Online collaborative writing revision intervention outcomes for struggling and skilled writers: An initial finding

References

• Baker, S. K., Chard, D. J., Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Apichatabutra, C., & Doabler, C. (2009). Teaching writing to at-risk students: The quality of evidence of self-regulated strategy development. Exceptional Children, 75, 303–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13, 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R. D., Begay, K., Coleman, K. B., Curtin, G., … Graham, S. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwo, G. S. M. (2015). Empowering EIL learning with a Web 2.0 resource: An initial finding from the cross campus Storybird feedback study. Computers & Education, 84, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2012). Motivation and gifted students: Implications of theory and research. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 622–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dailey, E. M. (1991). The relative efficacy of cooperative learning versus individualized learning on the written performance of adolescent students with writing problems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Daiute, C., & Dalton, B. (1993). Collaboration between children learning to write: Can novices be masters?. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 281–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 687–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahsl, A., & McAndrews, S. (2012). Journal writing: Support for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 47, 234–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, V., Gaidys, U., & Robb, Y. (2003). Hermeneutic research in nursing: Developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nursing Inquiry, 10, 113–120. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00163.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387.
   Google Scholar
• Garrard, D. (2011). A case study to evaluate the effectiveness of digital storytelling as a narrative writing tool (Master’s thesis, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland). Retrieved from https://ulir.ul.ie/bitstream/handle/10344/1818/2011_GarrardD.pdf;sequence=6">https://ulir.ul.ie/bitstream/handle/10344/1818/2011_GarrardD.pdf;sequence=6
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 78–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L. H., & Friedlander, B. (2008). POWERFUL Writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brookes
   Google Scholar
• Hedberg, N. L., & Westby, C. E. (1993). Analyzing storytelling skills: Theory to practice. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, R. Y. E. (2013). Writing skill enhancement when creating narrative texts through the use of collaborative writing and the Storybird Web 2.0 tool. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15, 166–183.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the U.S. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 312–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2012). Technology, Literacy, Learning: A Multimodal Approach. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In S. Price, C. Jewitt, & B. Brown (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital technology research (pp. 250–265). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). Language education and multiliteracies. In Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 195–211). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klecan-Aker, J. S., & Gill, C. (2005). Teaching language organization to a child with pervasive developmental disorder: A case study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 28, 263–276.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & Schafer, W. D. (1995). Evaluation of a writing instruction model that integrated a process approach, strategy instruction, and word processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 278–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Schwartz, S., & Graham, S. (1991). Effects of a reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T., Cuenca, S. Y., Irby, N., Mills, S., Mason, L., & Kubina, R. (2010). Persuading students with emotional disabilities to write: Findings from a design experiment. In B. Cook, M. Tankersley, & T. Landrum (Series Eds.), Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities: Vol. 23. Literacy and learning (pp. 237–268). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri, M., Scruggs, T., Mills, S., Irby Cerar, N., Cuenca-Sanchez, Y., Allen-Bronaugh, D., … Regan, K. (2009). Persuading students with emotional disabilities to write fluently. Behavioral Disorders, 35(1), 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The Nation’s Report Card: Trends in Academic Progress 2012 (NCES 2013–456). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2011/2012470.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, E. (2007). Collaborative learning in an online environment. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14, 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidenced-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olthouse, J. M. (2014). Gifted children’s relationships with writing. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, V. L. B. (1990). The revising process of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 22–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, K. (2008). Integrating the 6 + 1 writing traits model with cross-age tutoring: An investigation of elementary students’ writing development. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(1), 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. (2011). Peer review of writing: Learning from revision using peer feedback and reviewing peers’ texts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlan, T. (2004). Speech recognition technology and students with writing difficulties: Improving fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 337–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, H. (2010). Digital storytelling in the foreign language classroom. ELTWO, 3. Retrieved from http://130.217.226.8/bitstream/handle/10652/2496/article%20-%202011%20-%20Eltwo%20-%20digital%20storytelling.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, J. A., & Topping, K. J. (1999). Collaborative creative writing in eight-year-olds: Comparing cross-ability fixed role and same-ability reciprocal role pairing. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 154–179.
   Google Scholar
• Thang, S. M., Mahmud, N., & Tng, C. K. C. A. (2015). Digital storytelling as an innovative approach to enhance learning Mandarin as a second language. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11, 161–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., … Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27, 119–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utami, R. (2014). The effect of using computer assisted language learning (call) on the tenth grade students’ narrative writing achievement of man 1 Jember in the 2013/2014 in the 2013/2014 academic year (Doctoral dissertation, Jember University, Indonesia). Retrieved from http://repository.unej.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/57212/ROSSY%20UTAMI%20-%20080210401046_1.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, J. A. (2014). Bitstrips and storybird: writing development in a blended literacy camp. Voices from the Middle, 21, 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. Y. L. (1994). Instructional parameters promoting transfer of learned strategies in students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 110–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaria, S. M., Yunus, M. M., Nazri, N. M., & Shah, P. M. (2016). Students’ Experience of Using Storybird in Writing ESL Narrative Text. Creative Education, 7, 2107–2120.
   Google Scholar