Effects of word boxes on improving students’ basic literacy skills: A literature review

References

• *Alber-Morgan, S. R., Joseph, L. M., Kanotz, B., Rouse, C. A., & Sawyer, M. R. (2016). The effects of word box instruction on acquisition, generalization, and maintenance of decoding and spelling skills for first graders. Education & Treatment of Children, 39, 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AtReks (2013). Build a word—easy spelling with phonics (Version 3.0) [Mobile application Software]. http://itunes.apple.com.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M., & Stegelman, T. (2003). The critical role of phonological and phonemic awareness in reading success: A model for early literacy in rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 22(4), 47–54. doi:10.1177/875687050302200407
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. (1993). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, S. S., Walsh, A. K., Goldston, D. B., Arnold, E. M., Reboussin, B. A., & Wood, F. B. (2006). Suicidality, school dropout, and reading problems among adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 507–514. doi:10.1177/00222194060390060301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Durst, E., & Joseph, L. M. (2016). Scaffolding preschoolers’ acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of phoneme segmentation skills using sound boxes. NHSA Dialog: The Research to Practice Journal for Early Childhood Field, 19, 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. (2008). Examining the impact of phonics intervention on secondary students' reading improvement. Educational Action Research, 16(4), 545–555. doi:10.1080/09650790802445726
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. doi:10.3102/00346543071003393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkonin, D. B. (1963). The psychology of mastery elements of reading. In B. Simon & J. Simon (Eds.), Educational psychology in the USSR (pp. 165–179). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• *Joseph, L. M. (1998). Word boxes help children with learning disabilities identify and spell words. Reading Teacher, 52, 348–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Joseph, L. M. (2000a). Developing first graders' phonemic awareness, word identification and spelling: A comparison of two contemporary phonic instructional approaches. Reading Research and Instruction, 39(2), 160–169. doi:10.1080/19388070009558318
   Google Scholar
• *Joseph, L. M. (2000b). Using word boxes as a large group phonics approach in a first grade classroom. Reading Horizons, 41, 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• *Joseph, L. M. (2002a). Facilitating word recognition and spelling using word boxes and word sort phonic procedures. School Psychology Review, 31, 122–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. M. (2002b). Helping children link sound to print: Phonics procedures for small-group or whole class settings. Intervention in School & Clinic, 37(4), 217–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Keesey, S., Konrad, M., & Joseph, L. M. (2015). Word boxes improve phonemic awareness, letter–sound correspondences, and spelling skills of at-risk kindergartners. Remedial and Special Education, 36(3), 167–180. doi:10.1177/0741932514543927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Larabee, K., Burns, M., & McComas, J. (2014). Effects of an iPad-supported phonics intervention on decoding performance and time on-task. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(4), 449–469. doi:10.1007/s10864-014-9214-8
   Google Scholar
• *Maslanka, P., & Joseph, L. M. (2002). A comparison of two phonological awareness techniques between samples of preschool children. Reading Psychology, 23(4), 271–288. doi:10.1080/02702710290061355
   Google Scholar
• Mesmer, H. E., & Griffith, P. L. (2005). Everybody's selling it-But just what is explicit, systematic phonics instruction?. The Reading Teacher, 59(4), 366–376. doi:10.1598/RT.59.4.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., Clarke, P., Wright, B., & Williams, C. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(7), 911–919. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0130-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2017). Racial/ethnic enrollment in public schools. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cge.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (NRP). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. M., Clancy-Menchetti, J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2008). Successful phonological awareness instruction with preschool children: Lessons from the classroom. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28(1), 3–17. doi:10.1177/0271121407313813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. J., & Bates, T. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1301–1308. doi:10.1177/0956797612466268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, C., & Salter, W. (1997). The phonological awareness test. Chicago, IL: LinguiSystems.
   Google Scholar
• *Schmidgall, M., & Joseph, L. M. (2007). Comparison of phonic analysis and whole word-reading on first graders' cumulative words read and cumulative reading rate: An extension in examining instructional effectiveness and efficiency. Psychology in the Schools, 44(4), 319–332. doi:10.1002/pits.20227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Synthesizing single subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22(3), 221–242. doi:10.1177/01454455980223001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology. And Validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24–33. doi:10.1177/074193258700800206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Stahl, K. A. D. (1998). Everything you wanted to know about phonics (but were afraid to ask). Reading Research Quarterly, 33(3), 338–355. doi:10.1598/RRQ.33.3.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Nation’s Report Card (2015). 2015 reading results. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/files/infographic_2015_reading.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., & Bryant, B. R. (1994). Test of phonological awareness. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., & Wanzek, J. (2014). Intensive interventions in reading for students with reading disabilities: Meaningful impacts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test–Revised/Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar