Parent tutoring, instructional hierarchy, and reading: A case study

References

• Ardoin, S. P., & Daly III, E. J. (2007). Introduction to the special series: Close encounters of the instructional kind – How the instructional hierarch is shaping instructional research 30 years later. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), 1–6. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9027-5
   Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C. (2011). Effects of the Helping Early Literacy with Practice Strategies (HELPS) reading fluency program when implemented at different frequencies. School Psychology Review, 40, 149–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C. (2016). Helping Early Literacy with Practice Strategies (HELPS): A one-on-one program designed to improve students’ reading fluency. Raleigh, NC. The HELPS Education Fund. Retrieved from http://www.helpsprogram.org
   Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Laugle, K. M., Krouse, H. E., Lynn, A. E., Tayrose, M. P., & Stage, S. A. (2010). A control group comparison of two reading fluency programs: The Helps Early Literacy with Practice Strategies (HELPS) program and the great leaps K–2 reading program. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 137–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2006). Assisting low-performing readers with a group-based reading fluency intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Mitchell, R. C., Whitehouse, M. H., Samuels, F. H., & Stage, S. A. (2011). Effects of the HELPS reading fluency program implemented by classroom teachers with low-performing second-grade students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(3), 122–133. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Ross, S. G., Greene, D. J., Mitchell, R. C., & Whitehouse, M. H. (2012). Effects of the Helping Early Literacy with Practice Strategies (HELPS) reading fluency program with Latino English language learners: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(2), 134–149. doi:10.1007/s10864-011-9144-7
   Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., & Silber, J. M. (2006). An examination of group-based treatment packages for increasing elementary-aged students’ reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 43(2), 183–195. doi:10.1002/pits.20138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., Yeager, A., & Martinez, R. S. (2012). Effects of small-group and one-on-one reading interventions with second grade, low-performing Spanish readers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(1), 58–79. doi:10.1007/s10864-011-9141-x
   Google Scholar
• Casey, L. B., & Williamson, R. (2011). Training parents as effective literacy tutors: Increasing the procedural integrity of tutoring. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(3), 257–276. doi:10.1080/13611267.2011.597118
   Google Scholar
• Daly III, E. J., & Kupzyk, S. (2012). An investigation of student-selected and parent-delivered reading interventions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21(4), 295–314. doi:10.1007/s10864-012-9149-x
   Google Scholar
• Daly III, E. J., & Martens, B. K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(3), 459–469. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, E. J., Lentz, F. E., & Boyer, J. (1996). The instructional hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11(4), 369–386. doi:10.1037/h0088941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18(1), 23–45. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00043-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erion, J. (2006). Parent tutoring: A meta-analysis. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(1), 79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Fishel, M., & Ramirez, L. (2005). Evidence-based parent involvement interventions with school-aged children. School Psychology Quarterly, 20(4), 371–402. doi:10.1521/scpq.2005.20.4.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness to intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195–203. doi:10.1177/0022219412442150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good III, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Dewey, E. N., Wallin, J., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Latimer, R. J. (2013). DIBELSNext technical manual. Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gortmaker, V. J., Daly III, E. J., McCurdy, M., Persampieri, M. J., & Hergenrader, M. (2007). Improving reading outcomes for children with learning disabilities: Using brief experimental analysis to develop parent-tutoring interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 203–221. doi: doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.105-05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic instructional technology: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23–40). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. O., Hale, A. D., Sheeley, W., & Ling, S. (2011). Repeated reading and vocabulary-previewing interventions to improve fluency and comprehension for struggling high-school readers. Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 59–77. doi: doi:10.1002/pits.20545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupzyk, S., Daly III, E. J., & Andersen, M. N. (2011). A comparison of two flash-card methods for improving sight-word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 781–792. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupzyk, S., Daly III, E. J., & Andersen, M. N. (2012). Preparing teachers to train parents to use evidence-based strategies for oral reading fluency with their children. Contemporary School Psychology, 16, 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Yoon, S. Y. (2017). The effects of repeated reading on reading fluency for students with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 213–224. doi:10.1177/0022219415605194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legere, E. J., & Conca, L. M. (2010). Response to intervention by a child with a severe reading disability. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(1), 32–39. doi:10.1177/004005991004300104
   Google Scholar
• Lovitt, T. C., Eaton, M., Kirkwood, M. E., & Pelander, A. (1971). Effects of various reinforcement contingencies on oral reading rate. In E. Ramp & B. L. Hopkins (Eds.), A new direction for education: Behavior analysis (pp. 54–71). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, H. H. (2006). An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior Modification, 30(5), 598–617. doi:10.1177/0145445504272974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, B. K., Eckert, T. L., Begeny, J. C., Lewandowski, L. J., DiGennaro, F. D., Montarello, S. A., … Fiese, B. H. (2007). Effects of a fluency building program on the reading performance of low-achieving second and third grade students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), 38–53. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9022-x
   Google Scholar
• Martens, B. K., Witt, J. C., Elliot, S. N., & Darveaux, D. X. (1985). Teacher judgments concerning the acceptability of school-based interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16(2), 191–198. doi:10.1037//0735-7028.16.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., & Begeny, J. C. (2014). Improving student reading through parents' implementation of a structured reading program. School Psychology Review, 43(1), 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noell, G. H., Gansle, K. A., Witt, J. C., Whitmarsh, E. L., Freeland, J. T., Lafleur, L. H., … Northup, J. (1998). Effects of contingent reward and instruction on oral reading performance at differing levels of passage difficulty. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 659–663. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, L. J., Munson, S. M., & O’Shea, D. J. (1984). Error correction in oral reading: Evaluating the effectiveness of three procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 7, 203–214.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., & Burns, M. K. (2014). Using the instructional level as a criterion to target reading interventions. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(1), 79–94. doi:10.1080/10573569.2012.702047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persampieri, M., Gortmaker, V., Daly III, E. J., Sheridan, S. M., & McCurdy, M. (2006). Promoting parent use of empirically supported reading interventions: Two experimental investigations of child outcome. Behavioral Interventions, 21(1), 31–57. doi:10.1002/bin.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reschly, D. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 510–515. doi:10.1177/00222194050380060601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resetar, J. L., Noell, G. H., & Pellegrin, A. L. (2006). Teaching parents to use research-supported systematic strategies to tutor their children in reading. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(3), 241–261. doi:10.1521/scpq.2006.21.3.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, T. L. (1984a). Effects of previewing on the oral reading of mainstreamed behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 10(1), 33–39. doi:10.1177/019874298501000110
   Google Scholar
• Rose, T. L. (1984b). The effects of two prepractice procedures on oral reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(9), 544–548. doi:10.1177/002221948401700908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roshotte, C. A., & Torgesen, J. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180–188. doi:10.1598/RRQ.20.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. G., & Begeny, J. C. (2011). Improving Latino, English language learners’ reading fluency: The effects of small group and one-on-one intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 48(6), 604–618. doi:10.1002/pits.20575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoolwide. (2015). Curriculum products: Reading. Retrieved from http://www.schoolwide.com/marketplace/curriculum-products/reading.html/grade=10
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22(3), 221–242. doi:10.1177/01454455980223001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, K. D., Leader-Janssen, E. M., & Conley, P. (2014). Effects of repeated reading and listen passage preview on oral reading fluency. Reading Improvement, 50(1), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Szadokierski, I. E. (2012). Predicting intervention effectiveness from oral reading accuracy and rate measures through the learning hierarchy/instructional hierarchy (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International. (Accession Order No. AAT 163009340).
   Google Scholar
• Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252–261. doi:10.1177/07419325040250040801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar