Response to intervention in high school mathematics: One school's implementation

References

• Agrawal, J., & Morin, L. L. (2016). Evidence-based practices: Applications of concrete representational abstract framework across math concepts for students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31, 34–44. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12093
   Google Scholar
• Bellman, A., Bragg, S., Charles, R., Handlin, W., & Kennedy, D. (2009). Prentice Hall mathematics: Algebra 1. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, W. N. (2012). RTI in middle and high schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Gregg Peaster, L., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 85–95. doi:10.1177/0022219408326214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björn, P. M., Aro, M. T., Kopenen, T. K., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. H. (2016). The many face of special education within rti frameworks in the United States and Finland. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 58–66. doi:10.1177/0731948715594787
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2008). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., & Cosby, M. D. (2017). Tier 2 response to intervention in secondary mathematics education. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61, 239–247. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2016.1266595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., & Park, J. (2017). The concrete–representational–abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence–based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education. [Advanced Online Publication]. doi:10.1177/0741932517721712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. B., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R., Scammacca, N. N., Funk, C., Winter, A., … & Pool, C. (2008). The effects of tier 2 intervention on the mathematics performance of first-grade students who are at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(2), 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Pfannenstiel, K. H., Porterfield, J., & Gersten, R. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23. doi:10.1177/001440291107800101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Kanive, R., & DeGrande, M. (2010). Effect of a computer-delivered math fact intervention as a supplemental intervention for math in third and fourth grades. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 184–191. doi:10.1177/0741932510381652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Cary, M. S., Kosty, D., Baker, S., Fien, H., & Smolkowski, K. (2014). Preliminary evaluation of a tier 2 mathematics intervention for first-grade students: Using a theory of change to guide formative evaluation activities. School Psychology Review, 43, 160–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., Doabler, C. T., Smolkowski, K., Baker, S., Fien, H., & Cary, M. S. (2014). Examining the efficacy of a tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 152–165. doi:10.1177/0022219414538514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, M. S., Bryant, B. R., & Drogan, R. (2015). The impact of Tier 2 mathematics instruction on second graders with mathematics difficulties. Exceptionality, 23, 124–145. doi:10.1080/09362835.2014.986613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doabler, C. T., & Fien, H. (2013). Explicit mathematics instruction: What teachers can do for teaching students with mathematics difficulties? Intervention for School and Clinic, 48, 276–285. doi:10.1177/1053451212473141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foegen, A. (2008a). Algebra progress monitoring and interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foegen, A. (2008b). Progress monitoring in middle school mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 195–207. doi:10.1177/0741932507309716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., & Deno, S. L. (2001). Identifying growth indicators for low-achieving students in middle school mathematics. Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 4–16. doi:10.1177/002246690103500102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., & Morrison, C. (2010). Putting algebra progress monitoring into practice: Insights from the field. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46, 95–103. doi:10.1177/1053451210375302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., Olson, J. R., & Impecoven-Lind, L. (2008). Developing progress monitoring measures for secondary mathematics: An illustration in algebra. Assessment fro Effective Intervention, 33, 240-249. doi:10.1177/1534508407313489
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279. doi:10.1177/001440291207800301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S. (2006, November 13). Principles of effective assessment for screening and progress monitoring. Retrieved on September 14, 2016, from http://www.centeroninstruction.org/files/Lynn%20Fuchs%20Principles%20of%20Assessment1%2Epdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 14–20. doi:10.1177/004005990703900503
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hollenbeck, K. N. (2007). Extending responsiveness to intervention to mathematics at first and third grades. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 13–24. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00227.x
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S., Seethaler, P., Cirino, P., & Fletcher, J. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics difficulties: Seven principles for effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 79–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009–4060). Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. H., Valentine, C., Bryant, D. P., Pfannenstiel, K. H., & Bryant, B. R. (2016). Supplemental mathematics intervention: How and why special educators intensify intervention for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 78–88. doi:10.1177/0741932515597293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108–446. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• IRIS Center. (2016). RTI: Mathematics. Retrieved September 14, 2016 from http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/rti-math/challenge/#content
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Graff, J. J., & Miglioretti, D. L. (2009). Estimating reading growth using intermittent CBM progress monitoring. Exceptional Children, 75, 151–161. doi:10.1177/001440290907500202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. S., Galow, P. A., & Allenger, R. (2012). Application of algebra curriculum-based measurements for decision making in middle and high school. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39, 3–11. doi:10.1177/1534508412461435
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. S., & Smith, L. (2008). Implementation of response to intervention at middle school: Challenges and potential benefits. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 46–52. doi:10.1177/004005990804000305
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R., Boswell, L., Kanold, T., & Stiff, L. (2010). Algebra 1: Concepts and skills. Orlando, Florida: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Lembke, E. S., Hampton, D., & Beyers, S. J. (2012). Response to intervention in mathematics: Critical elements. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 257–272. doi:10.1002/pits.21596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellard, D., McKnight, M., & Jordan, J. (2010). RtI tier structures and instructional intensity. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 217–225. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00319.x
   Google Scholar
• Prewett, S., Mellard, D. F., Deshler, D. D., Allen, J., Alexander, R., & Stern, A. (2012). Response to intervention in middle schools: Practices and outcomes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27, 136–147. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansosti, F. J., Noltemeyer, A., & Goss, S. (2010). Principals’ perceptions of the importance and availability of response to intervention practices within high school settings. School Psychology Review, 39, 286–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S. (2015). Improving student achievement by infusing highly effective instructional strategies into multi-tiered support systems (MTSS) – response to intervention (RtI) tier 2 instruction. The National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Improving Students Achievement Series, 15. Retrieved from, https://www.misd.net/mtss/math/ncsm_position_paper_-_tier_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., Windram, H. S., & Bollman, K. A. (2016). Implementing response to intervention in secondary schools. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. Van Der Heyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 563–586). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, E., Solis, M., Ciullo, S., & McKenna, J. W. (2012). Special education teachers’ perceptions and instructional practices in response to intervention implementation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 115–126. doi:10.1177/0731948711432510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Fletcher, J. M., Denton, C. D., … Francis, D. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39, 3–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 137–146. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00070
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. (2012). The law and special education (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar