secondary education: Implications for promoting inclusive practices. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(4), 551–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volonino, V., & Zigmond, N. (2007). Promoting research-based practices through inclusion? Theory into Practice, 46(4), 291–300. doi.org/10.1080/00405840701593873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Floden, R. E. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider's view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 190–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, J., & Blanton, L. (2005). The call for collaboration in teacher education. Focus on Exceptional Children, 38(2), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigmond, N. (2006). Reading and writing in cotaught secondary school social studies classrooms: A reality check. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22(3), 249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond, N., & Matta, D. W. (2004). Value added of the special education teacher in secondary school co-taught classes. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Research in secondary schools (Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities (Vol. 17, pp. 55–75). Bingley, England: Emerald.
   Google Scholar